Prejudice And Discrimination Flashcards
Three-component attitude model
An attitude consists of three components: emphasizing thought, feeling and acting as essential to human experience
- cognitive
Beliefs about a group - affective
Strong and usually negative feeling about a group and the qualities they are supposed/believed to have - behavior
The intentions to behave/act in a certain way towards a group (not actual act)
Backlash
Women get criticized and rejected if they promote themselves
Are denied competence in male-stereotypical area (eg. job market)
Prevention focus
Negative emotion-related bias towards outgroup
Stigma
Group attributes that transfer negative social evaluation of people who belong to the group
Stigmatised groups are the targets of prejudice and discrimination
J-curve model
Graphical figure: shows how relative deprivation arises when attainment/achievements fall short of expectations
Cooperative goal relation
Non-zero sum
Sexual minorities
LGBTQ community victims/targets of prejudice and discrimination around the world
Only 1973 American Psychatric Association removed homosexuality from list of mental disorders
Advances: lesbian/gay pride celebrations, same sex marriage legal in many countries
Still: remain stigmatised, subtle forms of discrimination
Discrimination
Prejudice are based on negative stereotypes of groups and this turns out to aggression towards outgroup
Attitude-behavior relationship
can cause violence and even genocide
genocide
Ultimative expression of prejudice by exterminating a whole social group
(eg.poverty, relative deprivation, cyclical violence)
Instrumental goals
Short-term negative emotions
EG. Fear/anger
Instrumental value to the group
Social changes belief system
Ingroup boundarities are impermeable
No cognitive alternatives
=Social competition with dominant group as the only strategy to improve social identity
Social creativity
=Group-based behavioral strategies to improve social identity
Without DIRECT attacking dominants group‘s position
Social competition
=Group-based behavioral strategies to improve social identity
Directly confronting dominant group‘s position
Detecting racism:
Social distance
How close people are willing to get to eachother
Racist attitudes persist even in close social distance
Racist would go to same school with ethnicity but not marry
Emergent norm theory
Collective behavior is regulated by norms based on distinctive behavior that arises in initially normales crowd
Self-awareness is very low in crowds
Commons dilemma ‚tragedy of the common‘
A number of individuals/groups exploit a limited resource
Cooperation by all benefits all
Competition by all harms all
Implicit association test (IAT)
Reaction-time test to measure attitudes that people might conceal
Rich indicator:
Words we use, non-verbal communication channel (underlying emotions and prejudices)
Mental illness as a stigma
Less improvement
Brings shame over family (cultures of honour)
Dehumanization: Label mad, justify discrimination, „different=mad“
Collective guilt
Arises if people feel responsible for group‘s blameworthy actions
Coping with social dilemmas
Difficult to solve: people behave in a selfish way and fail to trust eachothers
1. Structural solutions
Requires powerful authority to implement measures (eg. limit carbon emissions)
- strong group identification
People act in ways that benefit the group rather than themselves
Improves communictaion to build trust and develop norms
Relative deprivation
Sense of having less than we are entitled to, feeling to deserve more
Under conditions of relative deprevation people feel frustrated and this frustration can lead to aggression
Fraternalistic relative deprivation
We compare ourselves with dissimilar others/members of a group
Social unrest=
Demonstrations, collective protests
Bookkeeping
Favorable information about outgroup could improve stereotypes
Positive intergroup distinctiveness
Provides member with favorable social identity
Basic human motivation for self-enhancement and to elevate self-esteem
Uncertainty reduction=group provides structure and clearer sense of self
Automatically defines our relationship with ingroup/outgroup members
We tend to identify more with extreme groups, if our uncertainty is intense
3 forms/types of behavior that illustrate underlying prejudice
- Reluctance to help
- Tokenism
- Reverse discrimination
Prejudice
an unfavorable attitude towards a social group and its members
part of human condition
Social psychological problem
Often based on stereotypes to justify prejudice/discrimination against an outgroup
Role congruity theory
Observers behave negatively when people behave inconsistent with heir role expectation
EG. Women as poor leaders=inconsistency with peoples schemas of effective leadership
Different roles men and women occupy in society
Men:
Competent and independent „but maybe not so nice“
Agency-based structural power
EG. Businessman, macho-man
