Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Bar > Property > Flashcards

Property Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q

Fee simple absolute

A

“To A”

Devisable, descendible, alienable

No future interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fee tail (VIRTUALLY NEVER TESTED)

A

“To A and the heirs of his body”

Passes automatically to grantee’s lineal descendants

Future interest: reversion (if held by grantor); remainder (if held by third party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fee simple determinable (NY: fee on limitation)

A

“To A so long as,” “To A until,”

Alienable, devisable, descendible, subject to condition

Future interest: possibility of reverter (held by grantor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fee simple subject to condition subsequent (NY: fee on condition)

A

“To A, but if X happens, grantor reserves right to reenter and retake”

Alienable, devisable, descendible, subject to condition

Future interest: Right of entry/power of termination (held by grantor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fee simple subject to an executory limitation

A

“To A, but if X occurs, then to B”

Alienable, devisable, descendible, subject to condition

Future interest: shifting executory interest (held by third party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Life estate

A

“To A for life” or “To A for life of B”

Alienable, devisable, and descendible if pur autre vie and measuring life is still alive

Future interest: reversion (if held by grantor); remainder (if held by third party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Definition of devisable:

A

can it pass by will?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Definition of descendible:

A

will it pass by the statutes of intestacy if its holder dies intestate (without a will)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Definition of alienable:

A

is it transferable inter vivos (during holder’s lifetime)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fee simple subjet to condition subsequent: language

A

Grantor must use clear durational language and carve out the right to re-enter (“To A, but if X occurs, grantor reserves right to reenter and retake”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defeasible fee requires clear DURATIONAL language

A

Words of desire, hope, intention are insufficient to create a defeasible fee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

General rule on absolute restraints on alienation

A

VOID. Absolute restraint on alienation is an absolute bar on the power to sell or transfer that is not linked to any reasonable time limdited purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Definition of life estate pur autre vie:

A

Life estate measured by a life other than the grantee’s

“To A for the life of B”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LIfe estate doctrine of waste: general rule

A

life tenant must not commit waste (must not do anything to hurt the future interest holders)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

General rule of voluntary waste and natural resources:

A

Life tenant must not consume or exploit natural resources on the property, unless exceptions apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exceptions to the general rule of life tenant and voluntary waste: (PURGE)

A

PU: prior use (life tenant may continue to exploit land if land was exploited before the grant)
R: repairs. Life tenant may consume natural resources for repairs and maintenance
G: grants. Life tenant may exploit if granted the right
E: exploitation (land is suitable ONLY to exploit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

General rule of permissive waste: when land falls into disrepair

A

Life tenant must maintain the premises in reasonably good repair

Must pay all ordinary taxes on the land to the extent of income from the land (or premises’ fair market value)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

General rule of ameliorative waste (MBE)

A

Life tenant must not engage in acts that will enhance the property’s value, unless all future interestholders are known and consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

General rule of ameliorative waste (NY):

A

Life tenant may make reasonable improvements unless remaindermen object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

3 future interests capable of creation in the grantor:

A
  1. possibility of reverter (only fee simple determinable)
  2. right of entry / power of termination: only fee simple subject to condition subsequent
  3. reversion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

A remainder is VESTED if:

A

it is both created in an ascertained person and is not subject to any condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

A remainder is CONTINGENT if:

A

it is created in an unascertained person or is subject to a condition precedent (“To A for life, then to B’s first child”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When the condition precedent occurs, a contingent remainder automatically transforms into:

A

an indefeasibly vested remainder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Contingent remainders: if grantor dies before condition precedent occurs,

A

remainderman still has springing executory interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

O conveys “To A for life, then to A’s heirs”.

A

A has life estate, A’s unknown heirs have a contingent remainder. O has reversion, since A could die w/o heirs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Doctrine of worthier title (rule against a remainder in grantor’s heirs) (MBE only):

A

O, who is alive, conveys “To A for life, then to O’s heirs”

The contingent remainder in O’s heirs is void. A simply has a life estate, and O has a reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Definition of indefeasibly vested remainder:

A

Holder of this remainder is certain to acquire an estate in the future, w/ no strings attached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Def. of vested remainder subject to complete defeasance / total divestment

A

Remainderman exists. No condition precedent. But his right to possession could be cut short because of condition SUBSEQUENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Def: of vested remainder subject to open:

A

Remainder is vested in a group of takers, at lest one of whom is qualified to take. But each member’s share is subject to diminution b/c additional takers can join in

“To A for life, then to B’s children”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Vested remainder subject to open: class closes when

A

any member can demand possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Def. executory interest

A

Future interest created in a transferee (third party), which isn’t a remainder and takes effect either by cutting short some interest in another person (“shifting”) or in the grantor or his heirs (“springing”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Def. shifting executory interest:

A

Always follows a defeasible fee and cuts short someone other than the grantor

“To A, but if B returns, to B”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

NY: difference between executory interests and contingent remainders?

