Principles Of Tooth Preparations Flashcards
5 Principles of Tooth Preparation and
Restoration Design
1) Preservation of tooth structure
2) Retention and resistance form
3) Structural durability of the restoration
4) Marginal integrity
5) Preservation of the periodontium
1) Preservation of Tooth Structure
3
- Irreversible surgical procedure
- Biologic
- Causes of Injury
• Biologic
3
- Adjacent teeth
- Gingival Tissues
- Dental Pulp
• Causes of Injury
4
- Mechanical
- Temperature
- Chemical
- Bacterial
• Pulpal Insult
2
Trauma from tooth preparation
• Decreased thickness of dentin protection
• Decreased thickness of dentin protection
• Remaining dentin thickness (between
prepared walls and pulp) key to its
protective nature
• Decreased thickness of dentin protection leads to (2)
→ Hypersensitivity
→ Pulpal inflammation and necrosis
Vital core
• A guide as to how much tooth structure can be removed w/o harming the
pulp
vital core depth (2)
- Pulp + 1mm minimum surrounding dentin
* Retentive features cut no deeper than 1.5mm (axial) - 2mm (central fossa)
• Tooth flexure / fracture –
undermining
cusps
• Cuspal Coverage:
reinforcement and
protection of remaining tooth structure
• Must balance:
ØUnnecessary destruction of sound tooth structure ØPreservation of the structural integrity of the remaining tooth Vs. ØMechanical requirements ØEsthetic requirements
• Morphologic reduction:
3
• Preserves the basic primary axial and occlusal tooth anatomy within the preparation. • Maximal thickness of residual tooth structure surrounding the pulp is retained. • Anti-rotational effects for increased resistance form.
Preparations must be designed
to resist
dislodging forces.
The -- form of the preparation is the most important of the factors under operator control which will determine if a restoration will remain cemented in place.
geometric
Retention Form
• Prevents
removal along path of insertion
• Occurs with sticky foods
• (least common problem)
Retention Form
• Provided for by:
• Two opposing vertical surfaces with minimal
convergence
• Cement offers frictional resistance –
shear stress.
• Mechanical Factors:
Dental Cements hold
through the mechanical interlocking of
projections of cement into irregularities of the
surfaces being joined.
Weakest -
Strongest –
tension
compression
Resistance Form
• Prevents restoration
dislodgement by
apical
or oblique forces.
apical
or oblique forces ex
• Occlusal forces
Resistance to --- forces, and not retention along the path of placement, is the greatest determining factor in a crown’s resistance to dislodgement.
lateral
• Resistance form is built into a preparation by forming walls to block anticipated movement due to: (2)
• Leverage
• Rotation around a vertical or
horizontal axis
Factors Affecting Resistance Form
(“Freedom from Displacement”)
(5)
- Total Occlusal Convergence ( Taper)
- Preparation Wall Length (OC or IC Dimension)
- Tooth Width (FL Dimension) - (Ratio of wall length : tooth
width) - Geometric Form (Limited Path of Insertion)
i. Grooves, boxes, vertical planes, pins
a. (Supplemental / internal prep features)
ii. Morphologic reduction / pyramidal shape of prep - Surface Area
• Inclination:
relationship of one wall of a preparation to the long axis of the preparation (“Taper”)
• Angle of convergence or total
occlusal convergence:
the
relationship of taper between two
opposing walls of a preparation.
• Historically, ideal TOC is
6o
Total Occlusal Convergence (Parallelism)
3
• Maximum R&R form obtained as opposing axial walls approach
parallelism.
• Some taper (total occlusal convergence) is required.
• Feature most under operator control.
As occlusal convergence increases, — decreases.
retention
• Maximum retention @ —; significant decrease > — TOC
5o
20o
For every 5 degree increase in the total convergence angle, the retention and
resistance form may decrease up to —%
50
What is an acceptable total occlusal
convergence?
•Guidelines should be based on the amount of
convergence required for adequate resistance
form and also on clinically achievable angles.
Average TOC of prepared teeth is in the range
of
10-20 degrees.
