Prejudice and discrimination Flashcards
the contact hypothesis (Allport, 1954)
'’interpersonal contact is the most effective way to reduce prejudice’’
The contact caveat (Barlow et al., 2012)
‘‘negative contact increases prejudice more than positive contact reduces it’’
social identity theory
'’idea that people had e a need to feel good about themselves and one major component of their self-esteem derives from the groups to which they belong’’ (Barrett, 2017. pg. 357)
-personal identity- characterised and qualities that distinguish is from others
social identity- characteristics and qualities that link us to group membership
social identity theory- terminology
in-group- ‘‘us’’
outgroup- ‘‘them’’
in-group bias- favouring us over them
minimal group paradigm- allocating people to groups chacartyerised by arbitrary criteria (e.g., overestimates vs underestimates or red shirt vs blue shirt
social identity, the outgrip homogeneity effect
outgroup members are more simulated to each other than in-group members
outgroup homogeneity effect
- Part & Rothbarte (1982)
- Chance & Goldstein (1981)
Automatic activation stereotype
-dual-process model cognitive processing
-equally strong among high and low-prejudice individuals (Devine, 1989)
-can be overcome (Kawakami et al., 2000)
yes/no training
Automatic activation stereotype
-dual-process model cognitive processing
-equally strong among high and low-prejudice individuals (Devine, 1989)
-can be overcome (Kawakami et al., 2000)
yes/no training
Automatic activation stereotype
-dual-process model cognitive processing
-equally strong among high and low-prejudice individuals (Devine, 1989)
-can be overcome (Kawakami et al., 2000)
yes/no training
realistic group conflicts theory
- Robber’s cabe study (from group processes and intergroup relations lecture)
- explanation for negative attitudes towards racial integration
- Michigan National election studies for school de-segregation (Lawrence, 1983)- white Americans feared black Americans as a danger to their life styles, goals, and resources
intergroup threat theory
realistic threats
- power, money, health
symbolic threats
- morals, way-of-life, beliefs
scapegoating
'’when one group unfairly claims that another group has intentionally caused its misfortunes’’
(Barrett, 2017. pg. 363)
Stems from relative deprivation processes
cultural influences
social experiences and culture
media - choice of stories and language (Duxbury, Frizell, & Lindsay, 2018) film and TV - people of colour underrepresented science -glass ceiling commission report, 1995) -admissions and faculty
cognitive bias
- stereotypes serve as mental shortcuts
- confirmation bias
- ultimate attribution error
individual differences: right wing authoritarianism
right wing authoritarianism
-“Individual difference variable comprised of three core elements: submission to legitimate authority, aggression against outgroups or deviants, and endorsement of conventional social norms and morality”
3 Components: Authoritarianism, Conservatism, Traditionalism
Authoritarianism
1. What our country really needs is a strong, determined leader who will crush evil, and take us back to our true path
2.There is nothing wrong with premarital sexual intercourse
individual differences: Social Dominance Orientation
Social Dominance Orientation
-“degree to which a person generally endorses hierarchy and inequality among social groups and specifically prefers that their ingroup dominates others” (Barrett, 2017. pg. 372-373)
Social Dominance Orientation
1. Some groups of people must be kept in their place
2. It’s probably a good thing that certain groups are at the top and other groups are at the bottom