Poverty and Pauperism, 1785-1870 Flashcards
What was the Speenhamland System
An allowance to subsidise low wages, started in 1795
Wages were topped up to the value of 3 loaves of break (4 1/2 loaves if the worker had a family)
Where was the Speenhamland system first implemented, and why
Berkshire
The Berkshire magistrates feared the impoverished conditions of workers (resulting from some being displaced due to enclosure and the French War in 1793 cutting off grain imports) could lead to revolution
When was the Speenhamland System abolished
In 1834 by act of parliament
What was the difference between ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor
‘Deserving’ poor were impoverished due to factors outside of their control, e.g. recession
‘Undeserving’ poor were impoverished due to factors under their control, e.g. laziness
Who administered poor rates (prior to 1834), and when was this early system formalised
‘Overseers of the Poor’, under the authority of the local Justice of the Peace
This system was formalised with the 1818 Act for the Regulation of Parish Vestries, as well as the 1819 Act to Amend the Laws for Relief of the Poor, which created parish committees, elected by rate-payers, to distribute poor relief
How much was spent on poor relief between 1814-1818
£6.4 million per year, on average
What was the link between the Swing Riots (1830) and the Speenhamland system
The Swing riots were most prevalent in places where the Speenhamland System was widely used
This is as farmers were often given lower wages, since they were topped up by poor relief
How much was poor relief expenditure between 1815 and 1834
2% of GNP
This amounted to over £5.7 million a year
What was Ricardo’s ‘wage fund theory’
Suggested there was a fixed fund at any given time for wages so if workers wanted an increase in wages, it would come at the expense of other workers’ wages
This theory was popular amongst ratepayers and the middle class
Between 1819 and 1823, how much did the cost of poor relief change per capita
From 11s 7d to 9s 2d after 1824.
The large number of low-paid workers meant the cost of poor relief was still high
When was the Poor Employment Act, and what did it do
The Poor Employment Act in 1817 made public money available to employ able-bodied paupers in public works projects
What did Malthus believe about poor relief
Malthus believed poor relief artificially increases the population without acting to increase the quantity of food
This would lead to price inflation and low wages, hurting those who work hard
What an arse.
Summarise the arguments of individualism on poor-relief
Poverty may come from the poor’s short sighted nature
The Poor Laws kept the poor poor as they reduced incentives.
Abolition would lead to higher wages with less taxes for landlords
Otherwise, population would increase and starvation would follow
What did Robert Owen argue about poor relief
Poverty comes from the market mechanism inadvertently keeping man poor.
Workers should work cooperatively, without ulterior incentive, and should get education
Mechanisation reduces the amount of Labour needed
Summarise the arguments of Collectivism on poor relief
The economic system itself was responsible for impoverishment
The poor laws were inadequate in aid
Land Tax to help the poor (based)
A rudimentary social security system
What did Jeremy Bentham argue about poor relief
Human action is determined by the pursuit of pleasure and escape from pain
As such, we should pursue to maximise total happiness for the greatest number
Policy must thusly be pragmatic at most, ruthlessly logical at best
Summarise the arguments of Utilitarianism
A National Charity Company, entrusted with responsibility to the nations poor
Panopticon prison model which would bring in those who couldn’t care for themselves
Any assistance should be no greater than reasonable, so workers don’t stay and can leave with their own incentive to achieve
Utilitarianism was not cruel, but rather a logical response to the assertation of maximising utility
What percentage of people in the North received poor relief compared to the South between 1802 and 1803
10% of the North received relief, compared to 23% of those in the South.
Main reason was low wages, roughly 12s per week
Who led the Royal Commission into poor relief, when was this, and what did they do
Established in 1832, with nine commissioners including Nassau Senior and Edwin Chadwick
Aimed to find information about the workings of the Poor Law and make recommendations
Questionnaires sent to 15,000 parishes, but only 10% were returned
What were Select Vestries and why were they corrupt
Groups of parishes which administered poor relief, and could be corrupt as relief went towards vested interests
This can be seen in Morpeth, which gave money to a local pub in the interest of beer sales