Social protest
Response to relative deprivation
To achieve social change
Study of social protest is complex (psychology, sociology, political science)
Conversion
Counter-stereotypical information could cause sudden attitude change
Miller and colleague: Link between frustration and aggression
- frustration can but does not has to lead to aggression
- can be powerful=show aggression in an overt way, powerless= more indirectly
- a series of small frustrations can increase probability of aggression
Stereotype content model on people with handicaps
Warm but incompetent
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Stigmatised groups know about negative stereotypes others have of them
People worry that their behavior confirms societal prejudices and have more anxiety, negative thoughts
Even behave in ways that fulfil others expectations
New racism
Conflict between emotional antipathy towards racial outgroup
modern values to behave in non-prejudiced manner
Stereotypes have changed, but not disappeared, people represent/express racism differently and in new forms
Bargaining (Handeln)
Process of intergroup conflict resolution
Representatives reach agreements by direct negotiation
When people bargain about own group=do it less compromisingly and are not easily satisfied with compromises
Bargaining often a way to remain status quo
Benevolent (wohlwollend) sexism
Not as obvious as hostile sexism
Different attitudes/reactions towards:
Traditional women: attraction/protection
Non-traditional women (eg. career women: hostility, domination, competition)
Genocide
Most extreme form of legitimized prejudice
Systematically extinguish targeted group (eg. killing fields)
More indirectly
Create conditions of disadvantage/hunger
Minimal group paradigm
Effect of categorization (same group membership) stronger than sharing the same beliefs
Collective behavior and the crowd
Behavior of people en Masse
EG. Protest, football games
Crowds produce primitive and homogenous behavior because:
Members are anonymous and lose their personal responsibility
People are able to release unconscious antisocial motives = Deindividuation
Non-normative collective action
Violence and dehumanization =anger, contempt
- Tokenism
Token=small positive act towards members of minority groups
To not engage in more meaningful acts to help
Can even activate stereotypes
EG. Token employment of minorities to keep positive image (but no important steps for equality)
Damage self esteem of employed token minorities
Sexism
Prejudice and discrimination against people based on their gender
Women are the most common victims of sexism and occupy a lower position than men in many points
EG buisness, government, employment
Self-categorization
Produces ingroup normative behavior
Free rider effect
Gaining all the benefits from group membership without making costly obligations of membership
Other members have to carry the costs (eg. public goods dilemma)
„Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all“ -when self-interest goes against collective good=competition and resource destruction
- Reverse discrimination
Extreme form of tokenism
Favor minority group to conceal prejudices and appear tolerant
For beneficial effects but only in short term
Cognitive dissonance point of view
To change attitude in line with behavior
self-perception theory
Challenge: distinguish between reverse discrimination and attempts to actually improve situation of minorities
Extended contact effect
Knowing about ingroup member who shares close relationship with outgroup member
Can improve own attitude towards outgroup
More subtle forms of racism
More subtle forms Aversive racism Modern racism Symbolic racism Regressive racism Ambivalent racism
Dogmatism and closed-mindedness
Related to authoritarianism, deals with personality predispositions
Cognitive style
Intolerant and predisposes people to be prejudiced
Resistant to change existing beliefs
Often people politically on the right wing
Frustration-aggression hypothesis (John Dollard and colleagues 1939)
All frustration leads to aggression and all aggression comes from frustration
Psychodynamic assumption
We only have a fixed amount of psychic energy available to perform psychological activities
We need psychic energy to achieve our goals (goal achievement=release)
Goal achievement frustrated, psychic energy remains activated
Unbalance can only be corrected by aggression
Intergroup differentiation
Behavior that emphasizes differences between our own group and other groups
Integrated threat model
Four sources of fear and anxiety:
- realistic threat
Sense of threat to existence of one‘s own group, well-being, political power
- symbolic threat
Threat posed by outgroup to ones values, beliefs, morals and norms - intergroup anxiety
Threat to self, experienced during intergroup interactions - negative stereotypes
Fear of intergroup anxiety based on negative stereotypes of outgroup