Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Fixed Prostodontics > Full metal & all ceramic restorations > Flashcards

Full metal & all ceramic restorations Flashcards

1
Q

• The restoration can survive in the biologic environment of
the oral cavity only if

A

the margins are closely adapted to the
Cavo surface finish line of the preparation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The configuration of the preparation finish line dictates the

A

shape and bulk of restorative material in the margin of the
restoration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Marginal Integrity
• It also can affect both

A

marginal adaptation and the degree of
seating of the restoration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CERVICAL FINISH LINES
Marginal Geometry – Margin Types
(5)

A

•Knife Edge
•Chamfer
•Shoulder
• Radial (Modified) Shoulder
•Bevel (Beveled Shoulder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Knife Edge Finish Line (Metal)
(5)

A

• Permits very acute margin of
metal
• Most conservative preparation type
• Flame or needle diamond
• Generally contraindicated
• Difficult to see; difficult to cast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Knife Edge Finish Line (Metal)
Other Disadvantage’s:
(2)

A

ØThe axial reduction may fade out
instead of terminating in a
definite finish line.
ØSusceptible to distortion in the
mouth when the casting is
subjected to occlusal forces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Knife Edge Margin
• Difficult to wax / cast →
(2)

A

• Produces thin margin susceptible to
distortion (B)
• OR Leads to over-contoured surface (C)
• (Poor emergence profile)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Knife Edge Finish Line (Metal)
• Indications:

A

very convex axial
surfaces; lingual surface of
mandibular posteriors; tipped teeth
where the axial surface is at an
angle >15o
• It will produce a distinct finish
line
• Less destruction of tooth
structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Chamfer Finish Line: Metal
• Margin Geometry – Narrow Chamfer
(3)

A

• (0.3mm) – 0.5mm axial depth
• Produces 30o – 45o acute metal margin / rounded internal angle
• Margin combines an acute edge (adaptability / seating) with a
nearby bulk of metal (strength).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Chamfer Finish Line: Metal
Round-end or torpedo diamond as axial wall is being produced
(1/3 – 1/2 diameter of rotary instrument).
• Axial preparation deeper than ½ diameter
results in

A

an acute, unsupported “lip” of tooth
structure at the margin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chamfer Finish Line: Ceramics
• Marginal Geometry

A

• Heavy Chamfer Metal-ceramic / Ceramic Crowns
- Adequate thickness for ceramic support
- Internal rounded angle ↓ stresses
- 1 – 1.2 mm axial depth
• Large round-end or chamfer diamond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Shoulder Finish Line
(2)

A

• 90o Cavo surface angle
• Flat-end diamond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Shoulder Finish Line
• Indications:
(2)

A

• Metal Ceramic Margins
• All-Ceramic Crowns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Modified (Radial) Shoulder

A

• Rounded internal axio-gingival
line angle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Shoulder Finish Line
• Cavosurface angle of 90o
(2)

A

• Supports adequate thickness of ceramic
• Rounded axiogingival line angle – decreased stresses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• Finish line most used for ceramic margins

A

Shoulder Finish Line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Shoulder Finish Line
Generally not used for cast metal
• WHY NOT?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Shoulder with Bevel

A

• Added to a shoulder, a bevel creates an acute edge of metal
(30o – 45o) at a margin.
- Inlay / Onlay
- Partial Veneer Crown
- Metal-Ceramic Crown (metal collar)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Chamfer is well suited for a complete cast crown:
(3)

A

• Ease of placement
• Ease of detection on impression; waxing, casting and adaptation to the tooth
• Acute in cross section while providing adequate bulk for strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Marginal Integrity Problems:
Roughness
(2)

A

• Roughness of the tooth surface finish line can prevent
close adaptation of the margin.
• Rough margin → plaque retention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

• Preparation:

A

high speed handpiece / air-water
spray with diamond burs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

• Finishing:

A

Slow speed w/ diamond or carbide
burs; hand instruments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

• Caries removal:

A

slow speed with a #4-6 round
carbide bur; spoon excavators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

• Raising pulp temperature 6oC ↑ pulp death by —%.

A

15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

• Increases of 10oC → –% incidence of pulp death

A

95

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

• Thermal Responses:
(3)

A

• Tooth preparation (↑5o-20oC)
• Light curing units (↑5o-20oC)
• Heat of polymerization: resins, provisional materials (↑5o-45oC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

• Thermal Responses:
(3)

A

• Tooth preparation (↑5o-20oC)
• Light curing units (↑5o-20oC)
• Heat of polymerization: resins, provisional materials (↑5o-45oC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Effect of Temperature Increase on the Pulp
how to avoid (4)

A

§Use copious water spray to cool dentin / pulp
§Use sharp burs / diamonds / high speed, light pressure
§Do NOT marginate crowns “dry”
§Prepare teeth as quickly as feasible / avoid desiccation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Instrumentation: Diamond Stones
(4)

A

• Remove enamel and dentin by grinding
• Most efficient (2-3X faster than carbide burs)
• Basic shapes: round end, flat end, (taper or cylinder);
flame / needle, wheel, torpedo, football / egg
• Diamond cleaning stone (wet)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Tungsten carbide burs
(2)

A

• milling cutters that shear tooth structure from
surface
• cut precise preparation features and smooth
surfaces in enamel and dentin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Twist drills
(2)

A

• cutting edges on the tip and fluted sides
• bore small-diameter holes in dentin for pins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Preparation finish line smoothness is important to

A

marginal fit and longevity.
(Preparation surface roughness does not affect
retention.)

33
Q

Instrumentation
• Hand instruments

A

smoothly finish
enamel finish lines
• Refine internal line angles
• Chisel
• Hoe
• Hatchet
• Margin trimmer

34
Q

Advantages of Full Metal Crowns
(3)

A

1) Complete coverage affords greatest retention and
resistance form
2) Allows for the greatest change in esthetic tooth form
and occlusion
3) Makes it successful in a wide range of situations such as
tooth form or alignment is not ideal and therefore a less
than perfect tooth preparation will be a likely result

35
Q

Disadvantages of Full Metal Crowns
(3)

A

1) Complete metal crowns are not esthetic to many people
and therefore they are often limited to non-visible areas
of the mouth
2) They require more extensive tooth preparation than
partial coverage crowns
3) If the finish line is subgingival around the entire tooth, it
is more likely there will be a less than optimal gingival
response

36
Q

Chamfer finish lines are recommended for all – metal crowns because they are easy to form,
adequately distinct on the tooth and die, and
provides sufficient space that the metal is
adequately rigid. A depth of — is
recommended

A

0.3 – 0.5 mm

37
Q

Chamfer finish lines exhibit a —.
They are formed by using a diamond
instrument with a rounded tip and a diameter of —

A

continuous cervical slope
0.6 – 0.8 mm

38
Q

The tooth is reduced until — of the instrument
diameter is located within the tooth. The rotary
instrument is then moved around the tooth
perimeter while maintaining the desired depth

A

½

39
Q

Axial Reduction
The axial surfaces (facial, lingual, mesial,
distal) are reduced using a

A

tapered round
– end diamond instrument so they
converge occlusally within the range of
10 to 20 degrees of total convergence

40
Q

REDUCTION FOR OCCLUSAL CLEARANCE
• Occlusal depth grooves are prepared to a
uniform depth of — using a coarse
grit diamond. They should follow the pathways
and depths of the developmental grooves.

A

1.0 – 1.5 mm

41
Q

REDUCTION FOR OCCLUSAL CLEARANCE
A depth groove prepared along the entire
— length of the central developmental
groove is very helpful in achieving adequate
reduction in an area that is commonly underreduced.

A

mesiodistal

42
Q

Line angles are rounded to facilitate pouring impressions without

A

trapping
air bubbles and investing wax patterns without air inclusions.

43
Q

Additionally, should nodules occur in the casting, they are easier to remove
when the

A

line angles have been rounded.

44
Q

Rounding Lines Angles for Cast Metal Crowns*
(3)

A

• Facilitates pouring impressions without voids in
the dies
• Facilitates investing wax patterns without air
inclusions and resulting casting nodules
• When casting nodules are present, they are
easier to remove.

