PR - CA and ABA (Main Deck)* Flashcards
WHEN APPROACHING A PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY QUESTION, WHAT 4 STEPS SHOULD YOU WALK THROUGH?
STEP 1: CONSIDER THE LAWYER’S DUTIES TO THE CLIENT
STEP 2: CONSIDER THE LAWYER’S DUTIES TO OTHERS
STEP 3: CONSIDER THE LAWYER’S DUTIES OF PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY
STEP 4: CONSIDER THE DUTIES ACCOMPANYING THE BUSINESS OF LAW
STEP 1 -
DUTIES TO CLIENT:
LIST 7 DUTIES LAWYERS OWE THEIR CLIENTS
1) Duty of Loyalty
2) Duty of Confidentiality
3) Duty of Diligence
4) Duty of Competence
5) Duty to Advise
6) Duty to Communicate
7) Duty of Fairness and Integrity
DUTY OF LOYALTY
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA & Cal):
A lawyer owes a duty of loyalty to her clients and must not represent a client if doing so would create a conflict of interest.
LIST 3 TYPES OF CONFLICTS A LAWYER MUST BE AWARE OF
1) Actual Conflicts
2) Potential Conflicts
3) Imputed Conflicts
ACTUAL CONFLICT
(Define)
Definition: An actual conflict exists if:
- The representation of one client will be directly adverse to the interests of another client, OR
- A significant risk exists that the representation of a client will be materially limited by:
- a) The lawyer’s responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person. OR
- b) By a personal interest of the lawyer.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT
(Define)
Definition: A potential conflict exists when circumstances specific to the case present a reasonable likelihood that an actual conflict of interest will arise.
IMPUTED CONFLICT
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: An imputed conflict is one in which a lawyer’s conflict of interest is imputed to associated lawyers.
Rule (ABA & Cal): Lawyers working in the same firm or department as a lawyer who is disqualified due to a conflict of interest are also disqualified from representation unless:
- The organization obtains the informed, written consent of all affected clients, OR
- Where applicable, an ethical wall is erected.
Rule (Cal): California extends this rule to impute conflicts to lawyers who have a close, personal, continuous, and regular relationship with a disqualified lawyer. Note: Imputed conflicts are based on the presumption that associated lawyers share confidential information with one another.
ETHICAL WALL
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: An ethical wall is a remedial tool that can prevent disqualification of attorneys to whom a conflict of interest would otherwise be imputed.
Rule: Erecting an ethical wall requires:
- The physical, geographic, and/or departmental separation of attorneys,
- Establishing sanctions for discussing confidential matters with the disqualified attorney,
- Establishing rules and procedures to prevent access to confidential information and files,
- Establishing procedures to prevent the disqualified attorney from sharing in the profits from the representation, AND
- Continuing education in professional responsibility.
WHAT TYPES OF CONFLICTS WILL NOT BE IMPUTED TO ASSOCIATED LAWYERS?
1) Conflicts stemming from a lawyer’s personal interests,
2) Conflicts stemming from a lawyer’s personal relationship with opposing counsel,
3) Conflicts stemming from a lawyer’s sexual relations with a client,
4) Conflicts stemming from prior or current government sen/ice,
5) In some cases, conflicts stemming from prospective clients.
a) Note: ABA rules dictate specific procedures that, if followed, can prevent a lawyer’s disqualification due to information obtained from a prospective client from being imputed to associated lawyers.
DUTY OF LOYALTY:
BETWEEN WHOM MAY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARISE?
1) Lawyer and Client
2) Lawyer and Other Party’s Attorney
3) Lawyer and Third Parties
4) Current, Former and Prospective Clients
5) Clients and Third Parties
6) Organizations and Constituents
LAWYER & CLIENT:
CONFLICTS TO AVOID
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA & Cal): A lawyer must not enter into a business relationship with a client or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, or other pecuniary interest adverse to the client unless:
1) The terms of the transaction are fair and reasonable to the client,
2) The terms are fully disclosed in writing in a manner that is reasonably understandable by the client,
3) The lawyer advises the client in writing that the client may seek the advice of an independent lawyer,
4) The client is given a reasonable opportunity to do so, AND
5) The client consents in writing to the terms of the transaction.
