Judicial Precedent Flashcards
what is the doctrine of judicial precedent?
- case law-past decisions
- doctrine of precedent-stand by what has decided
- if point of law in prev case is similar to present case
- courts must follow decisions from courts above
- if new act of parliament is passed which contradicts decision in a case, case stops having effect and act of parliament is now law
what is the hierarchy of courts in civil cases?
- supreme court
- court of appeal
- divisional courts
- high court
- county court
- magistrates court
county court
magistrates court
what is the hierarchy of courts in criminal cases?
- supreme court
- court of appeal
- queens bench divisional court
- crown court
- magistrates court
what are the types of precedent?
- original precedent-never been decided before
- binding precedent-from earlier case but must be followed
- persuasive precedent-not binding but judge may consider it and decide to follow it-can come from:
- courts lower down
- statements made obiter dicta
- dissenting judge
- courts in other countries
what is the rules for hierarchy of courts?
-every court bound to follow any decision made by a court above it in the hierarchy
- 2 exceptions where lower court not bound:
- decision by european court of justice
- human rights
what are the rules for appellate courts?
usually bound by own past decisions
-supreme court
-prev decisions by HofL still bind lower courts
-SC not bound by own past decisions
-precedent provides certainty
-rigid adherence might lead to injustice and restrict development of law
-prev decisions are binding but can depart from these when right to do so
-(Herrington v British Railways Board)
(R v Shivpuri)-overruled decision in (Anderton v Ryan)
-Court of Appeal-usually bound by own decisions but some limited exceptions
what are the rules for court of first instance?
where original trial is held
- high court-most senior and can make precedent
- inferior courts-county court, crown court and magistrates court-unlikely decisions can make precedent apart from ruling on point of law in crown court creates precedent for MC
what is stare decisis?
stand by what has been decided
what is ratio decidendi?
reasons given by judges for their decisions
where more than one judge:
- one judge may give judgement and other agrees
- particularly important or complicated point of law both judges may want to explain reasoning-may cause problems
what is obiter dicta?
other things said
-not binding
what is the rules for law reporting?
- must be accurate record of past decisions so they can be followed
- written reports have existed in england and wales since 13th century
- examples of well established reports:
- all england reports
- weekly law reports
- citations show which court the case was held in
- internet reports
what is the operation of judicial precedent?
- following
- where there is prev precedent and judge in present case decided it’s relevant, judge should follow decision
- if decision by court above or same level, judge must normally follow prev precedent
- overruling
- where court in present case states that legal rule decided in earlier case was wrong
- higher court may overrule decision by lower court
- can also occur when SC uses the practice statement to overrule past decision of its own
- distinguishing
- can be used by judge to avoid following past decision
- if main facts of present case are sufficiently different
- then not bound by prev case
what are the advantages of precedent?
- certainty
- consistency and fairness in the law
- flexibility
- time saving
what are the disadvantages of precedent?
- rigidity
- complexity
- slowness of growth