45
Q

Final Finished Surface Of The
Preparation

A

• The prepared surfaces and finish line are
smoothed using a fine grit diamond that
is the same size as the coarse grit
diamond used for the initial reduction
• A coarse grit diamond that has been used
multiple times for initial tooth reduction
and sterilized multiple times can also be
used as it will no longer create the
roughness it once produced

46
Q

Complete Metal Crown - Tooth
Preparation Review
•A chamfer finish line that is — mm in depth
•Axial reduction with — degrees of total
occlusal convergence
•Reduction for occlusal clearance of — mm
•Auxiliary axial resistance form features as needed
•Rounding of all line angles

A

0.3 – 0.5
10 to 20
1.0 – 1.5

47
Q

Advantages of Glass-Ceramic Crowns
(3)

A

1) Esthetic potential / translucency
2) Good tissue response
3) Conservative tooth preparation (??)
i. Compared to MCC preparation (lingual / occlusal metal)
ii. Facial versus lingual

48
Q

Disadvantages of Glass-Ceramic Crowns
(6)

A

1) Reduced strength
i. No metal substructure
ii. Brittle nature of material
2) Substantial tooth reduction required
3) Technique sensitive
i. Clinical tooth preparation
ii. Resin cementation
4) Opposing tooth wear
5) Greater fracture potential – posteriors ( Zirconia ?)
6) Fixed partial dental prostheses limitations (Zirconia ??)

49
Q

Glass-Ceramic Crowns
Indications (4)

A

1) High esthetic requirement
2) Favorable distribution of
occlusal load
3) Optimal tooth preparation is
possible
i. Ceramic support
ii. Circumferential shoulder or
heavy chamfer
4) When a more conservative
restoration is not indicated

50
Q

Glass-Ceramic Crowns
Contraindications (4)

A

1) Molar teeth (FC Zirconia)
i. Increased occlusal load
ii. Decreased esthetic demand
2) Unfavorable occlusion
i. Anterior: edge-edge or cervical 1/5
ii. Bruxism / clenching
3) Inadequate tooth length for
support
i. Ceramic thickness >2-3 mm
ii. Short clinical crowns
4) Inability to produce uniform
circumferential margin

51
Q

Modified Shoulder or
Heavy Chamfer
(5)

A

marginal integrity
structural durability
periodontal preservation
resistance
esthetics

52
Q

Axial Reduction
(4)

A

retention and
resistance
structural durability
esthetics

53
Q

Vertical Lingual Wall
(1)

A

retention and resistance

54
Q

Concave Cingulum Reduction
(1)

A

structural durability

55
Q

Rounded Line Angles
(1)

A

structural durability

56
Q

Design Specifications: All Ceramic Crown
• Incisal reduction
• Facial axial reduction
• Lingual axial reduction
• Marginal reduction

A

2.0 – 2.5 mm
1.2 – 1.7 mm
1.0 – 1.2 mm
1.0 – 1.2 mm

57
Q

The Benefits of All-Ceramic Crowns

A

• Enhanced esthetics due to the absence of metal and improved light
transmission. Most beneficial for teeth with normally colored dentin

58
Q

• With some dark teeth, can use — to mask dark dentin

A

zirconia core

59
Q

Ceramic Susceptibility to Fracture
(2)

A

• Microcrack formation and propagation
- Stress concentrations
- Surface flaws
• No mechanism for yielding to stress w/o fracture (plastic deformation).

60
Q

Biomechanical Factors: Overcoming
Deficiencies in Glass Ceramic Restorations
• Methods of strengthening brittle materials:
(2)

A
  1. Reinforced Glass Ceramics; Polycrystalline - Zirconia
  2. CAD-CAM
61
Q

Biomechanical Factors: Overcoming
Deficiencies in Glass Ceramic Restorations
• Methods of design to optimize success:
(4)

A
  1. Management of occlusal forces
  2. Restoration design and material
  3. Cementation (resin bonding)
  4. Tooth preparation design
62
Q

Particle-filled Glass-Ceramics
Lithium Disilicate (e.max)
Layered or Monolithic
• Indications:
(3)

A

• Anterior / Posterior crowns
• Anterior FDP
• Inlays / Onlays, Veneers

63
Q

Particle-filled Glass-Ceramics
Lithium Disilicate (e.max)
Layered or Monolithic
• Strength:

A

360-500 Mpa
(Moderate)

64
Q

Particle-filled Glass-Ceramics
Lithium Disilicate (e.max)
Layered or Monolithic
• — cementation
• Requires — occlusal thickness and — shoulder

A

Resin
1.5-2.0mm
1mm

65
Q

Glass Ceramics and Opposing Occlusal Forces
Anterior teeth
(4)

A

• Lower occlusal forces / less strength requirement
• Higher esthetic requirements
• Unfavorable occlusion – edge-edge and cervical 1/5
• Must have adequate tooth support (long walls)

66
Q

Zirco(YTZP): Core / Ceramic Veneer or Full
Contour Crown
Core thickness :

A

0.4mm minimum (layered with 1–2mm porcelain)
Full-contour zirconia with porcelain glaze (complete metal prep requirements)

67
Q

Glass Ceramics and Opposing Occlusal Forces
Posterior teeth
(3)

A

• Higher occlusal forces → greater strength requirements
• Less esthetic requirement
• Increased failure on molars (zirconia or MCC or metal)

68
Q

Glass Ceramics and Opposing Occlusal Forces
Bruxism / clenching
(2)

A

• Contraindication for glass-ceramic crowns / FDPs
• Suggest occlusal night guard with ACCs

69
Q

50% increase in fracture strength ACC with adhesive

A

resin cement

70
Q

Layers of Porcelain and High-Strength Core
Necessary reduction for thickness:

A

0.4mm zirconia core
+1.0 – 2.0 mm porcelain
≈1.2-1.4mm (axial) – 2.0-2.5mm (incisal) reduction

71
Q

ACC Preparation Design Considerations
(6)

A

• Flat planes at right angles to forces
• Modified shoulder (or heavy chamfer) margin
• Avoid sharp line angles (no grooves)
• Avoid steep proximal angles in finish line
• Adequate length of preparation for support
• Uniform axial reduction and minimal taper

72
Q

Sharp line angles promote fracture
(3)

A

• A sharp incisal edge may be reduced until a flat area is obtained.
• Incisal reduction should not exceed 3mm.
• Incisal edge ≥ 1mm wide (CAD-CAM)

73
Q

Adequate Tooth Preparation Length for Support
Short preparations cause considerable stress and may lead to fracture.

A

• When a load is applied from a lingual direction, the facial shoulder is placed
under compression and only the incisal-lingual length of the preparation provides
significant resistance to this force

74
Q

Effect of Taper on Strength
(2)

A

• Excessive porcelain bulk decreases strength.
• It is not the bulk of porcelain that gives strength to the crown, but the
resistance to flexure provided by support from the tooth preparation and
accuracy of fit.

75
Q

Shoulder Provides Support at Margin
(3)

A

• Occlusal loading → tensile/shear stress → fracture
• 90o shoulder helps provide support for porcelain
- Heavy Chamfer adequate with resin bonded cementation
• Excessively sloped finish line or bevel creates thin unsupported margin of
porcelain – prone to fracture

76
Q

All-Ceramic Margin Designs
(2)

A

• A rounded internal angle on the modified shoulder
decreases stress at the axiogingival line angle.
• A heavy chamfer is relatively simple to form.
- Supragingival (subgingival difficult to avoid “lip”)
- Enamel / resin bonding

77
Q

Effect of Finish Line Form
(3)

A

• Avoid excessive cervical slope / bevel
• Avoid rapid occluso-cervical undulations
• Uniformity and smoothness improves marginal fit

78
Q

TOOTH PREPARATIONS
CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Restorations

A

• Adequate occlusal reduction (2 mm) and lingual reduction (1 mm)
- Inciso-cervical height should not be greater than 10.5mm – length of milling
diamond)
• Well-defined, smooth finish lines
• Shoulder finish lines with rounded axio-gingival line angles
• Rounded line angles
- Incisal edge and internal angles ≥ 1mm wide

Fixed Prostodontics (19 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions