Computer Modeling for Property Insurance - Musulin Flashcards
Computer modeling of catastrophe perils for ratemaking purposes is becoming more prevalent. State 3 disincentives for insurers to manipulate model results to inflate loss estimates
- may lose market share to competitors charging lower rates
- increasing rates will increase reinsurance rates
- put pressure on the financial ratings of publicly traded companies since both reinsurance and rating agencies use these models, regardless of whether they are used in pricing or not
State 3 safeguards suggested to reduce the risk of model manipulation when a catastrophe model is used for ratemaking
- require a legal affidavit attesting that the user has not manipulated the models/assumptions
- require a formal opinion from the modeler on the proper use and execution of the model by the user
- have modelers provide regulations with a range of results by building type, geographic, deductible options
State two effects on the public individuals of computer modeling of catastrophe loss potential
- some may receive significant rate increase
- may be restriction on where can locate or tougher building codes
Describe 3 challenges that simulation models pose to the regulatory review of the catastrophe load included in rates
- difficulty in verifying the data: models often use exposure data which is not reported elsewhere in the financial statement
- model complexity: models require complex seismic, meteorological, actuarial expertise to understand the calculation
- black box nature: the data is often sent to the modeler’s facility and run through the proprietary models which makes it difficult to understand the process and calculation
6 undesirable consequences if state insurance departments did not accept computer catastrophe models in the regulatory process
- rates would likely be inadequate in higher risk leading to availability problems
- higher insolvency risk when a hurricane occurs
- reduced incentives to mitigate risk
- higher prices caused by greater information risk
- price instability
- not charging adequate rates for high risk insureds cause low risk subsidize high risk
Describe 4 consumer benefits of insurers using property catastrophe modeling
- comprehensibility of prices - better understand how their exposures relate to loss
- fair pricing - lessen need for low risk to subsidize high risk
- stable pricing - due to long term data and large volume of data used by the model
- reduced information risk - investors demand higher returns for unknown risk
- rational behavior - when cost of a good reflects its economically correct long term price, consumers will take that cost into account and act accordingly