Polity- Constitution and Political system Flashcards
Promulgation of Ordinance?
- Article 123 grants such powers to Prez
- An ordinance may be concerned with any subject that the Parliament has the power to legislate on and also has the same limitations as the Parliament to legislate according to the distribution of powers between the Union, State and Concurrent Lists. Thus, An ordinance can be issued only on those subjects on which the Parliament can make laws. And, An ordinance is subject to the same constitutional limitation as an act of Parliament. Hence, an ordinance cannot abridge or take away any of the fundamental rights
- There are three limitations with regard to the ordinance making power of the executive. They are:
i. The President can only promulgate an ordinance when either of the two Houses of Parliament is not in session.
ii. The President cannot promulgate an ordinance unless he is satisfied that there are circumstances that require taking ‘immediate action’.
In Cooper case, (1970), the Supreme Court held that the President’s satisfaction can be questioned in a court on the ground of malafide. This means that the decision of the President to issue an ordinance can be questioned in a court on the ground that the President has prorogued one House or both Houses of Parliament deliberately with a view to promulgate an ordinance on a controversial subject, so as to bypass the parliamentary decision and thereby circumventing the authority of the Parliament. The 38th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1975 made the President’s satisfaction final and conclusive and beyond judicial review. But, this provision was deleted by the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978. Thus, the President’s satisfaction is justiciable on the ground of malafide
iii. Ordinances must be approved by Parliament within six weeks of reassembling or they shall cease to operate. They will also cease to operate in case resolutions disapproving the ordinance are passed by both the Houses.
- President can also withdraw an ordinance at any time. However, his power of ordinance-making is not a discretionary power, and he can promulgate or withdraw an ordinance only on the advice of the council of ministers headed by the prime minister.
- An ordinance like any other legislation, can be retrospective, that is, it may come into force from a back date.
- It may modify or repeal any act of Parliament or another ordinance.
- It can alter or amend a tax law also.
- However, it cannot be issued to amend the Constitution.
- The rules of Lok Sabha require that whenever a bill seeking to replace an ordinance is introduced in the House, a statement explaining the circumstances that had necessitated immediate legislation by ordinance should be placed before the house
Repromulgation of Ordinance?
An ordinance can be re-promulgated only thrice
SC in DC Wadhwa case (1987), ruled that successive repromulgation of ordinances with the same text without any attempt to get the bills passed by the assembly would amount to violation of the Constitution and the ordinance so repromulgated is liable to be struck down
Fundamental Rights: intro/significance/purpose?
- Magna Carta of India
- uphold the equality of all individuals, the dignity of the individual, the larger public interest and unity of the nation.
- Political democracy;
- limitations on tyranny of executive and arbitrary laws of legislature
- aims to establish a ‘govt laws of men and not of men’
- named so coz guaranteed and protected by consti, fundamental law of the land ANDcoz they are most essential for all-round developmentof individuals
Features of FRs?
- some only to citizens, others to citizens, foreigners or legal persons
- NOT absolute bt qualified. Reasonable restrictions. thus, strike a balance betn rights of individual and rights of society as a whole, betn individual liberty and social control.
- Mostly against arbitrary action of state; some against states’s actions and against action of pvt individuals
- Some negative, others positive (conferring certain prvileges on persons)
- They are justiciable
- defended and guaranteed by SC
- nt sacrosanct or permanent- Consti Amend Act, basic str
- suspended during National emergency, except Art 20 and 21
- scope of ops limited by Art31A, Art 31B adn Art 31C
- Art 33- application to armed forces can be restricted or abrogated by Parliament
- Art 34- application can be restricted during martial law
- Most of them dirctly enforceable, while a few enforced by framed laws-Such a law can be made only by the Parliament and not by state
legislatures so that uniformity throughout the country is maintained
(Article 35)
Defn of state?
- Art 12
- All local authorities like improvement trusts, etc.
- All other authorities, that is, statutory or non-statutory authorities like
LIC, ONGC, SAIL, etc. - According to the Supreme Court, even a private body or an agency
working as an instrument of the State falls within the meaning of the ‘State’
under Article 12.
Art 13?
- Judicial Review
- Article 13 (2): Parliament and thestate legislatures are clearly prohibited from making laws that may take away or abridge the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizen
- term ‘law’ includes:
- Permanent laws enacted by the Parliament or the state legislatures;
- Temporary laws like ordinances issued by the president or the state
governors; - Statutory instruments in the nature of delegated legislation (executive legislation) like order, bye-law, rule, regulation or notification; and
- Non-legislative sources of law, that is, custom or usage having the force of law.
- Further, Article 13 declares that a constitutional amendment is not a law and hence cannot be challenged; However, Keshavanand Bharati case
Article wise FRs?
- Art 14-18: right to Equality
- Art 14: equality before law and equal protection of law
- Art 15: Prohibition of Discrimination
- Art 16: Equality of opp in public employment
- Art17: abolition of untouchability
- Art 18: Abolition of titles
- Art 19: Right to freedom
- Art 20-22: Rights to liberty
- Art 20: conviction of offences
- Art 21: Protection of life and personal liberty
- Art 22: against arrest and arbitrary detention
- Art 21A: Right to elementary education
- Art 23-24: right against exploitation
- Art 23: human trafficking and forced labor
- Art 24: child labor
- Art25-28: Right to freedom of religion
- Art 25: freedom of religion
- Art 26: freedom to manage religious affairs
- Art 27: Freedom from payment of taxes for promotion of any religion
- Art 28: Freedom from attending religious instruction or worship in certain educational institutions
- Art 29-30: Cultural and Educational rights:
- Art 29: Protection of language, script and culture of minorities
- Art 30: Right of minorities to establish and administer
educational institutions
- Art 32: consti remedies-WRITs
*
FR available only to citizens and not to
foreigners?
- 15
- 16
- 19
- 29 (language, script and culture of minorities)
- 30 (minorities educational insti)
FR available to both
citizens and foreigners
(except enemy aliens)?
- Art 14
- Art 20
- Art 21
- Art 21A
- Art 22,23,24,25,26,27,28
T/F: Art 21A (right to elementary education) is extended to foreigners too.
T
Art 14?
- citizens and foreigners
- ‘person’ also includes legal persons
- State shall not deny any person ‘equality before law’ or ‘equal protection of law’.
- ‘equality before law’ vs ‘equal protection of law’
- SC:
- where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not apply
- ‘Rule of Law’ as embodied in Article 14 is a ‘basic feature’ of the constitution
- forbids CLASS legislation bt permits reasonable classification bt classification should not be arbitrary, artificial or evasive. Rather, it should be based on an intelligible differential and substantial distinction.
- Exceptions
‘equality before law’ vs ‘equal protection of law’?
- Equality Before Law:
- british Concept
- connotes (a) the absence of any special privileges in favour of any person, (b) the equal subjection of all persons to the ordinary law of the land administered by ordinary law courts, and (c) no person (whether rich or poor, high or low, official or non-official) is above the law.
- The concept of ‘equality before law’ is an element of the concept of ‘Rule of Law’, propounded by A.V. Dicey, the British jurist. His concept has three aspects
- Absence of Arbitrary Power: no man can be punished except for a breach of law
- Equality Before Law
- Primacy of Rights of individual and that the consti is the result of those rights as defined and enforced by the courts
- Equal Protection of Law:
- American concept
- connotes: (a) the equality of treatment under equal circumstances, both in the privileges conferred and liabilities imposed by the laws, (b) the similar application of the same laws to all persons who are similarly situated, and (c) the like should be treated alike
without any discrimination - Thus, the former is a negative concept while the
latter is a positive concept.
Exceptions to rule of equality before law?
- Immunities enjoyed by President and Guv-
- not answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties
- No criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued against in any court during his term
- No process for the arrest or imprisonment shall be issued from any court during his term
- No civil proceedings against him during his term of office in any court in respect of any act done by him in his personal capacity, whether before or after he entered upon his office, until the expiration of two months next after notice has been delivered to him.
- publication in a newspaper (or by radio or television) of a substantially true report of any proceedings of either House/SLs
- MP or MLA in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in the
Legislature or any committee thereof - Art 31C- laws mad by the state for DSP in clause (b) or (c) of Art 39, cannot be challenged on Art 14 grnds. SC: “where Article 31-C comes in, Article 14 goes out”
- foreign sovereigns (rulers), ambassadors and diplomats enjoy immunity from criminal and civil proceedings.
- UNO and its agencies diplomatic immunity
Art 15?
- TWO provisions:
- State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of
- religion
- race
- caste
- sex
- Place of Birth
- no citizen shall be subjected to any disability, liability, restriction or condition on grounds only of
- religion
- race
- caste
- sex
- Place of Birth
- State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of
wrt access to shops, restaurants, hotels, public entertainment, use of wells, tanks, ghats, roads or places of public resort maintained wholly or partly by State funds or dedicated to the use of general public
- Second Provision prohibits discrimination both by the State and private individuals, while the first provision prohibits discrimination only by the State
- exceptions
Exceptions to Art 15?
- state is permitted to make any special provision for women and
children eg. free education of children - permitted to make any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the
scheduled castes and scheduled tribes - empowered to ———–”——————- regarding their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the state, except the minority educational institutions. (93rd CAA 2005)
T/F: Reservations for backward classes are an exception to Art 15.
F
Despite the previous f/c, SC , in Jan 2022, while uphelding the 27% quota for OBCs in All India Quota seats for NEET, reiterated that reservations for backward classes were not an exception but an extension of the principle of equality under Article 15(1) of the Constitution.
- This is seen as a positive discrimination in the Indian Context.
Art 16?
- equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of employment or appointment to any office under the State
- no discrimination for employmnt or office under the state on grounds only of
- religion
- race
- caste
- sex
- descent
- place of birth
- place of residence
- Three exceptions
Three exceptions to art 16?
-
Parliament can prescribe residence as a condition for certain employment
or appointment in a state or union territory or local authority or other
authority; currently only Telangana and andhraP - State can provide for reservation of appointments or posts in favour
of any backward class that is not adequately represented - A law can provide that the incumbent of an office related to religious or
denominational institution or a member of its governing body should
belong to the particular religion or denomination.
Art 17?
- abolishes ‘untouchability’ and forbids its practice in any form
- Untouchability (Offences) Act 1955—-> amended in 1976 as Protection of Civil rights act 1955.
- PoCR 1955 defines civil right as any right accruing to a person by reason of the abolition of untouchability by Article 17
- term ‘untouchability’ has not been defined either in the Constitution or in the Act
- Mysore HC: not its literal or grammatical sense bt the ‘ practice as it had developed historically in he country’
- It refers to the social disabilities imposed on certain classes of persons by reason of their birth in certain castes. Hence, it does not cover social boycott of a few individuals or their exclusion from religious services, etc.
- Under PoCA, A person convicted of the offence of ‘untouchability’ is disqualified for election to the Parliament or SL.
- SC: right under Article 17 is available against private individuals and it is the constitutional obligation of the State to take necessary action to ensure that this right is not violated
Art 18?
- Four Provisions:
- Titles:
- CONFERRING: Indian state cannot confer any title (except a military or academic distinction) on any body, citizen or a foreigner
- ACCEPTING frm foreign state:
- Indian citizen: cannot
- foreigner: if holding any office of profit or trust under the state, needs consent of Prez
- Present, Emoluments or Office: For both an Indian citizen or a foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the state, needs consent of Prez.
- Titles:
- 1996: SC upheld validity of national awards-as the are not hereditary titles of nobility and do not amount to titles.
National awards instituted in? revived in?
- 1954
- discontinued in 1977; revived in 1980
Art 19?
- Freedom of speech and expression
- assemble peacefully
- form associations or unions or cooperative societies (97th CAA,2011)
- move freely
- reside and settle
- practice any profession, occupation, trade or business
- These six rights are protected against only state action and not private
individuals. - available only to the citizens and to shareholders of a company but not to foreigners or legal persons like companies or corporations
- ‘reasonable’ restrictions only on the grounds mentioned in the Article 19 itself
Art 19: freedom of speech and expression: includes?
- propagate own or others’ views
- freedom of press
- commercial ad
- against tapping of phone
- RT telecast i.e Govt has no monopoly on e-media
- against bundh called
- RT know abt govt activities
- Freedom of Silence
- against imposition of pre-censorship on a newspaper
- RT demonstrate or picket bt not RT strike
Art 19: freedom of speech and expression: reasonable restrictions?
- soverignty and integrity of India
- security of state
- friendly foreign relations
- public order
- decency or morality
- contempt of court
- defamation
- incitement to an offence
Art 19: Freedom of Assembly?
- includes the right to hold public meetings, demonstrations and take out processions
- can be exercised only on public land and the assembly must be peaceful and unarmed
- does not include the right to strike.
Art 19: Freedom of Assembly: reasonable restrictions?
- Sovereignty and integrity of India
- Public order incl maintenance of traffic in the area concerned
- Sec 144 of CrPC
- Sec 141 of IPC: an assembly of 5 or more persons become unlawful if the object is to
- resist the execution of any law or legal process;
- to forcibly occupy the property of some person;
- to commit any mischief or criminal trespass;
- to force some person to do an illegal act; and
- to threaten the government or its officials on exercising
lawful powers
Art 19: Freedom of Association: reasonable restrictions?
- sovereignty and integrity of India,
- public order and
- morality
ALSO, right to obtain recognition of the association is not a fundamental right. SC held that the trade unions have no guaranteed right to effective bargaining or right to strike or right to declare a lock-out. The right to strike can be controlled by an appropriate industrial law.
Art 19: freedom of Movement?
- This right underline the idea that India is one unit so far as the citizens are concerned. Thus, the purpose is to promote national feeling and not parochialism.
- freedom of Movement has two dimensions:
- internal: art 19
- external: Art 21
Art 19: freedom of Movement: reasonable restrictions?
- interests of general public and
- the protection of interests of any scheduled tribe
- morality and public health: SC held that the freedom of movement of prostitutes can be restricted on the ground of public health and in the interest of public morals.
Art 19: freedom of residence?
- two parts:
- right to reside: stay temporarily
- right to settle: set up a hime or domicile
- right is intended to remove internal barriers within the country or between any of its parts. This promotes nationalism and avoids narrow mindedness.
- right to residence and the right to movement are overlapping and complementary.
Art 19: freedom of residence: reasonable restrictions?
- interest of general public and
- the protection of interests of any scheduled tribes
- Supreme Court held that certain areas can be banned for certain kinds
of persons like prostitutes and habitual offenders
Art 19: freedom of profession?
- This right is very wide as it covers all the means of earning one’s livelihood.
- State is empowered to:
- prescribe professional or technical qualifications necessary
- carry on by itself any trade, business; no objection can be made when the State carries on a trade either as a monopoly or in competition with any citizen
- This right does not include the right to carry on a profession or business or
trade or occupation that is immoral (trafficking in women or children) or
dangerous (harmful drugs or explosives, etc,). The State can absolutely
prohibit these or regulate them through licencing.
Art 19: freedom of profession: reasonable restriction?
- interest of the general public
Internet access as FR?
- SC, in Kashmir petitions declared Right to Internet as FR under Art 19: Freedom of expression as well as right to conduct commerce.
