Problem 7 Flashcards
When assessing the differences among people in their tendencies to behave in ways related to a certain trait, the context of the situation matters a great deal.
But why is the situation not sufficient enough to assess one personality trait, meaning why can’t we guess how a person will behave in a situation, based on how he/she behaved in a different situation ?
People still differ consistently in their overall level of a given trait, as observed across many situations
–> important to assess peoples overall patterns of behavior
e.g.: effect of aggregating
Within person variability
Occurs when the same person acts very differently on different occasions
Person argument
Suggests that due to the fact that behavior is determined in large part by a persons traits, a given individual will act similarly much of the time
Situation argument
Suggests that due to the fact that the immediate situation is the primary determinant of behavior, a given individual will act very differently on different occasions
Interactionism
Suggests that the processes whereby people react to changing situations should be assessed + personality consists of the differences between individuals in how they react to situations
–> finds middle ground between situationists + personists, BUT puts more emphasis on situationists
Density-distributions approach
Involves
a) observing people as they conduct their daily lives
b) measuring large numbers of their behaviors in a manner that allows their similarity to be assessed
–> used to determine how differently the typical person acts on different occasions
Fleeson’s whole trait model
Suggests that personality traits are stable distributions of momentary states of any of the big 5
–> shifts occur in response to situational or personal events
Within person fluctuations for most of the Big 5 are attributable to fluctuations in affect/emotional states.
How does this show in any of the big 5 traits ?
- Extraversion + Neuroticism are strongly related to affect
- Conscientiousness is independent of affect, more dependent on the situation
Personality state
Refers to short-term variation in a personality construct
–> doesn’t disqualify the personality trait
What are possible factors that contribute to within person variability ?
1. Life experiences
e.g.: work life different than private life
2. Approach or avoidance nature of an event
- will trigger the cognitive, affective + behavioral content of avoidance and approach-oriented personality, meaning your dispositions will determine how you will react in any given situation
Personality situation transactions
People create/shape their environment based on their personality traits/dispositions
ex.: extraverted - engage in more social situations
Why do people choose + create their daily environments + situations according to their personality ?
Because these environments are compatible with their behavioral dispositions (Personality)
–> thus, one might also change situations from incompatible to compatible when uncomfortable
Each trait of the big 5 is associated/compatible with a certain type of behavior.
Which are those ?
1. Neuroticism
- being alone + more intense negative effect
2. Extraversion
- being with friends
3. Openness to experience
- engaging less often in passive leisure activities (TV)
4. Conscientiousness
- tenacious goal pursuit + high task orientation
5. Agreeableness
- being more cooperative + avoiding conflicts
Is age significant for personality-situation transactions becoming stronger ?
Is it a moderator ?
No,
it was first assumed that they might increase with age due to increasing selectivity, but this wasn’t the case
–> BUT: age differences occurred in situations with few constraints
The following graph is consistent with the … view.
This suggests a … within variation.
- Personist
- Small