Piliavin Flashcards

1
Q

Name the method used in oiliavins study

A

Field experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the sample of piliavins study

A
  • opportunity sample
  • 4450 passengers on the subway
  • 55% white 45% black
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State the IVs of piliavins study

A
  • type of victim
  • race of victim
  • presence/absence of helping model
  • number of passengers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State the DV’s of piliavins study

A
  • time taken for 1st passenger to help

- total number of passengers who helped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State the aim of piliavins study

A

To study factors affecting whether people would help a collapsed man on the New York underground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the background of piliavins study

A

Kitty Genoese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe the case study of kitty genovese

A
  • Murder that took place in 1964

- 38 people claimed to see the event however no one called the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define the term bystander

A

Anyone who is present at an incident but not directly involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the meaning of the phrase diffusion of responsibility

A

When in large groups the responsibilities are shared between them all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many passengers were estimated to travel the subway in piliavins study?

A

4550

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the procedure used in piliavins study

A
  • An experiment fake collapsed in the subway
  • the number of people who helped was recorded by another experimenter
  • the type of victim varied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where and when did piliavins study take place ?

A

On the New York subway, between the hours of 11-3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the key theme of piliavins study

A

Response to people in need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does unsolicited participants mean?

A

They were normal people travelling on the subway so the experimenter did not get consent from them a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why did piliavins not need to gain consent?

A

Participants were in a public place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give the conclusions drawn from piliavins study

A
  • an I’ll person is more likely to recive hell that a drunk
  • men are more likely to help than women
  • people are more likely to help someone of the same ethnicity
  • there is a no strong relationship between the size of the group and the likely hold of being helped
  • the longer an incident goes on the less likely they are to be helped
17
Q

Give the assumptions of the social area

A
  • behaviour is affected by the imagined, implied or actual presence of others
  • a major influence on people’s behaviour, through processes and emotions and other people and the society have created
  • ab individuals behaviour is affected by situational factors for example the environment we find ourselves in
18
Q

Define the term ambiguity of situation

A

We are unsure of the situation and therefore we don’t help because we don’t want to embarrass ourselves

19
Q

Define the term pluralistic ignorance

A

We look to other people to see how they are reacting - if they are doing nothing, we also do nothing

20
Q

Give the strengths of the method used in piliavins study

A
  • one strength of a field experiment is the amount of realism
  • this tooo place in a natural environment (tram carriage)
  • this increases ecological validity
21
Q

Give a weakness of the method used in piliavins study

A
  • one weakness of a field experiment is the ethical issues raised
  • participants could not consent they were unsolicited participants
  • this raises ethical issues
22
Q

Describe the results in the ill vs drunk condition of piliavins study

A

-95% of the time the ill victim received help
-people took longer to help in the ill condition
Drunk 83% over 70s
I’ll 17% over 70s
-the proportion of which more than one person helped did not vary with race

23
Q

Describe the results of piliavins study in terms of race

A
  • In the ill comdition blakc and white victims were equally likely to be helped, however in the drunk condition but the black victim was less likely to receive help
  • same race effect in the drunk condition
  • the proportion of cases in which more than one person helped did not vary with race
24
Q

Describe the results of piliavins study in terms of number of bystanders

A
  • there was no evidence of diffusion of responsibility

- when more passengers were present, people were slightly more likely to receive help

25
Give the applications that can be drawn piliavins study
- saving lives - saving yourself, appear to a male of your make, does not appear drunk, get to somewhere people can’t leave, get help immediately
26
Give the costs of helping
Effort, time, risk of harm, negative emotional response
27
Give the rewards of helping
Social approval, self esteem, positive emotional response
28
Give the cost of not helping
Disapproval/judgement, self blame, guilt
29
Give the rewards of not helping
Avoiding the costs
30
List the controls used in piliavins study
- track chosen - trails run on the same train like at the same time of day - victim collapsed in the same part of the carriage and in the same way and at the same point of the journey - victim always male, same age and dresses the same
31
Describe the quantitative data in piliavins study
- number of people who helped - race of helpers - gender of helpers
32
Describe the qualitative data collected in piliavins study
Comments made by passengers