PLURALISM DIALOGUES Flashcards

1
Q

plural western society and tolerance

A

liberal democracies in western europe are characterised by the ideology of liberalism. it tolerates the freedoms of the individual as long as there is no threat to the wellbeing of society, and permits the individual to believe what each wishes, as long as they don’t undermine the rights of others. it allows and welcomes plural societies, considering a variation of lifestyles makes for cultural riches and diversity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is religious pluralism

A

one aspect of a plural society is religious pluralism. this can refer to a variation of beliefs within a religion, such as the anglican/catholic/methodist splits in christianity, and the variety of different religions mixing, such as islam, sikhism, or hinduism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two problems with a pluralist society

A

the epistemological problem: to what extent may truth claims of other religions be considered true in christian theology?
the soteriological problem: can people of non-christian religions or no faith receive god’s grace?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why do humans believe what they believe (phenomenological debate and cultural influence )

A

why do we believe what we believe? some argue it is a cultural or phenomenological debate. different cultures develop their lifestyles based on belief systems adapted to their environment. so it can be assumed that religious belief is connected to society but is not in itself exclusive or unique.

established religions don’t really use the phenomenological argument, responding that their beliefs are true regardless of culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sensus divinitaitus and knowledge of God being exclusive to christians only

A

for natural theology christian theologians, knowledge of god is not exclusive to christians, and non-christian religions may develop compatible truth claims. revealed theologians consider that something may be known of god through a sensus divinitatus, religious experience or conscience, but it is insufficient to have a full relationship with god, which can only be acheive through jesus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

necessary and sufficient beliefs in Christianity

A

avin d’costa argues the answer will depend on the ‘controlling beliefs’ of a christian community,

from a christian perspective, is belief in god necessary for salvation? some responses are:

belief is necessary but not sufficient, because belief in christ is also needed
belief in christ alone is necessary and sufficient
belief in christ is sufficient but not necessary because there are other conditions like being loving and kind
although there are many necessary conditions, no single condition is sufficient for salvation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the controlling beliefs within christianity and denominations may differ

A

he particular controlling beliefs will depend on the denomination, so while calvinism and roman catholicism teach all six, the catholic church does not believe we are fallen and incapable of knowing god. theologians of different traditions interpret these controlling beliefs based on what they consider to be necessary and sufficient conditions for salvation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Theological inclusivism and russel

A

he particular controlling beliefs will depend on the denomination, so while calvinism and roman catholicism teach all six, the catholic church does not believe we are fallen and incapable of knowing god. theologians of different traditions interpret these controlling beliefs based on what they consider to be necessary and sufficient conditions for salvation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

christian response to russel

A

christians would disagree that it is ‘untrue and harmful’, but many would agree if one religion is true the rest are not. this position is theological exclusivism. this raises to questions about the nature of god:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the two types of exclusivism

A

restrictive access exclusivism (RAE)

universal access exclusivism (UAE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

restrictive access exclusivism and the traditional belief

A

RAE is considered the most traditional position. the controlling beliefs here place emphasis on the sinfulness of human nature and the uniqueness of christ as the only means to salvation (sola christus). salvation is only possible through directly hearing the gospel (fides ex auditu) and baptism. this position is biblically supported:

jesus said to him, ‘i am the way, and the truth, and the life. no one comes to the father except through me’ – john
there is salvation in no one else – acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Calvinists and those who lived before christ

A

what about those who lived before christ or lived in a non-christian culture? is it impossible for them to receive salvation? it would seem contradictory for a just and loving god to condemn them when it is not their fault.

the response by calvinists is that humans are inherently sinful and god is not obliged to save anyone, but because he is loving, he will same the elect for their virtuous lives. some denominations have supported the doctrines of limited election, double predestination and the antelapsarian divine decree.

some contemporary scholars justify the criticism that double predestination limits human freedom and the purpose of faith by using the middle knowledge argument, which states that god knows all possible events done by free agents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Whats universal access exclusivism and how do calvinist view st pauls quote differently

A

a key different between RAE and UAE is when st paul writes that ‘in christ, god was reconciling the world to himself’, RAE interprets the world to mean the elect, while UAE interprets it to mean everyone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Quote from timothy and God desiring everyone to be saved

A

god our saviour desires everyone to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth…

timothy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how can those born before christ be salved

A

UAE is supported by roman catholic and protestant theologians. the problem is if god wants everyone to be saved, how are those born before or ignorant of christ can be saved if they lack fides ex auditu. two answers may be:

preparation: the following may be good preparation before they receive the gospel: living a moral life according to natural law, devotion to god in a non-christian religion and having a sensus divinitatis.
life after death: in hell or purgatory a person may encounter the gospel and accept god and christ.
importantly, UAE distinguishes between universal salvation and universalism because there can be no salvation outside the church (extra ecclesiam nulla salus).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pope paul and the Other religions reflecting some truth

A

although differing in many ways from her own teachings, nonetheless often reflect a ray of truth which enlightens everyone.
pope paul

17
Q

Catholic Church recognising a ray of truth within other religions however recognising that they do lack the necessary controlling factors for salvation

A

they lack the necessary controlling beliefs for salvation. in dominus iesus, the church makes it clear that the position of pluralism undermines the unicity of the church.

many consider the catholic position actually as inclusive, not exclusive, because it recognises rays of truth in other religions. this indicates ambiguity in the model of inclusive/exclusive. it also highlights the problems of a religion wishing to respect the integrity of each religion while not limiting god.

18
Q

Whats karl barths

A

at the heart of his theology is the argument that god may be known only when he reveals himself to whomever he choses. this seems to support RAE. one interpretation of barth is that he argues that since only christian revelation is true, all other must be untrue. barth also considers the teaching of the trinity as uniquely christian and it ‘fundamentally distinguishes’ it.

other scholars interpret him as UAE or inclusive. they argue that barth meant god’s revelations transform all religions because they are all human attempts to understand the divine and none can claim to know god. they also argue barth’s teaching on the trinity does not imply only christians have access to salvation.

19
Q

Critic of RAE

A

RAE has been the cause of christian imperialism, conflict and suffering. christianity has persecuted others for not having their version of the truth, fought wars against non-believers and been used by states to convert and control others.
RAE presents an unjust and unloving god to those who through no fault of their own have not received god.

20
Q

Critic of UAE

A

UAE lacks consistency, because other religions may have ‘rays of truth’ which are sufficient but these are not sufficient outside of the church

21
Q

What are the two types of inclusivism

A
structural incluvisists (SI)
restrictive inclusivists (RI)
22
Q

whats the structural inclusivism position

A

the SI position is that any religion whose structures develop an openness to god’s grace in jesus may receive salvation. the most influential form of inclusivism was developed by karl rahner.

23
Q

Rahner on all humans being aware

A

humans are aware of their mortality and limitations, and it prompts them to think about their existence. when they reflect on it, they realise that being is deeply mysterious. at this point, rahner claims they encounter the experience of god’s infinite grace, the source of being.

24
Q

all religions implicitly encourage the same thing however Christianity does this explicitly through jesus Christ

A

claims religions implicitly support this claim when they encourage us to behave selflessly, lovingly and charitably, and when their structures create this openness. the only religion which claims to present this grace explicitly is Christianity through Jesus.

25
Q

All humans having a subconscious openess to Gods grace

A

all human knowledge is limited and finite
because it is finite, humans have to accept that they can only have an unconditional ‘openness’ to existence
this ‘openness’ suggests all humans, even subconsciously, desire grace and salvation

26
Q

Karl rahner of the anonymous Christians

A

by anonymous christianity, rahner means any religious institution which through its structures, practices and values is a means of grace.

although the incarnation occurred at a particular time and place, its significance is a universal and timeless expression of god in the world. it doesn’t divide history but mark a new development within in.

therefore the absolutism of christianity must be questioned or else we must assume god doesn’t want humans to be saved. this isn’t compatible with god’s grace and love of creation. rahner argues we must all be capable of being members of the church.

27
Q

Not all religions are equally legitimate for Gods grace

A

based on his argument that all humans desire grace, rahner develops aquinas’ notion of the votum ecclesia, that even wanting grace by faithfully following a non-christian religion is sufficient for grace.

however, not all other religions are equally legitimate. for a religion to be lawful, it must be judged by the quality of salvation it offers. it must be more than a personal experience, and needs an organisational authority to regulate truth and falsehood.

there are still some individuals who do live morally and religiously outside the institution, and they must be judged too, suggesting anonymous christian individuals.

28
Q

The two apriori notions which Rahner considers

A

rahner considers two notions as a priori. first that humans are ignorant to some extent from original sin, and second that all humans are loved by god according to his grace.

this is not official catholic teaching. for the catholic church, all religions are soteriologically invalid unless they convert and become part of the visible church. rahner disagrees. he cites paul’s story about the temple to the unknown god made by the athenians as the basis for his argument that although they worshipped what they could not see, this is the god that christians know explicitly through christ. he argues paul does not condemn them but sees it as a way for them to know god without the gospel.

29
Q

Rahner - the church cannot be exclusive and play a role in sharing the grace of christ

A

he final part considers the role of the church in salvation. rahner argues that the church cannot be an exclusive community but play a role in sharing the teachings on christianity, especially in a more secular world. a christian has a duty to make god known to the world.

it is the role of the visible church to proclaim the explicit means of grace in the person of christ. moral action is only good if it conforms to christ’s example as the mediator of grace. in order to experience the fullness of grace an anonymous christian must convert and become a member of the church.

30
Q

Restrictive inclusivism

A

they argue that although god makes provision for individuals who have not heard the gospel but nevertheless respond positively to natural law and conscience, they do not consider a non-christian religion to be salvific like rahner does. it may at best be a good preparation.

31
Q

Critic of rahner and universal inclusivism

A

RI is not much different from UAE, it is really exclusivist
rahner makes christianity imperialist and offensive to non-christians, as if he is telling them ‘you might think you’re muslim but really you’re christian deep down’
it might be more accurate to say that christians are anonymous buddhists
he has focused too much on brace independent from christ, putting the principle of sola christus behind a general experience of god
it is unbiblical

32
Q

What is pluralism and what are its three different form

A

heological pluralism is the more recent development in theology of religions. it is attractive because it supports the secular liberal aim of religious diversity in society. since religiously motivated terror events like 9/11 and charlie hebdo, the aim for theological pluralists has been to remove imperialist motives and find harmony.

although there are several versions, they all think there are many ways to salvation. d’costa distinguishes three forms:

unitary theological pluralism (UTP)
pluriform theological pluralism (PTP)
ethical theological pluralism (ETP)

33
Q

What is john hicks global theory of frame work for greater understanding of other religion

A

he emphasises natural theology, placing little emphasis on traiditonal ideas of revelation.

kant and the an-Sich: it soon became apparent to hick that not all religions are theistic. he found a solution in kant’s distinction of noumenal and phenomenal knowledge. hick uses this to argue that although religions are phenomenally different, noumenally they are referring to the same underlying an-sich, or the Real.