Metal-Ceramic Restorations Flashcards

1
Q

Metal-Ceramic Restorations

A
  • A metal casting (coping) which fits over the prepared tooth with
    ceramic fused to it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Metal-Ceramic Restorations
* Combines

A

the strength and accuracy of cast metal with esthetics of
porcelain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Indications for Metal-Ceramic Restorations
* Need for full coverage with esthetic demands:
(3)

A
  • Extensive tooth destruction
  • Large restorations / undermined enamel
  • Opposing ceramic surfaces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Advantages of Metal-Ceramic Restorations
(4)

A
  • Natural appearance - esthetics
  • Retention and resistance qualities of full crown
  • More resistant to fracture than all-ceramic / dependable fabrication of FPD
  • Preparation is less demanding than Partial Veneer Crown
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • More resistant to fracture than all-ceramic / dependable fabrication of FPD
    (2)
A
  • Greater strength w/ less reduction than all-ceramic
  • Ability to have metal occluding surfaces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Key Tooth Preparation Form
Decisions
(2)

A

*Finish line form (3 types have been
used: chamfer; shoulder; and
shoulder-bevel)
*Margin design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Shoulder With A Beveled Finish Line
(2)

A
  • Some people think it makes for a better fitting
    crown
  • It is certainly acceptable to use such a finish line
    but it does not make the crown fit better and it does
    not work with a porcelain margin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Shoulder Finish Lines

A
  • Shoulder finish lines provide greater cervical space for
    an esthetic thickness of porcelain without
    overcontouring the crown and can be used with
    porcelain margins
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why Use A Shoulder Finish Line

A
  • Need for optimal porcelain thickness near the margin for
    esthetics and particularly when optimal reduction is not
    possible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why Use A Shoulder With A Rounded
Axiogingival Line Angle
(3)

A
  • Easier to prepare than a sharp angle
  • Required for any crown that will be milled
  • Produces less tooth weakening than sharp
    axiogingival line angles for small teeth or RCT,
    teeth that will be subjected to greater force since
    they are FPD abutments, and teeth with
    substantial secondary dentin where there is very
    little pulp space remaining (older patients)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Margin Design
* Metal collar –

A

ease of fabrication for non-esthetic
situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • Metal thinned to a fine line that is barely visible –
A

improved esthetics compared to metal collar but
more opacity than porcelain margin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • Porcelain (collarless metal ceramic crown)
A

– most
esthetic result but requires very skillful technician

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why Use A Shoulder Finish Line And Ceramic
Margin
(2)

A
  • Enhanced cervical esthetics
  • When there is gingival inflammation due to
    overcontoured crowns and you want to make slightly
    undercontoured crowns to improve the gingival
    response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Legitimate Reasons for Extending
Margins Subgingivally…
(6)

A
  • Existing caries
  • Extensions of previous restorations
  • Subgingival tooth fracture
  • Root sensitivity
  • Retention/ Resistance
  • Esthetics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Extending a margin subgingivally…
*To hide a ceramic or metal-ceramic margin
for esthetics
(2)

A
  • Should not extend more than ½ way into sulcus.
  • Well-adapted, smooth, proper axial contour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Preservation of the Periodontium: Axial Contours
* Emergence Profile: t

A

he part of the axial contour that extends from the
base of the gingival sulcus past the free margin to the height of contour.
* Straight or slightly concave; not bulky or excessively convex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Problems with Porcelain / Ceramics
(3)

A
  • Porcelain is subject to brittle fracture
  • Internal stresses
  • Excessive thickness (>3mm)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Problems with Porcelain / Ceramics
(2)

A
  • Porcelain abrasiveness – wear to
    opposing enamel / metal
  • Hardness and microscopic roughness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Metal-Ceramic Crown vs. Complete Metal
Crown
*Advantages:
(1)

A
  • Esthetics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Metal-Ceramic Crown vs. Complete Metal
Crown
*Disadvantages:
(1)

A
  • Increased removal of tooth structure
22
Q

Metal-Ceramic Preparation
Requirements are based on:
(3)

A
  1. Fundamentals of Tooth Preparation:
  2. Material requirements (components):
  3. Esthetic requirements
23
Q
  1. Fundamentals of Tooth Preparation:
    (1)
A
  • Retention and resistance form
24
Q
  1. Material requirements (components):
    (2)
A
  • Porcelain
  • Metal
25
Q
  1. Esthetic requirements
    (2)
A
  • Extent of porcelain coverage
  • Margin design and placement
26
Q

Marginal Geometry – Cervical Finish Line
Form
(2)

A
  • Shape and bulk of restoration margin
  • Marginal adaptation and degree of seating
27
Q

Geometry of Cavosurface Finish Line: Margin angles of less than 25o may produce a metal
margin that is

A

too thin and weak.