• — tooth preps have > TOC than (2) preps.
Molar
premolars and anterior
• Mandibular tooth preps have — TOC than maxillary tooth preps.
>
- Mandibular tooth preps have > TOC than maxillary tooth preps.
- Due to (2)
access and visibility
However, posterior preparations generally
require — TOC than anterior preparations.
more
• Posterior preparations are generally
shorter.
• Posterior occlusal forces are generally —.
higher
• Ideal TOC angle is:
6 to 10 degrees.
• Clinically acceptable TOC angle:
10 to 20 degrees.
• If the TOC angle is > 20 degrees, the preparation requires —.
modification
2) Length
Tooth preparation height measured from the
incisal/occlusal surface to
the margin.
• Greater height of the crown better the — of the restoration.
retention
• Increase height =
increases the are of cementation = Good retention
Wall length (height of the preparation) should be greater than the
tipping arc of displacement, to prevent displacement of the
restoration.
• “The preparation with — walls (a) interferes with the tipping
displacement of the restoration better than the short preparation
(b).”
longer
Decreased wall length causes
a
disproportionate decrease
in the resistance
As the preparation length is
increased the retention and
resistance is —.
increased
For every 1 mm increase in preparation length,
the retention and resistance form increases up
to —%.
10
• Wall length must interfere with
arc of rotation.
• The shorter the preparation the — the taper must be.
• The longer the preparation, the greater the taper may
be.
less
• The longer the preparation, the — the taper may
be.
greater
Height-Base Ratio – Arc of Rotation
• A narrow (smaller diameter) tooth can
have
greater resistance than a wider (larger
diameter) tooth with same wall length
• Shorter rotational radius for the arc of rotation
resists displacement
For adequate R&R form, the
height:base ratio should be
greater than
0.4 for all teeth
(TOC = 10
-20 degrees).
Because of the small diameter, the tangent line of this narrow preparation falls -- on the wall opposite the axis of rotation, resulting in a -- resisting area (A). Preparation A is narrower than preparation B, but its height and taper are the same. Because of the much greater radius of the arc of rotation its resisting area is smaller than that of the narrower preparation.
low
large
• If a molar is on average 10mm F -L dimension and it is determined that a 4mm wall length is minimal for resistance, the ratio of the wall length to the F -L dimension would be
0.4.
For adequate R&R form the height / base ratio
should be greater than — for all teeth.
0.4
- Incisors and Premolars: – mm minimum height.
- Molars: — mm minimum height
- (TOC = 10-20 degrees!)
3
4
Boxes, Grooves and Pin holes:
3
- Used when R&R form of primary features is inadequate.
- Establishes parallelism on opposing Intracoronal tooth surfaces.
- 2o Auxiliary Retentive Features limits the paths of withdrawal to ONE
2o Auxiliary Retentive Features shorten the
rotational radius
improving resistance to dislodgement
Proximal grooves on short — dies provide resistance to F-L horizontal displacement.
15o
• Grooves and box forms must have a definite wall —
to the direction of the displacing force.
perpendicular
• --- component of occlusal force has a rotating effect on a crown in a horizontal plane. • Walls must be created to block the movement
Horizontal
• Preservation of — line angles
in preparation
axial
— planes (perpendicular
to arc of rotation)
Vertical
Pyramidal vs. Conical Form
Pyramidal preparations have
increased resistance form
morphologic reduction
Pyramidal vs. Conical Form
Preserve
facioproximal and linguoproximal corners (line angles)
Surface Area:
3
• Retention is increased with increased surface area in sliding contact. • The greater the surface area, the greater the retention (especially if consider longer walls). •Not as important as TOC, and Height/Base ratio.
How is resistance form assessed?
- Measure TOC between 2 opposing walls (convergence guide)
- (6o)10o – 20o (maximum)
- Measure wall length parallel with long axis
- 3mm minimum OC dimension (4mm – molars)
- Measure tooth width (FL dimension) and wall height
- OC:FL ratio should be at least 0.4
- (4mm wall length / 10mm wide molar = 0.4)
What modifications can be made to increase
resistance form?
