Pre-Trial Argument Flashcards

1
Q

Name two ways to classify pre-trial hearings.

A
  • informal vs. formal
  • evidentiary vs. non-evidentiary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give examples of informal hearings.

A
  • negotiations with client
  • negotiations with opponent
  • settlement conferences
  • mediation
  • off the record conferences with the court
  • conferences with court staff
  • correspondence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the one true distinction between formal and informal hearings?

A

Whether you’re on or off the record.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What’s the one true distinction between evidentiary and non-evidentiary hearings?

A

You need a live witness to testify at an evidentiary hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give two examples of evidentiary hearings.

A
  • motion to suppress
  • temporary protective order hearing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the four parts of the formula for the movant?

A
  1. Who you are
  2. What you want
  3. Elevator pitch
  4. Basis for relief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an elevator pitch?

A

A one-sentence case narrative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are 4 factors of the basis for relief?

A
  1. Sources
  2. Technique
  3. Burden of Proof/Standard of Review
  4. Persuasion (if judicial discretion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are three sources you might rely on?

A
  1. Dispositive cases
  2. Statutes
  3. Rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are two techniques you should use?

A
  1. Dead certainty
  2. Shared struggle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 4 things about your facts can help you deliver dead certainty?

A
  1. Abundance
  2. Recency
  3. Consistency
  4. Universal acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Say more about the shared struggle.

A

The advocate invites the court to work together to forge a new path forward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are 5 devices you can use to persuade?

A
  1. Trilogies
  2. Syllogisms/enthymemes
  3. Tense control
  4. Show harm if relief is not granted
  5. Frame relief as very small request
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

re: tense control - what does each tense evoke?

A

Past - blame
Present - passion
Future - choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the 3 factors of the formula for the respondent?

A
  1. Basis to deny relief
  2. Reframing the facts
  3. Shift to persuasion (absent a good case or statute)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are three sources you might rely on to deny relief?

A
  1. Dispositive case
  2. Statute
  3. Rule
17
Q

What are three things to keep in mind while reframing the facts?

A
  1. Do not use opponent’s frame or word choice
  2. Have a separate elevator pitch
  3. Anticipate interruption when facts conflict
18
Q

What are 4 devices you can use to persuade?

A
  1. Be more reasonable than your opponent
  2. Frame your opponent’s request as extraordinary
  3. Offer a compromise (if facing risk of losing)
  4. Show the harm of the relief being granted