Poland and Russia Flashcards

1
Q

Which party won the Polish parliamentary elections 2015?

A

Law and Justice (PiS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When did PiS control the Polish parliament?

A

2015 - December 2023

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is monism?

A

A theory or doctrine that denies the existence of a distinction or duality in a particular sphere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley argue PiS has done since 2015 with regards to monism?

A

“the denial of credible alternative paths of development. Since 2015, PiS has re-politicised many of these areas of policy,
but its executive aggrandisement and exclusionist nativism have instantiated new forms of monism.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was liberalism viewed in Poland after 1989?

A

“an obligatory syntax of political thought”

For many, this was simply the logical corollary of a rejection of the preceding system: liberalism was “inverted Marxism”

less an ideology, more just the politics of normality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is the shift to liberalism after communism referred to?

A

the liberal consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three aspects of the liberal consensus?

A
  • Economic: belief in the superiority of the free market and in the economic rationality of the individual.
  • Civic: an emphasis on the free and active participation of individuals in civil society and the political process.
  • Cultural: openness and cultural plurality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What has historically been the relationship between the Polish nation and state?

A

Poland has been a nation without a state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What has the relationship between the Polish nation and state meant for liberalism after 1989 according to Polish sociologist Jerzy Szacki?

A

It compelled Poles “to pay special attention to moral unity” and to reject divisions and
conflicts within society as threats to vital national interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the difference between Polish and Western liberalism?

A

While Western liberalism was rooted in political, class, ethnic and moral heterogeneity, the homogeneity of contemporary Poland had created a heavily asymmetrical relationship between the dominant group and those who were at best tolerated, rather than regarded as moral equals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do Bill and Stanley describe liberalism’s transformation in Poland since the 1990s?

A

“liberalism became associated with a strain of “moderation” that ran across several different ideological groups of the political mainstream. Although this ethos was not always realised in practice, its essence inhered in the “common moral and prudential commitment” to protecting
the constitution, defending liberty against its opponents, and searching for solutions”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the reaction of conservative groups in Poland during the post-communist transition?

A

From the beginning of transition, conservative groups and social movements
had chafed at liberalism’s assumption of its natural superiority. While these voices were
disparate, isolated and largely ineffectual during the 1990s, over the next decade they
became increasingly influential, particularly after the economic crisis of 2008.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did a rejection of liberal cultural attitudes manifest themselves as conservative viewpoints gained traction?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does PiS describe post-communist transitions?

A

They use “a populist narrative which explains post-communist politics as a betrayal of “the nation” (naród) – or ordinary, “authentic” Poles – by “false” domestic elites supposedly in league with foreign interests.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Poland left with after 4 decades of communist rule?

A

A one-party system characterised by the dominance of the Polish United Workers’ Party (Polska Zjednoczona Partia Robotnicza, PZPR) over all other key institutions: the judiciary, the legislature, the media, and local government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did PiS present itself before gaining power in 2015?

A

“During PiS’s period in opposition, the party developed and strengthened its claims to represent the interests of “real Poles” against the designs of an inauthentic and usurping elite”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What do many see as the only legitimate source of moral values in Poland?

A

The Catholic Church

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How are those who advocate for pluralist conceptions of Polish identity undermined by PiS?

A

“the ruling party questions or dismisses the morality or “Polishness” of those who would defend alternative models of identity”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How are LGBT people and their supporters characterised?

A

“the “LGBT and gender ideology” was a foreign import responsible for the “sexualisation of children”, and threatening “our identity, our nation, its survival, and thus the Polish state”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is now the second biggest fear behind climate change amongst Poles as a result of political rhetoric?

A

“gender” ideology and the LGBT movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What do Bill and Stanley suggest is the reason behind PiS’s anti-LGBT rhetoric?

