Private Nuisance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the definition of private nuisance

A

an unlawful indirect interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land coming from neighbouring land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two main types of nuisance

A

loss of amenity-noise smell or fumes

material damage-dangerous state of affairs on D’s land causes significant damage to C’s land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the rule for parties to the nuisance

A

C-must have interest in the land

D-can be liable where the nuisance is result of natural causes which he is aware of but fails to deal with (Leakey v National Trust)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the cases for parties to the nuisance

A

(Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd)-members of household who don’t have interest in land can’t claim

(Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan)-person causing or allowing nuisance doesn’t need to have interest

(Leakey v National Trust)-D can also be liable where nuisance is result of natural causes which is aware of but fails to realise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the first step for private nuisance

A

unlawful use of land

  • not necessarily illeagal but unreasonable in how it affects C
  • courts must balance conflicting interest of neighbours
  • possibility that some element of fault but fault doesn’t have to be proved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the second step of private nuisance

A

indirect interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is indirect interference

A
  • loss of anemity

- material damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the cases for indirect interference

A

(Thompson-Schwab v Costaki)

Laws v Florinplace Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

which forms of interference can’t be claimed

A
  • right to a view
  • right to light
  • right to good tv reception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the factors of reasonableness

A
  • locality
  • duration
  • sensitivity
  • malice
  • social benefit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the rule and case for locality

A

depends on use of land and area it is situated in

Sturges v Bridgman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the rule and case for duration

A

interference usually likely to be continuous and carries on at unreasonable times of night

(Crown River Cruises Ltd v Kimbolton Fireworks Ltd)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the rule and case for sensitivity

A

if C particularly sensitive there may be no nuisance but if interference is foreseeable maybe then this might be actionable

(Robinson v Kilvert)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the rule and case for malice

A

deliberately harmful behaviour will be unreasonable and so actionable

(Christie v Davey)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the rule and case for social benefit

A

if action benefits the community the nuisance may be reasonable

(Miller v Jackson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does not count as a defence for nuisance and what are the cases

A

moving to the nuisance

(Miller v Jackson)

(Sturges v Bridgman)

17
Q

what are the rules and cases of the statutory authority defence to nuisance

A

most things that might be considered a nuisance are now regulated by environmental or other laws (Allen v Gulf Oil Refining)

planning permission can be lawful justification for a nuisance (Gillingham Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co.)

planning permission won’t be defence if it doesn’t change character of neighbourhood (Wheeler v Saunders)

18
Q

what are the rules and cases for deciding between injunctions

A

injunctions can be granted in whole or part (Kennaway v Thompson)

social benefit-more likely awarded damages than injunction (Dennis v MoD)

injunction not automatic right (Miller v Jackson)

damages should be considered remedy more often especially with planning permission or public interest (Coventry v Lawrence)

19
Q

what are the types of remedies

A

-injunctions
-damages
abatement
-ADR

20
Q

what is abatement

A

e.g. entering D’s premises to prevent further nuisance

21
Q

what is ADR

A

court encourage negotiation and mediation as if allows parties to come to resolution with less confrontation-important to live alongside each other