A

NONE. NY has abolished the distinction. They’re both called remainders subject to a condition precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

O conveys “To A, if and when he marries.” A is unmarried. A has:

A

springing executory interest

O has: fee simple subject to A’s springing executory interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

General rule of rule against perpetuities:

A

Certain kinds of future interests are void if there is any possibility, however remote, that the given interest may vest more than 21 years after the death of a measuring life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

RAP potentially applies to these kinds of interests:

A

contingent remainders, executory interests, and certain vested remainders subject to open

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

RAP NEVER applies to

A

any future interests in the grantor

vested interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

RAP: gift to an open class conditioned on the members surviving to an age beyond 21?

A

Violates the RAP!

Bad as to one, bad as to all. If it is possible that a disposition might vest too remotely w/ even just one class member, the entire class gift is void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

RAP: usually, __________ interests violate the RAP

A

Shifting executory interests

An executory interest w/ no time limit w/in which it must vest violates RAP

“To A so long as land is used for farming, and if it isn’t, to B” VOID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Charity exception for RAP

A

Gift from one charity to another will not violate the RAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

“Wait and see” / “second look” doctrine (reform of RAP):

A

Validity of any suspect future interest is determined on the basis of the facts as they now exist, at the end of the measuring life

This eliminates the “what if” line of inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Uniform Statutory RAP:

A

codifies the CL RAP and provides for alternative 90 year vesting period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Both “wait and see” and USRAP embrace cy pres doctrine:

A

“As near as possible”

If a given disposition violates the rule, a court may reform it in a way that most closely matches grantor’s intent while complying w/ the RAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

“Wait and see” and USRAP (and NY) reduce offensive age contingency to:

A

21 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

NY distinction about RAP reform:

A

NY applies CL RAP, rejects “wait and see” doctrine and cy pres doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Def: joint tenancy

A

2 or more own w/ the right of survivorship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Def: tenancy by the entirety

A

protected marital interest b/w married partners w/ right of survivorship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Def: tenancy in common

A

2 or more own r/ no right of survivorship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Right of survivorship in joint tenancy:

A

when one joint tenant dies, his share passes automatically to the surviving joint tenant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Creating a joint tenancy. 4 unities: “T-TIP”

A

Joint tenants must take their interests

T: at the same time
T: by the same title (same instrument)
I: with identical interests, and
P: right to possess the whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Creating a joint tenancy: in addition to “T-TIP,” grantor must

A

CLEARLY express right of survivorship (b/c joint tenancies are disfavored)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

To create joint tenancy, often a grantor must use

A

a STRAW (middleman). O conveys to straw, straw conveys back to O and X w/ right of survivorship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

How to severe a joint tenancy (“SPAM”):

A

Sale
Partition
and
Mortgage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

When joint tenant sells, even in secret, what does that make the buyer?

A

it disrupts the four unities, so buyer is a tenant in common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

When one joint tenant sells, and there were more than two joint tenants to begin

A

the joint tenancy remains intact b/w the other, non-transferring joint tenants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

When one joint tenant enters into K for sale of his interest to X, his interest…

A

is severed, from the very beginning of entering into a K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Severance of joint tenancy by partition: 3 kinds:

A
  1. Voluntary agreement
  2. Partition in kind (court action if best interest of all is to divide land)
  3. Forced sale (ct action if best interest of all is to sell land and divide proceeds proportionally)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Severance of joint tenancy by mortgage: general majority rule (including NY)

A

lien theory of mortgages. A joint tenant’s execution of a mortgage on his or her interest will not sever the tenancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

How to create tenancy by the entirety

A

It arises presumptively in any conveyance to married partners unless stated otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Defeating the tenancy by the entirety by unilateral conveyance:

