Criminal Procedure Flashcards
(78 cards)
4 reqs for search and seizure to be governed by 4A:
- S&S executed by gov. agent
- S&S was of an area/item protected by 4A
- Gov agent physically intruded on or violated reasonable expectation of privacy in a protected area
- Individual subject to S&S has standing
Who’s a “gov agent”?
- Publicly-paid cops
- Private citizens, if acting at direction of police
- Private security, if deputized w/ power to arrest
- Public school administrators
Areas/items expressly protected by 4A:
- persons
- houses
- papers
- effects
Items/areas NOT protected by 4A:
- paint scrapings on outsider of car
- bank accounts
- anything visible from public airspace
- garbage left at curb
- sound of voice
- odors
- style of handwriting
- open fields
What is the test for “reasonable expectation of privacy?”
Objective AND subjective test
Test for standing to challenge search/seizure:
Must be your personal privacy rights that were invaded, not a 3rd party’s
When D uses someone else’s residence for biz purposes, standing to challenge S&S?
No
When D is a car passenger, standing to challenge S&S?
No
NY: special rule for passengers in a car to challenge S&S
Can challenge possession of weapons, if attributed to them
3 reqs to make a warrant valid:
- Neutral/detached magistrate
- Supported by PC and particularity (OR cop relied on it in good faith)
- Properly executed by police
Standard for PC for purposes of getting a warrant:
Requires proof of a fair probability that contraband or evidence of crime will be found in the area searched
Can hearsay evidence be used to furnish PC for a warrant?
Yes
Can police rely on informants’ tips to furnish PC?
Yes, even if ANONYMOUS.
MBE: requires corroboration by police of enough of the info to allow magistrate to make a “common sense” determination based on a totality of the circumstances
NY: must establish informant’s basis of knowledge AND reliability/veracity (“Aguilar-Spinelli”)
Warrant’s particularity req:
Must specify the place to be searched and the items seized
Good faith exception to warrant’s PC/particularity req:
If cop relies in good faith, the warrant is still valid
But NOT in NY!
4 exceptions to warrant’s “good faith exception”:
- affidavit supporting warrant is so egregiously lacking that no reasonable officer would’ve relied on it
- warrant is so facially deficient in particularity that officers couldn’t reasonably presume it valid
- affidavit contains knowing/reckless falsehoods
- magistrate is biased in favor of prosecution
What must police do to properly execute a warrant?
- comply w/ warrant
2. knock and announce their presence/purpose before entering
When does an officer NOT have to knock and announce?
when cop reasonably believes that K&A would be futile, dangerous, or inhibit the investigation
8 exceptions to warrant req: (“ESCAPIST”)
Exigent circumstances Search incident to arrest Consent Automobile Plain view search Inventory Special needs Terry stop and frisk
Exigent circumstances don’t require a warrant. Example:
- Evanescent evidence
- Hot pursuit of fleeing felon
- Emergency aid exception
“Emergency aid” exception to warrant:
Cop can enter a residence w/o warrant when there is objectively reasonable basis for believing a person inside needs emergency aid
Reqs for SITA:
- arrest must be lawful
- search must be contemporaneous in time and place w/ arrest
- search must be limited to arrestee’s wingspan (body, clothing, any containers w/in immediate control)
***NY: officer can search containers w/in wingspan ONLY if he suspects that arrestee is armed
Special rules for searching cars incident to arrest:
Warrantless search is valid only if:
- arrestee is unsecured and still may gain access to the interior of the automobile, OR
- police reasonably believe that the automobile contains evidence of the crime for which the occupant was arrested
When is consent sufficient to search a person w/o warrant?
When consent is voluntary and intelligent