powerless: “One Person is Powerless to Make a Difference” Flashcards
This deck parallels the briefing at vbriefings.org/powerless
About this Deck: “One Person is Powerless to Make a Difference.”
This deck parallels the briefing at vbriefings.org/powerless
– There are no formal citations here, although sources may be mentioned. Full citations with links are provided in the briefing.
– It would be best to read the briefing before studying these cards. Reading the briefing first provides understanding and context.
What is the briefing titled “One Person is Powerless to Make a Difference” about?
This briefing explains, with seven key points, why one person can make a difference
Provide a high-level summary of the briefing on being powerless.
Individual actions can significantly reduce animal suffering. For example, as a person who chooses veganism spares over 25 land animals and even more aquatic animals each year while driving demand for plant-based alternatives.
Beyond saving animals, veganism can improve health, reduce environmental harm, and support a more equitable food system.
By living ethically, individuals can influence others and demonstrate how personal choices lead to meaningful societal change.
Place the “powerless” objection to veganism in its larger context.
The commodification of animals is so pervasive that it is easy to feel powerless.
However, you are already making a difference, for better or worse, and you can make a difference for the better.
Consider this: if you have adopted this objection to veganism and animal rights, it would seem that you have implicitly and subtly acknowledged that there is a difference to be made.
What key points are made in the “powerless” briefing (7)?
- You are already making a difference, for better or worse.
- The laws of supply and demand virtually ensure you will save lives and spare suffering by going vegan.
- It’s a matter of principle.
- Setting a powerful example will influence others.
- If everyone believed one person could not make a difference, there could be no progress.
- The difference you make goes beyond reducing the suffering of animals.
- The claim of being powerless could be, at its core, merely an excuse.
Explain why you are already making a difference, for better or worse.
Buying products made from animals makes a difference, but not a positive one. It contributes to suffering because it involves paying others to breed, abuse, and slaughter animals. It also helps ensure the suffering will continue by reinforcing the belief that it’s OK to do so.
Everyone makes a difference. The question is not, “Can you make a difference?”; the question is, “What kind of difference will you make?”
How will the laws of supply and demand virtually ensure you will save lives and spare suffering by going vegan?
While animals already in the production system cannot be saved, going vegan reduces future suffering by preventing more animals from being bred, abused, and slaughtered.
This shift occurs because of supply and demand: buying animal products drives the market to produce more, and reducing consumption signals the market to produce fewer animal products and more alternatives.
Choosing not to buy animal products impacts the demand, leading to fewer animals being exploited.
How many lives will you save in spare suffering by going vegan?
An analysis by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) determined each person in the United States eats 26 land animals per year.
Using data from the USDA and the Census Bureau, Counting Animals calculates vegetarians save, on average, over 400 animals per year—34 land animals and 370 sea animals. They acknowledge that vegans save even more.
Other estimates are higher. Of course, exactly how many animals you personally save will depend on your patterns of consumption before you become vegan.
What would the public response be if you saved 26 dogs or wild animals every year?
The public would lavish you with praise as a champion for the animals, and you would justifiably feel better about yourself for it.
Yet the animals we exploit and slaughter for food and other uses are no less deserving of their lives than wild animals or the pets we adore and protect. They are the same in all the ways that matter morally.
Explain why being began is a matter of principle, no matter how much power to effect change you have.
Even if you were the only person refusing to participate in a particular form of mass suffering for humans or other animals, and that lack of participation resulted in no discernible benefits for the victims, you should still consider not participating as a matter of principle.
Explain why going vegan will set a powerful example.
When you set a powerful example, you will likely have more influence on others than you realize. When you go vegan, a ripple effect begins.
Over time, some of your friends, family, and acquaintances, having observed you, will go vegan or at least begin reducing their demand for animal products.
That will influence others to do the same, which will, in turn, influence even more to do the same.
What would be the result of everyone believing one person cannot make a difference?
There would be no progress.
Imagine if Martin Luther King Jr. or Mahatma Gandhi believed they and their fellow activists could not make a difference.
Margaret Mead is credited with saying, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
How will the difference you make go beyond reducing the suffering of animals?
(powerless briefing)
The science is clear that going vegan will reduce your risk of chronic disease, diminish your footprint on the planet, and promote a more efficient food system better capable of feeding the world’s starving, hungry, and impoverished.
What might the claim of being powerless be at its core?
Consider whether it is a subconscious excuse because you are unwilling to change your behavior.
What two counterclaims are addressed in the “powerless” briefing?
—Claim 1: One person can’t impact demand because billions are slaughtered every year.
—Claim 2: One shouldn’t be given credit for saving lives when they stop eating animals.
How would you address the counterclaim that people shouldn’t be credited with saving lives when they stop eating animals?