A

can’t be done! Neither tenant, acting alone, can defeat the right of survivorship by unilateral transfer to a 3rd party

“Can’t touch this”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

3 features of the tenancy in common:

A
  1. Each co-tenant owns an individual part and each has a right to possess the whole
  2. each interest is divisible, descendable, and alienable. NO SURVIVORSHIP RIGHTS b/w tenants in common
  3. Presumption favors the tenancy in common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

If one co-tenant wrongfully excludes another co-tenant from possession, he has committed

A

wrongful ouster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Rent from co-tenant in exclusive possession: general rule

A

Absent ouster, co-tenant in exclusive possession is not liable to other co-tenants for rent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

(rent) A co-tenant who leases all or part of the premises to a third party

A

must account to his co-tenants, providing them their fair share of the rent income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

Generally, a co-tenant cannot acquire title through adverse possession. But the rule in NY:

A

a co-tenant may acquire title by possession if he is in exclusive possession for 20 continuous years (theory of implied ouster)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

A co-tenant who pays to repair premises gets

A

right to contribution for reasonable necessary repair, so long as she notified the others of the need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

A co-tenant who pays to improve the premises gets

A

NO right to contribution for “improvements”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Def: Tenancy for years

A

Lease for a fixed period of time. Therefore, no notice is needed to terminate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

Def: periodic tenancy

A

Lease whih continues for successive intervals until L or T gives proper notice of termination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Periodic tenancy can be created expressly. Can also arise by implication, in 3 ways:

A
  1. Land is leased w/ no mention of duration, but provision is made for payment of rent at fixed intervals
  2. Oral term of years in violation of SoF creates implied periodic tenancy measured by the way rent is tendered
  3. Holdover: in residential lease, if L elects to holdover a T who has wrongfully stayed on past the conclusion of the original lease, implied periodic tenancy arises measured by way rent is tendered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

To terminate a periodic tenancy, usually written notice must be given. How much notice?

A

At CL, at least equal to length of the period itself, unless otherwise agreed

But if tenancy is from year-to-year, only 6 months’ notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

Def: Tenancy at will

A

Tenancy for no fixed duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

Tenancy at will is rare, b/c a payment of regular rent will cause a ct

A

to treat it as implied periodic tenancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Tenancy at will may be terminated by

A

any party at any time, but a reasonable demand to vacate is usually needed

75
Q

Def: Tenancy at sufferance

A

Created when T has wrongfully held over past the expiration of the lease. We give wrongdoer a leasehold estate to permit L to recover rent

76
Q

(NY) L’s acceptance of rent subsequent to the expiration of the term will create:

A

an implied month-to-month periodic tenancy, unless otherwise agreed

77
Q

Tenant’s liability to third parties

A

T is liable for injuries sustained by invitees even where L promised to make all repairs

78
Q

Tenant’s duty to repair when lease is silent: general standard

A

T must maintain the premises and make ordinary repairs

79
Q

Tenant must not commit waste (3 kinds)

A

Voluntary, permissive, and ameliorative

80
Q

Law of fixtures: when tenant removes a fixture,

A

she commits voluntary waste

81
Q

Definition of fixture (landlord-tenant law)

A

once movable chattel that, by virtue of its annexation to realty, objectively shows the intent to permanently improve the realty

82
Q

When tenants install fixtures, do they get to remove them at the end of tenancy?

A

Agreement controls. But generally, T may remove annexed chattels if removal does not substantially damage the premises or destroy the chattel

83
Q

When premises are destroyed w/o T’s fault,

A

T is not liable

84
Q

When tenant breaches duty to pay rent and is in possession, L’s only options are to

A

evict through the cts or continue the relationship and sue for rent due

L must NEVER engage in self-help (changing locks, forcibly removing T, etc.)

85
Q

When T breaches duty to pay rent and is out of possession, L has three options (S-I-R)

A

Surrender: treat T’s abandonment as an implicit offer to surrender, which L accepts

Ignore abandonment and hold T responsible fr unpaid rent (minority jx)

Re-let premises on wrongdoer tenant’s behalf, hold him liable for any deficiencies

86
Q

When T breaches duty to pay rent and is out of possession, majority rule (not NY) requires a mitigation principle:

A

L must at least try to re-let

87
Q

L’s duty to deliver possession (majority rule):

A

L must put T in physical possession of the premises.

So if at start of T’s lease a prior holdover T is still in possession, T gets damages

88
Q

L’s duty: implied covenant of quiet enjoyment

A

In both residential and commercial leases, T has right to quiet use and enjoyment of the premises, w/o interference from L

89
Q

L can breach via constructive eviction (SI-N-G)

A

Substantial Interference: due to L’s actions or failures
Notice: T must notify L of the problem, and L must fail to respond meaningfully
Goodbye: T must vacate

90
Q

Landlord’s implied warranty of habitability: applies to

A

residential leases ONLY, not commercial

91
Q

Standard of landlord’s implied warranty of habitability:

A

premises must be fit for basic human dwelling

92
Q

T’s entitlements when implied warranty of habitability is breached (M-R-R-R)

A

Move out and end the lease
Repair and deduct
Reduce rent, or withhold all rent until ct determines fair rental value
Remain in possession, pay rent, and affirmatively seek $ damages

93
Q

When tenant transfers lease to another, it’s an assignment. L and T2 are in privity of estate, not K. L and T1:

A

are no longer in privity of estate, but remain in privity of K (they’re secondarily liable to each other)

94
Q

In a sublease, L and sublessee are in privity of estate or K?

A

Neither! Relationship b/w L and T1 remains fully in tact. It’s only ASSIGNMENTS where there is privity of estate b/w L and T2

95
Q

Def. remainder:

A

future interest in a 3rd party that can become possessory on the natural expiration of the preceding estate

96
Q

Difference b/w reverter and right of entry:

A

Reverter - estate automatically reverts to grantor

Right of entry - grantor may exercise his right of entry, not automatic

97
Q

Def. executory interest

A

Future interests in third parties that either divest a transferee’s preceding freehold estate (“shifting interests”), or

follow a gap in possession or cut short a grantor’s estate (“springing interests”)

98
Q

Do landlords impliedly warrant that premises are free of latent defects?

A

Generally no. L will be liable only if L knew or had reason to know of the defect or, in the exception, L rents furnished property for a short term

99
Q

Can a L impose higher rent on a holdover T?

A

Only if L told T of the higher rent before expiration of the old lease

100
Q

Generally, in tort, L is under no duty to make premises safe. But 5 exceptions (“CLAPS”)

A 
Common areas (must maintain)
Latent defects (must warn T of hidden defects L knows or should know about)
Assumption of repairs (if L voluntarily makes repairs, must do so w/ reasonable care)
Public use rule (L who leases public space, and who should know about a defect)
Short term lease of furnished dwelling
101
Q

Easement def:

A

the grant of a nonpossessory property interest that entitles its holder to some form of use or enjoyment of another’s land, called the servient tenement

102
Q

Is there a natural or automatic right to a negative easement?

A

No, they can only be created expressly

103
Q

Def. easement appurtenant

A

An easement that benefits its holder in his physical use or enjoyment of his prop (dominant tenement gets the benefit, servient tenement bears the burden)

104
Q

Def. easement in gross

A

An easement that confers upon its holders only some personal or pecuniary advantage unrelated to his use or enjoyment of his land. There is no benefited/dominant tenement

Ex: right to fish in another’s pond

105
Q

Can easement appurtenant pass w/ dominant tenement?

A

Yes, passes automatically! Need not be mentioned in the conveyance

106
Q

Can easement appurtenant pass w/ servient estate?

A

Yes, automatically, unless the new owner is a bona fide purchaser w/o notice of the easement

107
Q

Is easement in gross transferable?

A

No, not unless it is for commercial purposes

108
Q

Affirmative easement can be created in 4 ways (“PING”)

A

Prescription
Implication
Necessity
Grant

109
Q

Creating an affirmative easement by grant: if easement is for more than 1 year,

A

it must be in writing

110
Q

Creating an affirmative easement by implication, general rule:

A

Ct may imply an easement if previous use was apparent, parties expected it would continue b/c it’s reasonably necessary to the dominant land’s use and enjoyment

111
Q

Creating an affirmative easement by necessity. Easement of right of way will be implied by necessity if grantor…

A

conveys a portion of his land w/ no way out except over part of grantor’s remaining land

112
Q

Creating an affirmative easement by prescription: an easement may be acquired by satisfying the elements of:

A

adverse possession (continuous use, open/notorious, actual use, hostile use)

113
Q

Unilateral expansion of an easement:

A

never allowed

114
Q

Termination of an easement (“END CRAMP”)