- Kerala HC has also declared Internet as FR as part of FR to education as well as the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
- UN, in 2016, made a series of statements collectively describing that internet access as a basic human right.
Art 20?
- citizen or foreigner or legal person
- three provisions
- no ex-post facto law:
- this limitation is imposed only on criminal laws and not on civil laws or tax laws
- prohibits only conviction or sentence under an ex-post-facto criminal law and not the trial thereof
- protection (immunity) under this provision cannot be claimed in case of preventive detention or demanding security from a person
- no double-jeopardy: available only in proceedings before a court of law or a judicial tribunal.
- no self-incrimination: extends only to criminal proceedings and not to civil proceedings
- no ex-post facto law:
Art 21?
- no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law
- both citizens and non-citizens
- Gopalan case:
- SC narrow view of ‘procedure established by law’ as different frm ‘due process of law’- only against arbitrary executive action ant NOT frm arbitrary leg action
- SC held that the ‘personal liberty’ means only liberty relating to the person or body of the individual
- maneka gandhi case (1978): wider interpretation
- law should be reasonable, fair and just
- the ‘right to life’ as embodied in Article 21 is not merely confined to animal existence or survival but it includes within its ambit the
right to live with human dignity and all those aspects of life which go to make a man’s life meaningful, complete and worth living.
Rights within Art 21?
- free education upto 14yrs
- RT electricity
- Right to health
- Right to social security and protection of the family
- appropriate life insurance policy
- emergeny medical aid
- RT sleep
- timely medical treatment in Govt hospital
- travel abroad
- not to be driven out of a state
- RT hearing
- Free legal aid
- fair trial
- against solitary confinement
- speedy trial
- against handcuffing
- against inhumane treatment
- against delayed execution
- against bonded labour
- against custodial harassment
- Right of prisoner to have necessities of life
- against public hanging
- appeal frm a judgement of conviction
- against bar fetters
- RT information
- RT reputation
- RT live with human dignity
- Right of women to be treated with decency and dignity.
- RT social and economic justice and empowerment
- freedom frm noise pollution
*
Art 21A?
- free and compulsory edu to all 6-14 yrs children
- 86th CAA
- earlier under DSP Art 45, bt by this amendment, this DSP’s aim was changed to children under 6yrs age.
- RtE (upto 14yrs) was recognised as FR under Art 21, by SC in 1993
- RTE Act 2009
Art 22?
- grants protection to persons who are arrested or detained
- two parts-
- dealing with punitive detention
- dealing with preventive detention
Art 22: Punitive detention: rights granted? Exception?
(i) Right to be informed of the grounds of arrest.
(ii) Right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.
(iii) Right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, excluding
the journey time.
(iv) Right to be released after 24 hours unless the magistrate authorises
further detention.
- apply only to an act of a criminal or quasi-criminal nature or some
activity prejudicial to public interest - Not applicable to
- enemy alien.
- arrest under the orders of a court,
- civil arrest,
- arrest on failure to pay the income tax, and
- deportation of an alien.
Art 22: Preventive detention: Provisions??
- rights granted
(i) The detention of a person cannot exceed three months unless an advisory board reports sufficient cause for extended detention. The board is to consist of judges of a high court.
(ii) The grounds of detention should be communicated to the detenu. However, the facts considered to be against the public interest need not be disclosed.
(iii) The detenu should be afforded an opportunity to make a representation against the detention order.
- authorises the Parliament to prescribe:
- cases for which detention for >3months without advisory board’s opinion
- max period for which can be detained
- procedure to be followed by the advisory board
- 44th CAA: 3mo->2mo bt NOT yet Brought into force
- Parliament- EXCLUSIVE authority to make laws for preventive detention for defence, foreign affairs and the secu-rity of INdia .
- For matters related to security of a state, the maintenance of public order and the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community, both Parliament and SLA
3 examples of Preventive detention laws made by Parliament?
- National Security Act (NSA), 1980
- Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act (PBMSECA), 1980.
- Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), 2002. Repealed in 2004.
preventive detention in pre-Independence India?
existed even during the British rule. For example, the Bengal State Prisoners Regulation of 1818 and the Defence of India Act of 1939 provided for preventive detention
Art 23?
- prohibits traffic in human beings (including devdasis and slavery), begar and othr forms of forced labor (like bonded labor).
- both citizens and non-citizens
- protects the individual not only against the State but also against private persons.
- Parliament has made the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act,1956.
- ‘Forced’ also means compulsion under economic circumstances i.e. working for less than minimum wage
- acts:
- Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976;
- the Minimum Wages Act, 1948;
- the Contract Labour Act, 1970 and
- the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976
- EXCEPTIONS: State can impose compuslory service for public purpose like military or social service, for which it isn’t bound to pay.
Art 24?
- prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in any factory, mine or other hazardous activities BUT NOT in any harmless or innocent work.
- Child Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) act 1986, Factories Act 1948, Mines Act 1952 etc.
- 1996: SC directed estab of Child Labour Rehabilitation Welfare Fund
- Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005->
- National Commission and State Commissions for Protection of Child Rights and
- Children’s Courts for providing speedy trial of offences against children
- 2006: govt banned emplyment of children (<14yrs) as domstic servants in hotels, dhabas, shops etc.
Which of the following functions were performed by the Constituent Assembly?
- It passed certain statutes as a legislative assembly
- It ratified India’s membership of the Commonwealth
- It abolished the office of the Secretary of State of India and transferred his functions to the President of India.
1,2
The Indian Independence Act 1947 abolished the office of Secretary of State of India and transferred his functions to the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Affairs.
With reference to loss of citizenship under the Citizenship act, 1955, consider the following statements:
- If a person renounces his Indian citizenship, their minor children also loses their citizenship.
- The application for renunciation or termination of citizenship can be withheld if India is engaged in war.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Both True
- Statement 1: When a person renounces his Indian citizenship, every minor child of that person also loses Indian citizenship. However, when such a child attains the age of eighteen, he may resume Indian citizenship.
Which among the following is/are the element(s) of a State?
- Population
- Territory
- Government
- Sovereignty
Select the correct answer
- 1,2,3,4
- Population: The State is a human institution. It is the people who make a State. Antarctica is not a State as is it is without any human population.
- Territory: Just as every person belongs to a state, so does every square yard of earth. There is no state without a fixed territory. Living together on a common land binds people together.
- Government: The purpose for which people live together cannot be realized unless they are properly organized and accept certain rules of conduct. The agency created to enforce rules of conduct and ensure obedience is called government. It is through this medium that common policies are determined, common affairs regulated and common interests promoted. Without a government, the people will lack cohesion and means of collective action.
- Sovereignty: A people inhabiting a definite portion of territory and having a government do not constitute a state so long as they do not possess sovereignty. India before 15 August 1947 had all the other elements of the state but it lacked sovereignty and therefore it was not a State. Sovereignty is the supreme power by which the state commands and exerts political obedience from its people.
Consider the following statements with regard to Fundamental Duties:
- The framers of the Indian constitution incorporated Fundamental duties with a purpose to create a feeling of nationalism among the citizens.
- The parliament by passing a bill with simple majority can change the provisions in Fundamental duties.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Neither 1 nor 2
- Statement 1 is incorrect. The original constitution did not have fundamental duties. These duties are incorporated in 1976 after the 42nd amendment.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Any changes in the Fundamental duties require amendment of the constitution.
Preamble declares India as sovereign. What does this imply?
- There is no authority above India and is free to conduct its own affair.
- India can acquire a foreign territory or it can cede a part of its territory in favor of a foreign state.
Select the correct answer(s)?
Both are correct
Which among the following constitutional provision form the basis of India being a welfare state?
- Preamble 2. Fundamental Rights 3. Directive Principles of State Policy 4. Fundamental Duties
1,2,3
On which of the following grounds, the constitutional validity of a legislative enactment or an executive order can be challenged in the Supreme Court? 1. When it infringes the Fundamental Rights. 2. When it is outside the competence of the authority which has framed it. 3. When it is repugnant to the constitutional provisions.
All
Child Labour Amendment (2016)?
- amended the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 ——————-> Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986.
- prohibits the employment of children below 14 years in all occupations and processes.
- Further, the Amendment Act prohibits the employment of adolescents (14
to 18 years of age) in certain hazardous occupations and processes. - more stringent punishment
Art 25?
- Freedom of conscience: Inner freedom of an individual
- Right to profess: Declaration of one’s religious beliefs and faith openly
- Right to practice: Performance of religious worship, rituals, ceremonies
and exhibition - Right to propagate
- But, it does not include a right to convert another person to one’s own religion. Forcible conversions impinge on the ‘freedom of conscience’ guaranteed to all the persons alike.
- citizens as well as non-citizens.
- Qualifications:
- HOWEVER, subject to public order, morality, health and other provisions relating to fundamental rights
- State can regulate or restrict any economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice
- 2 explanantions: kirpans; Hindus includes Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists (in the context that state can throw open Hindu insti of a public character to all classes.)
Freedom of Religion and Attire (a constitutional perspective on recent Hijab row in KN)?
whether educational institutions can impose a strict dress code that could interfere with rights of students
- Art 25(1) is a right that guarantees a negative liberty — which means that the state shall ensure that there is no interference or obstacle to exercise this freedom.
- However, like all fundamental rights, the state can restrict the right for grounds of public order, decency, morality, health and other state interests.
- Over the years, the Supreme Court has evolved a practical test of sorts to determine what religious practices can be constitutionally protected and what can be ignored. In 1954, the Supreme Court held in the Shirur Mutt case that the term “religion” will cover all rituals and practices “integral” to a religion. The test to determine what is integral is termed the “essential religious practices” test.
- the test, a judicial determination of religious practices, has often been criticised by legal experts as it pushes the court to delve into theological spaces. In criticism of the test, scholars agree that it is better for the court to prohibit religious practices for public order rather than determine what is so essential to a religion that it needs to be protected.
- In several instances, the court has applied the test to keep certain practices out.
- In a 2004 ruling, the Supreme Court held that the Ananda Marga sect had no fundamental right to perform Tandava dance in public streets, since it did not constitute an essential religious practice of the sect.
- in 2016, a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the discharge of a Muslim airman from the Indian Air Force for keeping a beard. The judges distinguished the case of a Muslim airman from that of Sikhs who are allowed to keep a beard. The court essentially held that keeping a beard was not an essential part of Islamic practices. However this assessment was not made by examinig religious practices but based on a remark by a senior Muslim advocate., who indicated that there are varying interpretations on the issue in Islam.
- As far as Hijab is considered,
- In Amna Bint Basheer v Central Board of Secondary Education (2016), the Kerala HC held that the practice of wearing a hijab constitutes an essential religious practice.
- in Fathima Tasneem v State of Kerala (2018). A single Bench of the Kerala HC held that collective rights of an institution would be given primacy over individual rights of the petitioner. However, the school in this case was minority school (Catholic) while the school at the centre of the row in KN is a govt edu institution.
- Bombay HC in In Fathema Hussain Sayed v Bharat Education Society case, 2003 also ruled in favour of the education institution prohibiting hijab. But this institution was an all girls’ institution.
- Arguments of petitioners
- petitioners have argued that wearing a hijab is an expression protected under Article 19(1)(a). The petitioners have argued that a student silently wearing a hijab/headscarf and attending class cannot in any manner be said to be a practice that disturbs “public order” and is only a profession of their faith, thus an order banning it cannot seek refuge under reasonable restrictions clause of Art 19.
- The petitioners have also argued that the ban on headscarves violates the fundamental right to equality since other religious markers, such as a turban worn by a Sikh, are not explicitly prohibited.
- They also argued that the rules prescribed wearing of a dupatta for women and the state cannot dictate the manner of wearing that dupatta if a student wishes to cover her head with it.
Art 26?
- Rights of religious Denominations:
- Right to establish and maintain institu-tions for religious and charitable purposes
- Right to manage its own affairs in matters of religion
- Right to own and acquire movable and immovable property
- Right to administer such property in accordance with law
- Article 25 guarantees rights of individuals, while Article 26 guarantees
rights of religious denominations or their sections - subject to public order, morality and health but not subject to other provisions relating to the Fundamental Rights.
- Supreme Court held that a religious denomination must satisfy three conditions.
Supreme Court held that a religious denomination must satisfy three conditions. What are they?
- should be a collection of individuals who have a system of beliefs
(doctrines) which they regard as conducive to their spiritual well-being; - should have a common organisation
- should be designated by a distinctive name
Supreme Court held that the ‘Ramakrishna Mission’ and ‘Ananda Marga’ are religious denominations within the Hindu religion. It also held that Aurobindo Society is not a religious denomination
Art 27?
- no person shall be compelled to pay any taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination
- In other words, the State should not spend the public money collected by way of tax for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion
- prohibits the State from favouring, patronising and supporting one religion over the other. This means that the taxes can be used for the promotion or maintenance of all religions
- prohibits only levy of a tax and not a fee
Art 28?
- Freedom from Attending Religious Instruction
- four types of educational institutions:
- Institutions wholly maintained by the State.
- Institutions administered by the State but established under any endowment or trust.
- Institutions recognised by the State.
- Institutions receiving aid from the State.
- In 1, religious instruction is completely prohibited while in 2, religious instruction is permitted; in 3 and 4, religious instruction is permitted on a voluntary basis.
Art 29?
- Two provisions:
- any section of the citizens residing in any part of India having a distinct language, script or culture of its own, shall have the right to conserve the same
- no citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, or language.
- Article 29 grants protection to both religious minorities as well as
linguistic minorities. - However, the SC held that the scope of this article is not necessarily restricted to minorities only because of the use of words ‘section of citizens’ in the Article that include minorities as well as majority.
Art 30?
- Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions
- All minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. Minority Edu insti are of 3 types:
- institutions that seek recognition as well as aid from the State: these are subject to regulatory powers of state wrt syllabus, academics, discipline, teaching employment etc.
- institutions that seek only recognition NOT aid from the State: these are also subject to regulatory powers of state wrt syllabus, academics, discipline, teaching employment etc.
- institutions that neither seek recognition nor aid from the State: free to administer their affairs but subject to operation of general laws like contract law, labour law, industrial law etc.
- compensation amount fixed by the State for the compulsory
acquisition of any property of a minority educational institution shall not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed to them (44th CAA; to counter deletion of property rights as FR) - In granting aid, the State shall not discriminate against any educational institution managed by a minority.
- right under Article 30 also includes the right of a minority to impart
education to its children in its own language.
- All minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. Minority Edu insti are of 3 types:
- protection under Article 30 is confined only to minorities (religious or linguistic)
- However, the term ‘minority’ has not been defined anywhere in the Constitution
SC’s summarization wrt Art 30?
- Case: Secy of malankara Syrian catholic College case 2007
- rights of minorities wrt educational insti are
- To choose its governing body in whom the founders of the institution
have faith and confidence - To appoint teaching staff as also non-teaching staff
- To admit eligible students of their choice and to set up a reasonable
fee structure
- To choose its governing body in whom the founders of the institution
- right conferred on minorities under Article 30 is only to ensure equality with the majority and not intended to place the minorities in a more advantageous position. general laws of the land relating to national interest, national security, social welfare, public order, morality, health, sanitation, taxation etc., applicable to all
- right to establish and administer educational institutions is not absolute. Nor does it include the right to maladminister. There can be regulatory measures like laying down eligibility criteria and qualifications
- Extention of aid by the State, does not alter the nature and character of the minority educational institutions. The conditions can be imposed by the State to ensure proper utilization of the aid, without however diluting or abridging the right under Article 30(1)
Art 32?
- ambedkar called it the ‘soul and heart of the constitution’
- basic feature
- writs
- Parliament can empower any other court to issue directions, orders and
writs of all kinds. However, without prejudice to the above powers conferred on the Supreme Court. Any other court here does not include high courts - President can suspend the right to move any court for the enforcement of the fundamental rights during a national emergency (Art 359)
- SC’s ‘original’ and ‘wide’(power is not restricted to issuing of orders
or directions but also writs of all kinds) but ‘not exclusive’ powers. - Article 32 cannot be invoked simply to determine the constitutionality
of an executive order or a legislation unless it directly infringes any of the FRs.
WRITS?
- Before 1950, only the High Courts of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras had the power to issue the writs
- borrowed from English law
- Habeas Corpus
- Mandamus
- Prohibition
- Certiorari
- Quo-Warranto
Habeas Corpus?
- can be issued against both public authorities as well as private individuals.
- Not issued if
- detention is lawful,
- the proceeding is for contempt of a legislature or a court,
- detention is by a competent court, and
- detention is outside the jurisdiction of the court
Mandamus?
- means ‘we command’
- to a public official asking him to perform his official duties that he has failed or refused to perform
- can also be issued against any public body, a corporation, an inferior court, a tribunal or government
- NOT
- against a pvt individual or body
- to enforce deptt instr without statutory backing
- when duty is discretionary
- to enforce a Contractual obligation
- against President or state Guv
- against CJ of a HC acting in judcial capacity
Prohibition?
- issued by a higher court to a lower court or tribunal to prevent the latter from exceeding its jurisdiction or usurping a jurisdiction that it does not possess
- can be issued only against judicial and quasijudicial authorities.
- It is not available against administrative authorities, legislative bodies, and private individuals or bodies.
Certiorari?
- means ‘to be certified’ or ‘to be informed’
- issued by a higher court to a lower court or tribunal either to transfer a case pending with the latter to itself or to squash the order of the latter in a case (Thus preventive as well as curative)
- issued on the grounds of excess of jurisdiction or lack of jurisdiction or error of law
- available against judicial, quasi-judicial as well as administrative authorities (admin added in 1991 by SC) bt nt aginst legislative or pvt individuals or bodies
quo warranto?
- issued by the court to enquire into the legality of claim of a person to a public office
- can be issued only in case of a substantive public office of a permanent character created by a statute or by the Constitution. It cannot be issued in cases of ministerial office or private office.
- Unlike the other four writs, this can be sought by any interested person and not necessarily by the aggrieved person
Which article deals with FR wrt armed forces?
Art 33
Art 33?
- ONLY Parliament can restrict or abrogate FR for membrs of armed forces, para-military, police, intelligence agencies and analogous forces.
- any such law cannot be challenged in any court on the grounds that it violates FR
- Army Act,1950; Navy Act, 1950; Air force Act,1950 etc. impose restrictions on freedom of speech, RT form associations, right to communicate with press etc.
- also covers secular employees
- can also exclude court martials frm writ juris of SC and HCs wrt FR.
What is martial law?
ML imply the suspension of ordinary law and the government by military
tribunals. civil administration is run by the military authorities
according to their own rules and regulations framed outside the ordinary law.
Martial law vs National Emergency?
- FR:
- ML affects only FR
- NE affects nt only FR bt also C-S relations, distri of revenues and legislative power share
- courts
- ML suspends govt and ordinary law courts
- govt and ordinary law courts continue
- ground for imposition
- ML: breakdow of law and order
- NE: war, external aggression and armed rebellion
- area covered
- ML: specific area
- specific area or the whole country
- Consti
- ML: no specific provision in Consti. It is IMPLICIT
- specific and detailed provision in consti.
Which art deals with FR in martial law?
Art 34
Art 34?
- restriction on FR while ML in force in any area
- empowers Parliament to indemnify any govt servant or any other person for any act done by him for maintenance or restoration of order in any area where ML is in force and that cannot be chllenged due to FR
- Parliament can also validate any sentence passed, punishment inflicted, forfeiture ordered or other act done under martial law in such area
- Concept frm English bt nowhere defined in Consti
- SC held that declaration of ML doesn’t ipsi facto result in suspension of Habeas corpus
Art 35?
- power to make laws, to give effect to certain specified fundamental rights shall vest only in the Parliament and not in the state legislatures (even if some of these matters may fall under State list) to ensure uniformity thorughout India
- Parliament shall hv power to make laws wrt
- art 16: prescribing residence as a condition
- art 32: empowering any othr court to issue writs
- art 33: restricting or abrogating FR for armed forces
- art 34: indemnifying
- Parliament shall make laws for punishing offenses under FR like Untouchability (Art 17) and Human Trafficking (Art 23)
Right to property?
- originally FR-
- Art 19(1)(f) and
- Art 31: right aginst deprivation of his property; State can acquire on 2 conditions i.e. for Public purpose AND after payment of compensation
- led to a number of Constitutional amendments, that is, 1st, 4th, 7th, 25th, 39th, 40th and 42nd Amendments
- Through these amendments, Articles 31A, 31B and 31C have been added and modified
- Finally 44th CAA abolished RT Property as a FR by reepealing Art 19(a)(f) and Art 31 and instead inserted Art 300A in Part XII
Implications of RT Property as a legal (or a constitutional)right rather than a FR?
- can be regulated ie, curtailed, abridged or modified without constitutional amend-ment by an ordinary law of the Parliament
- protects private property against executive action but not against legislative action
- In case of violation, the aggrieved person cannot directly move the SC
- No guaranteed right to compensation in case of acquisition or requisition
of the private property by the state
Though the FR to Property under Part III has been
abolished, the Part III still carries two provisions which provide for the
guaranteed right to compensation in case of acquisition or requisition of the
private property by the state. What are they?
- When the State acquires the property of a minority educational institution
(Article 30) (added by 44th CAA) - When the State acquires the land held by a person under his personal
cultivation and the land is within the statutory ceiling limits (Article 31A) (17th CAA).
Exceptions to FR?
- Art 31A
- Art 31B
- Art 31C
Exceptions to FR: Art 31A?
- saves five categories of laws from being challenged and invalidated on the ground of contravention of FR under Art 14 and 19:
- acquisition of estates and related rights by state: also provides for the payment of compensation at market value when the state acquires the land held by a person under his personal cultivation and the land is within the statutory ceiling limit.
- taking over management of properties by the state
- amalgamation of corporations
- extinguishment or modification of rights of directors or shareholders of corporations
- extinguishment or modification of mining leases
Art 31B?
- saves the acts and regulations included in the 9th schedule from being challenged and invalidated on the ground of contravention of any of the fundamental rights
- I.R. Coelho case, 2007: SC ruled that there cannot be any blanket immunity frm JR and law put in 9th schedule after SC’s intro of concept of Basic structure can be subjected to JR if they violated FR guaranteed under Art 14,15,19 and 21 (i.e. Basic str of consti)
- no. of acts and regulations in 9th sched: 282
Art 31C?
- inserted by 25th CAA
- immunity to laws that seeks to implement socialistic DSP of Art 39(b) and (c) frm FR under art 14 and 19.
- Also had a second provision that stated that “No law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be questioned in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such a policy”, bt this was struck down by Sc in Keshavanand Bharati case
- 42nd CAA also sought to increase the scope of first provision to all DSPs bt this was again struck down by SC in Minerva Mills case.
Criticisms of FR?
- subjected to innumerable exceptions, restrictions, qualifications and
explanations - mainly political rights and lacks social and economic rights like right to work, right to rest etc.
- vague: words like ‘minority’, ‘public order’ not defined plus complicated language used
- no sacrosatnct;’basic str’ only limitation
- suspension during Emergency
- judiciary-> expensive remedy
- preventive detention takes away the spirit and substance of the chapter on fundamental rights
- no consistent philossophy: as viewed by Sir Ivor Jennings
Which article gives right of adult suffrage?
Art 326
Regulating act, 1773?
- first step taken by British govt to control and regulate affairs of EIC in INdia, requiring Court of Dirctors to report on its revenue, civil and military affairs in India. (Thus, for the first time, the British cabinet was given the right to exercise control over Indian affairs.)
- Guv of Bengal-> Guv General of Bengal: Lord Warren Hastings
- Executive council- 4 membered
- Guvs of Bombay and Madras subordinate
- SC at Calcutta
- prohibited pvt trade or bribes by comopany officials
1781 amendment?
The SC established under 1773 act had original and appellate jurisdictions where all
subjects could seek redressal. In practice, however, the
Supreme Court had a debatable jurisdiction vis-a-vis the council which created various problems. With the amendment, The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was defined—within Calcutta, it was to administer the
personal law of the defendant.
Pitt’s india act 1784?
- distinguished between the commercial and political functions of the
Company - Company’s territories in India were for the first time called the ‘British possessions in India’ and gave the British govt supreme control over Company’s affairs and its admin in India
- created a new body, Board of Control, to manage political, civil and military affairs while Court of Directors shall see to commercial affairs. BoC consisted of chancellor of exchequer, a secretary of state, and four members of the Privy Council (to be appointed by the Crown)
- In INdia, the guv Gen was to have a council of 3, ncluding the commander of Chief, and the presidencies of Bombay and Madras were made subordinate to Guv Gen
- A general prohibition was placed on aggressive wars
and treaties (breached often).
Charter Act of 1813?
In England, the business interests were pressing for an end to the Company’s monopoly over trade in India because of a spirit of laissez-faire and the continental system by Napoleon by which the European ports were closed for Britain. The 1813 Act sought to redress these grievances
● The Company’s monopoly over trade in India ended,
but the Company retained the trade with China and the trade
in tea.
● The Company was to retain the possession of
territories and the revenue for 20 years more, without
prejudice to the sovereignty of the Crown. (Thus, the
constitutional position of the British territories in India was
defined explicitly for the first time.)
● A sum of one lakh rupees was to be set aside for
the revival, promotion, and encouragement of literature,
learning, and science among the natives of India, every year.
(This was an important statement from the point of State’s responsibility for education.)
● The regulations made by the Councils of Madras,
Bombay, and Calcutta were now required to be laid before
the British Parliament. The constitutional position of the
British territories in India was thus explicitly defined for the
first time.
● Separate accounts were to be kept regarding
commercial transactions and territorial revenues. The power
of superintendence and direction of the Board of Control was
not only defined but also enlarged considerably.
● Christian missionaries were also permitted to come
to India and preach their religion.
Charter Act of 1833?
- Guv Gen of bengal-> Guv Gen of INdia and was given all civil and military powers. Thus, act created, for the first time, a Government of India having authority over the entire territorial area possessed by the British in India. A law member was added to the governor general’s
council for professional advice on law-making. - deprived the governor of Bombay and Madras of their legislative
powers. The Governor-General of India was given exclusive legislative
powers for the entire British India - ended the activities of the East India Company as a commercial body,
which became a purely administrative body. Territories of India were to be governed in the
name of the Crown. Lease of the company was further extended by 20 yrs. - attempted to introduce a system of open competition for selection of civil servants, and stated that the Indians should not be debarred
- way was paved for the wholesale European colonisation of India.
- All restrictions on European immigration and the acquisition of property in India were lifted
- Company’s monopoly over trade with China and in tea also ended.
- Indian laws were to be codified and consolidated
- No Indian citizen was to be denied employment under the Company on the basis of religion, colour, birth, descent,
etc. (Although the reality was different, this declaration
formed the sheet-anchor of political agitation in India.). - The administration was urged to take steps to
ameliorate the conditions of slaves and to ultimately abolish
slavery. (Slavery was abolished in 1843.)
Charter Act of 1853
- separated, for the first time, the legislative and executive functions of
the Governor-General’s council; with the addition of 6 new members for legislative purpose, established Indian (Central) Legislative council that functioned as a mini-Parliament. However, a law to be promulgated needed the assent of the governor general, and the governor general could veto any bill of the legislative council - The Company’s patronage over the services was
dissolved—the services were now thrown open to a competitive
examination.; Accordingly, the Macaulay Committee (the Committee on
the Indian Civil Service) was appointed in 1854 - introduced, for the first time, local representation in the Indian (Central)
Legislative Council. Of the six new legislative members of the governor general’s council, four members were appointed by the local (provincial)
governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal and Agra.
GoI Act 1858?
- mainly altered Governance inEngland and didn’t change much in india
- provided that India henceforth was to be governed by, and in the name
of, Her Majesty.Guv-Gen changed to Viceroy of India, as the direct
representative of the British Crown in India - ended the system of double government by abolishing the Board of
Control and Court of Directors. - created a new office, Secretary of State for India, a member of the British cabinet and was responsible ultimately to the British Parliament.
- established a 15-member Council of India to assist the secretary of state
for India, as a body corporate, capable of suing and being sued in India and in England.
Indian councils Act of 1861?
- a beginning of representative institutions by associating Indians
with the law-making process. It thus provided that the viceroy should
nominate some Indians as non-official members of his expanded legis council. the Raja of Benaras, the Maharaja of Patiala and Sir Dinkar Rao. - initiated the process of decentralisation by restoring the legislative
powers to the Bombay and Madras Presidencies. This policy of
legislative devolution resulted in the grant of almost complete internal
autonomy to the provinces in 1937. - establishment of new legislative councils for Bengal, North-Western Frontier Province (NWFP) and Punjab
- ‘portfolio’ system, though intro by Canning in 1859, recognised here
- empowered the Viceroy to issue ordinances, without the concurrence of
the legislative council, during an emergency. The life of such an
ordinance was six months.
Indian councils Act of 1892?
- increased non-official members in both central and provincial legislative councils bt retained official majority
- increased the functions of legislative councils and gave them the power
of discussing the budget5 and addressing questions to the executive - limited and indirect provision for the use of election in filling up some of the non-official seats both in the Central and provincial legislative councils, though nt using the word ‘election’ and instead nomination to CLC on the recommendation of provincial LC and Bengal Chamber of Commerce and nomination to PLC on recommendation of district boards, municipalities etc.
Indian Councils Act of 1909 (Morley-Minto reforms)?
- considerably increased the size of the legislative councils, both Central
and provincial. retained official majority in the Central Legislative Council but allowed the provincial legislative councils to have non-official majority - enlarged the deliberative functions of the legislative councils at both the
levels like allowed to ask supplementary questions, move resolutions on the budget, - provided (for the first time) for the association of Indians with the
executive Councils of the Viceroy and Governors. Satyendra Prasad
Sinha became the first Indian to join the Viceroy’s Executive Council. - introduced a system of communal representation for Muslims by
accepting the concept of ‘separate electorate’. Lord Minto came to be known as the Father of Communal Electorate. - separate representation of presidency corporations, chambers of commerce, universities and zamindars.
