planetary boundaries for a blue planet (marine lecture 5) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the planetary boundaries concept?

A
  • human civilisation developed in unusually environmentally stable Holocene period
  • since the industrial revolution = Anthropocene
  • human activities may push Earth out of stable Holocene state w detrimental/catastrophic effects for parts of world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was Holocene stability?

A
  • under slow, natural environmental change w earth’s regulatory capacity maintaining relatively stable conditions
  • temperature, freshwater availability & geochemical fluxes stayed w/i a relatively narrow range
  • feedback processes maintained global/regional stability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Anthropocene?

A
  • fossil fuel reliance and industrial agriculture disrupt this stability
  • push earth out of holocene
  • abrupt irreversible environmental changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the planetary boundaries?

A
  • a safe operating space
  • must live w/i to allow regulatory biophysical processes to persist
  • if thresholds exceeded important subsystems may shift into new state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was the planetary boundary framework refined?

A
  • discussed widely in policy, government, business sectors
  • key platform informing global sustainability efforts

refined to:

  • account for regional level heterogeneity
  • update quantification of planetary boundaries
  • identify the the core boundaries at global & regional levels

(Steffen et al., 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the planetary boundaries for a blue planet? Why is a marine perspective needed?

A
  • most pb research focused on terrestrial systems
  • but marine systems key to earth system functioning and societal wellbeing

marine ecosystems:

  • big
  • differ structurally & biologically from terrestrial ecosystems
  • under increasing pressure
  • critical to human beings, especially in poor countries where fisheries provide most protein
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How should blue planetary boundaries be approached?

A
  • build on existing (Rockstrom, Steffen) + proposed boundaries
  • integrate processes/data/concepts applicable in marine systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why are blue planet boundaries important?

  • land system change
A
  • vegetative cover mediates climate (C storage, moisture transfer, surface energy transfer)
  • measured habitat change
  • e.g. forest to cropland = change in C sequestration, albedo, evapotranspiration

marine biomes influence climate directly via similar processes to terrestrial biomes:

  • C sequestration by coastal vegetation
  • albedo changes (melting sea ice)
  • ocean-atmosphere coupling may counteract some terrestrial processes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why are blue planet boundaries important?

  • carbon sequestration
A
  • coastal habitats have v high C sequestration (salt marshes 50+x higher than tropical rainforests)
  • degradation of mangroves, sea grasses, coastal marshes etc driving emissions of similar order to deforestation despite 7x less area
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why are blue planet boundaries important?

  • albedo
A
  • difference between boreal forest (low) and grassland (high) albedo similar between that of open ocean (low) and sea ice (high)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Examples of how blue planet boundaries could be approached:

  • marine habitat change
A
  • change existing control variables
  • e.g. relative ice cover as equivalent to remaining forest cover
  • add sub-boundaries for loss of marine habitats
  • e.g. 3D structural complexity, area of undisturbed sea bed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Examples of how blue planet boundaries could be approached:

  • biogeochemical flows
A
  • 2 sub-boundaries: N & P
  • we aggregate regional effects in terrestrial and freshwater systems but only globally for marine
  • eutrophication is a major threat to coastal marine ecosystems
  • should measure regional effects in marine systems
  • consider other important marine nutrients (Fe & Si)
  • should consider top down biogeochemical impacts like fisheries ad well as bottom up enrichment
  • marine biogeochemical regimes vary with depth & through space
  • large differences in biogeochemical cycling, primary productivity and marine foodwebs
  • different marine ecosystems have different vulnerabilities to increased nutrient loading
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is biosphere integrity/the biosphere integrity index (BII)?

A
  • core planetary boundary central to earth system state
  • persistence - evolutionary history
  • functioning - functioning diversity
  • measured by biosphere integrity index
  • the biosphere integrity index is the proportion of species remaining as compared with primary vegetation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Could there be a marine biosphere integrity index?

A
  • feasibly BII could be developed for marine sites but lack of “control” sites data
  • functional diversity well established in marine ecosystems measured with biological traits
  • trait based measures could enhance current biosphere integrity as are more closely linked to ecosystem functioning than measures of richness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How to integrate marine functional diversity?

A
  • build on extensive work on marine system functional diversity
  • develop indicators of ecosystem state
  • e.g. size-based indicators for fisheries monitoring
  • apply accross systems for more holistic estimate of biosphere integrity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Human Appropriated Net Primary Productivity (HANPP)?

A
  • HANPP is the amount of NPP appropriated by humans
  • directly or via crops/livestock
  • proposed as additional planetary boundary
  • quantifies effect anthropogenic changes in productivity and harvest on ecological biomass flows
17
Q

Why/how to integrate marine HANPP?

A
  • 50% global production is marine
  • similar proportions NPP flows into shelf sea fisheries as is appropriated by humans on land
  • oceans comparable to land as C sink
  • harmonise integration of marine and land measures of productivity - new production v biomass accumulation
18
Q

What are the critiques of the planetary boundaries concept?

A
  • no evidence for/theoretical reason for extinction rate tipping types
  • allowing gradual change and not just threshold like tipping points make boundaries arbitrary
  • limit arbitrary even if robust estimates for biodiversity change were made
  • lacks clear definitions/too many contradictions
  • no unit specifications
  • no operational definitions so hard to apply practically
19
Q

What are the potential dangers of the planetary boundaries concept?

A
  • no operational definition of ‘safe operating space’
  • encourages idea human actions used to be environmentally benign/allowed recovery
  • idea that if planet isn’t literally collapsing yet we can continue to deplete it
20
Q

What are alternatives to the planetary boundaries concept?

A

address how biodiversity loss affects the different facets of ecosystem change:
• resilience (how fast systems recover)
• resistance (how much they change)
• variability (how much they fluctuate over time)
• persistence (how long they persist)

well-defined, have units, can
be monitored over time, can inform management