(3)
• Decrease TOC with axial wall re-shaping.
• Addition of grooves / small boxes (parallel
to path of insertion).
• Increase wall length
• Increase wall length (4)
• Place margin at a more apical position -Possibly subgingival • Pin-retained core • (Crown lengthening surgery) • (Orthodontic extrusion)
How can inadequate Retention / Resistance
Form be improved? (2)
• Reducing the TOC from 20° to 8° in the cervical 2 mm of the
axial walls significantly increased the resistance form.
• Limiting the paths of withdrawal to ONE path with the use of
grooves parallel to the intended path of withdrawal.
• Limiting the paths of withdrawal to ONE path with the use of
grooves parallel to the intended path of withdrawal.
• Grooves must not be over-tapered in relation to the path of
withdrawal.
Preparation modifications for over-converged tooth (2)
• Amalgam restorations removed; intracoronal walls
prepared for minimally convergent isthmus, boxes and
grooves.
• Axial walls prepared for minimal convergence in cervical
1/3; forming a shoulder with bevel.
STRUCTURAL DURABILITY OF THE RESTORATION
2
• Casting must be rigid enough not to flex.
• Sufficient tooth structure must be removed
to create space for an adequate bulk of
restorative material without over-contouring
the restoration
Preparation Features that contribute to
Structural Durability:
(3)
- Occlusal / Incisal Reduction
- Functional Cusp Bevel
- Axial Reduction
Inadequate Occlusal Reduction / Clearance (3)
• Thin area → hole in casting with wear
• Fractured ceramic
• Occlusal “adjustment” to opaque porcelain or metal on
metal-ceramic crown
• Morphologic Occlusal Reduction provides:
3
• Adequate occlusal/incisal clearance without excessive
removal of tooth structure.
• Uniform restoration thickness
• Parallels the major planes of the tooth (not flat)
- Morphologic Functional Cusp Bevel Reduction:
* Allows for
adequate thickness of restorative material
• without undue sacrifice of tooth structure
• without over-convergence
Axial Reduction: creates space for an
adequate bulk of metal
within the normal axial contours of the tooth.
Inadequate axial reduction →
(B) thin walls → weak or difficult to cast and finish
(C) bulky contours → plaque retention and periodontal
inflammation (poor emergence profile)
Requirements for successful restoration margins:
3
- Fit as closely as possible to minimize cement film width (25µ)
- Sufficient strength to withstand forces of mastication (geometry of prep)
- Located where dentist can finish and inspect, and patient can clean
4) Marginal Integrity
Considerations:
(2)
- Marginal Geometry
* Margin Location
The margin should fit as closely
as possible to minimize
cement film width (25 µ).
Margins must be closely
adapted to the
cavosurface finish line of the preparation. • Microleakage and recurrent caries • De-cementation of restoration
Marginal Geometry – Cervical Finish Line
• Cross-sectional configuration
Marginal Geometry – Cervical Finish Line
• Requirements:
(4)
- Conservation of tooth structure
- Readily identifiable on tooth, impression and die
- Provide sufficient bulk of restorative material
- Relative ease of tooth preparation
Marginal Geometry – Cervical Finish Line
• The design of the preparation finish line will dictate:
(2)
- The bulk of restorative material at the margin.
* The restoration fit.
Marginal Geometry – Margin Types
4
•Knife Edge •Chamfer •Shoulder -Radial (Modified) Shoulder •Bevel (Beveled Shoulder)
Maintain periodontal health:
3
- Margin location
- Marginal adaptation and smoothness
- Axial contours, emergence profiles
• Location must preserve the optimal health and prognosis
of the periodontium.
(5)
- Placed where the dentist can finish/evaluate.
- Placed where the patient can clean.
- Placed where they can be recorded during impression making.
- Placed on enamel whenever possible.
- Supragingival placement is optimal when possible.
Margin Location
• — as possible
Smooth
5 Principles of Tooth Preparation and
Restoration Design
1) Preservation of tooth structure
2) Retention and resistance form
3) Structural durability of the restoration
4) Marginal integrity
5) Preservation of the periodontium