A 
Estoppel
Necessity
Destruction of the servient land
Condemnation of the servient estate
Release
Abandonment
Merger doctrine (title to easement and title to servient land become vested in same person)
Prescription (adverse possession)
115
Q

Termination of easement by abandonment, general rule:

A

Easement holder must demonstrate by PHYSICAL ACTION the intent to never use the easement again (mere nonuse or mere words is insufficient)

116
Q

Def. of license:

A

mere privilege to enter another’s land for a delineate purpose. They are freely revocable, unless estoppel applies to bar revocation

117
Q

Neighbors talking by the fence: A says to B, “You can have that right of way across my land.” What happens?

A

Oral easement is unenforceable, violates the statute of frauds. This instead creates a freely revocable license

118
Q

Covenant def:

A

promise to do or not do something related to land. It’s a contractual limitation or promise regarding land. MUST be in writing

119
Q

Is a given promise a covenant or as equitable servitude?

A

If P seeks money damages, construe at law as covenant

If P seeks an injunction, construe in equity as an equitable servitude

120
Q

When does covenant run w/ the land? (2 factor analysis)

A
  1. Does the burden run? (harder)

2. Do the benefits run? (easier)

121
Q

Elements necessary for a burden to run w/ the land (“WITHN”)

A

Writing
Intent (original parties intended that cov would run)
Touch and concern the land (promise affects parties’ relations as land owners)
Horizontal and vertical privity
Notice (of the promise)

122
Q

Def. of horizontal and vertical privity:

A

Horizontal: nexus b/w original parties (there is succession of estate, like grantor-grantee, landlord-tenant, mortgagor-mortgagee)

Vertical: non-hostile nexus b/w A and A-1, like K, divise, descent (very easy to show)

123
Q

Elements necessary for benefits to run w/ land (“WITV”)

A

Writing
Intent
Touch and concern
Vertical privity

124
Q

Equitable servitude def:

A

A covenant that, regardless of whether it runs w/ land at law, equity will enforce against assignees of the burdened land who have NOTICE of the covenant (remedy: injunction)

125
Q

Elements to create an equitable servitude that will bind successors (“WITN”)

A

Writing
Intent
Touch and concern
Notice

126
Q

Implied equitable servitude arises with the common scheme doctrine. Two elements of common scheme doctrine:

A
  1. When sales began, seller had a general scheme of covenants restricting his property.
  2. The defendant buyer, whose deed had no covenant, had notice of the covenants in the prior deeds
127
Q

Implied equitable servitude - how does defendant have notice of the covenant? (“AIR”)

A 
Actual notice
Inquiry notice (neighborhood conforms to common restriction)
Record notice (publicly recorded docs)

NY: subsequent buyer does NOT have record notice of contents of prior deeds transferred to others by the common grantor

128
Q

Changed conditions is a defense to enforcement of an equitable servitude. General rule:

A

Changed conditions must be so pervasive that the entire area has changed. Mere pockets of limited change are not good enough

129
Q

Elements of adverse possession:

A

Continuous use
Open and notorious use
Actual use
Hostile use

130
Q

Possessor’s subjective state of mind for adverse possession:

A

MBE: irrelevant
NY: possessor must have a good faith belief that the land he is occupying is indeed his. It is bad faith for claimant to know he is occupying another’s land

131
Q

Tacking for adverse possession?

A

One adverse possessor may tack on to his time w/ the land his predecessor’s time, so long as there is privity, satisfied by any non-hostile nexus such as blood, K, deed, will

Tacking not allowed w/ ouster

132
Q

Adverse possession and disabilities

A

Statute of limitations will not run against a true owner who is afflicted by a disability at the start (infancy, insanity, imprisonment)

133
Q

Exception to SOF: doctrine of part performance

A

Need 2 of following 3:

B takes possession
B pays all or part of the price, and/or
B makes substantial improvement

Then equity will decree specific performance of an oral K for sale of the land

134
Q

NY: who bears risk of loss for conveyance of prop?

A

ROL remains w/ seller until buyer has title or takes possession

135
Q

Two implied promises in every land K:

A

Seller promises to provide marketable title (no adverse possession, encumbrances, or zoning violations)
Seller promises not to make any false statements of material fact

136
Q

Does land K have an implied warranty of fitness or habitability?

