OCD Paper 4 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was concluded about the effectiveness of lovell et al

A
  • Clinical outcome of CBT delivered by telephone was equivalent to treatment delivered face to face
  • similiar levels of satisfaction reported
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lovell et al: How + why did researchers gather baseline data from ppt

A
  • To establish baseline data we assessed patients twice w 4 weeks in between BEFORE randomisation to treatment groups
  • Researchers blinded to treatment allocation assed patients at both of baseline visits
  • The intial visit after treatment, and at 1,3 and 6 months follow up
  • Baseline data gathered to allow a comaprison w test data to determine if intervention has been successful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain diff between obsessions and compulsions

A

Obsessions= a state which someone thinks abt someone/smth constanatly/frequently; recurrent unwanted thoughts

Compulsions= repetive physical behaviours + actions; rituals that are perfromed over and over again IN ATTEMPT to relieve anxiety caused by obessional thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give 2 limitations to the YBOCS scale

A
  • Categories arent discrete; respondents may not be able to fully distinguish between each description e.g 1 hr appears twice for 2 diff catgeories
  • Categories may not apply at all times; sometimes the respondent may be in 1 category and another
  • May be difficult to distinguish between time spent on obsessions and time spent on compulsions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain how 1 other questionnare assesses OCD

A
  • The Maudsley Obsessive compulsive inventory (MOCI) is one of the most used tests in clinical psychology
  • To asses the obsessive/compulsive symotoms in pshyciatric patients
  • 30 items usuing T/F format
  • 4 sub scales: Checking (9 items), Cleaning (11 items) MAJOR,
  • Slowness (7 items), Doubting (7 items) MINOR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

S+W of usuing psychometric measures to assess OCD

A

Strengths
- Reliability is the extent to which the test gives consistent data over time e,g results from one person should be comparabale to results from another person
- Validity the extent to which a test accurately measures a person attributes
- test includes items as defined by DMS as typical of ppl w OCD + any person can be asssed in relation to the norm
- Quant data produced allowing comparisons

Weakness
- Tests do not take into account ID, aspects unique to a persons OCD
- test may not allow a person to express their feelings fully
- Test may attach a label to a person and the label may stick when label is too vague/inappripriaye for the person and their OCD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S+ W of biochemical treatment for OCD

A

Strengths:
- SSRIs directly restores a chemical imbalance that may cause OCD
- Can be given on a fixed schedule w dosage increased/decreased as required
- Treatments are easy and cheap to apply w little time/effort e.g 1 pill a day

Weakness:
- Treatments may alleivate symptoms but not remove the cause
- treatments have side effects which may make a person feel worse
- treatments may be addictive so only used short term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

outline 1 genetic explanations of OCD + 1 biochemical explanations of OCD

A

GENETIC
- Genes cause OCD
- Mattheisen et al= SLITRK3 associated w OCD, when removed in mice they began hoarding
- Taj et al= DRD4 related to uptake of dopamine

BIOCHEM:
- OCD caused by low levels of seratonin
- High levels of oxytocin pos correlated w early onset OCD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

suggest 2 ways in which 1 biomedical exp differes from cog explanations of OCD

A
  • Biomedical assumes causes are biological (genetic/neurological/chemical)
  • Cognitive exp assumes thoughts cause OCD
  • Biomedical assumes drug treatment are the best way to treat OCD
  • Cognitive exp focuses on cog/behavioral theraphy to target obsessions/compulsions or both
  • Genetic/neurological/Biomed= Nature/deterministic AND cognitive is Nurture/free will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

S+ W of biomedical explanation of OCD

A

Strengths:
- Genetics/chem can be studied objectivly = scientific data
- Studies can be done experimentally w Cause and effect + can be replicated

Weakness:
- Reductionist + reduce what could be a complex cogn phenomem to nothing more than chemicals
- Dont consider intercations between chemicals + persons interctions w other ppl/enviornement/learning
- Not generlisable beacuse although ppl have same biological functioning there ARE ID in the amount of chem causing imbalance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

S+W of Telephone CBT (Lovell)

