Professional Responsibility Flashcards
Study PR
Duties to clients
“Clients Love Fierce Counsel”
Confidentiality
Loyalty
Financial Responsibilities
Competence
& other reasonable things
Duties to non-clients
“Courts Feel Differently”
Candor/Truthfulness
Fairness
Dignity/Decorum
& other reasonable things
Mnemonic for duties of lawyers and to whom
“Clients Love Fierce Counsel; Courts Feel Differently”
Confidentiality
Loyalty
Financial Responsibilities
Competence
Candor/Truthfulness
Fairness
Dignity/Decorum
Other than clients, to whom do lawyers owe a duty?
Court, adversaries, third-parties, public
General rule re: duty of confidentiality
Do not reveal anything related to the representation without client consent.
Duty of confidentiality re: prospective clients and former clients
Duty of confidentiality attaches before the lawyer-client relationship, or even if NONE is formed.
After attaches, duty of confidentiality is ongoing through client’s lifetime.
Attorney-client privilege CA versus ABA:
CA–privilege ends with probate
ABA–extends after death of client indefinitely
Attorney client privilege versus duty of confidentiality
Duty of confidentiality = broader, relates to any disclosure
Attorney client privilege = rule of evidence about compelled testimony
Exceptions to duty of confidentiality
Consent
Lawyer defending himself. Can be malpractice, disciplinary action, a civil case to recover unpaid attorneys’ fees.
If compelled by court, law, or other ethical duty.
Duty of confidentiality and coming forward with info re: death or substantial bodily harm
ABA: the lawyer MAY breach the duty of confidentiality IF relates to death or substantial bodily harm, but don’t have to,
CA: (1) only for CRIMINAL acts that will result in death/serious bodily harm, (2) good faith effort to persuade client NOT to act, (3) TELL the client you are going to tell.
Duty of confidentiality re: financial crimes and harm
ABA: the lawyer MAY breach duty of confidentiality IF (1) the client is using the lawyer for the financial crime, AND (2) the disclosure will help prevent substantial financial harm.
CA: NO FINANCIAL CRIME EXCEPTIONS to duty of confidentiality
The relationships that might interfere with duty of loyality
(1) conflicts between or among clients
(2) conflicts between lawyer and client
(3) conflicts with third-party interference
When a representation will conflict with duty of loyalty
When the new representation will be (1) directly adverse to another client or (2) there is a SIGNIFICANT RISK that representation will be MATERIALLY LIMITED by
- conflict between or among clients
- conflict between lawyer and the new client
- conflicts with third parties
Imputed disqualification
General rule: Any group of lawyers who work closely together share each other’s conflicts.
Exceptions:
(1) if the conflict is from previous government or previous firm work, okay if ETHICAL WALL.
(2) uniquely personal conflicts not imputed
A conflict may be tolerated if
A case-by-case factual analysis establishes
(1) you have REASONABLE BELIEF effective representation possible
(2) INFORM each affected client
(3) the client CONSENTS CONFIRMED IN WRITING
CA: requires the whole thing to be in writing, the list of conflicts and the client consent
Duty of loyalty re: possible conflict with between new client and current client in another matter
Okay if informed reasonable consent by all clients.
CA insurance rule: an insurance provider whose interest is ONLY related to indemnity will not provide basis for a conflict.
If new client’s work would be related to and impacted by confidential info known from previous client’s work
Can violate both duty of confidentiality and loyalty
It’s only okay if FORMER client consents.
General rule re: going from government to private practice
If the MATTER at the firm is the SAME MATTER as worked on in government and worked PERSONALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY on the matter while in government
Imputed conflicts and government to private firm transitions
If you worked personally and substantially on a matter in the government and the firm is working on the same matter, the imputed conflict is resolved if:
(1) you’re screened off
(2) don’t share in the fee from that directly (but general profits share as a partner is okay)
(3) the former government employer is INFORMED (but consent not necessary)
Conflicts re: clerking then practicing
Can work on same matter if all parties consent
ABA versus CA and limiting malpractice liability
ABA: allowed only if the client is independently represented when they agree to that limitation
CA: you cannot limit malpractice liability at all
Payment in form of stock to the law firm
Okay if fair and reasonable, but cannot be so large as to hamper firm’s ability to give good advice
Board service as a lawyer
Generally frowned upon to do so on a corporate board because of duties of confidentiality and loyalty
Okay on a legal non-profit board
Selling rights to client’s story
ABA: not allowed during representation, but okay after
CA: generally discouraged but okay if judge allows
Loaning money to client
ABA: not allowed except for litigation related expenses
CA: it’s fine as long as written agreement, but cannot do it to attain prospective client’s business.
Lawyer as witness
ABA: only okay if (1) the testimony is about the legal services rendered, (2) the testimony is uncontested, (3) if lawyer brings distinctive value and failure to testify would impose substantial hardship on client.
CA: lawyer testimony okay if client consents
The lawyer on the other side is an immediate family member
Okay if all clients consent
CA also extends to “intimates” and co-habitants.
Sex with client
ABA: only okay if the sexual relationship was before the representation. Cannot develop during the representation.
CA: rule doesn’t apply with married or domestic partners
Federal securities laws and reporting violations
If lawyer observes violations, must report to highest levels of company.
If risk of fraud, substantial financial injury to investors or the organization, can report to SEC without client consent.
*preempts any CA regs/laws to the contrary