A

Neither! Buyer beware

137
Q

Recording system: if B is a bona fide purchaser, and we are in notice jx,

A

B wins, regardless of whether or not she records before A does

(Last BFP to enter wins)

138
Q

Recording system: if B is a bona fide purchaser, and we are in race-notice jx,

A

B wins if she records properly before A does

139
Q

To be a BFP, you cannot have notice of another person’s prior purchase of the prop. Must important is inquiry notice:

A

Whether he looks or not, B is on inquiry notice of whatever an examination of blackacre would show. So if another is actually in possession, B has inquiry notice, regardless of whether he actually inspected

140
Q

You cannot be a BFP if you are on record notice, meaning:

A

A’s deed was recorded properly w/in the chain of title

141
Q

Recording system: shelter rule def:

A

One who takes from a BFP will prevail against any entity that the BFP would’ve prevailed against (even if he would otherwise fail to receive BFP status)

142
Q

Recording system: wild deed rule:

A

If a deed, entered on the records (A to B), has a grantor unconnected to the chain of title (O to A), the deed is a wild deed. It is incapable of giving record notice of its existence

143
Q

Recording system: estoppel by deed rule:

A

One who conveys realty in which he has no interest is estopped from denying the validity of that conveyance if he later acquires the previously transferred intent

144
Q

Equitable mortgage def:

A

When O hands creditor a deed to blackacre that is absolute on its face rather than executing a note or mortgage deed

145
Q

Can parties to a mortgage transfer their interests?

A

Yes, the mortgage automatically follows a proper note

146
Q

If creditor-mortgagee transfers his interest by endorsing the note and delivering it to transferee, transferee is eligible to become:

A

a holder in due course. Meaning he takes the note free of any personal defenses that could’ve been raised against original creditor

147
Q

A holder in due course (creditor-transferee) is free of personal defenses, but still subject to “MAD FIFI” defenses:

A 
Material alteration
Duress
"Fraud in the factum" (lie about the instrument)
Incapacity
Illegality
Infancy
Insolvency
148
Q

Say O, debtor-mortgagor, sells Blackacre to B. B assumes the mortgage. Who is personally liable on the debt?

A

Both O and B

B is primarily liable, O remains secondarily liable

149
Q

Say O, debtor-mortgagor, sells Blackacre to B. B takes “subject to the mortgage.” Who is personally liable on the debt?

A

B assumes no personal liability. Only O is personally liable

150
Q

In foreclosure, what if there’s a surplus from proceeds from sale of Blackacre?

A

Junior liens are paid in order of priority

151
Q

How does foreclosure affect various interests?

A

Will terminate interests junior to the mortgage being foreclosed, but will not affect senior interests

Once foreclosure of a superior claim has occurred, w/ proceeds distributed, junior lienholders can no longer look to Blackacre for satisfaction

152
Q

How to determine priority of interests (i.e. mortgages)?

A

Once recorded, priority is determined by first in time, first in right

153
Q

Purchase money mortgage:

A

Mortgage given to secure a loan that enables the debtor to acquire the encumbered land

PMMs have priority over prior non-PMMs, even if those were recorded first. But subsequent mortgages/liens may defeat PMM priority via recording acts

154
Q

Equitable redemption def:

A

At any time prior to foreclosure sale, debtor has the right to redeem the land and free it of the mortgage (payments + interest)

Debtor/mortgage cannot waive the right to redeem… that is clogging the equity of redemption, it’s prohibited

155
Q

Riparian doctrine rule:

A

Water belongs to those who own the land bordering the water course.

Each riparian owner has a right to a reasonable use of the water (meaning natural… artificial use like irrigation is less reasonable)

One riparian will be liable if his use unreasonably interferes w/ others’ use

156
Q

Prior appropriation doctrine rule:

A

Water belongs initially to the state, but the right to divert it and use it can be acquired by an individual, regardless of whether or not he is a riparian owner.

Rights are determined by priority of beneficial use. First in time, first in right

Any productive/beneficial use of water is sufficient to create the appropriation right

157
Q

May landowner change drainage on his land to combat flow of surface water?

A

Yes, but some cts have modified the rule to prohibit unnecessary harm to other’s land

158
Q

Can surface owner use ground water?

A

Yes, entitled to make reasonable use of ground water. But use must not be wasteful

159
Q

Delivery of deed: must there be physical transfer of the deed itself?