Some might say that in a large market, the action of one individual could not possibly impact demand because it is such a small percentage of total demand.
This may or may not be true for one person, but the fact that millions are not buying products made from animals does reduce demand—and, consequently, supply.
Any one of the millions not buying such products accounts for a portion of that reduction in demand.
How would you address the counterclaim that one shouldn’t be given credit for saving lives when they stop eating animals?
One could argue that you are not saving any lives because you should not have been complicit in the slaughters in the first place.
If you would have otherwise contributed to the slaughter of an animal and then decided not to, you shouldn’t be credited with saving a life.
Point taken, but when the societal norm is paying others to slaughter animals, one could argue that it’s not entirely disingenuous to think of it as saving animals.
Share the inspiring story of a starfish, showing that one person can make a difference.
Once upon a time, there was an old man who used to go to the ocean to do his writing. He had a habit of walking on the beach every morning before he began his work. Early one morning, he was walking along the shore after a big storm had passed and found the vast beach littered with starfish as far as the eye could see, stretching in both directions.
Off in the distance, the old man noticed a small boy approaching. As the boy walked, he paused every so often, and as he grew closer, the man could see that he was occasionally bending down to pick up an object and throw it into the sea. The boy came closer still, and the man called out, “Good morning! May I ask what it is that you are doing?”
The young boy paused, looked up, and replied, “Throwing starfish into the ocean. The tide has washed them up onto the beach, and they can’t return to the sea by themselves.” The youth replied, “When the sun gets high, they will die unless I throw them back into the water.”
The old man replied, “But there must be tens of thousands of starfish on this beach. I’m afraid you won’t really be able to make much of a difference.”
The boy bent down, picked up yet another starfish, and threw it into the ocean as far as he could. Then he turned, smiled, and said, “It made a difference to that one!”
Adapted from The Star Thrower, by Loren Eiseley (1907–1977)
What is a good YouTube video to share about making a difference?
Colleen Patrick-Goudreau’s “Does being vegan really make a difference?” is on YouTube and embedded in the other resources section of the “powerless” briefing.
What general tips may be helpful in conversations on the “powerless” objection to veganism?
Your goal when discussing this objection to veganism is to challenge this sense of powerlessness and show that individual choices do create meaningful impact.
Realize that if someone asserts changing their behavior will not make a difference, they may be implicitly admitting that their behavior is ethically problematic. Otherwise, they would have just said, “It’s not wrong.” It might be helpful to point this out.
You can also point out that they are saying, in effect, that if most people commit a wrong it’s ok for me to commit a wrong. If they assert that’s not the case, then ask them to explain why that’s not the case.
In discussing the “powerless” objection to veganism, what question can you ask to segue the conversation back to animal ethics?
“Are you fully aware of the various kinds of suffering animals are forced to endure because we choose to make a difference for the worse? Let me explain…“
In discussing the “powerless” objection to veganism, what questions can you ask to show them they’re already making a difference—For better or worse?
Most people don’t realize that they are already making a difference, whether they intend to or not. The real question is what kind of impact they want to have.
—“Every time we buy animal products, we make a choice that contributes to suffering and death. That choice keeps demand for those products high and ensures the cycle continues. So, the question isn’t whether you make a difference—it’s whether your difference helps or harms.”
—“If you think one person’s actions don’t matter, ask yourself—what if nobody made ethical choices? Would progress ever happen?”
Why? This shifts their perspective from feeling powerless to recognizing that their actions already have consequences.
In discussing the “powerless” objection to veganism, what questions can you ask to make it personal?
“If you were an animal facing a life of suffering followed by slaughter, would you want someone to believe their choices didn’t matter, or would you want them to choose kindness?”
“If you rescued 26 dogs from being killed every year, people would call you a hero. So why not see yourself the same way when you spare 26 land animals and hundreds of sea animals by choosing veganism?”
In discussing the “powerless” objection to veganism, what questions can you ask to remind them of their values?
—“Even if your actions didn’t immediately change the world, wouldn’t you still want to live according to your values?”
—“If you knew an injustice was happening, would you participate in it just because others are?”
Why? This shifts the focus from outcomes to integrity—removing participation from cruelty is valuable regardless of how many others do the same.
In discussing the “powerless” objection to veganism, what questions can you ask to show them the power of influence?
By going vegan, they set an example for friends, family, and even strangers.
—“When you go vegan, others notice. Over time, your choices inspire family members, coworkers, and friends. And when they start changing, they influence others, too. That’s how every movement for justice has ever grown.”
—“If you knew that your actions could inspire others to change, what kind of example would you want to set?”
—“Think about how people like Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi created massive change. If they had believed one person couldn’t make a difference, where would we be?”
Why? This helps them see that change happens gradually, one person at a time.