A

tactical reasons: firstly, to mobilise its religiously conservative base to vote; and, secondly, to compete for the young male vote against the even more radical anti-LGBT posture of far-right Confederation, (Konfederacja). More generally, PiS’s cultural policy has been informed by a long-term strategy to absorb radical positions in order to embrace the broadest political spectrum and to eliminate right-wing opponents: in Kaczyński’s words, to ensure that “only the wall can be to the right of us” .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How did Kaczyński describe PiS’s aim in using populist rhetoric, as seen in their anti-LGBT language?

A

To ensure that “only the wall can be to the right of us”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What has PiS created in response to the supposed tyranny of political correctness and LGBT ideology imported from the West?

A

PiS has constructed its own anti-pluralist cultural ideology. Those who espouse a different value system to the preferred Catholic traditionalism are not merely political opponents, but constitute an existential threat to the very life of the nation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What was the ‘mono-power’ that PiS sought to undermine and replace when it came to power in 2015?

A

The liberal democracy that had been gradually increasing since 1989.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Who was the Polish state divided between in the first partition?

A

Russia, Prussia, and Austria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

When was the first partition of Poland?

A

August 1772

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Which states divided Poland in the second partition?

A

Russia and Prussia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

When was the second partition?

A

September 1793

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

When was the third partition?

A

January 1797

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Who was involved in the third partition?

A

The same three nations as the first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What does Robert Brier see Poland’s most important political struggles evolving around?

A

“cultural orientations and biographical patterns,” which in turn expose “diverging
moral-symbolic horizons and ways of thinking,”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What does Miroslawa Grabowska interpret Poland’s religious and national prominence as?

A

A rejection of communist culture that was present prior to 1989.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What was the adoption of liberalism predicted to lead to eventually, and has it?

A

A restructuring of party competition along economic lines rather than cultural and symbolic ones, but it has not happened in Poland as predicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Which is Polands major right-wing party?

A

Law and Justice (PiS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What are the four broad periods of the Polish nation’s history?

A
  1. First Polish Republic (1569–1795)
  2. Second Polish Republic (1918–1939)
  3. Polish People’s Republic (1947–1989)
  4. Third Polish Republic (since 1989)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

When was the First Polish Republic?

A

1569-1795

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

When was the Second Polish Republic?

A

1918-1939

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

When was the Polish People’s Republic?

A

1947-1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

When was the Third Polish Republic?

A

1989-present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What campaign did PiS launch in 2003?

A

A political campaign based on the assertion that the Third Republic is characterized by fundamental structural deficiencies and needs to be replaced by a Fourth Republic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What would the Fourth Republic look like?

A

The product of a moral revolution entailing a rebirth of religious and patriotic values, an uncompromising decommunization, and the strengthening of collective memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What would the Fourth Republic be the completion of?

A

Moreover, the PiS characterizes the foundation of this new state as the fulfillment of the 1980s Solidarity revolution, while portraying their opponents as people who betrayed Polish identity and the legacy of the democratic opposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Who is the Electoral Action Solidarity (AWS)?

A

A coalition of right-wing and conservative parties in Poland that were successors to Solidarity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

When was AWS formed?

A

1996, as the new constitution was being prepared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Who dominated the parliament that drafted Poland’s 1997 constitution?

A

Left-wing and communist successor parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

How did AWS portrat the draft of the new Polish constitution?

A

“The draft was worked out in a parliament in which political forces of a leftist, and especially communist, orientation dominate. And the draft has just such a character. It reflects only one ideological orientation.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

In whose name was Solidarity’s draft of a Polish constitution adopted?

A

God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What did the Solidarity trade union do in 1994?

A

Write its own constitution for a new Polish state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What was the Solidarity constitution presented as?

A

The continuation of the historic achievement, consciousness, culture, and judicial tradition of the Polish nation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What was the cultural identity expressed in the Solidarity constitution linked to?

A

This identity was, second, presented as being fundamentally linked with a religious value system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What did the official constitution not do in the eyes of AWS?

A

Represent the true Polish nation, being the product of a minority of left-wing elites.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

How was socila conflict in the 1980s framed?

A

As a biopolar conflict between society/nation and the state/system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What does Geneviève Zubrzycki argue Poles understood the transition to democracy as?

A

The recovery of a nation state and independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

How does Jan Kubik define culture?

A

“A historically transmitted pattern of meanings embodied in symbols, a system of inherited conceptions expressed in symbolic forms by means of which men [sic] communicate, perpetuate, and develop their knowledge about and attitudes toward life.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What was the significance of Catholicism to dissidents under communism?

A

It broke the cultural hegemony of the totalitarian communist state, and provided a different, more fundamental source of dignity and rights that the communist regime could be criticised for violating.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What is the usual relationship between nationalism and religion and how is it different in Poland?

A

Usually nationalism replaces religion and can even become a religion itself, but in Poland religion has become integral to the national idea instead of being replaced by it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What does Robert Brier suggest some believe would happen if religion were to dissapear from Poland?

A

The Polish nation whose fate is assumed to be so indissolubly linked with Catholicism would virtually cease to exist if it was deprived of its—alleged—spiritual
identity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

How did the Catholic nation differ from the national idea promoted during communist rule in the People’s Republic?

A

The Catholic nation narrative claimed that the moral community of the Polish nation, albeit oppressed, already existed. It needed not to be built but saved. The Solidarity paradigm thus claimed merely to reconstitute something that was, allegedly, already there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

If communism offered the vision of a new society, what did the Polish Catholic nation offer?

A

The vision of a recreated society - one that had been there throughout history but had been oppressed and needed to be given expression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

When was Pope John Paul II elected?

A

1978

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

How long had it been since there was last a non-Italian Pope?

A

455 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

When were the Polish Round Table Talks?

A

February - April 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

When was the Round Table Agreement signed?

A

6 April 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What were 3 significant outcomes of the Round Table Agreement?

A
  1. Legalization of independent trade unions
  2. The introduction of the office of President (thereby annulling the power of the Communist party general secretary), who would be elected to a 6-year term
  3. The formation of a Senate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What was the significance of creating the office of President in the Round Table Agreement?

A

It annulled the power of the Communist party secretary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

How much of the Senate and Sejm were allowed to be freely contested after to Round Table Agreement?

A

100% of the Senate, 35% of the Sejm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

What percentage of Senate and Sejm seats did Solidarity win in the June 1989 elections?

A

99% of the Senate, all of the 35% freely contestable seats in the Sejm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

How had the Solidarity revolution supposedly been betrayed?

A

Instead of being seen as bringing about society’s cultural restitution, The Round Table was viewed as an agreement that Solidarity’s “treasonous” left-wing
liberals struck with the communists to their mutual advantage and at the expenses of
the Polish nation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

How did the Round Table influence approaches to the drafting of the new constitution?

A

The arguments of the opponents of the official draft were shot through with references to the communist past, and the new constitution’s adoption was described as a continuation of the Round Table.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

When was the Polish Constitution ratified?

A

April 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

How did the AWS present their draft of a Polish Constitution?

A

As an attempt to “finish the revolution”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

What is another name for the Solidarity draft of the constitution?

A

The citizens’ draft

73
Q

What happened in the 1993 parliamentary elections in Poland?

A

Left wing parties made a return, winning a majority of seats.

74
Q

Which two parties made great gains in the 1993 parliamentary elections?

A

Democratic Left Alliance (SLD)
Polish People’s Party (PSL)

75
Q

What gave fuel to right-wing partys’ ideas about persistent communist influence after 1989?

A

The electoral victories of left-wing parties in 1993 and 1995.

76
Q

What had happened that led right-wing parties to view the Polish Constitution as a product of left-wing influence?

A

The control left-wing parties had over its drafting folling their electoral successes in 1993 and 1995.

77
Q

Which party’s candidate won the 1995 presidential election?

A

The left-wing party Democratc Left Alliance (SLD)

78
Q

Who did the SLD defeat in the 1995 presidential election, furthering the idea of a revolution betrayed?

A

Lech Wałęsa, former leader of the Solidarity movement.

79
Q

Who is the current president of Poland?

A

Andrzej Duda

80
Q

What party does Andrzej Duda belong to?

A

Independent but formerly of PiS (and they backed him in 2020 elections)

81
Q

Who is the prime minister of Poland elected in 2023?

A

Donald Tusk

82
Q

What party does Donald Tusk belong to?

A

Civic Platform (PO)

83
Q

Which party had controlled the office of prime minister before Tusk’s victory?

A

PiS, for 8 years under two different prime ministers.

84
Q

What is Civic Platform’s (PO) ideological leaning?

A

Centre-right liberal

85
Q

How does John Mueller describe the transformations of nations in central and eastern europe since 1989?

A

“most of the postcommunist countries of central and eastern Europe have essentially completed their transition to democracy …what they now have is, pretty
much, it. They are already full-fledged democracies if we use as models real Western countries”

86
Q

Does Mueller’s comments support the narratives of PiS?

A

No. PiS argue the revolution is unfinished whereas Mueller believes the transformations have been completed.

87
Q

What is Huntington’s test for democracies?

A

The two-election test (requiring a freely elected government to cede power after a subsequent electoral defeat).

88
Q

What sort of democracies can pass Huntington’s minimalist test?

A

Delegative democracies and illiberal democracies, where the people only have a say when they vote and elites are left relatively unconstrained.

89
Q

What do Dryzek and Holmes argue is necessary for any democracy?

A

Popular legitimacy and acceptance of the political system.

90
Q

Without popular legitimacy for democracy, what alternative sources of support for democratic systems are there?

A

Economic performance
Habituation
Coercion.

All three of these latter alternatives provide weak defenses for democracy, especially if economic crisis arrives.

91
Q

How do Dryzek and Holmes interpret the idea of democracy?

A

“an open-ended conversation, to which political leaders and activists, ordinary people, social scientists, and political theorists alike can contribute. Thus there is no single, fully specified destination called “democracy” to which all societies are heading”

92
Q

What does Tatiana Rogovskaia say about Russia’s democratic tradition?

A

Russia has very little in its deep history to recall in support of any post-communist democratization process…by mid-1921, the country was a one-party dictatorship.

93
Q

What does Tatiana Rogovskaia argue Gorbachev’s reforms amounted to?

A

Perestroika, demokratizatsiya, and glasnost were in the end tinkering with the Soviet system.

94
Q

What does the failed coup against Gorbachev in 1991 represent in the view of Tatiana Rogovskaia?

A

The continuing presence of hard-line communists wanting to reverse the Gorbachev reforms.

95
Q

What did Acting Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar do in Russia in 1991-2?

A

Tried to implement market reforms through ‘shock therapy’ that was quickly abandoned due to its failure.

96
Q

What are the three ‘democratic discourse’ found by Drysek and Holmes in Russia in 1997?

A

Chastened Democracy
Reactionary Anti-Liberalism
Authoritarian Development

97
Q

What is the basis of ‘chastened democracy’ support for democracy?

A

It is better than the Soviet Union and is therefore preferable.

98
Q

Describe the Reactionary Anti-Liberalism discourse in Russia?

A

Reactionary Anti-Liberalism ascribes no intrinsic value to democratic procedures or liberal freedoms. It sees a need for firm action to get things done and solve problems effectively; and the Soviet regime is looked upon with favor, because in this respect it is seen as delivering the goods much better than its successor.

99
Q

What is the main objective of the Authoritarian Development discourse in Russia?

A

The first priority is to make Russia rich. And the means are more explicitly authoritarian: a strong state, public morality, social discipline, coercive laws, if necessary “beating people with a stick” to force them to live in a more developed modern society.

100
Q

What identity problems does Dryzek and Holmes see in Russia?

A

Russians have for centuries been unsure in their own minds whether their country and culture are European, Asian, orsui generis. This confusion has led Huntington (1996) to identify Russia, like Turkey and Australia, as a deeply “torn” country.

101
Q

Which identity does Chastened Democracy align with?

A

European and Western

102
Q

What was the significance of the fall of the USSR to Russian identity?

A

Russians had thought of themselves primarily as Soviets, leading to them having to rethink their identities.

103
Q

Other than an empire, what else do Dryzek and Holmes argue Russia lost in 1991 which impacted Russian identity?

A

Their role as a superpower.

104
Q

How do Dryzek and Holmes describe Solidarity’s impact?

A

As the original source of the forces that eventually brought down the Soviet Union.

105
Q

How many members did Solidarity have at its peak in the early 1980s?

A

9.5 million

106
Q

In what way did the communist regime fall in Poland?

A

They negotiated an agreement for competitive elections with Solidarity in 1989.

107
Q

What alternative interpretation of the success of communist parties in 1993 elections does Dryzek and Holmes offer?

A

It was a rejection of the Church’s position on abortion and its general hostility to the left, both seen as unfair.

108
Q

Which party was the best organised in the immediate post-communist years in Poland?

A

The Democratic Left Alliance, the party of former communists.

109
Q

What do Dryzek and Holmes conclude about the discourse of democracy in Poland?

A

Commitments to civic, republican, and democratic values are widely shared – even among those most estranged from the post-communist status quo.

110
Q

What do Dryzek and Holmes think the West is not?

A

Something for the East to be compared to and measured against in order to determine its democratic development, because the West is not perfectly democratic.

111
Q

How do Dryzek and Holmes understand democracy?

A

As something that can never be completed, and that can be pursued in many ways.

112
Q

Do Dryzek and Holmes believe the history of each country determines the present or future where democracy is concerned?

A

No. They do not think the influence of the past determines the prospects or type of democracy in a state.

113
Q

Why does the past not inform the present in the way many claim it does for Dryzek and Holmes?

A

Because people have selective readings of the past, which are usually arbitrarily made to portray present circumstances in a favourable or negative light depending on their biases.

114
Q

What type of discourse did Dryzek and Holmes not find in Poland?

A

An authroitarian one opposing democratic discourses.

115
Q

What does Poland’s discursive configuration suggest to Dryzek and Holmes?

A

That it has the least problematic outlook for democracy in the post-communist states.

116
Q

What was the overall attitude of scholars towards state structures during post-communist transitions?

A

They believed that there should be a reduction in the size and scope of the state becuase of its dominance under communist rule.

117
Q

What does Pauline Luong believe post-communist state transitions can show us?

A

How the state comes into being and into action in the modern era rather than just what the modern state does.

118
Q

What three features of post-communist state-building does Pauline Luong think makes it distinct?

A
  1. It is rapid, taking place over decades rather than centuries.
  2. dominated as much by informal structures and practices as by
    formal institutions.
  3. influenced by unique international pressures, such as the pull of the European Union and the demands of globalization.
119
Q

What does Pauline Luong see as the prevailing attitude towards the state in the post-communist era?

A

The desire for state-dismantling rather than state-building, due to the prevailing view that the communist state was a behemoth and far too big.

120
Q

What does Pauline Luong believe post-communist state formation can show us?

A

How the state comes into being and into action in the modern era.

121
Q

What three things make the post-communist state-building process unique according to Pualine Luong?

A

1 - it is rapid, occurring over decades rather than centuries.
2 - informal structures and practices play a large part, not just formal institutions.
3 - it is influenced by unique international pressures.

122
Q

What is the prevailing approach to scholarship on statebuilding accourding to Luong?

A

Most scholars start at the consolidated modern state and then work backwards to determine the process that led to its creation.

123
Q

What is the problem with applying the traditional method of state-building to post-communist states according to Luong?

A

Post-communist states are neither stable nor consolidated. Their state-building processes are ongoing and dynamic and they have not yet reached a stable end-point.

124
Q

What did Soviet leaders attempt to do with regards to society-state boundaries according to Luong?

A

Blur the boundaries betweent he two and create a powerful and hegemonic state.

125
Q

How successful were Soviet leaders is blurring the boundaries between state and society?

A

They were successful in the USSR but not in all of the East European states, meaning there was more space for society to develop their independent of the state.

126
Q

What is the crucial difference between the Soviet successor states and other post-comminist East European states?

A

The amount of space reserved for society to organize independently of the state, and is dependent on the degree to which state-society boundaries exist.

127
Q

What is the contrast between state-building in the West and in post-communist societies?

A

Post-communist state-building builds on existing formal state structures whereas earlier state-building in the West did not.

128
Q

What factor increased the siginificance of existing state structure during the post-communist state-building process?

A

The rapidity of state-building. It necessitated a reliance of existing structures and prevented new ones being built.

129
Q

Who does the reliance on existing state structure favour?

A

Elites, who both already have access to exisitng structures and are in control of its reshaping.

130
Q

How has the impact of international actors changed with the post-communist state-building process?

A

In prior episodes of state-building, actors had to react to the international context but not necessarily to comply with its demands and international standards as they do now.

131
Q

What international agents influence post-communist state-building?

A
  • International Monetary Fund [IMF]
  • World Bank [WB]
132
Q

What sort of states do international agent pressure state-builders to create?

A

Ones with a democratic political system, a market economy, and free trade that provide stable property rights.

133
Q

How might post-communist statebuilders subvert international pressure to build a particular type of state?

A

They can build formal institutions that compley but use informal practices to subvert their impact.

134
Q

What does Pauline Luong consider the structures of the state to be the outcome of?

A

Elite competition.

135
Q

What factor limited the ability of elites to shape the post-communist state?

A

The extent to which society could organise independently under communist rule.

136
Q

Why do independently organised groups increase the likelihood of representation in the post-communist statebuilding process?

A

They offer a strong incentive for entrepreneurial elites to serve as their representatives because they can provide a ready-made basis for political support.

137
Q

What independent and voluntary organisation formed in Poland due to a failure to eliminate the distinction between state and society?

A

Solidarity, 1980-1981

138
Q

What years did mass protests take place in Poland, demonstrating that it was the most rebellious of all the Soviet blocs?

A

1956, 1968, 1970–1, 1976, and 1980–1

139
Q

How does Luong characterise the impact of societal groups when the Soviet Union collapsed?

A

When communist regimes collapsed, these previously organized societal groups were ready to be tapped in many East European countries but exacted representation in exchange for their support.

140
Q

In what situations, therefore, do we observe representative competition between elites in the post-communist state-building process?

A

In those states where a clear line emerged between the communist party state and its subjects that allowed mobilization by society on its own behalf, including Poland.

141
Q

In contrast to Poland, what does Luong observe in Russia during the post-communist state-building process and why?

A

Self-contained competition between elites because the boundary between state and society was blurred under communism and, hence, former ruling elites did not face mobilized opposition.

142
Q

Why did elites rely on existing structures for state-building?

A

They had ready access to them and in the rapid period of change there was no time to build no channels for competition, and so relied of the ones that were already there.

143
Q

Who are the actors in the post-communist state-building process likely to be?

A

The same elites who occupied preexisting centers of power and so have ready access to these structures.

144
Q

What does Luong mean by informal power structures?

A

Personal relations and networks that lack official codification and are located outside of formal channels.

145
Q

How does Luong characterise the relationship between the speed of transition and post-communist state-building?

A

In short, the faster the pace of state-building, the more powerful the legacies of the previous regime and state structures.

146
Q

How does the unlikelihood of Russia ever being invited to join NATO or the EU impact its state-building process?

A

It enfeebles the demands of these two organizations that Russia democratize further.

147
Q

Where does Pauline Luong see nearly consolidated democratic states in the post-communist world?

A

Where there is a combination of a prior state-society distinction and a centralized state apparatus, like in Poland.

148
Q

What example of state-building does Russia exemplify according to Pauline Luong?

A

One where elite competition is formal but self-contained, and elites are largely unrestrained by the population they seek to rule because there are no other countervailing sources of authority.

149
Q

If elites are more contrained by society what is more likely to be the outcome of state-building?

A

A modern democratic state.

150
Q

What influences did West European statebuilders face, and what did they not?

A

External threats that compelled them to establish military and fiscal institutions as well as to form economic alliances, but not institutional templates or well-endowed supranational actors.

151
Q

By focusing on processes of elite competition rather than existing consolidated states as scholars typically do, what does Luong conclude are two necessary preconditions of democratic states in the modern era?

A

“formal institutions and organized societies that constrain elites”

152
Q

What sort of language does Kate Korycki call that used by Polish politicians?

A

Memory-talk

153
Q

What is the most profound distinction between Poland’s political parties in the view of Kate Korycki?

A

How they interpret the past 70 years of Polish history.

154
Q

How is the Polish political field organised according to Kate Korycki?

A

“the past organizes the political field in Poland”

155
Q

What does the turn to the past mean for the typical right-left divide of politics in Poland according to Korycki?

A

It gives it a moral character, making it a matter of right-wrong, us-them instead.

156
Q

What 2 things does PiS claim about communism in Poland in Korycki’s view?

A

First, that it is evil and anti-Polish, and second that it is not over but is persisting due to post-communist allies in government (in other words, their political opponents).

157
Q

What does the charge of being a communist mean in Poland?

A

Being anti-Polish, because communism is foreign and evil because it is anti-Polish.

158
Q

Although communist influence has declined in Poland, where does Korycki see its continued influence?

A

As a symbolic trope.

159
Q

What is the dual utility to PiS of labelling their opponents as communists?

A

It polarises the political field by making their opponents enemies of Poland, but also allows PiS to portray themself as Poland’s saviour.

160
Q

How varied are Poland’s party’s programmes?

A

Not very. They are all on the right regarding the economy and all generally desire less Church influence in government although to slightly varying degrees.

161
Q

Despite the similarities in the programmes of Poland’s parties, how does Kate Korycki describe the political field?

A

As intensely contested and polarised.

162
Q

Where does the intense competition between Polish parties come from if they are all programatically similar?

A

Their views and orientation to the past and communism in particular.

163
Q

How does Kate Korycki describe PiS?

A

Christian-Democratic
Socially conservative
Friendly to the Church
Sceptical of the EU
Pro-local market

164
Q

How does Kate Korycki describe PO?

A

Neoliberal
Seeks to limit the state
Promote market solutions to economic and social problems

165
Q

How does Kate Korycki describe SLD?

A

Liberal party
Friendly to business
Firmly committed to the EU
More than PO or PiS, suspicious of the Church

166
Q

At what level does Korycki think competition between parties in Poland operate?

A

Political identity

167
Q

How does Korycki describe parties in Poland that do not condemn communism explicitly?

A

As non-dominant players.

168
Q

How does PiS define Poland’s political problem?

A

In terms of persisting communism.

169
Q

What does PiS accuse of allowing communism to persist?

A

The SLD and their allies PO, whose members are all former comunists or their descendants.

170
Q

Why does PO accuse PiS as being irrational?

A

Because to PO communism ended in Poland with the fall of the USSR.

171
Q

What rhetorical purpose does the past serve for PO?

A

They point to the failures of communist central planning to promote their own pro-market reforms and argue for further market liberalism.

172
Q

Where does the rhetorical power of anti-communism come from in Poland?

A

Its anti-Polishness and irredemable evil.

173
Q

How is the national community understood to Poles?

A

A community of:
- culture
- language
- historical experience
- political tradition
- civilizational values
- experienced fate

174
Q

Who does PiS present as Poland’s 2 historical enemies?

A

The Nazis and the communists.

175
Q

What areas of the state are still captured by communist from before 1989 according to PiS?

A
  • Judiciary
  • Bureaucracy
  • Military
  • Security
  • Police forces
  • Bank managers
176
Q

What does denying the transition from communism allow PiS to do according to Kate Korycki?

A

Make the past present.

177
Q

How does Korycki describe PiS’s tactics at their most basic?

A

“The method at its most basic involves branding enemies as communists or their direct ideational descendants. This designation does not need explaining—it carries an automatic, transparent, and deadly moral load.”

178
Q

What is worse in the Polish view, Nazism or Communism?

A

Communism