Policies (Education) Flashcards
What policies did the Tripartite System 1944 introduce?
Free education for all students up to the age of 15
Created 3 different kinds of schools
Which theoretical perspectives would like the Tripartite System 1944?
Functionalists - encourages sifting and sorting, and allows people to learn skills for the particular kinds of career they would be going into
Postmodernists - avoids a ‘one size fits all’ education
New Right - all of the above
Which theoretical perspectives would not like the Tripartite System 1944?
Marxists - allows the middle class to get the top education, but restricts most of the working class from having access to it
Feminists - grammar schools required girls to get a higher score in the 11+ than boys in order to get in
What are the 3 kinds of schools the Tripartite System 1944 introduced?
Grammar schools - Students had to pass the 11+ to get in. Offered an academic curriculum which gave access to higher education (university). Approx. 20% of students attended these schools
Secondary modern schools - Offered a more practical curriculum which gave access to more manual work for those who failed the 11+. Approx. 75% of students attended these schools
Technical schools - Provided vocational education for those who had a specific talent/skill. Approx. 5% of students attended these schools
What are some evaluation points for the Tripartite System 1944?
Positive:
- The system provided almost guaranteed social mobility for working class students who made it into grammar schools by giving them a stronger education
Negative:
- The system reproduced class inequality, giving middle class students a better chance of getting into grammar schools because of their cultural capital
- Discriminated against girls, who needed a higher score on the 11+ than boys to get into grammar schools
What policies did the Comprehensive System 1965 introduce?
Removed secondary modern and grammar schools, replacing them with comprehensives
Expanded the curriculum, sports, and recreational activities in schools
Which theoretical perspectives would like the Comprehensive System 1965?
Marxists - Offers a better standard of education to the working class than the previous (Tripartite) system
Feminists - Offers a more equal standard of education than the previous (Tripartite) system
Which theoretical perspectives would not like the Comprehensive System 1965?
Postmodernists - They disagree with a ‘one size fits all’ education
New Right - Same as above
What is a comprehensive school?
All children attend the same kinds of school, giving them equal opportunities to the working class. It offers new subjects and new sports/recreation activities
What policies did the Education Reform Act 1988 introduce?
Marketisation policies:
Ofsted, league tables, open enrolment, formula funding/voucher system
National curriculum
SATs tests
Which theoretical perspectives would like the ERA 1988?
New Right - it was their policy, and it made the schools system more competitive in the same way that the business world is
Which theoretical perspectives would not like the ERA 1988?
Marxists - marketisation benefits the middle class more than the working class
What is Ofsted?
Ofsted are an inspection service which investigate the teaching and standards of schools. They check each one every 2-8(ish) years
What are league tables?
League tables are where schools publish their qualification results each year so that parents can compare schools when deciding where to send their kids
What is open enrolment?
Open enrolment allows any student to apply to any school in the country, rather than being restricted to applying to local schools
What is formula funding/the voucher system?
A method of providing funding for schools. Schools receive a certain amount of money from the government for each student that attends
What is marketisation?
The process of making schools compete in the same way that businesses do
What is the aim of marketisation?
If schools have to compete with others to get students then they will all have to improve their standards, meaning all students get a better standard of education
What are some evaluation points for league tables?
Gillborn & Youdell (2000):
A-C economy - schools are more interested in middle class students as they are seen as better students, meaning they get chosen by better schools over working class students
Educational triage - top students receive a little bit of help, middling students receive the most help to make sure they get at least a C, and the lowest performing students get no help and are seen as ‘hopeless cases’. Middle class students tend to be seen as the top performers, and working class students as the lowest performers
What evaluation points are there for Ofsted?
Positive:
- It creates a parentocracy
- Encourages all schools to improve their standards
Negative:
- Gerwitz: this benefits middle class privileged-skilled choosers the most, then semi-skilled choosers, then working class disconnected-local choosers
What is a parentocracy?
A combination of the words ‘parents’ and ‘democracy’, giving parents power and choice over which schools they send their children to
What are Gerwitz’s different kinds of choosers?
Privileged-skilled choosers:
Middle class parents who have cultural and economic capital to find out which schools are best for their children and help them get in
Semi-skilled choosers:
Working class parents with some cultural capital to help them choose the best schools, and the desire to do so
Disconnected-local choosers:
Working class parents with neither the cultural capital nor desire to find out which schools are best for their children
What are some evaluation points for formula funding/the voucher system?
Positive:
- Raises standards in all schools as they have to improve to gain more students
Negative:
- Underperforming schools, who don’t attract more students each year, continue to get worse as they lose out on funding until they may eventually close
What are some evaluation points for open enrolment?
Positive:
- Creates a parentocracy
- Raises standards in all schools as they have to improve to gain more students
Negatives:
- Benefits the middle class the most as they have the economic and cultural capital to find out which schools are best, and move nearer to them if needed