LAWYER & CLIENT:
HOW IS DECISION-MAKING POWER ALLOCATED BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT?
Client’s Power (ABA):
1) In both civil and criminal cases, a lawyer must honor the client’s decisions regarding:
a) The objectives of representation, AND
b) Whether to settle a matter.
2) In a criminal case, a lawyer must also honor the client’s decisions regarding:
a) What plea to enter,
b) Whether to waive jury trial, AND
c) Whether the client will testify.
Lawyer’s Power (ABA): The lawyer, after consulting with the client, will determine the means by which the client’s objectives will be pursued.
LAWYER & OTHER PARTY’S ATTORNEY:
CONFLICTS TO AVOID
(State the Rule)
Rule (Cal): A lawyer must not represent a client in a matter if another party’s attorney:
1) Is related to the lawyer (i.e., spouse, parent/child or sibling),
2) Lives with the lawyer,
3) Is a client of the lawyer, OR
4) Shares an intimate personal relationship with the lawyer.
Exception: The lawyer may represent the client if he informs the client in writing of the relationship.
LAWYER & THIRD PARTIES OR WITNESSES:
CONFLICTS TO AVOID
(State the Rule)
Rule (Cal): A lawyer cannot accept or continue representation of a client if:
1) The lawyer has a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with a party or witness in the same matter,
2) The lawyer previously had such a relationship with a party or witness, and that relationship would substantially affect the attorney’s representation,
a) Note: This includes relationships the lawyer should reasonably know of.
3) The lawyer has or had such a relationship with a third party whose interests the lawyer knows would be substantially affected by the outcome, OR
4) The lawyer has or had a legal, business, financial, or professional interest in the subject matter of the representation.
Exception: The lawyer may continue representation if she informs the client in writing of the relationship.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN CLIENTS
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer cannot represent more than one client in a matter that involves an actual conflict of interest unless:
1) The lawyer reasonably believes she can provide competent and diligent representation to all affected clients,
2) The representation is not prohibited by law,
3) The lawyer is not representing one client against another in the same trial, AND
4) Each affected client gives informed, written consent.
Rule (Cal): A lawyer cannot accept representation of more than one client in a matter in which the interests of the clients actually or potentially conflict unless the lawyer obtains the informed, written consent of each client.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN CLIENTS:
AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS
(State the Rule)
Rule (Cal): An attorney who represents multiple clients must have the informed, written consent of all clients before entering into an aggregate settlement agreement of a claim.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN CLIENTS:
FORMER CLIENTS
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer who has represented a client in a matter cannot later represent another person in the same or substantially related matter if the clients’ interests are materially adverse unless the former client gives informed, written consent.
Rule (Cal): A lawyer must not accept employment adverse to a former client if the lawyer has obtained confidential information material to the employment due to her representation of the former client unless the former client gives informed, written consent.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN CLIENTS:
WHAT IS THE TEST TO DETERMINE IF A LAWYER HAS OBTAINED DISQUALIFYING INFORMATION FROM A FORMER CLIENT?
Rule (Cal): A lawyer is found to possess confidential information adverse to a former client and is disqualified from accepting representation of a prospective client whose interests are adverse if a substantial relationship exists.To determine whether a substantial relationship exists, courts look to:
1) Factual similarity of the cases,
2) Legal similarity of the cases, AND
3) Nature and extent of the lawyer’s involvement in the prior representation.
CONFLICTS FACED BY FORMER & CURRENT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
(State the Rule)
Former Government Employees (ABA): A lawyer who has formerly served as a public officer or employee of the government must not represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee unless the appropriate government agency gives informed, written consent.
Current Government Employees (ABA): A lawyer currently serving as a publicofficer or employee must not:
1) Participate in a matter in which thelawyer participated personally and substantially while in private practiceunless the appropriate government agency gives informed, written consent,OR
2) Negotiate for private employment witha party or an attorney involved in amatter in which the lawyer is participating personally and substantially,
a) Exception: A lawyer clerking for a judge may negotiate for private employment if the lawyer notifies the judge of his actions.
