Product paper 4 Flashcards
Food package and test perception Becker
- aim to investigate how the color + shape of a product’s packaging affect perceived taste + overall attitudes towards the product.
HYPOTHESIS
- Yogurts in angular pots will have a stronger flavor than those in rounded pots.
- High color-saturation pots will have a stronger flavor than low color-saturation pots.
- Consumers sensitive to design will experience more intense effects from packaging.
METHOD:
- Field experiment in a German supermarket.
- IV: Color saturation (high vs. low), shape angularity (angular vs. rounded), + design sensitivity of participants.
- 151 German supermarket customers
PRE-TEST:
- Pair of pots most diff was chosen for design pots in main study
Researchs presented 2 pairs of pots that varied in term sof hue, saturation and brightness
- ppt completed the potency scale for these pairs
- pair that differed MOST selected (variants)
MAIN STUDY:
- Pre-test to select packaging pairs, ppt viewing a 20-second video of packaging variants rotating 360º
- taste lemon yogurt, and completing computer a questionnaire.
RESULTS
- Angular packaging perceived as more potent than rounded.
- No diff in taste intensity between high and low color saturation.
- Significant interaction for design-sensitive participants; angular pots led to more intense taste.
- Angular pots rated more positively with a higher suggested price than rounded pots.
- No significant difference in high vs. low color saturation.
- Higher suggested price for angular pots linked to perceived potency.
Atalay eye movement tracking and shelf position/attention
- investigate the effect of horizontal centrality on choice likelihood.
- 67 students selected products from two planograms (vitamin supplements and meal replacement bars).
- showed three brands in three columns.
- Eye-tracker monitored gaze location and duration.
-ppt completed a questionnaire on brand attitudes. - Selection took 35 seconds.
- Central brands received more visual attention and longer fixation.
- Central products were chosen 18% more often than side products.
Competiton focused and product focused selling technique
Competition:
- every buyer the same; salesperson already knows their needs
- , no need to ask questions,
- influences buyer w examples of other customers
Product focused:
- Aims to educate buyer abt product
- creates a need to buy product,
- persuasion based on attributes
- emphasizes technical details/performance of the product
- empashis on product, special features + designs etc
- sales person needs excellent knowledge of product
Customer focused sales technique
- A customers problems are viewed as unique + salesperson will address these individuals needs
- Salesperson activley engages the buyer: is a consultant rather than persuader
- Salesperson seeks info+input from buyer
- seller asks abt customer needs, wants and desires so fit the product to customer
whats meant by a planaogram
- A visual diagram/drawing providing details of where every product in a retail store should be placed
- can be specific (items on 1 shelf) in a specific aisle/section or general (whole store)
- has 2 functions: product placement and improved sales
Outline 2 findings from Atalays study
- a centrally located brand within a product category is chosen more often even when its not placed in the center of the shelf/visual field
- brands in the horizontal center recive more visual attention
- Theres an intial central fixation bias= tendency to look first at the central option,
- central gaze cascade effect= progressivley increasing attention focused on central option prior to decision
- A product more likley to sell if placed centrally on shelf
Suggest how each of Atalays findings are useful
- Useful to seller: A product more likely to sell if plaved centrally on shelf
- Centrality applies to diff products: possibley all products
- Products on promotion can be specifically placed to sell e.g MUP
- Products which provide higher profit margins for seller placed in central positon
- Useful medtholdogy: eye tracking software is useful tool in consumer research
S+W of usuing eye tracking to gather consumer data
Strengths:
- Eye tracking is scientifc equipment which is reliable
- Data recorded is objective: where a person looks is clear + unambigious
- Quantative data + so comparisons can be made between ppt and between studies
- Provides immediate feedback
- Easy to use, requires no training, non invasive
Weakness:
- ppt can choose to look in whatever direction they wish- they know their eye movemets are being tracked
- Cultrual diff in where ppl are socialised to look
- Data is where ppt has looked but doesnt provide an explanation of why that person looked in that specific direction
- Eye tracking is reductionist- product purchase isnt just based on vision; some products smell/quality/touch may influence
- Cannot be used w every ppt, ppl w contact lense/long eyelashes
- Eye movement may be subconscious + diff to control at all times so data inaccurate
is gift wrapping important + why/why not
Yes:
- wrapping a gift creates expectation of whats inside
- wrapping a gift shows attentions to detail; that person giving gifts cares
- wrapping a gift creates a positive impression in a recipent being met for the first time
No:
- Wrapping a gift MAY create an expectation of whats inside + if expectation not met= recepient may be disappointed
- A gift, however wrapped is better than no gift
- A plain gift wrapping may create intial disappointment leading to higher pleasure when gift revealed
Design a study acronym
LESVCVRED
- Hypothesis
- Location
- Experimental design
- Sample
- Validity
- Controls
- Variables
- Reliability
- Ethics
- Data
Kardes disrupt then reframe technqiue
- DTR technique involes delibrately confusing consumer w a disruptive message/confusing info THEN reframing/rewording in a much clearer way
- SO consumer understands whats being said, is happy + this reduces number of counter arguments and can close a sale
- e.g price for a note card is 300 pennies, then ‘thats $3 its a bargain!’
explain how an Indepent measures design was used in Exp 1: Kardes
- emplyed a reframe only control script
Why is IM better than repeated measures sometimes
- Usuing repeated measures design would alert any customer to the diff technqiues = demand characteristics or stray away from manipulation
- so the 2nd technqiue would produce eitheir no or invalid results
- order effects if theres a carry over between exp 1 +2/practise effects= again the results not valid
- fatugue/boredom so low motivation to complete tests to best of their ability
adv of field exp
- setting is high in ecological validity
- ppt behave in naturally as their unaware their participating in a study
- sample is more likely to be representative
- sample larger than labratroy
Ethics of disrupt + reframe technique
For:
- sales people try to sell, this is just one technique available from a wide range
- there are other techniques that involves psychological tricks and this is no better/worse
- can walk away if they’re unhappy or feel they’ve been manipulated in anyway
against:
- participants are tricked/deceived which is unethical
- maybe all sales techniques should be reviewed for ethics like purchase quantity decisions
- a stooge may Bias results, due to their appearance, manner, or some other feature
- this is not a psychological study which protects participants, but it’s real life with often little/no protection