GoI Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms): Background and Provisions?
Background:
- Amidst 1st WW, On August 20, 1917, the British Government declared, for the first time, that its objective was the gradual introduction of responsible government in India
Provisions:
- separating the central and provincial subjects for legislating. However, the structure of government continued to be centralised and unitary
- DYARCHY: divided the provincial subjects into two parts—transferred and reserved
- separated, for the first time, provincial budgets from the Central budget
and authorised the provincial legislatures to enact their budgets. - Introduced Bicamerlaism and direct elections for the first time. Indian Legislative Council was replaced by a bicameral legislature consisting of an Upper House (Council of State) and a Lower House (Legislative Assembly). The majority of members of both the Houses were chosen by direct election.
- granted franchise to a limited number of people on the basis of property, tax or education.
- three of the six members of the Viceroy’s executive Council (other than the commander-in-chief) were to be Indian
- extended the principle of communal representation by providing
separate electorates for Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians and
Europeans. - created a new office of the High Commissioner for India in London and
transferred to him some of the functions hitherto performed by the
Secretary of State - provided for the establishment of a public service commission. led to Central Public Service Commission was set up in 1926
- provided for the appointment of a statutory commission to inquire into
and report on its working after ten years of its coming into force.
recommendations of Simon commission? After that?
- abolition of dyarchy,
- extension of responsible government in the provinces,
- establishment of a federation of British India and princely states,
- continuation of communal electorate
To consider the proposals of the commission, the British Government convened three round table conferences of the representatives of the British Government, British India and Indian princely states.
Communal Award?
- Aug 1932, by British PM, Ramsay McDonald
- The award not only continued separate electorates for the Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians and Europeans but also extended it to the depressed classes (scheduled castes)
- Poona Pact, retained the Hindu joint electorate and gave reserved seats to the depressed classes.
GoI Act, 1935?
- establishment of an All-India Federation consisting of provinces and princely states as units. However, the federation never came into being as
the princely states did not join it. - division of powers: Federal, Provincial and concurrent list. residuary powers given to Viceroy
- abolished dyarchy in the provinces and introduced ‘provincial autonomy’ in their defined space
- introduced bicameralism in six out of eleven provinces.
- Act introduced responsible governments in provinces, that is, the governor was required to act with the advice of ministers responsible to the provincial legislature. This came into effect in 1937 and was discontinued in 1939.
- adoption of dyarchy at the Centre: reserved and transferred subjects. However, this provision didn’t come into operation at all.
- extended the principle of communal representation by providing
separate electorates for depressed classes (scheduled castes), women and labour (workers). - abolished the Council of India, established by the Government of India
Act of 1858. The secretary of state for India was provided with a team of
advisors. - extended franchise. About 10 per cent of the total population got the
voting right. - provided for the establishment of a Reserve Bank of India, a Federal PSC, a Provincial PSC, Joint PSC and a Federal Court.
Indian Independence act, 1947?
- ended the British rule in India and declared India as an independent and
sovereign state from August 15,1947 - provided for the partition of India and creation of two independent
dominions of India and Pakistan with the right to secede from the British
Commonwealth. - abolished the office of viceroy and provided, for each dominion, a
governor-general, who was to be appointed by the British King on the
advice of the dominion cabinet - empowered the Constituent Assemblies of the two dominions to frame
and adopt any constitution for their respective nations and to repeal any
act of the British Parliament, including the Independence act itself. - empowered the Constituent Assemblies of both the dominions to
legislate for their respective territories - abolished the office of the secretary of state for India and transferred his
functions to the secretary of state for Commonwealth Affairs - proclaimed the lapse of British paramountcy over the Indian princely
states and treaty relations with tribal areas from August 15,1947. - provided for the governance of each of the dominions and the provinces
by the Government of India Act of 1935, till the new Constitutions were
framed. The dominions were however authorised to make modifications
in the Act. - designated the Governor-General of India and the provincial governors
as constitutional (nominal) heads of the states. They were made to act on the advice of the respective council of ministers in all matters. - dropped the title of Emperor of India from the royal titles of the king of
England.
Constitutional Bodies?
- EC
- UPSC/SPSC
- Finance Commission
- NCSC/NCST
- SO for Linguistic minorities
- CAG
- AG
- Advocate General of te state
EC: features?
- Art 324
- permanent and independent body
- power over election to Parliament, SL, President of India and VP
- All india body
EC: composition?
- CEC + any no. of ECs as decided by president
- 1950-Oct 1989: single member body
- Oct 1989-Jan 1990: 3 ECs (voting age 21->18)
- Jan 1990-Oct 1993: single member
- after Oct 1993: 3 ECs
- The chief election commissioner and the two other election commissioners
have equal powers and receive equal salary, allowances and other perquisites - In case of difference of opinion amongst the Chief election commissioner and/or two other election commissioners, the matter is decided by the Commission by majority.
EC:
T/F: In case of difference of opinion amongst the Chief election commissioner and/or two other election commissioners, the matter is decided by the.CEC, as he is the first among equals.
F
by majority, even though CEC is the chairman
EC: appointment?
by President
EC: appointment process reforms?
- SC has recognised that “Election Commission is not only responsible for conducting free and fair elections but it also renders a quasi-judicial function between the various political parties including the ruling government and other parties. In such circumstances the executive cannot be a sole participant in the appointment of members of Election Commission as it gives unfettered discretion to the ruling party to choose someone whose loyalty to it is ensured and thereby renders the selection process vulnerable to manipulation.”
- Three Writ Petitions are urging the Supreme Court to declare that the current practice of appointment of ECs by the Centre violates Article 14, Article 324(2), and Democracy as a basic feature of the Constitution. These petitions argue for an independent system for appointment of ECs
- In 1975 itself, the Justice Tarkunde Committee recommended that ECs be appointed on the advice of a Committee comprising the Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Opposition Leader and the Chief Justice. This was reiterated by the Dinesh Goswami Committee in 1990 and the Law Commission in 2015.
- The 4th Report (2007) of the Second Administrative Reforms Commission additionally recommended that the Law Minister and the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha be included in such a Collegium.
- Art 324(2) contains a ‘subject to’ clause which provides that both the number and tenure of the ECs shall be “subject to provisions of any law made in that behalf by Parliament, be made by the President.” This ‘subject to’ clause was introduced, in the words of B.R. Ambedkar, to “prevent either a fool or knave or a person who is likely to be under the thumb of the Executive.” It was left to Parliament to enact legislation regarding the appointment of ECs. Apart from enacting a law in 1989 enlarging the number of ECs from one to three, Parliament has so far not enacted any changes to the appointment process.
EC: regional commissioners?
-
president may also appoint after consultation with the election
commission such regional commissioners as he may consider necessary
to assist the election commission.
EC: conditions of service and tenure of office?
- for both EC members as well as regional commissioners, President determines.
- salary, allowances and other perquisites, which are similar to those of a judge of the Supreme Court
- hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 65
years
EC: removal?
- CEC: He cannot be removed from his office except in same manner and on the same grounds as a judge of the Supreme Court. In other words, he can be removed by the president on the basis of a resolution passed to that effect by both the Houses of Parliament with special majority, either on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Thus, he does not hold his office till the pleasure of the president, though he is appointed by him.
-
Any other election commissioner or a regional commissioner cannot be
removed from office except on the recommendation of the CEC. He doesn’t need to be impeached bt simply removed by President on the advice of CEC.
T/F: EC members is appointed by President and hold their office till the pleasure of the President.
F
removal only on the grounds and in the manner of removal of a SC judge.
EC: provisions for Independence?
- Security of tenure to CEC
- service conditions of CEC (not all the members of CEC) cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment
- removal of any other EC member or regional commissioner requires recommendation of CEC
EC: Issues in independence?
- Consti hasn’t prescribed any qualifications for members
- COnsti has not specified the term
- Consti hasn’t debarred retiring ECs frm any further appointment y Govt. They can be re-appointed to the same office as well.
EC: challenges faced in effectiveness?
- not adequately equipped to regulate the political parties. It has no power in enforcing inner-party democracy and regulation of party finances.
- Independence from executive is being questioned. The meeting of CECs and PMO in 2021 was a bad look. Plus, Allegations of EVMs malfunctioning, getting hacked and not registering votes, corrodes the trust of the general masses in ECI.
EC: powers and functions?
- Administrative
- area of constituencies otbo Delimitation Commission act
- electoral rolls and registration
- schedule of elections
- recognition to political parties and allot symbol
- Advisory
- advise President/Guv on disqualification of MPs/MLAs
- advise the president whether elections can be held in a state under
president’s rule in order to extend the period of emergency after one year.
- Quasi-Judicial
- settling disputes of recognition to PPs or symbols allotted to them
- disputes related to electoral arrangements
- Code of Conduct
EC: state level?
At state level, EC is assisted by Chief Electoral Officer. below this, Collector at district level acts as the returning officer for whole district, who appoints a returning officer for every constituency and a presiding officer for every polling booth.
State Election Commission?
The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of all elections to the panchayats shall be vested in the state election commission.
It consists of a state election commissioner to be appointed by the governor.
His conditions of service and tenure of office shall also be determined by the governor.
He shall not be removed from the office except in the manner and on the grounds prescribed for the removal of a judge of the state high court . A judge of a high court can be removed from his office by the president on the recommendation of the Parliament. This means that a state election commissioner cannot be removed by the governor, though appointed by him
His conditions of service shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
The state legislature may make provision with respect to all matters relating to elections to the panchayats.
T/F: State Election Commissioners work independently of the Election Commission of India
T
Consider the following statements regarding state election commission.
1. The Governor appoints the state election commissioner and determines his conditions of service and tenure of office.
2. The state election commissioner can be removed only in the manner and on the grounds as a judge of a high court.
3. It is mandatory upon the State Election Commissions to adopt the Electoral rolls created by the Election Commission of India for the Legislative assembly polls.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a) 1 only
b) 1, 2
c) 1, 3
d) 1, 2, 3
B
The Governor appoints the state election commissioner and determines his conditions of service and tenure of office. However, the state election commissioner can be removed only in like manner and on the like grounds as a judge of a high court.
Appointment of Chief electoral Officer at State level?
by CEC in consultation with state Govt.
UPSC: part?
part XIV
UPSC: composition? qualification?
- Constitution doesn’t specify the strength
- No. decided by president
- Usually, 9-11 members, including the chairman
- NO qualifications prescribed except that one-half of the members of the Commission should be such persons who have held office for at least ten years either under the GoI or under the government of a state.
UPSC: appointment?
by President
UPSC: conditions of service and tenure?
- Conditions of service decided by President
- chairman and members of the Commission hold office for a term of
six years or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
UPSC: removal of members?
- can be removed by President in the manner as provided in the Constitution.
- NO Impeachment required bt grounds mentioned
- insolvent (bankrupt)
- paid employment outside , while in office
- If unfit to continue by reason of infirmity of mind or body, in the opinion of the Prez
- Misbehaviour:
- In this case, Prez has to refer the matter to SC for enquiry, the advice rendered to be binding
- Defn of ‘misbehaviour’: (a) interested in any contract or agreement by GoI or a SG or (b) participates in any way in the profit of such contract or agreement
UPSC: President can appoint one of the members of the UPSC as an acting
chairman in the following two circumstances?
(a) When the office of the chairman falls vacant; or
(b) When the chairman is unable to perform his functions due to absence or
some other reason.
UPSC: reappointment?
- Chairman: not eligible for further employment in the GoI or a state
- member of UPSC: eligible for appointment as chairman of UPSC or SPSC bt nt any other employment in GoI or a state
- Chairman or member of UPSC: nt eligible for re-appointment to the same office.
UPSC: independence ensured by?
- security of tenure to both chairman and members
- conditions of service cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment
- entire expenses incl salaries charged on CFI
UPSC: functions?
T/F: jurisdiction can be extended by Parliament.
- exams for All-India services, central services (GrpA and Grp B) and Public services of UTs; selection by UPSC doesn’t confer any right to the post upon the candidate. Though, All such cases of non-acceptance must be approved by the Appointments Committee of the Union cabinet. An individual ministry or department has no power to reject the advice of the UPSC.
- any needs of a state on request of state guv and approval of Prez
- consulted on promotions, transfers and disciplinary matters
- consulted on Matters of temporary appointments for period exceeding one year and on regularisation of appointments.
T
UPSC: matters that are kept outside the functional jurisdiction of the
UPSC?
T/F: Parliament can increase or decrease the jurisdiction of UPSc.
(a) While making reservations of appointments or posts in favour of any
backward class of citizens.
(b) While taking into consideration the claims of SCs/STs in making appointments to services and posts.
(c) With regard to the selections for chairmanship or membership of
commissions or tribunals, posts of the highest diplomatic nature and a bulk
of group C and group D services.
(d) With regard to the selection for temporary or officiating appointment to a
post if the person appointed is not likely to hold the post for more than a
year.
F
Parliament can increase bt President can decrease (bt all such regulations made by the president shall be laid before each House of Parliament for at least 14 days. The Parliament can amend or repeal them).
T/F: UPSC is the Central Personnel agency in india.
F
UPSC is only a central recruiting agency while the Department of Personnel and Training is the central personnel agency in India.
UPSC vs CVC?
- both are consulted in disciplinary matters wrt a civil servant
- However, the UPSC, being an independent constitutional body, has an edge over the CVC, a statutory body.
SPSC: composition? qualification?
- strength left to discretion of Guv
- no qualifications prescribed except that 50% should be such persons who hv held office for at least 10 yrs under GoI or a state Govt
SPSC: appointment?
by Guv
SPSC: conditions of service and tenure?
- Consti authorises Guv to determine Conditions of service
- hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 62 years, whichever is earlier
T/F: SPSC members or chairman can relinquish their
offices at any time by addressing their resignation to the President, even though they are appointed by Guv.
F
resignation to Guv
SPSC: removal?
- only by President
- on the same grounds and in the same manner as he can remove a chairman or a member of the UPSC
SPSC: powers DIFFERENT frm UPSC?
SPSC is consulted by the governor while framing rules for appointment to judicial service of the state other than the posts of district judges. In this regard, the concerned state high court is also consulted.
T/F: Constitution makes a provision for the establishment of JPSC and so, JPSC is a constitutinal body.
F
Though Consti does make the provision, it doesn’t create any JPSc and that power resides with the Parliament.
JPSC: features?
- mostly similar to SPSCs
- BUT, appointment OR conditions of service determined by OR resignation to OR removal by President
UPSC: pre-independence history?
- GoIAct 1919: CPSC; set up in 1926 for recruiting civil servants
- GoI Act 1935: FPSC + Provincial PSC and JPSC
Finance Commssion: Art? feature? appointment?
- Art 280
- Quasi-Judicial body
- constituted by the president of India every fifth year or at such earlier time as he considers necessary
Fin comm: Composition?
- Chairman + 4 members
- Constitution authorises the Parliament to determine the qualifications
of members of the commission and the manner in which they should be
selected- chairman should be a person having experience in public affairs
- other members frm amongst the following:
- A judge of high court or one qualified to be appointed as one.
- A person who has specialised knowledge of finance and accounts of the
government. - A person who has wide experience in financial matters and in
administration. - A person who has special knowledge of economics.
- A person who has specialised knowledge of finance and accounts of the
- A judge of high court or one qualified to be appointed as one.
Fin Commission:
- Tenure?
- Reappointment?
- hold office for such period as specified by the president in his order.
- They are eligible for reappointment.
Fin Comm: functions?
- Vertical Distribution: distribution of the net proceeds of taxes to be shared between the Centre and the states
- Horizontal Distribution: allocation between the states of the respective shares of such proceeds.
- principles that should govern the grants-in-aid to the states by the
Centre (i.e., out of the consolidated fund of India) - measures needed to augment the consolidated fund of a state to
supplement the resources of the panchayats and the municipalities in the
state on the basis of the recommendations made by the state finance
commission - Any other matter referred to it by the president in the interests of sound
finance
Fin Comm: advisory nature of the recommendation?
- not binding on GoI
- Dr. P.V. Rajamannar, the Chairman of the 4th FC, “Since the Finance Commission is a constitutional body expected to be quasi-judicial, its recommendations should not be turned down by the Government of India unless there are very compelling reasons”.
- constitution of India envisages the Finance commission as the balancing wheel of fiscal federalism in India
NCSC:
- Article?
- composition?
- Appointment?
- conditions of service and tenure of office?
- Art 338
- a chairperson, a vice-chairperson and three other members
- appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal
- determined by president; Under the Rules, they hold office for a term of three years.
NCSC: evolution?
- originally, Consti provided a Special Officer for SCs & STs, reporting to President; named as Commissioner for SCs&STs
- 1978: Government (through a Resolution) set up a non-statutory
- *multi-member Commission** for SCs and STs; the Office of Commissioner for SCs and STs also continued to exist.
- 1987: Government (through another Resolution) modified the fns and renamed it as NCSC&ST
- 65th CAA,1990: a high level multi-member NCSC&ST replaced the Commissioner for SCs and STs as well as the Commission set up under the Resolution of 1987
- 89th CAA,2003: bifurcation
NCSC: powers?
- while investigating any matter or inquiring into any complaint, has all the powers of a civil court trying a suit
- vested with the power to regulate its own procedure
- powers like summoning, discovery of any document, examining witnesses
- Central government and the state governments are required to consult
the Commission on all major policy matters affecting the SCs
What commission is there for OBCs and Anglo-Indians on the lines of NCSC?
NCSC, itself is required to discharge similar functions with regard to the other backward classes (OBCs) and the Anglo-Indian Community as it does with respect to the SCs
NOTE: NCSC’s powers wrt to OBCs are now repealed and given to NCBC.
NCST:
- Article?
- Evolution?
- art 338-A
- Evolution:
- NCSC&ST by 65th CAA,1990 as a constitutinal body
- Separate NCST by 89th CAA,1990
NCST: Extra functions added by President in 2005?
- measurs to confer ownership rights in respect of minor forest produce to STs living in forest areas
- safeguard rights of the tribal communities over mineral resources, water resources etc
- improve the efficacy of relief and rehabilitation measures for tribal groups displaced by development projects
- Measures to ensure ensure full implementation of the Provisions of
Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 - reduce and ultimately eliminate the practice of shifting cultivation by tribals
- involvement of tribal communities for protecting forests and undertaking social afforestation
T/F: NCSC and NCST are under the jurisdiction of Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
T
National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC): about? str? constitutional provisions? (can also refer f/c schemes for vulnerable sections)
- 102nd Constitution Amendment Act, 2018 provides constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC).
- Previously NCBC was a statutory body under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
Structure:
- The Commission consists of five members including a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and three other Members appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal.
- The conditions of service and tenure of office of the Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and other Members is determined by President.
Consti provisions:
- Article 340 deals with the need to, inter alia, identify those “socially and educationally backward classes”, understand the conditions of their backwardness, and make recommendations to remove the difficulties they face.
- 102nd Constitution Amendment Act inserted new Articles 338 B and 342 A.
- Article 338B provides authority to NCBC to examine complaints and welfare measures regarding socially and educationally backward classes.
- Article 342 A empowers President to specify socially and educationally backward classes in various states and union territories. He can do this in consultation with Governor of concerned State. However, law enacted by Parliament will be required if list of backward classes is to be amended.
- The amendment also brings about changes in Article 366.
NCBC: powers and responsibilities?
- to examine the request made for the inclusion of any category as a backward class or to investigate the conditions or problems faced by the category under inclusion and then tender such advice to the central government. The nature of that advice is ordinarily binding on the central government. (This function not mentioned under Art 338B, but was under the 1993 Act. Thus, effectively this is no more applicable )
- The commission investigates and monitors all matters relating to the safeguards provided for the socially and educationally backward classes under the Constitution or under any other law to evaluate the working of such safeguards.
- It participates and advises on the socio-economic development of the socially and educationally backward classes and to evaluate the progress of their development under the Union and any State.
- It presents to the President, annually and at such other times as the Commission may deem fit, reports upon the working of those safeguards. The President laid such reports before each House of Parliament.
- NCBC has to discharge such other functions in relation to the protection, welfare and development and advancement of the socially and educationally backward classes as the President may, subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament, by rule specify.
- It has all the powers of a civil court while trying a suit.
NCBC: historical evolution?
- Two Backward Class Commissions were appointed in 1950s and 1970s under Kaka Kalelkar and B.P. Mandal respectively.
- In Indra Sawhney case of 1992, Supreme Court had directed the government to create a permanent body to entertain, examine and recommend the inclusion and exclusion of various Backward Classes for the purpose of benefits and protection.
- In pursuant to these directions parliament passed National Commission for Backward Classes Act in 1993 and constituted the NCBC.
- 123rd Constitution Amendment bill of 2017 was introduced in Parliament to safeguard the interests of backward classes more effectively.
- Parliament has also passed a separate bill to repeal the National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993, thus 1993 act became irrelevant after passing the bill.
- The bill got the President assent in August 2018 and provided the constitutional status to NCBC.
The final say in regard to inclusion or exclusion of socially and economically backward classes (SEBCs) is firstly with
a) Supreme Court
b) Parliament
c) President
d) National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)
c
The Supreme Court held that “the final say in regard to inclusion or exclusion (or modification of lists) of SEBCs is firstly with the President, and thereafter, in case of modification or exclusion from the lists initially published, with the Parliament
T/F: Constitution makers viewed Special officer for Linguistic Minorities as critical for saving Tribal Culture.
F
Originally Consti didn’t have provision for SOLM
Evolution of Office for Special Officer of Linguisic Minorities?
- recommended by States reorganisation Commission
- 7th CAA, 1956: inserted art 350-B
SOLM:
- appointment?
- qualifications?
- conditions of service and tenure?
- removal?
- function?
- appointed by prez
- not mentioned in consti
- not mentioned in consti
- not mentioned in consti
- among others, has to submit to the President of India, the reports on the status of implementation of the Constitutional and the nationally agreed safeguards for the linguistic minorities
T/F: SOLM occupies an independent office and doesn’t come under any one ministry.
F
comes under Min of Minority affairs
defn of linguistic minority?
A linguistic minority is a group of people whose mother tongue is different from that of the majority in the state or part of a state. Thus, the linguistic minorities are determined on a state-wise basis.
Conscience of Constitution?
FR and DPSP, acc to Granville austin
CAG:
- Article?
- Ambedkar’s view?
- appointment?
- conditions of service and tenure?
- removal?
- art 128
- most imp officer under the Constitution of india
- by Prez by a warrant under his hand and seal
- salary and other service conditions are determined by the Parliament; salary equal to SC judge; 6yrs or upto 65 yrs age , whichever is earlier
- can be removed by the President on same grounds and in the same manner as a judge of the Supreme Court. In other words, he can be removed by the president on the basis of a resolution passed to that effect by both the Houses of Parliament with special majority, either on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
CAG’s oath?
- true faith and allegiance to consti
- uphold soverignty and integrity of India
- duly and faithfully and to the best of his ability, knowledge and judgement perform the duties of his office withhout fear or favour, affection or ill-will
- uphold consti and the laws
Measures to ensure independence of CAG?
- Security of tenure
- not eligible fr re-appointment under GoI or any state
- salary and conditions of service determined by parliament and cannot be altered to his disadvantage after his appointment
- conditions of service of persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department and the administrative powers of the CAG are prescribed by the president after consultation with the CAG.
- administrative expenses of the office of the CAG, including all salaries, allowances and pensions of persons serving in that office are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India
- no minister can represent the CAG in Parliament
T/F: Consti authorises President to prescribe the duties and powers of the CAG in relation to the accounts of the Union and of the states and of any other authority or body.
F
authorises the Parliament
duties and functions of the CAG?
acc to CAG’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) act, 1971
AUDIT of EXPENDITURE AND RECEIPTS of GOVTs
- audits expenditure related to CFI, CF of all states and CF of UTs with legislature
- audits expenditure frm Contingency Fund of India and Public acct of India as well as each state
- receipts and expenditure of the Centre and each state
- all transactions of the Central and state governments related to debt, sinking funds, deposits, advances, suspense accounts and remittance
business. He also audits receipts, stock accounts and others, with approval of the President. - ascertains and certifies the net proceeds of any tax or duty. His certificate is final.
AUDIT OF BODIES
- any deptt ofCG or SGs
- All bodies and authorities substantially financed from the Central or
state revenues - Government companies; Other corporations and bodies, when so required by related laws
- of any other authority when requested by the President or Governor. For example, the audit of local bodies
ADVISORY
- advises the President with regard to prescription of the form in which accounts of the Centre and the states shall be kept (Article 150)
- He acts as a guide, friend and philosopher of the Public Accounts
Committee of the Parliament.
T/F:
CAG compiles and maintains the accounts of state Govts bt nt of Central govt.
T
In 1976, he
was relieved of his responsibilities with regard to the compilation and
maintenance of accounts of the Central Government due to the separation
of accounts from audit, that is, departmentalisation of accounts
Audit reports submitted by CAG to the President?
Three audit reports:
- audit report on appropriation account: compare the actual expenditure with the expenditure sanctioned by the Parliament through the Appropriation Act,
- audit report on finance accounts: show the annual receipts and disbursements of the Union government , and
- audit report on public undertakings
T/F: CAG submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of the Centre to
President.
T
He submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of the Centre to President, who shall, in turn, place them before both the Houses of Parliament (Article 151).
T/F: CAG submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of a state to
governor
T
He submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of a state to
governor, who shall, in turn, place them before the state legislature
(Article 151).
- T/F: CAG is an agent of Parliament and conducts audit of expenditure on
behalf of the Parliament - T/F: CAG is responsible only to the Parliament.
- T
- T
CAG audit:features?
- expenditure vs receipt: CAG has more freedom with regard to audit of expenditure than with regard to audit of receipts, stores and stock.
- For expenditure he decides the scope of audit and frames his own audit codes and manuals, he has to proceed with the approval of the executive government in relation to rules for the conduct of the other audits
- CAG audit has 2 aspects: legal and regulatory audit (money was legally available or nt for the purpose it was spent for and whether the authority is proper or nt) as well as propriety audit (wisdom, faithfulness and economy of the expenditure).
- unlike the legal and regulatory audit, which is obligatory on the part of the CAG, the propriety audit is discretionary
Limitations on auditory powers of CAG?
- Secret Serviec expenditure: has to accept a certificate from the competent administrative authority
- Also doesn’t cover RBI, SBI, LIC, FCI. CAG can audit them but on advice of President only.
CAG’s role: India vs britain?
- CAG of India only performed the role of an Auditor General and not of a Comptroller but in Britain it has the power of both Comptroller as well as Auditor General.
- In India the CAG audits the accounts after the expenditure is committed i.e. ex post facto. In UK no money can be drawn from the public exchequer without the approval of the CAG.
- In India, CAG is not a member of the parliament while in Britain; CAG is a member of house of the Commons.
CAG audit and public corporations?
- Some corporations are audited totally and directly by the CAG, for
example, Damodar Valley Corporation, ONGC, Air India, Indian Airlines Corporation, and others. - Some other corporations are audited by private professional auditors who are appointed by the Central Government in consultation with the CAG. If necessary, the CAG can conduct supplementary audit. The examples are, Central Warehousing Corporation, Industrial Finance Corporation, and others.
- Some other corporations are totally subjected to private audit. In other
words, their audit is done exclusively by private professional auditors (directly submit their findings to parliament) and the CAG does not come into the picture at all. eg, RBI, LIC, SBI, FCI
CAG: History and Evolution?
- Office of the Accountant General was established in 1858 (the year the British took over administrative control of India from the East India Company).
- In 1860 Sir Edward Drummond was appointed as the first Auditor General.
- Meanwhile after some restructuring the Auditor General of India came to be called the Auditor and Accountant General to the Government of India.
- In 1866, the position was renamed Comptroller General of Accounts, and in 1884, it was re-designated as Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
- Under the Government of India Act 1919, the Auditor General became independent of the government as statutory backing was given for the position.
- The Government of India Act 1935 further strengthened the position of the Auditor General by providing for Provincial Auditors General in a federal set-up.
- The act also described the appointment and service procedures and gave a brief overview of the duties of the Auditor General of India.
- The Accounts and Audits Order of 1936 provided detailed accounting and auditing functions of the auditor general.
- This arrangement remained unchanged until India’s independence in 1947. After independence, Article 148 of the 1949 Indian Constitution provided for the establishment of a Comptroller and Auditor General to be appointed by the President of India.
- CAG jurisdiction was extended to Jammu and Kashmir in 1958.
- In 1971 the central government enacted the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers, and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971. The act made CAG responsible for both accounting and auditing duties for central and state governments.
- In 1976 CAG was relieved from accounting functions.
AGI:
- Article?
- appointment?
- qualification?
- conditions of service and tenure?
- removal?
- Art 76
- by Prez
- a person who is qualified to be appointed a judge of the SC i.e.
- he must be a citizen of India
- he must have been a judge of some HC for 5 years or an advocate of some HC for ten years or an eminent jurist, in the opinion of the president.
- term nt fixed by Consti; remuneration also nt fixed by consti and is decided by prez
- Constitution does not contain the procedure and grounds for his removal. He holds office during the pleasure of the president. This means that he may be removed by the president at any time.
AGI:
- Rights?
- Duties?
- Rights:
- right to audience in all courts
- right to speak and take part in proceedings of both houses or their joint sitting or any committee of which he may be a named member, Bt NO right to vote
- enjoys all the privileges and immunities that are available to a MP
- duties
- rep GoI in SC/HC
- rep GoI in any reference made by the Prez to SC under Art 143 (Article 143 of the Constitution authorises the president to seek the opinion of the Supreme court in the two categories of matters: On any question of law or fact of public importance which has arisen or which is likely to arise.)
- T/F: AGI is a full-time counsel for Govt.
- AGI doesn’t fall into the category of govt servants.
- AGI is debarred frm pvt legal practice while in office.
- F
- T
- F; though cannot argue against GoI or defend criminal prosecutions without permission of goI
T/F: Article 76 only mentions AGI and does not mention about the solicitor
general and additional solicitor general.
