Dual Diagnosis and Facilitating Change Flashcards

1
Q

What is dual diagnosis?

A

AKA: Co-morbidity/Co-occurrence
More than one diagnosis
2 or more health problems
Medical, Mental health, Alcohol and Drug, Intellectual Impairment, etc…
Distinctions:
Heterotypic / Homotypic
E.g. mental health and physical disorder vs 2 mental health disorders
Concurrent / Successive
E.g. alcohol dependence and depression at same time vs panic disorder in teenage years and cannabis abuse in twenties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incidence of dual diagnosis

A

“The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four Americans is suffering from some form of mental illness. Think of your three best friends. If they’re okay, then it’s you.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Incidence of dual diagnosis (DD)

A

20-30% of population will experience MH disorder in lifetime
Over 12 months, 18% experience MH disorder in Australia
10% anxiety, 8% substance use, 6% affective (NSMHW, 1997)
If have MH disorder
likely to have substance use issues and vice versa
How likely? – considerable variation in the answer
DD Prevalence estimates range from 30-90%
Why does it vary?
Depends on diagnostic criteria (Severe, Axis I/II, PD, Sub-clinical)
Setting (e.g. A&D vs MH, treatment vs community)
Specific groups (e.g. Indigenous, homeless)
Gender also a factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Incidence of Dual Diagnosis

A
In alcohol and drug settings
Mostly anxiety, depression, and personality disorders
Some psychosis/schizophrenia
In mental health settings
Mostly alcohol and tobacco 
67% nicotine use in those with Psychosis
Some cannabis/speed/heroin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Causal hypothesesDepression

A

Depressants – general depressant effect
Alcohol
Interferes with medications
Long term effect on relationships, employment, health, etc…
Cannabis
Long-term use may cause ‘depression-like’ symptoms
Hypothesised ‘Amotivational syndrome’
Opiates
Lifestyle related factors associated with opiate dependence
Stimulants
Existing depression may get worse when coming down
Common in the months following cessation
Use/abuse may worsen the sleep / wake cycle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Causal hypotheses Anxiety

A

Depressants - Agitation, anxiety, and irritability common features of withdrawal
Alcohol
Alcohol related problems can create new worries
Cannabis
Paranoia a common symptom of intoxication
Stimulants
chronic use - anxiety states and panic
high doses - obsessive cognitions and compulsive behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Causal hypotheses Psychosis

A

Reinforcing effect of drugs related to dopamine
Dopamine hypothesis - Psychosis
Cannabis
Hypothesised to precipitate psychotic episodes
Some evidence suggests a causal link, but still debated in literature
Pharmacology and potency (THC vs CBD; Dose-response)
Cannabis use known to increase rates of hospitalisation, psychotic relapse and psychotic symptoms
Synthetic Cannabis a largely unknown area, but anecdotal reports are concerning
Stimulants
May directly cause psychotic episodes
Amphetamine psychosis: brief psychotic reaction that may last for several weeks
Can this trigger a more chronic psychosis?
Alcohol
Negative symptoms worse and affects treatment
Non-compliance with medication and higher relapse rates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Now think about poly-drug use…

A

What happens to the mental state when a cocktail of drugs are used?
Uppers and downers cycle
Simulates Bipolar Affective Disorder?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Causal hypothesesMH leading to A&D disorders

A

Depressant drugs used as a form of “self-medication” of anxiety symptoms
‘Social lubricant’
Stimulant drugs used as self-medication of depression
‘Pick me up’
Pain relieving drugs to manage chronic emotional pain/trauma
Opiates and sedatives commonly linked to a Hx of trauma (up to 90%)
‘Drowning your sorrows’
Cannabis to manage issues with low appetite
Stimulants used to supress appetite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Discussion Question

A

Steph is 22 years old and had used speed on and off for the last five years
After a particularly heavy use period over four days she starts to get very paranoid and after attacking her parents, she is taken to hospital by police
When she is assessed, she is diagnosed with a drug induced psychosis and after spending a week in hospital appears to have completely recovered

Consider:
What might happen when she tries to return home to her parent’s house?
What are some of the other challenges Steph may face now that this event is in her history?
What if it happens again?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is dual diagnosis of concern? Issues for the client

A

Greater severity of Disorders:
More hallucinations, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation
Relapse risk increased
Rehospitalisation
Effects on medications
Loss of support networks/extra challenges:
Unstable accommodation, criminal justice system
Family / relationship issues / stress
Double stigmatisation
Harder to receive/access service
Lack of education
Forensic mental health/legal issues
Poorer self care:
Increased risk taking behaviour (esp. HIV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Issues for treatment services

A

-Complex presentations
More than one drug use/mental health issue
Psycho-social issues
-Diagnoses are often unclear
Lack of screening
Misdiagnosis
-Lack of dual expertise or awareness of issues
Lack of confidence in DD
-Added work vs more effective work perceptions
-Lack of flexibility in service provision
Appointment based models
-Confronts clinicians own issues?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Diagnostic issues: Schizophrenia

A
Positive symptoms
Hallucinations
Delusional thinking
Disorganised speech
Negative symptoms
Flattened affect
Lack of motivation
Poverty of speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Diagnostic issues: Depression

A
Depression
Low mood or irritable
Loss of interest in things
Appetite issues/weight variations
Sleep problems
Reduced activity
Lack of energy
Guilt/worthlessness
Poor concentration
Suicidal ideation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Relationships b/w MH & SUD

A

Use of substances causes or exacerbates an underlying mental health problem (Primarily Substance Abuse)

Mental Health disorders lead to substance use and abuse (Primarily Mental Health, e.g. Self-medication)

Mental health disorders and substance abuse disorders develop together and reinforce each other (Bi-directional Model, e.g. Benzodiazepines and Depression)

Both MH and SUD disorders develop somewhat independently of each other due to common causes or risk factors (Common Factors, e.g. Trauma/Adversity/etc…)

Regardless of relationship, usually become inter-connected over time and result in a worsening clinical picture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case Example:

A

Bill attends a counselling service and was assessed and diagnosed with alcohol dependence, anxiety disorder and being highly stressed. He reported his father was a violent alcoholic and during the past 12 months Bill had a relationship breakdown and lost his job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Research perspectives

A

Research provides no clear answer on causal relationships
Causal link has been demonstrated in both directions
Regardless, neither will assist in the recovery from, treatment of, or relapse prevention of the other
Best way to manage is not dependant on cause
concurrent treatment and management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Treatment Models: Sequential

A

Sequential - One disorder is treated before the other
Best suited to situations where it is thought one disorder is secondary to the other, where the symptoms that look like a second disorder are really related to the first and there is no real comorbidity at all

Difficulty in determining if the disorders are separate
Conflicts within and between services about who will treat the person eg. A&D say its MH; MH say its A&D
Very difficult to say a relationship doesn’t exist between the symptoms
Approach restricted to situations where the evidence shows that a particular procedure can’t be effectively delivered until a specific symptom is addressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Treatment Models: Parallel

A

Parallel - two different practitioners/treatment teams deal with the two separate problems
Current common model

Advantage that both disorders are getting simultaneous treatment

Disadvantages: 
treatments mistimed or act in conflict
different services goals
little info sharing
no co-ordinated response - Who is taking prime responsibility for case management?
Black hole
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Treatment models

A

Specialised dual diagnosis service
Development of expertise

Duplicated infrastructure
Resource intensive
Communication???
Who is suitable
Very high prevalence of dual diagnosis clients in all services
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Treatment models: Collaborative

A

A&D services with overlap of Mental Health Services

ADVANTAGES
Uses existing infrastructure
uses each others expertise
acknowledges the need for close cooperation

DISADVANATGES
communication issues
differing treatment services goals and priorities

22
Q

Treatment Models: Integrated

A

Develop expertise within a small group within the service

Comprehensive

23
Q

National and State Programs

A

Over the last 20 years, we have seen more focus on need to respond to DD
Particularly in Victoria
National and State funding has been applied to provide guidelines and support, and some specific services for DD
E.g. Headspace, dual diagnosis specialist positions
Variations between states
Need for greater alignment with what is working?
Response within mental health systems the priority?

24
Q

Evidence based treatment

A

Limited (but increasing) evidence base
Treatment more effective when:
Integrated
Focused on maintaining motivation & promoting treatment engagement
Assertive case management
Extends over several months
Based on “no wrong door” approach
Majority of research on pharmacological management
Some promising results – SSRIs supported in most cases
Initial activation issues
2-6 weeks until effective
less effective when alcohol misuse present
Cautions related to use of Benzodiazepines

25
Q

Summary

A

DD is a common problem
The rule rather than the exception in treatment
Many issues exist that make the problem worse:
Assessment difficulties, service variations, attitudes, perceptions, stigma, lack of expertise and training, poor outcomes, loss of social connection, legal issues
Solving the problem takes a coordinated, educated, integrated workforce that treats the problems with understanding and support
Much progress has been made, but more to be done
Better national alignment?
Mental Health system response?

26
Q

Facilitating Change

A

We know people can change…

…But how do they change?

Does it happen instantaneously?

…Or is it a Process?

If we knew the process, could we help

27
Q

BackgroundHistory of change facilitation

A

How to help people change?

Old way:
Confront “addictive personalities”/denial

Key Skill - Coercion

Resistance, argument, reduced change

28
Q

New Way – Motivational InterviewingFive Important Assumptions

A

Motivation is a state not a trait
Resistance is not a force we must overcome
Ambivalence is normal
Person seeking help should be an ally rather than an adversary
Recovery and change are innate, constant and intrinsic to the human experience

29
Q

BackgroundCentrality of Ambivalence

A

Ambivalence - central to addictive behaviours
Awareness of risks, costs & harms
Also attached and attracted to behaviour
Confrontation about adverse consequences
E.g. “Drugs are bad…”
Often results in argument
E.g. “But, I really like being high”
Reinforces reasons for continuing
Ambivalence - coexisting & conflicting feelings about behaviour
Normal, understandable, acceptable, and expected
Strong & sometimes long held attachment to problem behaviour
(e.g. physical dependence, social association, conditioned association, help with coping, etc…)

30
Q

Stages of Change ModelProcess of Change

A

Research into process of change

Process rather than an event
Process of changing addictive behaviours happens via a series of stages from pre-contemplation to maintenance

31
Q

PRECONTEMPLATIONHappy User

A

Not planning to change in foreseeable future
Uninformed or under informed
“It isn’t that they can’t see the solution. It is that they can’t see the problem.”
Families/friends etc… see the problem
Resistant to change
Sometimes demoralised following relapse

32
Q

CONTEMPLATIONOn the Fence

A
Aware of problem
Seriously thinking about/considering change
Not yet made commitment to change
Ambivalence
Weighing up the pros and cons
33
Q

PREPARATIONMaking a Plan for Change

A

Plan for action in next month

Open to information and support

May have made small changes
e.g. Reduced smoking slightly

34
Q

ACTIONMaking Changes

A

Putting plan into action
Modification of behaviour, thoughts, environment
Behavioural changes (1 day to six months)
Considerable commitment of time and energy
High potential for relapse

35
Q

MAINTENANCEChanges that Last

A

Changes maintained for 6 months or longer

Focus is on preventing relapse

More confident

36
Q

RELAPSEA slip up

A

Rule rather than exception
Most people don’t make it on first attempt

Can go back to any stage

Can happen on multiple occasions

Does not mean that the person is unmotivated

37
Q

Prevalence of Relapse

A

Relapse is a common occurrence

90% of clients will experience a lapse within 12 months of completing treatment (brief return to use)

60% of clients will experience a relapse (return to old patterns) within 12 months

38
Q

Spiral Stages of Change Model

A

Stages of change not usually linear and organised in practice

Typically cycle back and forth several times
–Each time learning more about themselves and triggers for relapse

39
Q

Spiral Pattern of Change

A

Keep redoing the precontemplation, contemplation, Preparation and action

40
Q

Strategies for facilitating movement through the stages of change

A
  • Motivational Interviewing
  • -Decisional balance
  • Does not mean that MI and Stages of Change aka ‘Trans-theoretical Model’ are the same thing!
41
Q

What is Motivational Interviewing?

A

“ A directive, client-centred approach for initiating behaviour change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence.”

                      (Rollnick and Miller, 1995)
42
Q

The MI ‘Spirit’

A

-Collaboration
–Client centred and driven
–Partnership not ‘expert’/‘recipient’
-Evocation
–Designed to elicit clients own motivations
–‘Change-talk’
-Autonomy
Ultimately the client is responsible for change
Freedom to choose the direction

43
Q

Think

A

Think about a behaviour or habit that you would like to change but have not been able to achieve this yet
What stops you from making the change?
How do you react when others ask you how you are going with making the change?

44
Q

Decisional Balance

A
  • -Decisional balance - perceived advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of problem vs change
  • -Assumption - motivation for change affected by decisional balance
  • -Can assist in assessment of stage of change
45
Q

Four General Principles of MI: Express Empathy

A

Acceptance facilitates change
Ambivalence is normal
Skillful reflective listening is fundamental

46
Q

Four General Principles of MI: Develop Discrepancy

A

Use clients own motivators to highlight discrepancy between present behaviour and important personal goals or values
‘Psychological squirm’

47
Q

Four General Principles of MI: Roll with Resistance

A

Avoid arguing for change
Resistance not directly opposed, signal to respond differently
Client is primary resource for solutions

48
Q

Four General Principles of MI: Support Self-Efficacy

A

Client’s belief in possibility for change - important motivator
Client responsible for change
Counsellor’s belief in client also important

49
Q

Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing

A

Support for the use of MI in several clinical trials (e.g. meta-analysis by Noonan & Myers, 2007)
Support for use in brief settings of 15 mins, superior to simple advice giving (Rubak et al., 2005)
Greatest support for changing substance use
Possibly not as effective with nicotine
Also support for use in changing other health behaviours and counselling settings
E.g. Diet, exercise, employment, educational achievement, relationship counselling, criminal behaviour, child safety, DV

50
Q

Critique of Motivational Interviewing

A

Large variability in effectiveness – Why?
Causal process remains unclear
Training/Processes variations in session?
Technique has changed over time, but is there quality control in place?
Confusion with Trans-theoretical model
Not stand alone intervention, useful as adjunct to more intensive treatment
MI may raise motivation to change, but the client still needs the skills and knowledge required to change

51
Q

How can we motivate people to change? Traditional View

A

Traditional View: use pressure and force
Reasons for change come from counsellor/society/others
Break down resistance through shame, guilt, loss, threat, anxiety, or humiliation
Ambivalence - sign of denial
Outcome: SHORT-LIVED CHANGES

52
Q

How can we motivate people to change? Alternative View

A

Alternative View: Develop personal desire
Motivate by focus on what is important or valued
Their own reasons to change
Helping person to feel accepted and empowered
Respect autonomy, choice and personal responsibility for change
Ambivalence normal - part of the process
Outcome: LONG-LASTING CHANGES