Political Developments Flashcards

1
Q

Give evidence from elections that there was support for the republic (pro-rep parties)

A
  • there were 2 elections in 1924 where there was greater support for pro-rep parties: SPD, DDP, DVP and Centre.
  • Over 61% voted for pro-Rep parties in May 1924, and 67% in Dec.
  • May 1924 election -> Nazis won 6.5% of the vote. However, in December won only 3% of vote.
  • Communist parties saw fortunes fall under May 1924.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give evidence from elections that pro-rep parties struggled to gain widespread support

A
  • pro rep parties still struggle to have a stable majority gov with widespread support.
  • E.g. Dec 1924 -> 45 communist deputies elected.
    -> 1928: 54 were elected.
  • E.g. Dec 1924 -> 103 Nationalist (DNVP) deputies elected.
    -> however, in 1928, 73 elected.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give the key features of coalition Govs in the Weimar Republic

A
  • there was a total of 7 coalition Govs between Nov 1923 and March 1930.
    -> only 6 of 23 cabinets between 1919-1932 had majority support.
  • Govs unable to plan for the long-term -> gordon Craig ‘an endless cabinet crisis’
    -> more concern for ‘filling ministerial chairs’ then actually governing country.
  • trivial issues could wreck governments -> E.g. 1926, the gov of Luther had collapsed over a dispute over the German flag.
  • the formation of a Grand Coalition in 1928 -> led by Hermann Muller had the potential for stability.
    -> however had divisions.
    -> took till the spring of 1929 for parties to agree on gov policies.
    -> disputes over budget and foreign policy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How were deputies elected into the Reichstag

A
  • Deputies in the Reich under prop rep were chosen from party lists to collectively represent a large area.
    -> there was no direct connection between a deputy and his/her constituents.
  • deputies were not allowed to display individuality but behaved under party bereacracies.
    -> the Reich debated over matters that did not match interests of voters.
  • party leaders of pro-democratic parties gave higher priority to interests of own party rather than wider national interest.
    -> support for democratic institutions waned as a result.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the development of the SPD

A
  • 1924-28, the largest single party -> but only took part in 1/6 coalition Govs in these years.
    -> unwilling to let go of their Marxist philosophy which was its trademark.
    -> Inflexible on important issues -> unwilling to compromise which is something required in coalition Govs.
    -> Actually opposed government more often -> contradicts their desire for democracy -> despite having leading role in establishing the Weimar Rep.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the development of the Centre Party

A
  • this was based on the religious affiliation.
    -> had wide diverse support groups: industrial workers, industrialists, farmers and landlords.
    -> were more flexible than the SPD in terms of appeal.
    -> however had divisions on social and economic problems.
  • Leadership changed in 1928 -> Heinrich Burning, right-wing, was less committed to democracy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the development of the DDP

A
  • It was in decline by the mid 1920s.
  • Made up of intellectuals with limited political experience.
  • Internal disputes -> unclear over what it stood for.
  • participated in all coalition Govs 1924-28
    -> possible a weakness in the Reich -> proof of weak coalitions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain the development of the DNVP

A
  • aims: restoring the monarchy and dismantle the T of V.
  • had growing diversity -> younger members were willing to compromise -> joined the coalition in 1926 and in 1927.
  • 1928, lost support -> return to old ideas.
  • Alfred Hugenberg became the party leader in 1928 -> was involved in the ‘freedom law’ and was against the Young Plan.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the development of the NSDAP (Nazis)

A
  • failure at Munich Putsch 1923, was in decline -> Hitler had a 5 year sentence but only served 8/9 months -> LENIANT right-wing bias.
  • in 1928, decided to focus on discontent of farmers -> protestant North of Germany.
    -> rural areas in the North, Nazi Gain an 18% vote in 1928 Reich election.
  • Membership grew to 150,000 by October 1929
    -> clear signs of revival.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the development of KPD (communists)

A
  • had support in industrial / port areas: Ruhr, Saxony, Hamburg, Berlin.
    -> dedicated to overthrowing the Republic.
  • policies and tactics were dictated by the USSR -> E.g. 1923, KPD leaders were instructed to launch a revolution.
  • After 1924 -> told to focus on attacking SPD as they were seen as betraying the working class -> labelled them as social fascists.
  • Focus was taken away from the Nazis.
    -> serious division in the left-wing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the attitude of the old elites towards the Weimar Republic

A
  • the army, civil service and the judiciary, hostile to parliamentary democracy.
    -> had a firm view that the Republic was born out of betrayal of the Fatherland.
    -> hostility strengthened by signing of T of V and hyperinflation.
  • Election of Hindenburg only briefly helped them to reconcile to the existence of the W Rep.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the of the working class towards the Weimar Republic

A
  • many industrial workers felt the Republic had not delivered on promises of greater equality and social justice.
    -> crushing of left-wing revolts by the army and the police was clear that democracy was failing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the attitude of the middle class towards the Republic

A
  • many of the middle class continued to prosper and were supportive of the republic.
  • however lower-middle class suffered a catastrophic decline in incomes as a result of hyperinflation.
    -> had welcomed economic stability under Stresemann and stability under Hindenburg -> resentment of the republic continued.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly