PPD - ethics of resource allocation, human rights, social media Flashcards

1
Q

What factors influence resource allocation

A
  • Life threatening or life limiting
  • Cost of treatment and also future cost saving
  • *Patient age (QUALYs take age into account)
  • Innocence (haven’t fulfilled life potential)
  • Self-inflicted disease – lifestyle choices? Autonomy?
  • Effectiveness of treatment/ contribution to evidence
  • Dependents (children to look after)
  • What would the public say? (politics)/ stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rationing resources has vecome more important because (3)

A
  • shift from acute illness to chronic long term
  • normal physiological events medicalised (HRT?)
  • increase in choice of and increase cost of medications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 allocation theories

A

Egalitarian
Maximising
Libertarian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Egalitarian principle and its challenge and criticism

A

NHS was founded on a requirement to provide all care that is necessary and appropriate to everyone (equal access) - Aristotelian equality/justice

Challenge: how to resolve the tensions between egalitarian aspirations and finite resources (Rawlins and Dillon)

Criticism: resources are finite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Maximising principle and its challenge, and criticism and benefits

A

Criteria that maximise public utility

Challenge: Who is best to decide this? Should drs be involved in rationing decisions?

Criticism: lacks compassion

Benefit: more prevalent conditions treatment improves productivity (benefits most people)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Libertarian principle

A

Each is responsible for their own health, wellbeing and fulfilment of life plan.

John Stuart Mills - Harm principle:

  • Should be free to do what you want unless you dont cause anyone else harm
  • Censorship is the enemy of progress
  • Freedom of speech - offence isnt harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

German health care incentive scheme

A

Contributions are a percentage of income earned; so well off shoulder more burden

Incentives to change individual health behaviour. E.g., bonuses (cash, sports or kitchen eqpt, or reduction for insurance contributions) for participation in routine screening, health promotion and check-up programmes.

The pay out must come from the savings made by better health behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The question of equity

A

Private programmes attract and retain higher income groups because they contribute more and cost less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sustainability in medicine definition

A

Meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can you address sustainability as F1

A
  • ABX
  • over investigating - managing expectations
  • Polypharmacy - mediction reviews
  • Prescription OTC analgesics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the rule of rescue (Jonsen)

A

RR describes the imperative people feel to rescue identifiable individuals facing avoidable death

‘anethical imperativeto save individual lives even when money might be more efficiently spent to prevent deaths in the larger population’ (Doughety)

‘the powerful human proclivity to rescue a single identified endangered life, regardless of cost, at the expense of any nameless faces who will therefore be denied health care’ (Osborne and Evans)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Article 14 of Human Rights

A

The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without
discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.

Underlying assumptions:

  • The irreducible moral status of individuals demands that people are treated in ways that are compatible with that moral status
  • These claims can be made against a duty bearer such as the state and are universal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Humans Right Act 1998 - what is its relation to healthcare

A

Health is the state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or informity…the highest attainable level of health is the fundamental right of every human being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rights that are frequently engaged in healthcare

A
  • Art 2 – the right to life (limited)
  • Art 3 – the right to be free from inhuman and degrading treatment (absolute)
  • Art 8 – the right to respect for privacy and family life. (qualified)
  • Article 12 – right to marry and found a family
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Absolute rights

A
  • righttoprotection fromtorture,inhumananddegradingtreatment
    andpunishment(Article3),
  • theprohibition onslaveryandenforcedlabour(Article4)
  • Protectionfromretrospectivecriminal penalties(Article7)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limited/qualified rights - define and give eg

A

These rights are limitedunderexplicit andfinitecircumstances, eg. righttoliberty (Article5) – DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY (need to know about)

  • Article 8(2) - state can restrict the right to respect for private and family life; To protect health or morals, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others; social needs
17
Q

“Refusing treatment because of advanced age alone” defies which 2 human right articles

A

Article 2 and Article 14 (prohibition on discrimination).

18
Q

‘Deny resources because of gender or sexuality” defies which human rights article -

A

Article 14

19
Q

What happens if patient wants to challenge the exercise of power by a public body (eg NHS)

A

Judicial review

English law case that sets out the standard of unreasonableness of public-body decisions that would make them liable to be quashed on judicial review, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness.

The Court held that it could not intervene to overturn the decision of the defendant simply because the court disagreed with it.
To have the right to intervene, the court would have to conclude that:

  1. in making the decision, the defendant took into account factors that ought not to have been taken into account, or
  2. the defendant failed to take into account factors that ought to have been taken into account, or
  3. the decision was so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would ever consider imposing it.
20
Q

Benefits of social media in healthcare x4

A
  1. establish wider and more diverse social and professional networks
  2. engage with public and colleagues in debates
  3. facilitate public access to accurate health information
  4. improving patient access to services
21
Q

Risks of social media in healthcare x4

A
  1. loss of personal privacy
  2. potential breaches in confidentiality
  3. online behaviour that may be perceived as unprofessional, inappropriate or offensive by others
  4. future employers