28
Q

Preservation of the Periodontium
Location of the Margin
* Subgingival margins are difficult to evaluate
(2)

A
  • Christensen: 120μ marginal gaps undetected
  • Bjorn: 40-50% with 0.2-0.3mm defects
29
Q

“Biologic Width”

A
  • The combined connective tissue-epithelial attachment from the alveolar
    crest to base of the gingival sulcus (approximately 2 mm).
  • (+ 1 mm for a healthy gingival sulcus = 3mm free gingival margin to alveolar crest.)
30
Q

Anterior Metal-Ceramic Preparation
* Resistance Form: Facial – Lingual Preparation

A
  • Parallel to the facial cervical 1/3 - 2/3 of prep
  • Lingual wall height is limited:
  • need “ideal” taper for resistance form in F-L direction
  • prevents dislodgment in protrusive and lateral
31
Q

Anterior Metal-Ceramic Preparation
* Proximal Axial Wall Preparation:

A
  • Longest opposing axial walls
  • Most of the retention form comes from the parallel M-D surfaces
32
Q

Material Requirements
* Adequate room for restorative materials
* Porcelain
(2)
* Metal
(2)
* Masking of metal
(2)

A
  • Opaque, body, incisal
  • Support (shoulder)
  • Substructure strength
  • Restoration fit
  • Porcelain thickness
  • Optimum esthetics
33
Q

Components of the Metal-Ceramic Restoration
* Metal coping:
* Opaque porcelain:
* (Shoulder porcelain)
* Gingival, body, and incisal porcelain:

A

0.3-0.5 mm veneered areas
0.8-1.0 mm un-veneered areas

~ 0.1-0.2 mm

~ 0.8 mm

0.8 – 1.5 / 2 mm

34
Q

Two-Plane Facial Reduction (Morphologic Reduction):

A

Allows adequate reduction for uniform color / contours and resistance.
Inadequate reduction → bulky contour or opaque “bright spot”
Over-reduction → decreased resistance / pulpal insult.

35
Q

Single Plane Under-reduction: “Bright spots”
Inadequate reduction results in light reflection from the

A

opaque porcelain

36
Q

Single-Plane – Over-reduction
(3)

A
  • Pulpal “blush” / pulpal exposure
  • Axial reduction → approaches pulp quickly
  • 1.2 – 1.5mm at cervical is often too much
  • Amount removed ↑ with ↑ TOC preparation
  • ↑TOC = ↓Resistance form
37
Q

Uniform facial
reduction
(multi-plane)
provides space
for

A

uniform
color and
normal crown
contours

38
Q

DEPTH GROOVES: Uniform tooth reduction
(2)

A
  1. Select / measure the diamond with diameter that equals desired
    reduction depth ~ 1.2 mm.
  2. Form depth grooves using the full instrument diameter in both facial
    planes.
39
Q

Uniform proximal reduction facilitates
the development of

A

normal appearing
proximal color and translucency

40
Q

Porcelain proximal surface allows light transmission
Adequate reduction through — is necessary

A

interproximal
*Proximal wing of preparation → metal in proximal → blocks light
transmission

41
Q

Elimination of proximal wings with gradual
transition from facial to lingual allows more

A

esthetic
proximal porcelain surface.

42
Q

Extension of facial shoulder reduction slightly
greater than — lingual to contact; gradual blend
to lingual

A

1mm

43
Q

Anterior Metal-Ceramic Design
Porcelain Shoulder
(Collarless M-C Crown)
Depth:
* Finish Line Geometry:

A

1.2 mm
* Modified (Radial)
Shoulder

44
Q

Anterior Metal- Ceramic Design
* Margin framework
design:
* Margin Geometry

A
  • Disappearing Margin
  • Heavy Chamfer
  • (Modified Shoulder)
45
Q

Margin Placement Anterior Teeth:
(3)

A
  • facial is often subgingival for esthetics
  • supragingival if no significant esthetic contraindication
  • may depend on the type of ceramic restoration used and framework design
46
Q

Metal-Ceramic Coping Design: Margin
* Metal Collar
* Width:
(3)
* Finish Lines used:
(2)

A

0.3-0.5mm
* Marginal integrity
* Finish
* Compromised esthetics

  • Shoulder with bevel
  • Heavy chamfer
47
Q
  • Why use a metal collar?
    (3)
A
  • Ease of fabrication
  • Include thin, unsupported tooth structure
  • Extend margin apically with less tooth reduction
48
Q

Components of Metal-Ceramic Crown
Coping Design: Posterior Occlusal
— thickness – porcelain
+ — thickness – metal
— mm total

A

1.5 mm
0.5 mm
2.0

49
Q

Metal Occlusion
(4)

A
  • less tooth reduction
  • less opposing tooth wear
  • stronger restoration
    *1.5mm occlusal reduction
50
Q

Porcelain Occlusion
(4)

A
  • Esthetic zone
  • Generally NOT 2nd Molars
  • Opposing ceramic surfaces
  • 2.0mm occlusal reduction