PRIVACY AND INTERNATIONAL LAW Flashcards
CASL
Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation
the rules for collecting, storing, and using private information, as well as sending advertising emails
Obligations PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act) for private sector organizations
- Consent
- Purpose Specification: Clearly identify why the information is being collected and how it will be used.
- Safeguards: Ensure that the data is securely stored to protect it from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure.
- Access and Correction: Individuals have the right to access their personal information and request corrections if necessary.
Sending Advertising Emails under CASL
- Consent Requirements:
o Express Consent: The recipient explicitly agrees to receive marketing emails, often through an opt-in mechanism.
o Implied Consent: This applies in situations like existing business relationships or when an individual has published their email address (e.g., on a public website) without a statement prohibiting unsolicited emails. - Identification: Every email must identify the sender and include the organization’s name, address, and contact information.
- Unsubscribe Mechanism: IEvery email must includea functional and easy-to-use unsubscribe mechanism Requests to unsubscribe must be processed within 10 days.
Determining Jurisdiction Of International Lawsuit
Use the Van Breda Test: Courts will take jurisdiction over a matter if these factors allow it:
Traditional factors / “Real and Substantial Connection” test / Forum Non Conveniens
Traditional Factors
Defendant’s presence in the jurisdiction or consent to submit to the court’s jurisdiction
Real and Substantial Connection to the Jurisdiction
The Defendant is domiciled or resident in the province;
The defendant carries on business in the province;
The tort was committed in the province; or
A contract connected with the dispute was made in the province.
Forum Non Conveniens
Even if the court has jurisdiction over the matter, it can decline to exercise its jurisdiction if another jurisdiction would be clearly more convenient or appropriate.
Forum non conveniens factors:
* Service of documents
* Availability of Witnesses
* Enforcement of Judgment
* Avoidance of multiplicity of actions
* Standing
* Applicable law
Enforcement of Foreign Awards
There is no obligation for one jurisdiction to recognize the judgment of another jurisdiction. Questions arise to its legitimacy, including:
* Was the judgment made in the appropriate forum?
* Was the judgment legitimately obtained?
* Does the judgment offend against either natural justice or public policy?