WHAT IS THE RULE FOR IMPUTED CONFLICTS DUE TO A LAWYER’S FORMER GOVERNMENT SERVICE?
Rule (ABA): When a lawyer is disqualified from representation due to former government service, no lawyer in a firm with which that lawyer is associated may knowingly undertake or continue representation of the client unless:
1) The disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter,
2) The disqualified lawyer is apportioned no part of the fee from the matter, AND
3) Written notice is promptly given to the appropriate government agency.
PROSPECTIVE CLIENT
(Define)
Definition (ABA): A prospective client is a person who discusses with a lawyer the possibility of forming an attorney-client relationship with respect to a matter.
PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS:
WHAT IS A LAWYER’S DUTY TO PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS?
Rule (ABA): Even if no attorney- client relationship is formed, a lawyer cannot represent a client with interests materially adverse to those of a prospective client in the same or substantially related matter unless both the current and prospective clients give informed, written consent.
CONFLICTS BETWEEN CLIENTS OF THE LAWYER’S FORMER FIRM & THE LAWYER’S PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS
Rule (ABA): If, while employed by a firm, a lawyer acquired material and confidential information about a client whose interests are materially adverse to those of the lawyer’s prospective client, the lawyer may not accept representation unless the former client provides informed, written consent.
PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS:
IS A LAWYER’S DISQUALIFICATION DUE TO A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT IMPUTED TO THE LAWYER’S CURRENT FIRM?
Rule (ABA): If a lawyer is disqualified due to having received information from a prospective client, no lawyer in a firm affiliated with the disqualified lawyer may knowingly undertake or continue representation in the matter, unless:
1) Both clients give informed, written consent, OR
2) The disqualified lawyer took reasonable measures to avoid exposure to more information than was reasonably necessary to determine whether to represent the prospective client, AND
a) The disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter,
b) The disqualified lawyer receives no fee from the matter, AND
c) Written notice is promptly given to the prospective client.
CLIENTS & THIRD PARTIES:
PAYMENT FOR ATTORNEY’S SERVICES
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer must not allow a third party who pays for representation of a client to interfere with the lawyer’s professional judgment.
Rule (Cal): A lawyer cannot accept compensation for representing a client from a third party unless:
1) The lawyer exercises independent professional judgment free of influence from the third party in the client’s case,
2) The lawyer maintains the confidentiality of the client, AND
3) The client gives informed, written consent.
TO WHAT/WHOM ARE DUTIES OWED WHEN A LAWYER REPRESENTS AN ORGANIZATION?
Rule (ABA & Cal): When a lawyer represents an organization, the lawyer’s client is the organization itself. Thus, the lawyer’s duties are owed to the organizational entity, not its individual members.
Note:
1) Organizations are represented by or act through’ authorized constituents.
2) An organization’s constituent can be an officer, employee, or decision-making body within the organization, so long as the person/entity is authorized to represent the organization in a given matter.
REPRESENTING ORGANIZATIONS:
UNDER ABA RULES, WHAT SHOULD A LAWYER DO IF AN AGENT OF THE ORGANIZATION INTENDS TO HARM OR HAS HARMED THE ORGANIZATION?
Rule (ABA): The lawyer must act in the best interest of the organization. If a lawyer finds that an agent has acted or intends to act in a manner that is harmful to the organization (i.e., either directly or by violating the law while acting in a representational capacity), the lawyer should:
Step 1: First, report the activity to the next highest authority in the organization.
Step 2: If no action is taken to halt or rectify the harm, the lawyer should report the activity to the next highest authority in the organization, continuing up the chain of command until remedial action is taken.
Step 3: If, having reached the highest authority in the organization, no effort has been made to halt or rectify a clearly illegal activity, the lawyer may reveal information normally protected by the duty of confidentiality to a third party, but only to the extent necessary to prevent substantial injury to the organization.
