Politics 2 Flashcards
What did politics have to do with the progress, success or failure of the RD (responsibility deal) policy?
- politicians have the power to give grants for fundings (education and businesses)
- people made relationships with politicians
- individual approach rather than population approach as did not want to reduce sells =. this opposes minimum unit pricing which is against profit
Why was Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) favoured by the public health bodies?
- drink related harm yearly cost is 20 billion
- good for health
- allow distribution of funding elsewhere if they could tackle problem and reduce spending on it
- address alcohol related problems which reduces burden on healthcare system
Should the public health bodies have persevered in their relationship with RD?
government had relationship with industry/stakeholders so industry were very powerful
- royal colleges withdrew support of policy then public health bodies (public health England) withdrew
- should have fought harder to be there as it is relevant to them
- were not listened to and so withdrew to not be part of something they did not believe in
What is the responsibility of government in the context of alcohol policy?
depends on political view on how much control state has over us
Define Tame problem
Tame problem
Can be simple or complex, but is prone to being solved by a process of linear solution.
We are typically trained to take a problem-solving approach that will, for the most part, work for these…
They require a plan…
Define wicked problem
Wicked problem
Is complex and complicated by multiple competing drivers, interests, uncertainty and possible competing solutions
Many public policy issues and social protection issues (including health care) are examples of this.
They require a strategy…
4 actions of governements alcohol strategy coallition
There were broadly four areas of action…
National action on price, advertising and availability
Local action on licensing, enforcement and antisocial behaviour
Industry responsibility drive
Supporting for consumer information and individual behaviour change / treatment services
stakeholder analysis
Power (high, moderate, low)
Interest (high, moderate, low)
Support (for, against)
stakeholder analysis for policy change
Power (high, moderate, low)
Interest (high, moderate, low)
Support (for, against)
focus our efforts on the most influential stakeholders
those with most power and interest manage most thoroughly
those with most power : Anticipate and meet needs
those with most interest: Keep completely
informed
those with least interest and power - regular minimal contact
monetary disincentives
tax eg. sugar tax
Strategic plan to policy change
Monetary disincentives - increase prices eg. sugar tax controlling media education communicate evidence based medicine Understand other peoples opinion powerful stakeholders who are interested