Principles of Effective Treatment and Ethical Considerations Flashcards
Principles of effective treatment
- No single treatment is appropriate for all individuals
- Treatment needs to be readily available
- Effective treatment attends to multiple needs of the individual, not just his or her drug use
- An individuals treatment plan must be assessed continually & modified as necessary to ensure the plan meets the person’s changing needs
- Remaining in treatment for an adequate period of time is crucial for treatment effectiveness
- Counselling (individual or group) & other behavioural therapies are critical components of effective treatment for addiction
- Medications are an important element of treatment, especially when combined with counselling & other behavioural therapies
- Clients presenting with coexisting mental health & substance abuse should have both disorders treated in an integrated way.
- Medical detoxification is only the first stage of treatment & by itself does little to change long-term drug use
- Treatment does not need to be voluntary to be effective
- Possible drug use during treatment must be monitored continuously
- Treatment programs should provide assessment for blood borne viruses & other infectious diseases, & counselling to help modify or change behaviours that place the person or others at risk of infection.
- Recovery can be a long term process & frequently requires multiple episodes of treatment
Highlighted Principles of effective treatment
- No single treatment is appropriate for all individuals
- Effective treatment attends to multiple needs of the individual, not just his or her drug use
- Remaining in treatment for an adequate period of time is crucial for treatment effectiveness
- Treatment does not need to be voluntary to be effective
Percentages of patients who relapse
Type 1 diabetes: 20-50% Drug Addiction: 40 to 60% Hypertension: 50 to 70% Asthma: 50 to 70%
Effectiveness of TreatmentComparison of Treatment approaches & matching
Are some treatments more effective than others?
Project MATCH (1997)
eight year period; 30 locations; 130 clinical professionals
12 step programs; CBT; MET (Motivational Interviewing)
few outcome differences, apart from the effect of Psychiatric Severity
without Dual Diagnosis more abstinent days following 12-step rather than CBT
but for those with DD this effect disappeared
Criticisms of Project Match
Criticisms of Project Match (e.g. Glasser 1999; Heather 1999)
Eligibility criteria
Polydrug users excluded (except THC)
Too much focus on assessment and follow-up for research
interrupted usual therapy
All participants attended AA groups
the 12-step group just went to more
Abstinence was the determinant of success
No control group
Major conclusions from Project Match:
Major conclusions from Project Match:
No superior treatment model exists
Therapist and therapeutic relationship (Bambling & King 2001)
No single treatment intervention is effective for all people
Matching treatments to clients is a complex but important process
Glasser on Project Match
“Project MATCH… the Titanic of treatment outcome studies.
Like Project MATCH, the great ship was large, the largest man-made object to that point in history. It was complex; it generated enormous enthusiasm;
and it sank like a stone on its maiden voyage with great loss of life…”
Miller & HesterInformed Eclecticism
“…future progress and practice should be directed to an informed eclecticism, an openness to a variety of approaches that is guided by scientific evidence.”
Miller & Hester Informed Eclecticism 4 assumptions:
There is no single superior approach to Treatment (Rx) for all individuals
Rx programs/systems should be constructed with a variety of approaches that have been shown to be effective
Different individuals respond best to different Rx approaches, and
It is possible to match clients to optimal Rx, therefore increasing Rx effectiveness and efficiency
Australian Treatment Outcomes Study (ATOS)
Australian Treatment Outcomes Study (ATOS)
Heroin users
Replacement; withdrawal; residential rehabilitation; non-Treatment control
3 and 12 month post entry follow-up
Treatment sample differed from general population
More PTSD, Depression, Borderline PD, and disability.
High suicide and overdose rate; criminality (Holt, Ritter, Swan and Pahoki, 2002)
ATOS Outcomes
General functioning improved (Ross et al 2004)
Majority of participants abstinent for the 1 month prior to 12 month follow-up 65% Replacement 63% residential rehabilitation 52% withdrawal 25% non-Treatment control
Noticeable reduction in criminal behaviours, improved injection related health, decline in Depression
Future directions
Research indicates a need to:
Improve understanding of dependence & withdrawal
Greater attention to the use of psychosocial interventions as primary & adjunct treatment
Consider significance of lifetime treatment history & how individual treatment episodes fit together to achieve recovery
Assess effectiveness & efficiency under typical circumstances
Assess effectiveness of treatment interventions with subgroups
Ethics
To be a utilitarian means that you judge actions as right or wrong in accordance with whether they have good consequences. So you try to do what will have the best consequences for all of those affected.
Peter Singer
In the real world, 90% of the money spent on medical research is focused on conditions that are responsible for just 10% of the deaths and disability caused by diseases globally.
Peter Singer
Ethics in AOD practice
Consider the many difficult decisions you may be faced with when working in the alcohol and drug field…
How might the illegality of drug use impact on your work?
What about working with drug using parents?
Or clients under 18?
When do you terminate treatment?
Quote
“Addiction affects the lives of all human kind, either directly or indirectly. The cost to individuals and societies is immense and tackling the problem is as much one for policy makers as clinicians, counsellors and scientists. Ethical issues permeate much of the work of all these groups.”