A

Not always, just a test of present intent. Ask: did grantor have the present intent to be bound (regardless of whether deed was handed over)?

NOTE: recipient’s express rejection of the deed defeats delivery

160
Q

General warranty deed def:

A

Warrants against all defects in title, including those due to grantor’s predecessors.

This is the best deed buyer could get

161
Q

“A conveyance of an interest in land shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value, without notice thereof, unless the conveyance is recorded”

A

Notice. If B is BFP, he wins

162
Q

“Any conveyance of an interest in land shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value, without notice thereof, whose conveyance is first recorded”

A

Race-notice statute

To win, B must be BFP and win the race to record

163
Q

If there is a senior mortgage still existing, does buyer at a foreclosure sale take subject to the mortgage?

A

Yes, meaning he is NOT personally liable on the senior debt. But the senior mortgage CAN still foreclose on property, so buyer has incentive to pay off first bank’s lien

REMEMBER: foreclosure does not affect any interest senior to the mortgage being foreclosed

164
Q

Equitable conversion def:

A

A purchaser of real prop becomes the equitable owner of title to the prop at the time he signs a K to purchase the land at a later date. The ROL is on the buyer

Seller retains legal title to prop prior to conveyance, but land interest is considered personal property (right to payment, not right to prop)

165
Q

If one co-tenant wrongfully ousts another co-tenant from possession of the premises, ousted co-tenant is entitled to receive:

A

her share of the fair rental value of the property for the time she was wrongfully deprived

166
Q

If someone inherits property, is he considered a BFP?

A

No, b/c he didn’t pay value for it

167
Q

Easement duration:

A

PERPETUAL, unless the grant specifically says otherwise

168
Q

Does misuse of an easement terminate the easement?

A

NO! Appropriate remedy for servient owner is an injunction against the misuse

169
Q

Tenancy by the entirety. What happens when one spouse executes a deed or mortgage?

A

NOTHING, it’s ineffective

170
Q

If joint tenant mortgages his interest, and then he dies, and bank goes to foreclose:

A

Nothing! If joint tenant dies before foreclosure, the death extinguishes the mortgagee’s or lienor’s interest

171
Q

Landlord’s duty to deliver possession of premises is satisfied when:

A

L puts T in ACTUAL possession of the premises at the beginning of the leasehold term

172
Q

Assignee and LL are each liable to other on all covenants that “run with the land.” Meaning?

A

If the covenant touches and concerns the land. I.e. benefits LL and burdens the tenant (or vice versa) with respect to their interests in the property

173
Q

Oral expression of an intent to abandon an easement: what effect?

A

None, unless committed to writing (release) or accompanied by action (abandonment)

But if owner changes his position in reasonable reliance on the representations, easement terminates through ESTOPPEL

174
Q

Every land sale K has implied covenant of marketable title at closing. What constitutes unmarketable?

A

Encumbrances like mortgages, liens, restrictive covenants, easements, and significant encroachments

175
Q

Does quitclaim deed contain covenant to provide marketable title?

A

Yes

176
Q

Do land sale Ks have warranty of fitness or quality?

A

No implied warranty of quality or fitness for purpose, UNLESS it’s the sale of a NEW HOUSE

177
Q

A seller of existing buildings may be liable for:

A
  1. Misrepresentation (fraud)
  2. Active concealment of defect
  3. Failure to disclose defect if he knows or has reason to know, defect isn’t apparent, and defect is serious and would cause buyer to reconsider
178
Q

Deed formalities:

A

In writing
Signed by grantor
Reasonably identify the parties and land

(and delivered and accepted)

179
Q

Accretion/avulsion belongs to whom?

A

Accretion (slow deposit of soil on land abutting water) belongs to abutting owner

Avulsion (sudden change of watercourse) doesn’t change ownership rights

180
Q

When deed grantor retains control:

A

Indicates a lack of intent to pass title. Thus, no title passes

181
Q

Valid delivery when grantor gives deed to third party w/ instructions to give it to grantee?

A

Yes

182
Q

What if recorder’s office forgets to forget an instrument?

A

Instrument is considered properly recorded when filed w/ office, even if not properly indexed. Subsequent purchase is considered to have notice (and can sue recorder’s office)

183
Q

Common enemy theory def:

A

Owner can take any protective measures to get rid of water (e.g. dikes)… generally can do anything other than unnecessary damage to others’ lands

Bar (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions