problem of evil key concepts Flashcards

1
Q

who talks about the evidential problem of evil

A

Hume and Mill -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mill on the evidential problem of evil

(who develops this and what do they say )

A

can be understandable for god to allow some evil but the amount in the world is excessive

  • Draper: gratuitous evil - can actually embitter which makes it even worse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define the word embitters

A

make some resentful and bitter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define

gratuitous evil

who talked about it

A

evils that do not contribute to any greater good and includes the sufferings of animal, innocent children too young to learn a lesson etc

Paul draper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who talks about the inconsistent traid

A

Mackie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hume on the problem of evil

his play

A

wrote a play with one of his characters being a sceptic
- prior probablility - someone unfamilliar with our world is unlikely to assume the world is a work of a good god
- his character Philio, uses analogy of a house full of imperfections (leaks, holes) - sceptical to assume divine being created it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does hume mean when talking about nature having poor worksmanship and that the laws of nature lead to misery

natural evil

A

worksmanship: either excess of defecit such as floods then a drought

natural laws lead to misery - gravity makes people fall to their deaths - more danger in the world etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does hick differ to irenaous

heaven

A

hick belives in universalism - all souls go to heaven

irenaeus - souls burn in hell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 solutions to the logical problem of evil

A
  • dytheism - god is not wholly good
  • process theology - god is not yet entirely omnipoteny and is changing and evolving
  • theodicies !
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain Irenaous and likeness

A

god created us in his image but we develop in the human world into his likeness
- jesus is the only one to be in his likeness so far
- adam and eve expelled into human world to develop - too immature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does Schliermacher criticise arguments of free will

A

He proposed that it would be illogical for a perfect creation to go wrong so evil must have been created for a certain reason - its not just human free will because god could have made a perfect creation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

criticism of Irenaous

A

most of his beliefs are not accepted by christians

god knew what would happen - omnipotent - so is responsible for the evil still

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

privatio boni

a similie

A

absence of good
augustine

darkness is just the absence of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

criticism of privation of good

four

A
  • it is not like darkness because sickeness is not the abscence of health
  • doesnt solve evidential problem of evil - excessive
  • gods foreknowldeg takes away our responsibility
  • occams razor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

occams razor

how does it relate to augustine

A

simplest explanation is to be preffered
to believe in agustine is to believe in the fall of man, angels and origional sin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hick

two

A

humans have to be morally immature and imperfect to attain true freedom and goodness
soul making theodiy

17
Q

chain of reasoning

hick - gratuitous evil - epistemic distance-prayer - experience
-mackie

A

hick criticised for gratuitous evil - no need for that since it wont benefit anyone

need for epistemic distance so has to have random evil

epistemic distance is a weak argument - pointless to pray if that was true since god wont show up and disproves so many religious experiences where god appears to ppl

furthermore - mackie - wonders why god would allow such cruelty if suffering is enough

18
Q

swinburne on free will

A

free creatures must live in a free world

19
Q

criticisms of process theology

A
  • goes against christina doctrine bysaying god is not omnipotent
  • against aquinas’ eternal timeless god
  • only solves the issue by changing the def of god
20
Q

great lisbon earthquake of 1755

A

natural evil example
demolished the city in portrugal
- 100,000 deaths estimated
- quakes, tsunami and fire
- during christian holiday all saints day

21
Q

how do christians respond to natural evil of lisbon earthquake

2 points and eval

A
  • ‘wrath of god’ - but why would he punish sinners by destoryin g churchers
  • Rousseau - result of overcrowding in the city that caused deaths so moral evil - can link this to modern times global warming that is excacerbating bad weather - but if god caused this he wouldve known the result, just deflecting the problem
22
Q

Voltairre on lisbon earthquake

A

uses it to discredit design argument
- god failed to create a safe world for human floruishing