Power and Powers in IR Flashcards
The study of power
The study of power is fundamental to the study of world politics. We can use power to describe how the world changes.
Mainstream IR states that power is concentrated in 1 of three pools, these include unipolar, bipolar and multipolar.
Power was conceptualised by early realists like Morgenthau and Waltz, it is a entity and intrinsic to tangible things such as military, wealth and geography. Therefore IR developed into a discipline focused on material resources and the states that controlled them.
Bipolar
Bipolar is argued as the most stable option of all the three, in a system where there are two equally dominant power there is reduced incentives of balancing.
There is a constant movement of adjustment and readjustment, if one state becomes too powerful, then others will balance too it.
The cold war showed a more perfect balance of power, the incentive for balancing was low.
Unipolar
Most prominent after the cold war which led the discussion towards the importance of international institutions, economic growth/development and away from military and competition, the USA brought stability as they were the major world power.
Benefits of unipolarity
Hegemonic stability - this is the idea that international order can be provided by a single hegemonic power. For this to happen, the hegemon needs to define its long-term interests in ways that are compatible with the interests of others in the system (e.g. through regimes and institutions).
This hegemonic stability is grounded on hard power aspects such as, Largest military arsenal, largest economy and the currency of the last resort, in practise the US could not go bankrupt, the result would be the collapse of the world economy.
Hard power
The ability to get others to do what otherwise would not do through threats or rewards. (coercion, payment).
Soft power
Getting others to want the outcomes that you want (attraction, persuasion)
Examples of soft power
For the USA this is the attraction of culture such as Hollywood and the American way of life. They attracted others to want the same lifestyle and want to be like you and live the same lifestyle. This made the USA a particularly powerful hegemonic power.
It is more challenging to be authoritarian and to be a soft power.
Smart power
The ability to combine hard and soft power resources into effective strategies.
Change in power post 1990
9/11 was a movement away from this 1990s landscape, there was a shift towards the importance of security.
For the first time in a very long time, the USA was heavily weakened and the idea of a unipolar world was changed. For the rest of the decade the US spent money and drained resources in Afghan and Iraq conflicts, and whilst this happens other states grow economically and become more relevant.
Brazil, Russia, India and China began to emerge, they were named the BRICs, these countries now in 2023 outweigh the G7 in global GDP at PPP, 32.1% vs 29.9%. China now has the largest global share.
We can now argue that the world today is more multipolar or bipolar, USA and China dominate, but Russia, India, Brazil and the G7 are also important, so can be described as multipolar.
Definitions of power
A has power over B to the extent that he can get B to do something that B would otherwise not do.
This definition can be to do with many factors such as military force or money.
Power can be unsuccessful, no matter resources, for example Vietnam. The USA had vastly superior resources but still managed to fail to win. Sometimes a unbalanced interaction can fall in favour of those who are perceived to have little power. Ukraine for example.
Problems with power - Circulatory argument
‘Power is often used as the killer argument, the ultimate put-down, something happens because of power’ and if something does not happen then it is because the power did not reach its potential. We do not try and argue why the power did fail.
Lump-power falicy
‘In real world politics, we have no existing measure to tell us how much a billion inhabitants weigh in power compared with a nuclear weapon or hundreds of them’
Inaccuracy of measuring power in a nice and precise way, particularly when you compare resources, behaviour and success.
First face
Decision making power, involves a person having power over another’s so that they do something they otherwise would not do, Robert Dahl 1952
Second face
Agenda setting power, involves more covert exercise of power, controlling the terms of discussion, Peter Bachrach and Morton Baratz, 1962.
Third face
Shaping preferences, refers to power that circulates through thoughts and beliefs. Prevent someone from even discussing something.