Business Associations (Main Deck)* Flashcards
WHAT MUST YOU CONSIDER WHEN APPROACHING A BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS QUESTION?
STEP 1: DETERMINE IF AGENCY PRINCIPLES ARE RELEVANT
STEP 2: IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION
STEP 3: DISCUSS ISSUES OF FORMATION, OPERATION & DISSOLUTION
Note: Because principles of agency are inherent in many types of business relationships, it is important to determine if agency is relevant regardless of the type of business organization presented on the exam.
AGENCY
(Define)
Definition: Agency is a relationship in which oneperson (the agent) is authorized to act on the behalf of and subject to the control of another (the principal).
LIST 6 WAYS AN AGENCY RELATIONSHIP MAY BE CREATED
1) Express Authority
2) Implied Authority
3) Apparent Authority
4) Ratification
5) Inherent Authority
6) Agency by Estoppel
EXPRESS AUTHORITY
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Express authority is actual authority given by a principal to an agent through the parties’ manifestation of consent to enter into an agency relationship.
Rule: An agency relationship based on express authority is created by:
1) The principal’s manifestation of consent that the agent shall act on the principal’s behalf and subject to the principal’s control, AND
2) The agent’s manifestation of consent to acton behalf and subject to the control of the principal.
Note: The consent of the parties can be communicated through words or actions.
IMPLIED AUTHORITY
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Implied authority is actual authority implied from the principal’s granting of express authority to the agent.
Rule: An agent is given implied authority to perform the functions that are practically and reasonably necessary to carry out the duties expressly delegated by the principal.
Note: Whether authority is implied is interpreted from the perspective of a reasonable person in the agent’s position.
APPARENT AUTHORITY
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Apparent authority results from the principal’s representations to a third party.
Rule: An agency relationship based on apparent authority is found where a principal’s words or actions would cause a reasonable person to believe that the principal has authorized the agent to act on the principal’s behalf.
Note:
1) Whether an agent has apparent authority is interpreted from the third party’s perspective.
2) If the third party has actual or constructive knowledge that the agent did not have actual authority, apparent authority will not be found, regardless of the principal’s representations.
RATIFICATION
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Ratification is the principal’s subsequent affirmation of an act that was not authorized by or binding upon the principal at the time the actor committed the act.
Rule: An agency relationship based on ratification is created when:
1) An actor engages in conduct on behalf of the principal without the principal’s consent, AND
2) The principal subsequently affirms the actor’s conduct.
Note: Ratification is all or nothing. Thus, the principal must affirm all of the actor’s conduct or none at all.
HOW CAN A PRINCIPAL AFFIRM THE CONDUCT OF ANOTHER?
Rule: A principal may affirm an actor’s conduct through:
1) Express affirmation, OR
2) Implied affirmation.
Note:
1) Implied affirmation will be found if the principal:
a) Accepts the benefits of the transaction (if it was possible to decline the benefits),
b) Remains silent or takes no action, OR
c) Uses the actor’s conduct for the principal’s benefit (e.g., bringing a lawsuit to enforce a contract signed by the actor).
2) The principal must accept the results of the actor’s conduct with full knowledge of all material circumstances.
3) Once ratified, the act is treated as authorized by the principal, and the actor is retroactively treated as the principal’s agent to carry out the act.
INHERENT AUTHORITY
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Inherent authority is found where necessary to protect a third party from harm caused by an agent.
Rule: Where an agent has neither actual nor apparent authority to act on behalf of a principal, public policy considerations may lead a court to find the agent had inherent authority to act.
Note: Inherent authority is often found in three situations:
1) Undisclosed Principals
AGENCY BY ESTOPPEL
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Agency by estoppel is a theory of agency that is used to protect third parties who have changed their position in reliance on a principal’s representations.
Rule: Agency by estoppel will be found where:
1) A principal represents to a third party that an agent has authority to act on the principal’s behalf,
a) Note: The representation may be intentional, reckless or negligent, may consist of words or conduct, and may be a false representation or the concealing of a material fact.
2) The third party reasonably believes the principal’s representation, AND
3) The third party changes its position in reliance on that representation.
Note: The third party must have relied on the principal’s representation in good faith (i.e., the third party did not have actual or constructive knowledge of falsity).
WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF FINDING AN AGENCY RELATIONSHIP TO EXIST?
Principal: Once an agency relationship is found to exist, the principal owes duties to the agent and can be held liable for the consequences of the agent’s acts carried out within the scope of the agency relationship.
Note: The principal can be held liable in tort or in contract:
1) Tort: The principal can be held liable for harm caused by the agent while acting within the scope of the agency relationship
2) Contract: The principal can be bound by contracts entered into by the agent on behalf of the principal.
Agent: Once an agency relationship is found to exist, the agent owes fiduciary duties to the principal.
RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR
(Define & State the Rule)
**Definition: **Respondeat Superior is the doctrine by which a principal can be held vicariously liable in tort for the actions of an agent acting at the principal’s direction and subject to the principal’s control.
Rule: A principal will be held vicariously liable for tortious acts committed by his agent if the tortious acts occur while the agent is acting within the course or scope of the agency relationship.
Note:
1) An act is within the course or scope of the agency relationship if the act is necessary to carry out the agent’s required functions or if it would reasonably be expected that the agent would perform the act.
2) Minor deviations generally are held to be within the course and scope of the agency relationship. Large deviations generally are found to be outside the scope of the agency relationship.
TO WHAT EXTENT CAN AN EMPLOYER BE HELD LIABLE FOR THE TORTIOUS CONDUCT OF AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?
Rule: Generally, an employer will not be held vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of an independent contractor or for the conduct of an independent contractor’s employees.
Exception: An employer may be held liable for harm caused by an independent contractor or its employees if:
1) The employer maintains control over the area of work from which the tort arises,
2) The employer was negligent in hiring the independent contractor,
3) The independent contractor is engaged in an inherently dangerous activity, OR
4) A nondelegable duty is involved (e.g., constructing a building to code).
WHAT DUTIES DO AGENTS OWE PRINCIPALS?
Rule: The agent owes the principal:
1) A duty of due care,
a) Rule: The agent must act in good faith and in a manner she reasonably believes to be in the best interest of the principal.
2) A duty of loyalty,
a) Rule: The agent cannot serve her own interest at the expense of the principal, make secret profit, or usurp the principal’s opportunities.
3) A duty of obedience and performance,
a) Rule: An agent must obey the lawful instructions of the principal and perform her work in a manner acceptable to the principal.
4) A duty of accountability, AND
a) Rule: The agent must maintain an accurate accounting of all transactions undertaken on behalf of the principal.
5) Any additional duties specified in the contract creating the agency relationship.
WHAT DUTIES DO PRINCIPALS OWE AGENTS?
Rule: The principal owes the agent:
1) A duty to compensate,
a) Rule: The principal must pay the agent the agreed-upon commission or fee, or a reasonable fee if none was agreed upon.
2) A duty to reimburse,
a) Rule: The principal must reimburse the agent for expenses incurred on the principal’s behalf that were paid for by the agent.
3) A duty to facilitate,
a) Rule: The principal must provide the materials and information necessary for the agent to perform her job.
4) A duty to indemnify, AND
a) Rule: The principal must protect the agent for losses incurred during the course of the agency relationship due to the principal’s misconduct.
5) Any additional duties specified in the contract creating the agency relationship.
LIST 9 WAYS TO STRUCTURE A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION
1) Sole Proprietorship
2) Joint Venture
3) General Partnership
4) Limited Partnership
5) Limited Liability Partnership
6) Limited Liability Company
7) Corporation
8) Close Corporation
9) Professional Corporation
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
(Define)
Definition: A sole proprietorship is an arrangement in which the business is not a separate legal entity from the owner of the business (i.e., the owner and the business are one and the same).
Note:
1) A sole proprietor has unlimited personal liability for the debts and obligations of the business.
2) Creditors may recover claims against the business from the sole proprietor’s personal assets.
JOINT VENTURE
(Define)
Definition: A joint venture is an agreement between two or more parties to undertake an economic activity for mutual profit, usually for a specific project or a specified period of time.
Note:
1) Joint ventures are governed by partnership and contract law.
2) The parties involved in joint ventures may be people, groups of people, or companies.
3) All parties contribute capital and share in revenues, expenses, and control.
PARTNERSHIP
(Define)
Definition: A partnership is an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit.
Note:
1) Partnerships are governed by state law, which is largely based upon the uniform partnership acts.
2) In most cases, a partnership agreement can override the default provisions provided by the uniform partnership acts.
GENERAL, LIMITED, & LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
(Define)
General Partnership: A general partnership is a partnership in which each partner is held fully liable for all debts and obligations of the organization.
Limited Partnership: A limited partnership is a partnership in which general partners may be held fully liable for the debts and obligations of the organization but limited partners are granted limited liability.
Limited Liability Partnership: A limited liability partnership is one in which all partners are granted limited liability.
FORMATION OF A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
(State the Rule)
Rule: A general partnership may be formed by:
1) Voluntary agreement of the partners,
2) Conduct ofthe partners, OR
3) Estoppel.
Note: An agreement to form a general partnership may be formal or informal and need not be in writing.
TO WHAT WILL COURTS LOOK TO DETERMINE IF A PARTNERSHIP EXISTS IN THE ABSENCE OF A FORMAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT?
Rule: To determine whether a partnership exists in the absence of a formal partnership agreement, courts look to:
1) The intention of the parties,
2) Whether profits and losses are shared,
3) Whether the parties exercise joint administration and control over the business operation,
4) The level of capital investment by each partner, AND
5) Whether partnership property is commonly owned.
Note:
1) The sharing of profits (i.e., net returns) is prima facie evidence that a partnership exists.
2) Joint ownership of property, sharing of gross returns, or contribution of capital alone generally will not establish the existence of a partnership.
PARTNERSHIP BY ESTOPPEL
(Define & State the Rule)
Definition: Partnership by estoppel is a partnership created by operation of law when an individual holds himself out to others as a partner.
Rule: Partnership by estoppel will be found where:
1) An individual represents to others, through words or conduct, that he is a partner,
2) A third party reasonably believes that representation, AND
3) The third party changes her position in reliance on that representation.
FORMATION OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(State the Rule)
Rule: A limited partnership is formed by two or more people executing and filing with the Secretary of State a Certificate of Limited Partnership that includes:
1) The name ofthe limited partnership,
2) The address of the principal office,
3) The name and address of the agent designated to receive service of process,
4) The names and addresses of the general partners, AND
5) Any other matters the person filing the certificate deems important to include.