Professional Responsibility Flashcards
The Rules of the Virginia Supreme Court authorize the imposition of sanctions, including:
striking pleadings, staying further proceedings, and dismissal.
Under Virginia Statutory law, the Court may impose sanction on
its own initiative, without request from a party, which shall include reasonable expenses, attorney’s fees, and costs charged to the offending party or counsel.
Under Virginia Statutory law, insulting language directed toward a Court or misbehavior of an officer of the court in his officer capacity, are
both grounds for finding someone guilty of contempt.
Any Virginia Judge may prohibit any lawyer from practicing in
his or her court as a sanction.
The Virginia Cannons of Judicial Conduct say that when a Judge has knowledge of an ethical violation that reflects on a lawyer’s
honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness to practice law, he or she should inform the Virginia State Bar.
A lawyer may not knowingly make a _____ statement of fact or law to a tribunal.
false
*the rule regarding candor toward the tribunal
When a lawyer knowingly makes a false statement of fact or law to a judge, he or she has certainly violated the rule regarding
candor toward the tribunal.
For your reference, this rule can be found in the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3. It says, “A lawyer may not knowingly make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.”
NOT any of these:
The rule regarding meritorious claims and contentions
The rule regarding fairness to the opposing party
The rule regarding conflicts of interest
The rule regarding lawyer disqualification
A lawyer may not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert a legal issue, unless
there is a good-faith basis for doing so that is not frivolous.
*The rule regarding meritorious claims and contentions
A lawyer must not conceal
a document or other material having potential evidentiary value, for the purpose of obstructing a party’s access to evidence.
- The rule regarding fairness to the opposing party
When a judge finds a lawyer guilty of summary contempt of court, what punishments may the judge impose immediately and without empaneling a jury?
A fine of up to $250 AND
Up to 10 days in jail AND
Banning lawyer from practicing in that courtroom
No court shall, without a jury, for any such contempt as is mentioned in the first class embraced in § 18.2-456, impose a fine exceeding $250 or imprison more than ten days; but in any such case the court may, without an indictment, information or any formal pleading, impanel a jury to ascertain the fine or imprisonment proper to be inflicted and may give judgment according to the verdict.
Where a new client representation would be directly adverse to an existing client, and the large multi-attorney law firm has determined that one of its attorneys cannot represent the new client because of the conflict, the firm must:
not represent the new client, and screen the attorney who received the information from all of the existing client’s matters, with written notice provided to the prospective new client.
**Under the imputed disqualification rule, Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1:10, if one attorney in a firm cannot represent a given client, then no attorney in the firm can.
When a potential new client’s interests would be directly adverse to an existing client’s interests, the lawyer…
May represent the new client and the existing client if she reasonably believes
the representation would not adversely affect the relationship with the other client,
AND
the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim against his other client in the same litigation,
AND
both clients consent in writing after consultation
When a prospective client reveals to a lawyer information that could be significantly harmful to that client, the lawyer
cannot also represent another client with interests materially adverse to the prospective client in the same or substantially related matter. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1:18(b)&(c)
THE DUTY OF LOYALTY TO YOUR CLIENT: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST -
The Black Letter Law:
You have a duty of loyalty to your client. If an interest of another client, yourself, or a third party creates a significant risk of materially limiting your representation—or your representation of one client is directly adverse to another—you have a concurrent conflict of interest.
Generally, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a
concurrent conflict of interest