Forms of Business Ownership Flashcards
Law of agency
Relationships law of agency regulates (3)
Law of agency deals with contractual or non contractual fiduciary relationships involving an agent authorized to act on behalf of the principal to create legal relations with a third party Regulates relationships between - agent and principal - agent and third party - principal and third party Relies on good faith representation Usually created by contract
Types of agents (3)
Universal = hold broad authority to act on behalf of principal General = more limited authority to conduct certain transactions over time Special = authorized to conduct single transaction of a specified series over a limited time
Actual authority
Can be expressly conferred or implied, authority arises by consensual agreement
If agent acts outside of their authority, they may breach contract or be liable to third party for breach of implied warranty of authority
Implied/usual = authority can be inferred by virtue of the agent’s position when it is reasonably necessary for them to carry out express authority
- can be customary (customs of trade imply authority) or incidental (authority is necessary for completing primary express authority)
Apparent/ostensible authority
Principal’s words/conduct would lead reasonable third party to believe that agent had authority, even if principal and agent never discussed such relationship
Doctrine of holding out/agency by estoppel = principal will be stopped from denying grant of authority if third parties have changed their positions to their detriment based on representations made
Ratification
Even if agent acts outside of their authority, principal can still choose to ratify agreement between agent and third party
Ratification can occur by conduct/inaction
Rama Corp Ltd v Proved Tin & General Investments Ltd
About: agency by estoppel To use this defense, you must have - a representation - reliance on the representation - alteration of your position resulting from such a reliance
Watteau v Fenwick (UK)
About: representation of authority
Third party can hold liable a principal whose agent interacted with the third party outside their authority and the principal’s knowledge
Principal is liable for all acts of the agent which are within the authority usually confided to an agent of that character
Heavily criticized decision
Implied actual authority due to nature of agent’s position
Agent’s liability to third party
If agent has actual or apparent authority, agent will not be liable by third party for acts performed within scope of authority as long as agency relationship and identity of principal have been disclosed to the third party
If identity is unknown, then agent has no apparent authority to third party
If agency is unknown, the contractual relationship is between agent and third party
When agent has no actual or apparent authority, the agent is liable to third party for breach of implied warranty of authority
Agent’s liability to principal
If agent has acted without actual authority but the agent is still bound to agreement because agent had apparent authority to third party, agent is liable to principal for any damage
Principal’s liability to agent
If agent has acted within scope of actual authority, principal must provide protection for agent for payments made while completing principal’s business
Vicarious liability: principals are liable for their employees and agents acting within their scope of duties
Duties of the agent (3)
Fiduciary duty = agent must prioritize principal’s interests, must undertake tasks specified by agency and discharge their duties with care and due diligence
- agent must not accept new obligations inconsistent with duties to principal, and cannot represent conflicting interests of more than one principal without consent of principal
- agent must not usurp an opportunity from the principal (for themselves or another party)
Duty of care = to act reasonably
Contractual duty = to honour agency contract
Duties of principal
Contractual duty = to honour agency contract
Make full disclosure of info relevant to transactions agent is authorized to make
How agency relationship can be terminated (4)
Dissolved by agreement such as
- withdrawal by agent (however, principal can’t revoke agency when agent has interest in subject of agency, to the prejudice of such interest, until debts are satisfied)
- agent renounces business of agency
- by discharge of contractual agency obligations
Operation of law
- death, insanity of bankruptcy of either party
Rules for agency termination (3)
Principal can’t revoke agent’s authority after it has been partly discharged
If agency if for fixed period, principal can’t terminate agency early without sufficient cause, principal must give reasonable notice and may be liable to compensate agent for losses
- agent abides by same terms for early termination of fixed term agency
Termination doesn’t take effect until agent is notified, and doesn’t take effect to third parties until they have been notified
Examples of agency relationships (4)
Employment
Financial advice
Contract negotiation
Real estate