Family Law Flashcards
Factors relating to changes in Canadian families (7)
Aging population (decrease in fertility, increase in life expectancy)
Changing family structure (less married couples)
Decreasing fertility rate
Conjugal status over life course (increase in cohabitation)
Declining marriage rate
Increase in common law unions
Increase in divorce
Formal Ontario marriage requirements
s31
Set out in Marriage Act
Couples must get marriage license, must have 2 witnesses, and must have authorized person to marry them
Must be 18, or 16 with parental consent
As long as couple acted in good faith and lived together after ceremony, marriage is still valid even if officiator wasn’t authorized or they didn’t properly get license
Essential conditions for valid marriage (3)
No longer have to be of the opposite sex, same sex marriage confirmed in Ontario in 2005
Marriage is void if persons are related lineally, are siblings, or half siblings (also includes adoption)
Marriage is void if one of the parties is already married (polygamy is a crime)
Divorce
Divorce Act
Defined by spouses living apart for at least 1 year before divorce, or if a spouse has committed adulty/treated the other spouse with such cruelty that cohabitation is intolerable
Sharing of financial gain between married couples
NFP
Married persons are entitled to equal share of total financial product of marriage, determined as net family family property
Spouse whose NFP is lesser is entitled to 50% of the difference between them
NFP = value of all property except section 2 that spouse owns on valuation date after deducting debts and property aside from matrimonial home
Court can award different amount if they believe that equalizing NFP would be unjust
Spouses can opt out of family property provisions under Family Act through marriage contract
Subsection 2 in NFP (5)
Property other than matrimonial home acquired by gift or inheritance, as well as income from such property if donor stated it to be excluded from NFP
Damages/settlement from personal injury
Life insurance
Property that spouses have agreed to exclude from NFP
Pensionable earnings under CPP
How to calculate NFP (6)
- Determine valuation date (of separation or day before spousal death)
- Find total value of property interests owned by spouse
- Deduct value of excluded property
- Deduct value of debts
- Deduct value of all marital properties and subtract debts
- If result is negative, it is deemed to be 0
Matrimonial homes s18 (definition)
Matrimonial home is every property the person has an interest in and at time of separation occupied with their spouse
Matrimonial homes s19 (rights)
Both spouses have equal possession
When only one spouse has an interest in home, other spouse’s right of possession is personal as against the first spouse’s, ends when they cease to be spouses
Matrimonial homes s21 (disposal) (4 conditions)
No spouse shall dispose of the home or their interest in it unless
- the other spouse consents
- the other spouse has released all rights
- a court order authorizes the disposal
- the property isn’t a matrimonial home
Matrimonial homes s24 (court orders) (6)
Regardless of home ownership, court may
- provide for caretaking of home
- given exclusive possession to one spouse
- order that spouse to pay other spouse
- control house contents
- order spouse to pay for house liabilities
- authorize disposal of spouse’s interest
Criteria for gaining exclusive possession of matrimonial home (6)
Best interests of children
Existing orders from Part 1 of Family Act
Financial position of spouses
Written agreement between parties
Availability of other accommodation
Violence committed by one spouse against family
Law governing common law partners
Almost all federal statutes treat common law couples the same as married couples
While federal government can legislate wrt spousal obligations upon divorce, they can’t deal with divorce in common law partners because that is provincial civil right jurisdiction
Nova Scota v Susan Walsh & Wayne Bona
About: law governing common law partners
SCC held that while NS Matrimonial Property Act distinguished between people based on marital status, it wasn’t discrimination because it didn’t infringe on dignity
Some people choose not to marry because they don’t want to be in economic partnership, giving common law couples spousal status would remove this freedom
Eric v Lola
About: economic aspects of common law couple vs marriage
Majority initially held that exclusion of common law partners in Quebec legislation was discrimination because it disadvantaged the economically dependent partner if relationship ended, but one of the justices switched sides after reasoning Quebec’s choice to promote relationship autonomy wrt property was justifiable infringement on right to equality