T
Advocate General of state:
- appointment?
- qualification?
- conditions of service and tenure?
- removal?
- appointed by Guv
- must be qualified to be appointed a judge of a HC i.e.
- citizen
- must hv held a judicial office for 10 yrs or been an avocate of a HC for 10 yrs
- term of office or the remuneratioin or tenure of the advocate general is not fixed by the Constitution. he holds office during pleasure of the Guv
- Constitution does not contain the procedure and grounds for his removal. he may be removed by the governor at any time. he may be removed by the governor at any time.
DPSP: intro?
- frm Irish Constitution of 1937, who had copied it frm Spanish Constitution
- Ambedkar: ‘novel features’
- Acc to Granville Austin, along with FRs, contain the philosophy of the consti and is the soul of the consti as well as Conscience of the Constitution.
DPSP: features?
- denotes the ideals that the State should keep in mind while formulating policies and enacting laws.
- resemble the ‘Instrument of Instructions’ enumerated in the Government of India Act of 1935. The only difference is that they are instructions to the legislature and the executive, while the ‘IoI’ was only for Guv-Gen and Guv.
- They aim at realising the high ideals of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity as outlined in the Preamble to the Constitution and seek to establish economic and social democracy in the country
- non-justiciable
- though non-justiciable, help the courts in examining and determining the constitutional validity of a law. The SC has ruled many a times that in determining the constitutionality of any law, if a court finds that the law in question seeks to give effect to a DPSP, it may consider such law to be
‘reasonable’ wrt Art14 or 19 and thus save such law from unconstitutionality.
DPSP: socialistic ones?
- Art 38: promote welfare by securing justice-social,economic and political- and to minimise inequalities in income, status, facilities and opportunities.
- Art 39:
- secure adequate means of livelihood for all
- equitable distri of material resources for the common good
- prevention of concentration of wealth and means of production
- equal pay for equal work for men and women
- health of workers and protecting children against forcible abuse
- opportunities for healthy dev of children
- Art 39A:
- promote equal justice
- provide free legal aid to the poor
- Art 41: secure
- RT Work
- RT education
- RT public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness
- Art 42:
- just and humane conditions of work
- maternity relief
- Art 43: secure
- living wage
- decent std of life
- social and cultural opportunities for all workers
- Art 43A: take steps to secure the participation of workers in the mgmt of
industries - Art 47: raise
- level of nutrition
- st of living of people
- improve public health
DPSP: socialistic ones?
Art 38,39,39A,41,42, 43, 43A, 47
DPSP: Art 38?
- Socialistic
- promote welfare by securing justice-social,economic and political- and
- to minimise inequalities in income, status, facilities and opportunities. (44th CAA)
DSP-Art 39?
- Socialistic
- secure adequate means of livelihood for all
- equitable distri of material resources for the common good
- prevention of concentration of wealth and means of production
- equal pay for equal work for men and women
- health of workers and protecting children against forcible abuse
- opportunities for healthy dev of children (42ndCAA)
DSP-Art 39A?
- Socialistic
- 42ndCAA
- promote equal justice
- provide free legal aid to the poor
DSP: Art 41?
Socialistic
Secure:
- RT Work
- RT education
- RT public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness
DSP: Art 42?
Socialistic
- just and humane conditions of work
- maternity relief
DSP: Art 43?
Socialistic
secure
- living wage
- decent std of life
- social and cultural opportunities for all workers
DSP: Art 43A?
Socialistic
42nd CAA
take steps to secure the participation of workers in the mgmt of
industries
DSP: art 47?
Socialistic
- raise level of nutrition
- taise std of living of people
- improve public health
DSP: Gandhian principles?
Art 40, 43, 43B, 46, 47 and 48
DSP: art 40?
Gandhian
organise village panchayats and endow them with necessary powers and authority to enable them to function as units of self-government
DSP: art 43?
Gandhian
promote cottage industries on an individual or co-operation basis in rural areas
DSP art 43B?
gandhian
97th CAA
promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control and professional management of co-operative societies
DSP: Art 46?
gandhian
- promote the educational and economic interests of SCs, STs, and other weaker sections of the society and
- to protect them from social injustice and exploitation
DSP: art 47?
Gandhian
prohibit the consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs which are injurious to health
DSP: art 48?
gandhian
prohibit the slaughter of cows, calves and other milch and draught cattle and to improve their breeds
Consider the following statements.
1. Article 44 of the Constitution says the state shall endeavour by suitable legislation to secure for citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.
2. The duty of the court is far greater in other directive principles than in Article 44.
3. The definition of ‘State’, under Article 12, also includes local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a) 2 only
b) 1, 2
c) 2, 3
d) 1, 2, 3
C
Article 44 of the Constitution says the state shall endeavour to secure for citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India. The definition of ‘State’, as given in Article 12, includes the overnment and Parliament of India and the government and the legislature of each of the states and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.
While Article 44 uses the phrase “state shall endeavour”, other Articles in the ‘Directive Principles’ chapter use expressions such as “in particular strive”; “shall take steps”; “shall promote with special care”; “shall in particular direct its policy”; “shall regard its primary duty”; “shall be obligation of the state” etc. All of these mean that the duty of the court is far greater in other directive principles than in Article 44.
While Article 43 mentions that the “state shall endeavour by suitable legislation”, the phrase “by suitable legislation” is absent in Article 44, which indicates that the framers did not intend enactment of uniform civil code by a single legislation.
DSP: liberal-intellectual principles?
Art 44, 45, 48, 48A, 49, 50 and 51
DSP: art 44?
Liberal-intellectual
UCC
DSP: art 45?
Liberal-intellectual
86th CAA
provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years
DSP: art 48?
Liberal-intellectual
organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific
lines
DSP: art 48A?
Liberal-intellectual
42nd CAA
protect and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and wild
life
DSP: Art 49?
Liberal-intellectual
protect monuments, places and objects of artistic or historic interest
which are declared to be of national importance
DSP: art 50?
Liberal-intellectual
separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the
State
DSP: art 51?
Liberal-intellectual
- promote international peace and security
- maintain just and honourable relations between nations
- foster respect for international law and treaty obligations
- encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration
DPSP: historical sanction behind them?
- Sir B N Rau, the Constitutional Advisor to the Constituent Assembly,
recommended that the rights of an individual should be divided into two
categories—justiciable and non-justiciable, which was accepted by the
Drafting Committee - they impose a moral obligation on the state authorities for their application, but the real force behind them is political, that is, public opinion, as observed by A K Swamy Ayyar
- Dr B R Ambedkar had pointed out that the Directives have great value because they lay down that the goal of Indian polity is ‘economic democracy’ as distinguished from ‘political democracy’
- intended to fill in the vacuum in Part III by providing for social and
economic rights.
Criticisms of DSP?
- non-justiciable: Sir Ivor Jennings called them as ‘pious aspirations’
- Illogically Arranged: Sir Ivor Jennings pointed out that these principles have no consistent philosophy.
- Conservative: According to Sir Ivor Jennings, the Directives are based on the political philosophy of the 19th century England
- Constitutional conflict: K Santhanam has pointed out that the Directives lead to a constitutional conflict (a) between the Centre and the states, (b) between the Prez/Guv and the PM/CM
FR vs DSP?
- 1951: Champakam Dorairajan case: SC ruled that in case of conflict, FR would prevail and DSP to be subsidiary to FRs. Bt also allowed amendment of FRs by Parliament by CAA leading to 1st, 4th and 17th CAA to implement DSPs
- 1967: Golaknath case: FR sacrosanct and not amendable for DSPs
- 1971: 24th and 25th CAA
- 24th CAA: empowered Parliam. to amend any of FR by CAA
- 25th: inserted Art 31Cthat had 2 provisions:
- protection frm Art 14,19 & 31 to laws for DSP under 39(b) and (c)
- any such law can’t be questioned on whether it does give effect to such a policy or nt
- 1973: Keshavanand Bharati case: struck down the 2nd provision of 25th CAA; introduced basic str doctrine.
- 1976:42nd CAA: extended the scope of Art 31C, thereby giving primacy to DSPs over FRs 14,19 &31.
- 1978: 44th CAA: Art 31 (RT Property) removed
- 1980: minerva Mills case: extension by 42nd CAA struck down, though protection to Art 39 (b) & (c) accepted; SC talked of balance betn DSPs and FRs.
- Thus present position: FR>DSPs bt FRs can be amended by Parliament for implementing DSPs bt without altering ‘basic str’.
Directives outside Part IV?
- Claims of Sc/STs to services (Art 335)
- Instruction in mother tongue (Art 350A)
- Development of Hindi Language (Art 351)
T/F: none of the Constitutions of major democratic countries specifically contain a list of duties of citizens.
T
Fundamental duties: Evolution?
- 1976: sardar Swaran Singh Committee suggested addition of 8 consti duties
- added 10 Consti duties as a new part by 42nd CAA in 1976, though certain recommendations of committee were not accepted like.
- penalty for non-compliance of duties
- laws for such penalty immune frm FR JR
- duty to pay taxes
Fundamental duties: list?
- Consti, its ideals and institutions, National flag and anthem
- noble ideals that inspired freedom struggle
- upohld and protect sovereignty, unity and integrity of India
- defend country and rnder national service when called upon
- promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood AND to renounce practices derogatory to dignity of women
- value and preserve India’s rich heritage and culture
- protect and improve the natural environment AND hv compassion fr living creatures
- develop scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform
- safeguard public property and to abjure violence
- strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective
activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour
and achievement - education to his child or ward between the age of 6-14yrs (86th CAA)
Fundamental duties: features?
- some moral while others are civic duties
- essentially contain just a codification of tasks integral to the Indian way of life
- confined to citizens only and do not extend to foreigners.
- non-justiciable; However, the Parliament is free to enforce them by suitable legislation
Fundamental duties: criticisms?
- nt exhaustive eg. vote,pay taxes
- Some of the duties are vague, ambiguous
- described by the critics as a code of moral precepts due to their non-justiciable character
- inclusion of FDs as an appendage to Part IV of the Constitution has reduced their value and significance
- C K Daphtary, former AGI, while opposing the inclusion of FDs, said that more than 99.9 % of the citizens were law-abiding and there was no need to tell them about their duties. He argued that as long as the people are satisfied and contended, they willingly perform their duties.
T/F: FDs help the courts in examining and determining the constitutional
validity of a law.
T
In 1992, the Supreme Court ruled that in determining
the constitutionality of any law, if a court finds that the law in question
seeks to give effect to a fundamental duty, it may consider such law to be
‘reasonable’ in relation to Article 14 (equality before law) or Article 19
(six freedoms) and thus save such law from unconstitutionality
32) Consider the following statements regarding Fundamental Duties.
1. The Part IV-A of the Constitution which consists of only one Article 51-A specifies the eleven Fundamental Duties.
2. The 91th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2002 added one fundamental duty to the constitution.
3. Like the Directive Principles, the Fundamental duties are also non-justiciable in nature.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a) 1 only
b) 1, 2
c) 1, 3
d) 1, 2, 3
C
The 86th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2002 added one more fundamental duty
Commiittee on working of FDs: name and observations?
Verma Committee, identified the existence of legal provisions for the implementation of some of the Fundamental Duties
- Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act (1971)
- various criminal laws in force provide for punishments for encouraging enmity between different sections+ Protection of Civil Rights Act (1955)
- (IPC) declares the imputations and assertions prejudicial to national integration as punishable offences
- Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of 1967 provides for the declaration of a communal organisation as an unlawful association
- RPA,1951 provides for the disqualification of MP/MLA for soliciting votes on the ground of religion or promoting enmity
- Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, Forest (Conservation) Act of 1980
procedure for the amendment of the Constitution as laid down in Article
368?
- can be initiated in either house of Parliament
- by a minsiter or by a pvt member
- Doesn’t require prior permission of President
- mst be passed in each house by a special majority (1/2 + 2/3rd)
- no joint sitting provision
- If seeks to amend federal provision, mst also be ratified by legislatures of 50% of the states by a simple majority
- After duly passed by both the Houses of Parliament and ratified by the
state legislatures, where necessary, the bill is presented to the president for assent. - Prez mst give his assent. can neither withold his assent nor return the bill for reconsideration.
Article 368 gives Parliament the power to amend the Constitution and describes its procedure. Consider the following statements regarding the legal position with regards to the amendment of this article itself?
1. The article can be amended by the Parliament only if the amendment does not destroy the basic structure of the Constitution.
2. The article can be amended by the Parliament only if a bill to this effect was introduced by the President.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a) 1 only
b) 2 only
c) Both 1 and 2
d) Neither 1 nor 2
A
Total types of amendment provided for in the constitution?
- Amendment by art 368: two subtypes
- Amendment by special majority of the Parliament
- Amendment by special majority of the Parliament and the ratification of half of the state legislatures.
- Amendment by simple majority of the Parliament: similar to the
ordinary legislative process; these amendments are not deemed to
be amendments of the Constitution for the purposes of Article 368
Non-368 constitutional amendment applicable for?
- States:
- Admission or establishment of new states.
- Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing ones
- Abolition or creation of legislative councils in states
- Elections to State Legislature
- UTs
- salaries and emoluments
- 2nd schedule
- salaries and allowances of MPs
- Workings in parliament
- Quorum in Parliament
- Rules of Procedure
- Privileges of members and committees
- Use of English language in Parliament
- Elections to Parliament
- Delimitation of Constituencies
- SC:
- Number of puisne (other than CJI) judges in SC
- increasing jurisdiction of SC
- Citizenship—acquisition and termination.
- 5th and 6th sched
- Use of official language
Art 368- non-federal amendment: features?
- majority of the provisions in the Consti, including amendment of FRs, DPSP and all other provisions nt covered by 1st and 3rd categories.
- expression ‘total membership’ means the total number of members comprising the House irrespective of fact whether there are vacancies or absentees
- Strictly speaking, the special majority is required only for voting at the
third reading stage of the bill but by way of abundant caution the requirement for special majority has been provided for in the rules of the Houses in respect of all the effective stages of the bill
Art 368: Federal amendments:
applicable to which provisions?
time limit fr states to take action
- provisions that can be amended this way
- election of President and its manner
- extent of executive power of Union and states
- SC and HC
- distri of legislative powers betnUnion and states
- any of lists in 7th sched
- rep of states in parliament
- Art 368 and its procedure
- no time limit within which the states should give their consent to the bill
types of majority in Indian consti?
- simple
- absolute
- effective
- special
simple majority?
- majority of more than 50% of the members present and voting
- eg. if total strength=545; vacant=5; absent=10; present be abstaining frm voting=20, then simple majority would be (545-5-10-20)/2 +1=256
- normal motions and bills, incl No-confidence Motion, Motion of Confidence, Motion of Thanks, Censure Motion, Adjournment Motion, Money Bills, Ordinary Bills
absolute majority?
