Porter 2 Flashcards
Describe purpose of The Sherman Act
- to prevent collusion and attempts to gain monopoly power
- insurers could no longer form groups to control rates and coverage
Describe purpose of The Robinson-Patman Act
- prohibited price discrimination with the exception of price differentials that could be shown to result from differences in operating costs
- insurers could reduce premiums to drive out competition only if they could prove that the reduction resulted from increased efficiencies in operations
What was the defense used by SEUA?
Paul v. Virginia ruled that insurance was not interstate commerce and therefore it was not subject to federal antitrust laws
What was the decision on SEUA by the U.S. Supreme Court?
Decision overturned ruling by deciding insurance was interstate commerce, and federal legislation now applied to insurance
Describe the activities of the NAIC in the wake of the SEUA decision
NAIC sought to appeal the decision. When the appeal was denied, NAIC sought to continue state regulation resulting in passage of McCarran-Ferguson Act.
Outcome and Impact of Paul v. Virginia
Outcome: ruling that insurance was not interstate commerce and it should be regulated by the states and not the federal government.
Impact: regulated by states, bureau ratemaking allowed
Outcome and Impact of US v SEUA
Outcome: ruling that insurance was interstate commerce and therefore it was subject to federal regulation
Impact: bureau ratemaking not allowed, federal antitrust laws (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, Federal Trade Commission Act) apply
Outcome and Impact of McCarran-Ferguson Act
Outcome: returned insurance regulation to the states and exempted insurance from federal antitrust law provided that relevant activities were regulated by the states and did not involve boycott, coercion, or intimidation
Impact: bureau ratemaking was allowed as long as it was regulated by the states. Most states passed prior approval regulation
Identify 4 activities of the SEUA that led to criminal indictments
- boycotting of agents who sold non-SEUA insurance
- collusion to set rates
- fought rate filings from non-SEUA members
- mandated inclusion in rating bureau
Describe 2 main questions considered by the Supreme Court in analyzing the SEUA case
- Did congress intend the Sherman Act to prohibit insurer’s conduct of monopolizing business?
- Do insurance transactions across state lines constitute “commerce among several states”, which will subject them to Congressional regulation?
Purpose of excess & surplus lines market
to provide coverage for unusual risks with high policy limits, or those that cannot find coverage in the admitted market in the state
3 ways the excess & surplus lines market is regulated
- agents and brokers must be specially licensed to place business with xs and surplus lines insurers
- there are minimum financial requirements for insurers looking to write these plicies
- there is diligent search criteria in which producer must sign an affidavit that a diligent search of the admitted market was performed
3 exceptions for McCarran-Ferguson Act
- Sherman Act still prohibits boycott, coercion, and intimidation
- if states do not regulate an aspect of insurance, then federal antitrust laws apply
- a federal law that regulates a specific activity of insurance supersedes state laws with respect to that aspect or activity
Describe purpose of Clayton Anti-Trust Act
- identified and made illegal activities that lessened competition or created monopoly power
- examples include price discrimination, requiring purchase of one product with the purchase of another, and mergers between competitors
5 arguments in favor of Congress’ regulation of insurance in the SEUA decision
- insurance is not a business that is distinct in each of the states - it is interconnected and interdependent among the states
- only 18 out of more than 200 SEUA members were domiciled in only 1 of the 6 SEUA states
- intangible products, such as electric impulses of telegraph transmissions, were subject to Congressional regulation
- other businesses make sales contracts in states where they do not have headquarters, and these are subject to the Commerce Clause
- no business that is transacted over state lines is beyond the regulatory powers of congress. Insurers should not be an exception