Close relationships: social theories Flashcards
four types of social reward (Hill, 1987)
- positive stimulation
- attention
- emotional support
- social comparison
reinforcement effect model of interpersonal attraction (Clore & Byrne, 1974)
- we prefer to interact with others who provide emotional rewards
- gravitate positive experiences
social exchange theory (Kelly & Thibaut, 1978)
- maximise gain
- minimise loss
equity theory (Hatfield, Rapson & Bensman, 2011)
relationship more likely to be successful when both partners enjoy the same ratio
communal relationship (Clark & Mills, 1979)
- people are concerned with the welfare of others and give without expecting anything in return
- characterised by more sharing and compromise, less coercion
caveats
- social reward: feelings good for meeting ones obligations
- benefits received because the partners needs are met
Two factor theory (Schachter & Singer, 1962)
-the evolutionary psychology of close relationships
evolutionary perspective of attraction
- natural selection vs sexual selection
- facial attractiveness
- perceived and actual benefits of physical attractiveness
- body attractiveness
- personality attractiveness
- risk-taking as a mating strategy
natural selection vs sexual selection
(Darwin, 1859)
-NS= individuals in a population naturally vary
-some traits are better suited to the environment
-individuals with adaptive traits are more likely to survive and reproduce
(Darwin, 1859)
-SS= some elaborate non-adaptive traits are associated with mating success
-risk of possessing trait decreasing survival out weighted by reproductive benefits
sexy son hypothesis
- woman find some men more physically desirable because they have good genes that can be passed on to their sons
- the woman’s sons will then have greater reproductive success due to their attractiveness
- Sela et al., 2015 found that how attractive woman perceived their partner to be to other woman predicted orgasm likelihood
non-physical traits
humour, creativity, intelligence
- evidence that humour is associated with attractiveness for short-term mating (when females rate males), but humour is not related to attractiveness when ,males rated females (Cowan & Little, 2013)
- woman orgasm more frequently with high humour males, as well as males who were ‘nice smelling, faithful, creative and warm’ (Sherlock et al., 2016)
- Kaufamn et al., 2018 argues we need better validated measures and more robust to determine whether these are sperate constructs
mis-matched relationships
everyone has different preferences
twin studies suggest a genetic basis for mate preferences as twins have very similar preferences
-but twin often end up with very different long-term partners
-suggesting people are not ending up with partners who match their preferences
-Griffith, Pryke and Buttermer (2011) found that monogamous female Gouldian Finches (Erythrura gouldiae) who paired with a low-quality male had three times higher levels of stress hormones compared to finches who paired up with a high quality male