Pressure Groups Essay Flashcards
Introduction
When it comes to pressure groups’ influence on the government, some would argue that the most effective way for citizens to influence is by responding to consultations. However it can be argued that setting up and signing a petition are also an effective method. Ultimately this response will show why lobbying the government is maybe the most influential method available to citizens.
Responding to Consultations
Describe
This allows pressure groups to listen and engage with the people who share the same expertise which they try to change. This can influence the government’s decisions on laws and legislations as the pressure group using the consultation can express their views and show the amount of people willing to take action.
Responding to consultations
Example
For example, the Scottish Government recently consulted on tougher penalties for people who harm wildlife. The Law Society, an insider pressure group responded with their experience and the proposal became law in 2020.
Responding to Consultations
Analysis
It is ideal for a pressure group to make a contribution on an issue as it gives the group an advantage against the government because they are more likely to have their views taken into account as a result. This also shows a huge number of people who are willing to vote against the government if action is not taken.
Responding to Consultations - aren’t influential
Describe
The government does not have to accept the responses given, or act upon it. The government may only issue a consultation for the pressure groups to give the perception that the pressure groups views are being acknowledged despite the government already having made up their minds. This can be the case when approaching an election that they need support for.
Responding to Consultations - aren’t influential
Example
For example, in 2017 the UK Government consulted on letting disabled people vote electronically, then took a year to respond by rejecting the idea despite the Royal Society for the Blind supporting it.
Responding to consultations - aren’t influential
Analysis
Despite support from a knowledgeable group such as the RNIB, the government was still able to ignore the response and delay the rejection until a time that suited them. Ultimately the government still has the final say and are able to do as they please, if they feel their argument is not knowledgeable or strong enough they can easily disregard the work of the pressure groups.
Responding to consultations
Link back
In theory responding to consultations should allow space to influence the government as they are working to become more aware of the issue and propose factual statements to convince a change however if the government does not feel they put forward their views in a convincing way they are easily able to be ignored.
Setting up and signing petitions
Describe
They will often start petitions to prove their support for a cause of issue which they believe needs to be changed. The more signatures that are gathered then the more support that is shown to the government for the selected cause. The signatures can often reflect the public’s opinion and the sheer volume of citizens that back the cause. This will also inevitably help the government to attain the support in further elections as large majorities’ views are being taken into account.
Setting up and signing petitions
Example
For example, in 2019 the UK Government supported the introduction of Finns Law after the Finns Law group set up a petition that received over 130,000 signatures. This law gave greater protection to police dogs and horses after the police dog Finn was stabbed.
Setting up and signing petitions
Analysis
This suggests that petitions can be immensely influential as they are able to change laws with the power of the majority. They can be shared quickly across social media platforms to raise awareness and get attention, which especially highlights the Government’s response to the petition.
Setting up and signing petitions - aren’t influential
Describe
The government may choose to ignore or reject the petition as it does not affect them. Some of these petitions don’t actually receive enough signatures to gain any kind of attention from the media or the Government. They are also open to anyone to create so it can be a big challenge to raise awareness on one single pattern.
Setting up and signing petitions - aren’t influential
Example
For example, the Time for Inclusive Education pressure group first tried to use a petition to change the law to change Scottish education at the start of their campaign but this was rejected by the government and others.
Setting up and signing petitions - aren’t influential
Analysis
Essentially petitions are easy to ignore, as they are not overbearing and in your face they are put aside and dismissed due to possibly insufficient evidence to prove their point to the government. This is shown as later on in their campaign Time for Inclusive Education, were successful in their fight to change Scottish education therefore proving that petitions were not a successful method for them.
Setting up and signing petitions
Link back
Although petitions may work for some if they are able to attain a sufficient amount of signatures to prove to the government that there is enough evidence that a change is required, it is not effective for all as in many cases petitions can and will be ignored by the government.