Political Developments Flashcards
Give evidence from elections that there was support for the republic (pro-rep parties)
- there were 2 elections in 1924 where there was greater support for pro-rep parties: SPD, DDP, DVP and Centre.
- Over 61% voted for pro-Rep parties in May 1924, and 67% in Dec.
- May 1924 election -> Nazis won 6.5% of the vote. However, in December won only 3% of vote.
- Communist parties saw fortunes fall under May 1924.
Give evidence from elections that pro-rep parties struggled to gain widespread support
- pro rep parties still struggle to have a stable majority gov with widespread support.
- E.g. Dec 1924 -> 45 communist deputies elected.
-> 1928: 54 were elected. - E.g. Dec 1924 -> 103 Nationalist (DNVP) deputies elected.
-> however, in 1928, 73 elected.
Give the key features of coalition Govs in the Weimar Republic
- there was a total of 7 coalition Govs between Nov 1923 and March 1930.
-> only 6 of 23 cabinets between 1919-1932 had majority support. - Govs unable to plan for the long-term -> gordon Craig ‘an endless cabinet crisis’
-> more concern for ‘filling ministerial chairs’ then actually governing country. - trivial issues could wreck governments -> E.g. 1926, the gov of Luther had collapsed over a dispute over the German flag.
- the formation of a Grand Coalition in 1928 -> led by Hermann Muller had the potential for stability.
-> however had divisions.
-> took till the spring of 1929 for parties to agree on gov policies.
-> disputes over budget and foreign policy.
How were deputies elected into the Reichstag
- Deputies in the Reich under prop rep were chosen from party lists to collectively represent a large area.
-> there was no direct connection between a deputy and his/her constituents. - deputies were not allowed to display individuality but behaved under party bereacracies.
-> the Reich debated over matters that did not match interests of voters. - party leaders of pro-democratic parties gave higher priority to interests of own party rather than wider national interest.
-> support for democratic institutions waned as a result.
Explain the development of the SPD
- 1924-28, the largest single party -> but only took part in 1/6 coalition Govs in these years.
-> unwilling to let go of their Marxist philosophy which was its trademark.
-> Inflexible on important issues -> unwilling to compromise which is something required in coalition Govs.
-> Actually opposed government more often -> contradicts their desire for democracy -> despite having leading role in establishing the Weimar Rep.
Explain the development of the Centre Party
- this was based on the religious affiliation.
-> had wide diverse support groups: industrial workers, industrialists, farmers and landlords.
-> were more flexible than the SPD in terms of appeal.
-> however had divisions on social and economic problems. - Leadership changed in 1928 -> Heinrich Burning, right-wing, was less committed to democracy.
Explain the development of the DDP
- It was in decline by the mid 1920s.
- Made up of intellectuals with limited political experience.
- Internal disputes -> unclear over what it stood for.
- participated in all coalition Govs 1924-28
-> possible a weakness in the Reich -> proof of weak coalitions.
explain the development of the DNVP
- aims: restoring the monarchy and dismantle the T of V.
- had growing diversity -> younger members were willing to compromise -> joined the coalition in 1926 and in 1927.
- 1928, lost support -> return to old ideas.
- Alfred Hugenberg became the party leader in 1928 -> was involved in the ‘freedom law’ and was against the Young Plan.
Explain the development of the NSDAP (Nazis)
- failure at Munich Putsch 1923, was in decline -> Hitler had a 5 year sentence but only served 8/9 months -> LENIANT right-wing bias.
- in 1928, decided to focus on discontent of farmers -> protestant North of Germany.
-> rural areas in the North, Nazi Gain an 18% vote in 1928 Reich election. - Membership grew to 150,000 by October 1929
-> clear signs of revival.
Explain the development of KPD (communists)
- had support in industrial / port areas: Ruhr, Saxony, Hamburg, Berlin.
-> dedicated to overthrowing the Republic. - policies and tactics were dictated by the USSR -> E.g. 1923, KPD leaders were instructed to launch a revolution.
- After 1924 -> told to focus on attacking SPD as they were seen as betraying the working class -> labelled them as social fascists.
- Focus was taken away from the Nazis.
-> serious division in the left-wing.
What was the attitude of the old elites towards the Weimar Republic
- the army, civil service and the judiciary, hostile to parliamentary democracy.
-> had a firm view that the Republic was born out of betrayal of the Fatherland.
-> hostility strengthened by signing of T of V and hyperinflation. - Election of Hindenburg only briefly helped them to reconcile to the existence of the W Rep.
What was the of the working class towards the Weimar Republic
- many industrial workers felt the Republic had not delivered on promises of greater equality and social justice.
-> crushing of left-wing revolts by the army and the police was clear that democracy was failing.
What was the attitude of the middle class towards the Republic
- many of the middle class continued to prosper and were supportive of the republic.
- however lower-middle class suffered a catastrophic decline in incomes as a result of hyperinflation.
-> had welcomed economic stability under Stresemann and stability under Hindenburg -> resentment of the republic continued.