REPRESENTING ORGANIZATIONS:
UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES, WHAT SHOULD A LAWYER DO IF AN AGENT OF THE ORGANIZATION INTENDS TO HARM OR HAS HARMED THE ORGANIZATION?
Rule (Cal): The lawyer must act in the best interest of the organization. If a lawyer finds that an agent has acted or intends to act in a manner that would harm the organization (i.e., either directly or by violating the law while acting in a representational capacity), the lawyer should:
Step 1: First, urge the party to reconsider the activity and explain its likely effect upon the organization.
Step 2: If the agent continues to engage inthe harmful activity, the lawyer shouldreport the matter to the next highestauthority, continuing to the highestauthority within the organization if remedialor preventive action is not taken.
Step 3: If the highest authority in the organization refuses to halt or rectify the illegal and harmful activity, the lawyer’s only option is to resign.
REPRESENTING ORGANIZATIONS:
WHAT ARE A LAWYER’S DUTIES TO THE ORGANIZATION VERSUS THE ORGANIZATION’S CONSTITUENTS?
Rule (ABA & Cal): A lawyer must make clear to an organizational client’s constituents that the client is the organization if it appears that an actual or potential conflict of interest exists between the organization and its constituents.
Rule (Cal): The lawyer must also make clear to constituents that information given by them will be used in the organization’s best interest should a conflict of interest arise.
WITHDRAWAL FROM REPRESENTATION:
UNDER ABA RULES, WHEN MAY A LAWYER VOLUNTARILY WITHDRAW FROM REPRESENTATION?
Rule (ABA): A lawyer may withdraw from representation if:
1) Withdrawal can be accomplished without materially and adversely affecting the client’s interests,
2) The client has used or is using the lawyer’s services to commit a crime or fraud,
3) The lawyer fundamentally disagrees with clients’ actions or finds them repugnant,
4) The representation will cause an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer,
5) The representation has been made unreasonably difficult by the client, OR
6) The client substantially fails to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer.
WITHDRAWAL FROM REPRESENTATION:
UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES, WHEN MAY A LAWYER VOLUNTARILY WITHDRAW FROM REPRESENTATION?
Rule (Cal): A lawyer may withdraw from representation if:
1) The client insists on presenting a claim or defense that cannot be supported by a good faith argument,
2) The client seeks to pursue an illegal course of conduct,
3) The client’s conduct makes it unreasonably difficult for the attorney to represent,
4) The client breaches an agreement regarding fees or expenses,
5) The client demands the attorney commit an illegal or unethical act,
6) Continued employment is likely to result in a violation of the professional code,
7) The client demands the lawyer act in a way that is against the lawyer’s judgment,
8) The lawyer’s mental or physical condition makes it difficult to effectively represent,
9) The client knowingly and willingly assents to terminating representation, OR
10) The lawyer believes in good faith the court will agree another good cause for withdrawal exists.
WITHDRAWAL FROM REPRESENTATION:
WHEN MUST A LAWYER WITHDRAW FROM REPRESENTATION?
Rule (ABA): A lawyer must withdraw from representation if:
1) Continuing representation will result in a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct,
2) The lawyer’s physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client, OR
3) The lawyer is fired.
Rule (Cal): A lawyer must withdraw from representation if:
1) Continuing representation will resultin a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the lawyerknows/should know of this result,
2) The lawyer’s physical or mental condition renders it unreasonablydifficult to represent the client, OR
3) The lawyer knows the client ispursuing legal action to harass ormaliciously injure another person.
WHAT ARE A LAWYER’S DUTIES UPON TERMINATION OF REPRESENTATION?
Rule (ABA & Cal): A lawyer has a duty to mitigate adverse consequences of withdrawal. Upon termination of representation, a lawyer must take reasonable steps to protect a client’s interests by:
1) Providing reasonable notice to the client,
2) Allowing the client adequate time to find other counsel,
3) Returning papers and property to the client, AND
4) Refunding any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned.
DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA & Cal): A lawyer owes a duty of confidentiality to her client.
ABA: A lawyer must not reveal information relating to the representation of a client, regardless of when or from where the information was acquired, unless:
1) The client gives informed consent,
2) The disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, OR
3) Disclosure is permitted by an exception to the duty.
Cal: A lawyer must maintain inviolate the confidence and at every peril to herself preserve the secrets of her client unless:
1) The client gives informed consent, OR
2) Disclosure is permitted by an exception to the duty.
UNDER ABA RULES, WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTIONS TO A LAWYER’S DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY TO THE CLIENT?
Rule (ABA): A lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent reasonably necessary to:
1) Prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm,
2) Prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that will likely result in substantial financial loss to another,
3) Mitigate harm caused by the client’s crime or fraud (if the client is using/has used the lawyer’s services to commit the crime or fraud),
4) Obtain legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with ethics rules,
5) Establish the lawyer’s claim or defense in a dispute between the lawyer and client or in a claim in which the client was involved,
6) Respond to allegations concerning the lawyer’s representation, OR
7) Comply with a court order.
UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES, WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTIONS TO A LAWYER’S DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY TO THE CLIENT?
Rule (Cal): A lawyer may reveal confidential information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes is necessary to prevent a criminal act that is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm.
WHAT SHOULD A LAWYER DO BEFORE DISCLOSING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION?
Rule (Cal): Before revealing confidential information to prevent a criminal act that would likely result in death or substantial bodily harm, a lawyer must, if reasonable under the circumstances, make a good faith effort to persuade the client not to commit or continue the criminal act.
WHAT SHOULD A LAWYER CONSIDER WHEN DECIDING WHETHER TO DISCLOSE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION?
Rule (Cal): When deciding whether to disclose confidential information to prevent the commission of a violent criminal act, a lawyer should consider:
1) The amount of time the lawyer has to make the decision,
2) Whether the client has made similar threats before,
3) Whether the client has ever acted or attempted to act on them,
4) Whether the lawyer believes her efforts to persuade the client not to engage in criminal conduct have been successful,
5) The extent to which the client’s constitutional rights will be adversely affected by the disclosure,
6) Other adverse effects to the client,
7) The extent of information that must be disclosed, AND
8) The imminence of the prospective harm to the victim.
DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
FORMER CLIENTS
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer owes a continuing duty of confidentiality to former clients. A lawyer may not reveal information relating to his representation of a client, even after the representation has terminated, unless:
1) The lawyer obtains informed consent of the client. OR
2) The information has become generally known.
A DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): Even if no attorney- client relationship is formed, a lawyer cannot use or reveal information learned during a consultation with a prospective client except to the extent necessary to determine if a conflict with a former client may arise.
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE & THE DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
Attorney Client Privilege: The Attorney-Client Privilege is an evidentiary rule that ensures a lawyer will not be compelled to disclose information communicated by the client to the lawyer during the course of their relationship.
Duty of Confidentiality: The Duty of Confidentiality is broader than the attorney-client privilege and prohibits the disclosure of all information relating to the representation, regardless of the source of the information or when the lawyer received the information.
DUTY OF DILIGENCE
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.
DUTY OF COMPETENCE
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer must provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Rule (Cal): A lawyer must not intentionally, recklessly, or repeatedly fail to represent a client with competence. Competence requires the diligence, learning and skill, and mental, emotional, and physical ability reasonably necessary for such representation.
DUTY OF COMPETENCE:
CAN A LAWYER ACCEPT A CLIENT IF THE LAWYER LACKS SUFFICIENT LEARNING AND SKILL?
Rule (Cal): If a lawyer lacks sufficient learning and skill, the lawyer may nonetheless provide competent representation by:
1) Associating with or consulting a reasonably competent lawyer, OR
2) Acquiring sufficient learning and skill by researching the issue before performance is required.
Note: In cases of emergency, California allows attorneys to provide advice or assistance in matters in which the lawyer may not have the requisite skill to perform competently.
DUTY TO ADVISE
(State the Rule)
Rule (ABA): A lawyer must exercise independent professional judgment and render candid service.