- majority of more than 50% of the total strength of the house
- eg. if total strength=545; vacant=5; absent=10; present be abstaining frm voting=20, then absolute majority wud be 545/2+1= 273.5 (273)
- Such kind of majority is not required in isolation in the Indian Parliament
- Abolition or creation of Council of States: Absolute + Special Majority in SLA
- Removal of Supreme Court Judge: Absolute + Special Majority in each house
- Emergency Proclamation: Absolute + Special Majority by each house
- Amendment of the Constitution via article 368: Absolute + Special Majority by each house
Effective majority?
- more than 50% of the effective strength (total- absent/vacant)
- eg. if total strength=545; vacant=5; absent=10; present be abstaining frm voting=20, then effective strength = (545-5-10)/2+1= 266
- Removal of the Vice-President: Effective Majority in RS & agreed by LS
- Removal of Deputy chairman Rajya Sabha/ Removal of Speaker of LS/SLA
Special Majority?
three sub-types
- Majority by two-third strength of the house {example impeachment of president under article 61}
- Majority by two-third of present and voting members {Example: Power of Parliament to legislate with respect to a matter in the State List in the national interest, under article 249}; Certain constitution amendment bills etc.
- Absolute majority + majority of two-third present and voting {Example: Removal of Supreme Court Judge, CAG etc.
emergence of basic str/ amendability of FRs?
- Shankari Prasad case1 (1951), the constitutional validity of the 1st CAA 1951), which curtailed the right to property, was challenged.
- word ‘law’ in Article 13 includes only ordinary laws and not the CAA
- Thus, power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution under
Article 368 also includes the power to amend FRs
- Golaknath case 1967: constitutional validity of 17th CAA(1964), which inserted certain state acts in the Ninth Schedule, was challenged
- FR were said to be ‘transcedental and immutable’; not amendable
- ‘law’ in Art 13 also includes CAA
- 24th CAA,1971: declared that the Parlia has the power to amend any of FRs under Article 368 and such an act will not be a law under the meaning of Article 13
- Keshavanand Bharati case,1973: upheld 24th CAA bt laid down doctrine of Basic str
- 42nd CAA: amended Article 368 and declared that there is no limitation on the constituent power of Parliament. This provision was struck down in Minerva Mills case (1980).
From the various judgements, the following have emerged
as ‘basic features’ of the Constitution?
- Constitution:
- Supremacy of Consti (KB)
- secular character (KB) and freedom of religion (election case)
- Sovereign, democratic and republican nature (KB, election case)
- federal character (KB)
- balance betn FR and DSP (Minerva Mills)
- Principles (or essence) underlying FRs
- Ltd power of parliament to amend Consti (Minerva Mills)
- Governance system:
- separation of powers (KB)
- Parliamentary system (KB)
- free and fair elections
- Judiciary:
- JR (election case) (Minerva Mills)
- rule of law (election case) (mandal case)
- independence of judiciary
- effective access to justice
- powers of SC under Art 32, 136, 141 and 142
- Powers of HC under Articles 226 and 227
- Citizen centric
- welfare state (KB)
- freedom and dignity of individual (KB)
- principle of equality (election case)
- Miscellaneous:
- unity and integrity of the nation
NITI Aayog: intro?
- an executive body
- premiere policy ‘Think Tank’, providing both directional and policy i/p
- shaped by a ‘bottom up’ approach rathr than a ‘top-down’ model, as with Planning Commission
NITI aayog: composition?
- Chairperson: PM
- VChair: appointed by PM; enjoys rank of Cabinet min
- members:
- Ex-officio: max 4 members of Union CoM, nominated by PM
- Full time: no fixed no.; enjoy rank of MoS
- part time: max 2, frm leading uni, research org etc; on rotational basis
- CEO: appointed by PM for a fixed tenure; rank of Secy to GoI
- GOverning Council: all CMs (incl UTs) and Lt. Guvs
- Regional councils: to address specific issues; formed for a specified tenure
- Special invitees: experts, domain specialists
VC of NITI Aayog: appointed by? rank?
PM
Cabinet minister
Ex-officio members of NITI Aayog?
Max 4 members of CoM, nominated by PM
Regional councils within NITI Aayog?
- Toa ddress specific issues for a region
- for a specified tenure
- convened by PM
- comprises of CMs and LGs of that regions
NITI Aayog specialised wings?
- Research wing
- Consultancy wing: market place, playing match maker
- Team India wing: comprises of rep frm every state and ministry and serves as permanent platform for national collab
Subordinate office of NITI Aayog?
National Institute of Labour Economics Research and Development
(formerly Institute of Applied Manpower Research)
Planning Commission: formation?
- on recommendation of Advisory Planning Board under K C Neogi
- by an executive resolution in March 1950.
- was only a staff agency—an advisory body and had no executive responsibility
Planning commission: composition?
- PM: chairman
- deputy chairman: fixed tenure; rank of Cabinet minister
- Ex-officio members: FM and planning minister
- Some Central ministers as part time members
- 4-7 full time expert members
- SGs were NOT represented
Programme Evaluation Organisation?
- estab in 1952
- as an independent unit of erstwhile Planning Commission
- nw under NITI Aayog
- undertook an assessment of the implementation of development
programmes and plans as contained in Five-Year Plans
Planning Commission: critical evaluation?
- ARC described PC as ‘Super/Parallel cabinet’
- D.R. Gadgil declared it as ‘failed in its task’ root of which lies in the process by which PC, essentially only an advisory body, has come to mix itself with actual formation of public policies, even in matters other than development
- K. Santhanam: PC has superseded the federation and our country is functioning like a unitary system is many respects
- Rajamannar: highlighted overlapping fns and responsibilities of PC and FC in federal foscal transfers
National Development Council: formation? composition? fn?
- in 1952, by an executive resolution
- composition:
- PM: chairman
- all Union Cabinet ministers
- the CMs of all states and UTs and admins of all UTs
- members of PC (nw NITI Aayog)
- Draft Five-Year Plan prepared by the PC (now NITI Aayog) is first submitted to the Union Cabinet. After its approval, it is placed before the NDC, for its acceptance. Then, the Plan is presented to the Parliament. With its approval, it emerges as the official Plan and published in
the official gazette - it is listed as an advisory body to the PC (now NITI Aayog) and its recommendations are not binding
NHRC: intro/ features?
- statutory (and not a constitutional) body
- estab in 1993 under Protection of HR Act, 1993
- jurisdiction:
- watchdog of human rights in the country
- i.e. the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual - guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the international covenants and enforceable by courts in India
NHRC: composition and qualifications?
- Chairman + 4 members + 4 ex-officio members
- Chairman shud be a retired CJI
- members shud be
- serving or retired judges of SC AND
- serving or retired CJ of a HC AND
- two persons having knowledge or practical experience wrt HR
- 4 ex-officio members: chairmen of
- NC for minorities
- NCSCs
- NCSTs
- NCW
NHRC members appointment?
- chairman and members are appointed by the president on the recommendations of a six-member committee consisting of
- PM as its head,
- the Speaker of the LS,
- the Deputy Chairman of RS
- leaders of the Opposition in both the Houses of Parliament and
- the Central home minister
- Further, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court or a sitting chief justice of a high court can be appointed only after consultation with the chief justice of India.
NHRC:
- tenure of members?
- re-employment?
- conditions of service?
- chairman and members hold office for a term of five years or until they attain the age of 70 years, whichever is earlier
- After their tenure, the chairman and members are not eligible for further employment under the Central or a state government.
- salaries, allowances and other conditions of service of the chairman or
a member are determined by the Central government. But, they cannot be
varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
NHRC: removal of members?
- president can remove the chairman or any member from the office under the following circumstances:
- If he is adjudged an insolvent; or
- If he engages, during his term of office, in any paid employment outside the duties of his office; or
- If he is unfit to continue in office by infirmity of mind or body;
- If he is of unsound mind and stand so declared by a competent court;
- If he is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for an offence
- proved misbehaviour or incapacity: In these cases, Prez has to refer the matter to SC for an enquiry. BUT advice nt Binding.
T/F: salaries, allowances and other conditions of service of the chairman or
a member of NHRC cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment..
T
NHRC: fns?
- HR violation investigate: either suo motu or when petitioned in court
- intervene in any proceeding involving allegation pending in a court
- visit jails and detention places
- review the factors including acts of terrorism that inhibit the enjoyment of HR
- research in HR and spread awareness
NHRC:
- offices?
- power(s)?
- LImitation?
- role?
- hqr at Delhi bt can establish at other places too
- powers
- regulate its own procedure
- all the powers of a civil court and its proceedings hv a judicial charac
- may call for info or report from CG/SGs or any other authority subordinate thereto
- has its own nucleus of investigating staff. Also empowered to utilise
the services of any officer or investigation agency of the CG/SG - submits its annual or special reports to the Cg/SG concerned. These reports are laid before the respective legislatures
- limitations:
- not empowered to inquire into any matter after the expiry of one year from the date on which the act constituting violation of HR is alleged to have been committed
- no power to punish the violators of HRs, nor to award any relief including monetary relief to the victim; only recommedary
- recommendations are not binding, But, it should be informed about the action taken on its recommendations within one month
- limited role, powers and jurisdiction with respect to the violation of HRs by the members of the armed forces. CG shall inform the commission of the action taken within three months
HUMAN RIGHTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2006?
- wrt NHRC:
- NHRC can undertake visits to jails even without intimation to SG
- Enabling NHRC to trnsfr complaints received by it to concerned SHRC
- Chair & members can resign in writing to Prez
- SHRC:
- reducing no. of members frm 5 to 3
- Changing the eligibility condition for appointment of members
- Chair & members can resign in writing to Guv
- Both NHRC and SHRCs
- Strengthening the investigative machinery
- can nw recommend award of compensation during the course of enquiry
- Clarifying that the Chair of NHRC and SHRCs are distinct frm members
- Clarifying that the absence of any member in the Selection Committee for selection of the Chairperson and member of the NHRC or the SHRCs will not vitiate the decisions taken by such Committees
SHRC:
- jurisdiction?
- composition?
- HR violations wrt State list and Concurrent list subjects; hwever if any such case is already being inquired into by NHRC or any other statutory comm,then SHRC stays away
- Chair+ 2 members
SHRC
- appointment?
- qualification?
- tenure?
- further employment?
- conditions of service?
- by Guv on recommendation of a committee of
- CM: head
- speaker of SLA (+ chailrman of LC)
- state HM
- LoO in LA (+ LoO in LC)
- a sitting judge of a HC/DJ only after consultation with the CJ of HC
- chair shud be a serving or retired CJ of a HC; members shud be serving or retired judge of HC or a district judge with min 7yrs experience as DJ AND a person having knowledge of practical experience with HR
- 5yrs or 70yrs age, WIE
- chairperson and members are not eligible for further employment under a SG/CG
- determined by SG; cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment
SHRC: removal?
- Though appoined by Guv, removable by Prez only
- on the same grounds and in the same manner as for Chair and members of NHRC i.e. (a) If he is adjudged an insolvent; or
(b) If he engages, during his term of office, in any paid employment outside
the duties of his office; or
(c) If he is unfit to continue in office by reason of infirmity of mind or body;
or
(d) If he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court; or
(e) If he is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for an offence.
(f) on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity: has to refer to SC; advice nt binding
Human Rights Court?
- Protection of Human Rights Act (1993) provides for establishment of Human Rights Court in every district for the speedy trial of violation of human rights
- can be set up by SG with the concurrence of CJ of HC
- For every HR Court, the SG specifies a public prosecutor or appoints an advocate (who has practiced for seven years) as a special public prosecutor.
CIC:
- formed under?
- composition?
- appointment?
- qualification?
- RTI act 2005
- Chief IC + NOT MORE than 10 ICs
- After RTI amendment 2019, CIC as well as ICs will be appointed by CG
- earlier, by Prez, on the recommendation of a committee consisting of
- PM as chair
- LoO in LS
- a union Cabinet minister nominated by PM
- earlier, by Prez, on the recommendation of a committee consisting of
- They should be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, mgmnt, journalism, mass media or administration and governance
- shud nt be MP/MLA
- shud nt hold any other office of profit or carrying out any business or pursuing any profession
- shud nt be connected with any political party
CIC:
- tenure?
- re-employment?
- removal?
- conditions of service?
- hold office for a term to be decided by CG (currently fixed at 3yrs) or until 65yrs age,WIE (changed frm 5 yrs in 2019 amendment)
- Not eligible for re-appointment BUT NO COMMENTS ON RE-EMPLOYABILITY
- though an IC can be appointed as Chief IC, but he cannot hold office for more than a total of five years including his term as Information Commissioner.
- Rule 22 of amended RTI act says that the Centre has discretionary powers to relax any of these rules with any “class or category of persons in future” and so this might change at the discretion of CG
- prez can remove Chief or any IC under following circumstances:
- adjudged an insolvent
- convicted of an offence which involves moral turpitude
- any paid employment outside during his term in office
- unfit to continue due to infirmity of mind or body
- acquired such financial or other interest as is likely to affect
prejudicially his official functions - on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity: has to refer to SC; advice nt Binding
-
after the amendment to RTI in 2019, to be notified by CG
- earlier, Chief IC’s similar to those of CEC and that of ICs similar to ECs
CIC: powers?
- receive and inquire into a complaint wrt any matter relating to obtaining information
- Commission can order inquiry into any matter if there are reasonable
grounds (suo-moto power). - While inquiring, the Commission has the powers of a civil court
- During inquiry of a complaint, all public records must be given to the Commission and no record can be held back on any grounds
- can also impose penalties or ask the public authority to compensate for any loss suffered by the applicant
- submits an annual report to CG which places it in Parliament
SIC:
- created under?
- composition?
- appointment?
- qualifications?
- under RTI act 2005
- State Chief IC and not more than 10 state ICs
- After amendment of 2019, to be notified by CG
- earlier by Guv, on the recommendation of a committee consisting of
- CM as chair
- LoO in LA
- State cabinet minister nominated by CM
- earlier by Guv, on the recommendation of a committee consisting of
- should be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and
experience in law, science and technology, social service, management,
journalism, mass media or administration and governance- shud nt be a MP/MLA
- shud nt hold any office of profit/ carrying on any business/professio
- shud nt be connected to any political party
SIC:
- tenure?
- re-employment?
- removal?
- conditions of service?
- same as CIC
- same as CIC
- by Guv, rest same as CIC (in proved misbehaviour or incapacity, Guv has to refer to SC; nt binding)
- Conditions of service: after the amendment, to be decided by CG. Earlier,
- State Chief IC: same as EC
- state ICs: similar to Chief secy of SG
National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992?
- The act defines a minority as “a community notified as such by the Central government.’’ Government of India has declared six religions namely, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhist and Parsis (Zoroastrian) and Jain as religious minorities in India.
- Under this act, the government formed the National Commission for Minorities which consist of Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson and five Members.
- The five Members including the Chairperson shall be from amongst the minority communities.
- The commission monitors the working of the safeguards provided in the Constitution and in laws enacted by Parliament and the State Legislatures.
Emergency Provisions: part?
T/F: During Emergency, CG becomes all powerful and states go into total control of centre.
T/F; Emergency converts federal str into a unitary one and this transformation is unique feature of Indian consti.
Part XVIII
T
T
National Emergency:
- Article?
- ground?
- 32th CAA,1975?
- two types?
- Art 352
- when the security of India or a part of it is threatened by war or external aggression or armed rebellion (even if imminent)
- President can also issue different proclamations, whether or not there is a proclamation already issued by him and such proclamation is in operation
- When due to ‘war’ or ‘external aggression’, known as ‘External emergency’; when due to armed rebellion, its called ‘Internal emergency’
NE: parliamentary approval?
- mst be approved by both houses within 1 month frm date of issue. (2mnth—>1month by 44th caa)
- hwever, if NE is proclaimed at a time when, LS has been dissolved, or if LS has been dissolved within that 1 month period, without approving NE, the proclamation survives until 30 days frm first sitting ofLS after its reconstitution, provided RS has approved it in the meantime.
- if approved by both houses, it continues for 6 months, and can be extended to an indefinite period with approval of parliament every 6 mnths(44th CAA; earlier only one approval needed and thereafter would go on until executive wanted). If parliament dissolved in that 6month period, NE will continue upto 30 days frm next first sitting, provided RS approved it in the meantime
- Approval: Special majority (44th CAA; earlier simple majority adequate) in each house (1/2 + 2/3rd)
NE: revocation?
- may be revoked at any time by Prez by a subsequent proclamation. That doesn’t require Parliament’s approval
- If LS passes a resolution disapproving its discontinuation, Prez mst revoke. (44th CAA; earlier LS had no control whatsoever)
- 44th CAA: where 1/10th of total members of the LS give a written notice to the Speaker (or to the president if the House is not in session), a special sitting of the House should be held within 14 days for the purpose of considering a resolution disapproving the continuation of the proclamation
- Resolution of disapproval is different frm a resolution approving continuation of a proclamation in 2 respects
NE: Resolution of disapproval is different frm a resolution approving continuation of a proclamation in 2 respects. what?
- resolution of disapproval needs to be passed by LS only, while the latter needs both houses
- resolution of disapproval needs to be passed by simple majority while latter needs special majority.
Effects of NE: aspects?
3 aspects:
- effects on C-S relations
- effects on life of LS and SLA
- effects on FR
effects of NE: on C-S relations?
- Executive:
- C can direct any S regarding manner of exercisng its executive power in any matter. In normal times, the Centre can give executive directions to a state only on certain specified matters.
- Thus, SG under complete control of CG, though they are not suspended
-
Legislative:
- parliament can make laws on any sub mentioned in state list
- Though legislative power of S isn’t suspended, it can be over-ridden by Parliament. In brief, the Consti becomes unitary frm federal.
- laws made by Parlia on the state subs during NE become inoperative six months after the emergency has ceased to
operate. - Prez can issue ordinances on state subs also, if parliament is nt in session
- Parliament can confer powers and impose duties upon the C or its officers/authorities wrt matters outside the Union List, in order to carry out the laws made by it under its extended jurisdiction
- 42nd CAA: the two consequences mentioned above (executive and legislative) extends not only to a state where the Emergency is in operation but also to any other state.
- Financial:
- Prez can can modify the constitutional distri of revenues between the C&S
- Such modification continues till the end of the financial year in which the Emergency ceases to operate
- every such order of the President has to be laid before both the
Houses of Parliament.
effects of NE: on life of LS and SLA?
- life of LS
- may be extended beyond its normal term by a law of parlia for 1 yr at a time (indefinitely)
- However, this extension cannot continue beyond a period of 6mnths after the emergency has ceased to operate
- eg. term of 5th LS (1971-77) was extended 2 times by 1 yr at a time
- life of a SLA
- Parliament may extend the normal tenure of a state LA by one yr at a time for indefinite period.
- However, this extension cannot continue beyond a period of 6mnths after the emergency has ceased to operate
effects of NE: on FR?
articles that deal with it?
- Art 358 (FR under Art 19) & 359 (FRs other than 19,20 & 21)
- Art 19:
- all 6 FRs under Art 19 are automatically suspended; no separate order reqd
- it automatically revives once NE ceases to operate
- Any law made during Emergency, to the extent of inconsistency with Article 19, ceases to have effect immediately
- However, no remedy lies for anything done during the Emergency even after the Emergency expires
-
limitations imposed by 44th CAA:
- the 6 FRs under Art 19 can be suspended only when NE is declared on the grounds of war or external aggression and not on the grnds of armed rebellion
-
only those laws which are related with the Emergency are
protected from being challenged and not other laws. Also, the executive action taken only under such a law is protected.
- Art 359:
- FRs as such aren’t suspended bt only their enforcement i.e. Prez can suspend right to move any court for their enforcement
- suspension of enforcement relates to only those FRs that are specified in the Presidential Order
- suspension could be for the period during the operation of emergency or for a shorter period as mentioned in the order
- may extend to the whole or any part of the country
- should be laid before each House of Parliament for approval
- When the Order ceases to operate, any law so made, to the extent of inconsistency with the specified FR, ceases to have effect. But no remedy lies for anything done during the operation
- limitations imposed by 44th CAA on art 359:
- Prez can’t suspend the right to move the Court for the enforcement of FRs guaranteed by Articles 20 to 21
- only those laws which are related with the emergency are protected from being challenged and not other laws and the executive action taken only under such a law, is protected.
Art 358 vs Art 359?
- Art 358- Art 19 only; Art 359-> to all those FRs suspended by Presidential order
- Art 358-> automatic suspension of ARt 19; Art 359-> not automatic; only empowers the president to suspend the enforcement of the specified FRs
- Art 358: only in case of external emergency, nt for internal emergency. Art 359 for either.
- Art 358: suspends Art 19 fr entire duration and extends to entire country; Art 359: for a period specified by Prez and may extend to a part of country
- Art 358 suspends Art 19 completely; Art 359 doesn’t empower the suspension of the enforcement of Articles 20 and 21
NE proclaimed so far?
- 1962: Chiniese aggression; upto Jan 1968; thus a fresh proclamation was not needed at the time of war against Pakistan in 1965.
- DEc 1971: Pak aggression; Even when this Emergency was in
operation, a third proclamation of National Emergency was made in June - Both the second and third proclamations were revoked in March 1977.
- 1975: due to ‘internal disturbance’; Shah commission did not justify the declaration of the Emergency
Foundations of President’s rule?
Art 355: imposes a duty on the Centre to ensure that the government of
every state is carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution
Art 356: Centre takes over the government of a state under Article 356 in case of failure of constitutional machinery in state
Art 365: whenever a state fails to comply with or to give effect to any direction from the Centre, it will be lawful for the president to hold that a situation has arisen in which the government of the state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of Consti.
Art 356:
- Prez can issue a proclamation
- if he is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of a state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the
Constitution. - president can act either on a report of the governor of the state or otherwise too
Prez’s rule: approval? distinction with approval for NE?
- mst be approved by both houses, by a simple majority, within two months frm date of issue
- If LS dissolved or it gets dissolved during the 2 months period without approving the proclamation, proclamation can survive until 30days frm first sitting of next LS, provided RS approves it in the meantime.
- approval stands for 6 months
- can be extended for max 3 yrs period with approval every 6 months; hwever if LS gets dissolved in the meantime, similar 30 days limit stands
-
limits imposed by 44th CAA: beyond 1 yr, Prez’s rule proclamation can be extended by Parliament only if:
- a NE in op in whole of India OR in whole or part of THAT state
- EC mst certify that GE to LA of the concerned state cannot be held due to difficulties.
Prez’s rule: revocation?
can be revoked at any time by a subsequent proclamation. It does nt require Parliament’s approval
Consequences of prez’s rule?
- effect on Prez’s powers
- effect on SLA
- effect on Parliament’s powers
- effects on state’s HC
Consequences of prez’s rule: effect on Prez’s powers?
- He can take up the fns of the SG and powers vested in the governor or any other executive authority in the state: thus, Prez dismisses state CoM headed by CM and State Guv carries on state admin on behalf of Prez
- can declare that the powers of the state legislature are to be exercised
by the Parliament: thus, Prez either suspends or dissolves the SLA and Parliament passes state legislative bills and state budget. - can take all other necessary steps including the suspension of the
constitutional provisions relating to any body or authority in the state. - When the state legislature is thus suspended or dissolved:
- when LS is nt in session, Prez can authorise expenditure frm state CF, bt that will hv to be sanctioned by the Parli in the future
- when Parliament is not in session, Prez can promulgate ordinances for the governance of the state.
- Parliament can delegate power to make laws fr the state to the Prez or to any other authority specified by him in this regard
Consequences of prez’s rule: effect on SLA?
- Prez can declare that the powers of the SLA are to be exercised by the Parlia
- In practice, President either suspends or dissolves the SLA, Parliament takes up the legislative responsibilities of SLA
- When the state legislature is thus suspended or dissolved,
- Parlia can delegate law making for the state to Prez or to any other authority specified by him for this
- such laws by Parlia or by Prez by delegation, can confer powers and impose duties on Centre or its officers and authorities
- when LS is nt in session, Prez can authorise expenditure frm state CF, bt that will hv to be sanctioned by the Parli in the future
- when Parliament is not in session, Prez can promulgate ordinances for the governance of the state.
Consequences of prez’s rule: effect on Parliament’s powers?
- Prez suspends or dissolves SLA and declares that powers of SLA are to be exercised by parliament. The Parliament can then pass the state legislative bills and the state budget
- When the state legislature is thus suspended or dissolved:
- Parliament can delegate the power to make laws for the state to the (This power to delegate is nt there when Parliament legislates on state list subjects during NE) President or to any other authority specified by him.
- So far, the practice has been for the president to make laws for the state in consultation with the MPs from that state. Such laws
are known as President’s Acts. - Parliament or in case of delegation, the President or any other specified authority can make laws conferring powers and imposing duties on the Centre or its officers and authorities
- A law made by the Parliament or president or any other specified authority continues to be operative even after the President’s Rule. But it can be repealed or altered or re-enacted by the state legislature.
Consequences of prez’s rule: effect on state HC? effect on FRs?
- President cannot assume to himself the powers vested in the concerned state high court or suspend the provisions of the Constitution relating to it.
- In other words, the constitutional position, status, powers and functions of the concerned state HC remain same even during the President’s Rule.
NO EFFECT ON FRs
consequences of Prez’s rule: effect on C-S relations?
During its operation, the state executive
is dismissed and the state legislature is
either suspended or dissolved. The
president administers the state through the
governor and the Parliament makes laws
for the state. In brief, the executive and
legislative powers of the state are
assumed by the Centre.
Consider the following statements.
1. The criminal legislations and various judicial pronouncements in India sternly deal with unlawful and subversive activities which are detrimental to the unity and integrity of India.
2. The Constitution (Forty–Second Amendment) Act, 1976 inserted and defined “anti-national activity” and is still in existence.
3. As per the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, the responsibility of maintaining law and order, including protection of life and property, rested primarily with the State governments.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a) 1 only
b) 1, 2
c) 1, 3
d) 1, 2, 3
C
Constitution (Forty–Second Amendment) Act, 1976 inserted in the Constitution Article 31D (during Emergency) which defined “anti-national activity” and this Article 31D was, subsequently, omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977
T/F: a NE can be revoked by LS by a resolution bt such a provision for revocation of Prez’srule by LS resolution isn’t there.
T
can be revoked by Prez, on his own only.
Prez’s rule:
- imposed first time in?
- Ambedkar’s views?
- in Punjab in 1951
- hoped that the drastic power conferred by Article 356
would remain a ‘dead-letter’ and would be used only as a measure of last
resort
Prez’s rule: scope of JR?
- 38th CAA: satisfaction of Prez in invoking Art 356 FINAL and Conclusive, which cud nt be challenged in any court on any ground.
- 44th CAA: deleted the above provision–> Prez’s satisfaction nt beyond JR
- Bommai case (1994)
Prez’s rule: SC’s observations in Bommai case (1994)?
- presidential proclamation subject to JR
- satisfaction mst be based on relevant material; can be struck down if based on irrelevant or extraneous groundor of found to be malafide
- Burden lies on centre to prove that relelvant materials exist
- court cannot go into the correctness of the material or its adequacy bt only its relevance
- if PR held invalid, SC can restore dismissed SG and revive SLA if it was suspended or dissolved
- SLA shud be dissolved only after Parlia has approved Presidential proclamation; until then, only suspension
- Secularism is a basic feature; hence a SG pursuing anti-secular politics can be dismissed under art 356
- if doubts over confidence of LA in the SG, then it shud be tested on the floor of teh house and until then, ministry shud nt be unseated
- Where a new party forms govt at the Centre, it will not have
- the authority to dismissgovt of other parties in the states
- power under Article 356 is an exceptional power and should be used only occasionally
Bommai case: improper situations for imposition of Prez’s rule?
- guv recommends imposition of PR without probing the possibility of forming an alternative ministry, when a SG resigns or is dismissed
- Where the guv makes his own assessment of the support of a
ministry in the assembly and recommends PR without allowing the ministry to prove its majority on the floor of the Assembly. - Where the ruling party enjoying majority support in the assembly has
suffered a massive defeat in the general elections to the LS eg1977,1980 -
Internal disturbances not amounting to internal subversion or physical
breakdown. -
Maladministration in the state or allegations of corruption against the
ministryorstringent financial exigencies - Where the state government is not given prior warning to rectify itself
except in case of extreme urgency leading to disastrous consequences
Financial emergency:
- Art?
- grounds?
- Art 360
- if Prez is satisfied that a situation has arisen due to which the financial stability or credit of India or any part of its territory is threatened
Financial emergency: Parliamentary approval?
- mst be approved by both houses, by simple majority, within 2 months frm date of its issue (if LS dissolved etc. then 30days)
- once approved by both houses, FE can continue indefinitely till it is revoked i.e
- No max period
- no repeated approval needed
Financial emergency: revocation?
may be revoked by Prez at any time by proclmation; doesn’t require parliamentary approval.
Financial emergency: JR?
38th CAA: satisfaction of the president in declaring a Financial Emergency final and conclusive and not questionable in any court on any ground
44th CAA deleted this provision and thus, satisfaction of Prez isn’t beyond JR
Effects of Financial Emergency?
- Centre acquires full control over the states in financial matters
- Centre can direct any state to ensure financial Propriety or wrt any other matter deemed necessary and adequate for the purpose
- can reduce salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons serving in the state
- can ask for reservatin of all money bills or other Financial bills for consideration of Prez after its been passedby the SLA
- ca reduce salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons serving the union as well as judges of SC/HCs
T/F: Provision of Financial emergency is inspired frm similar provisions in British Constitutin.
F
inspired frm National recovery act of USA, 1933
Parliament: HIndi names adopted in?
1954
Rajya sabha:
- share of states and UTs in RS?
- allocation of seats in the RS to the states and UTs acc to?
- election of representatives of states?
- election of representatives of UTs?
- T/F: the practice of Prez nominating 12 distinguished members to RS is inspired frm American consti.
- 245= 229 + 4 + 12; seat share acc to pop
- 4th schedule
- be elected members of SLAs in accordance with system of proportional representation by single transferable vote
- only Delhi and Puducherry hv rep in RS; rep are indirectly elected by members of an electoral college specially constituted for the purpose
- F; American senate has no nominated members