A

Strengths:
- No travelling time to see therapist
- Takes less time e.g 30mins on phone
- Person at home is more comfy being in familair enviornment; less stressful than in clinic
- theraphy + procedures exactly the same

Weakness:
- No non verbal comms
- Verbal comms may be restirected (may talk longer face to face compared to OTP)
- therapist cant review materials e.g HMWK diary
- therapists cant control enviornmeny like no distractions in clinic but MANY at home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S+W of ERP Lehmukul

A

Strengths
- Lehmukhul successfully treated Jason using ERP; if one can be treated then so can all
- ‘Basic’ treatment can successfully be adapated to meet individual needs
- If ERP works w/ children then it should work w adults; Jason was 12 y/o
- ERP involves facing fears step by step so no one should ever have a problem (unlike flooding)

Weakness:
- Lehukhul successfully treated Jason, but this one child cant generalise from 1 person
- it was a case study + Jason was unique , he has autism
- no theraphy works for everyone, alternatives may be more appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sampling technqiues u can use

A
  • random sample was chosen so everyone in the target population has an equal chance of
    participating.
  • self-selecting so participants can volunteer (or not) to participate.
  • an opportunity sample was not chosen to avoid researcher bias when selecting participants.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why choose a directional hypothesis

A
  • A directional hypothesis was chosen because it predicts the direction of the results in this case
    it is predicted that seratonin drugs will be effective when compared to a control group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why choose a non directional hypothesis

A
  • A non-directional hypothesis was chosen because it makes no prediction regarding the direction of the results in this case it is not known whether ppt have developed OCD due to their upbrining or genetics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

choice of question format

A
  • a closed questionnaire was chosen with a yes/no answer box to make the questions easy to answer and to analyse.
  • a closed questionnaire was chosen to provide quantitative data which could be easily analysed.
  • a closed questionnaire with a 4-point Likert scale was used so participants could not opt-out
    with neutral answers
17
Q

S+W of lab study

A

Strengths:
a laboratory experiment has an IV, DV and controls;
* laboratory experiments are reductionist so one variable can be isolated
and studied.
* participants know they are taking part in a study (so give consent but
not informed consent).
* IV can be studied precisely using scientific equipment
* extraneous situational variables can be controlled

Weakness:
- most consumer behaviour takes place in the real world and so studies should be conducted in the real world (rather than in a laboratory).
* It may be reductionist to isolate variables to study (i.e. the IV) when
many other variables that are controlled may contribute to consumer
behaviour as a whole.
* participants may respond to demand characteristics.

18
Q

MOCI

A
  • developed the MOCI to classify different types of OCD
  • useful for research into causes and treatments.
    -Item Generation: Created 65 true/false statements related to OCD symptoms.
  • Narrowed down to 30 items that best differentiated between the groups (e.g., avoidance of public telephones due to contamination fears)

Strength: High test-retest reliability.
- 50 students completed the MOCI, reassessed after one month.
- 89% of 1500 pairs of scores were consistent, showing high reliability.

**Weakness: **
- Use of fixed-choice (true/false) questions.
- May not capture the full extent of a respondent’s thoughts or behaviors.
- Difficulty interpreting questions about average behavior (e.g., soap usage) may lead to inaccurate diagnoses.

19
Q

YBOCS

A
  • Semi-structured interview schedule.
  • Five items on obsessions.
  • Five items on compulsions.
  • RATING SCALE 0-4 scale based on symptom severity in the last week.

Severity Scores:
8-15: Mild
16-23: Moderate
24-31: Severe
32-40: Extreme
Duration: Interviews typically take about 30 minutes.
- How much of your time is occupied by obsessive thoughts?”
- 0: None, 1: Less than 1 hour/day, 2: 1-3 hours/day, 3: 3-8 hours/day, 4: More than 8 hours/day.

Strengths:
- Inter-rater Reliability: High agreement between different interviewers on severity ratings.

Weaknesses:
- Temporal Variability: Asking about the last week may not capture symptom fluctuation.
- Symptoms could be worse on specific days, leading to an inaccurate assessment of overall impact.
- Lack of Qualitative Data: w/o context, scores may not fully reflect the effect on a person’s functioning.