Physical Organic Chemistry and Conformational Analysis Flashcards
What 5 tools can be used to provide indirect evidence for a mechanism?
Regio and stereochemistry of products and intermediates.
Structures of by-products.
Isotope labelling (common isotopes are 13C, 2D and even 18O).
Observing intermediates by: NMR, IR, UV-Vis, GC/HPLC, MS and EPR.
What 2 ways can short-lived intermediates be observed?
Use another selective mechanism only possible with the intermediate such as the Diels-Alder reaction.
Spin traps such as nitroxides can stablise radicals.
Give a way an Sn1 and Sn2 reactions can be told apart only comparing the reactant and product.
The reaction centre will invert in an Sn2 reaction.
What do mechanisms provide and hence why are they important to study?
The provide detailed descriptions of all elementary steps in a given reaction.
How can the possible conformations of a molecule change its reactivity? For example a long alkyl chain.
Conformations depending on solvent and temperatures can form that ‘wrap up’ and be blocked from reacting.
Which ring system size is the least strained in theory? How can this be demostrated? What is the take home message from this?
5-membered are the least strained in theory based on angle of the shapes.
Plotting the ring size against the heat of combustion per CH2 group shows that 6 membered rings are the most stable.
Cyclohexane rings and larger are considered strain free.
What is the actual shape taken by 3, 4, 5 and 6 membered rings? Comment on their stability and draw each of them.
3 - has to be planar, eclipsed C-H bonds are very strained
4 - a V shaped stucture forms with two atoms at the base, the twisting reduces eclipsing
5 - ‘open envolope’ shape, C-H bonds are almost ax/eq so are called psuedo axial and equitorial
6 - most stable form is the chair conformation but the boat and twist boat can also occur, the chair makes all C-H bonds staggered
Draw the ring flip mechanism.
Sketch, with values, the energy graph for a ring flip.
Why is axial tBu so much less favoured than axial iPr?
iPr only has 2 methyl groups so the hydrogen can be oriented to face the other axial groups to minimise the steric clash. With tBu, no possible rotation is possible to avoid the steric clash.
When looking at flat cyclohexane ring, how can you tell if groups will be equitorial or axial?
Define one direction for one atom as eq, the atoms adjacent will have eq positions in the other direction to the originial. The equitorial position will alternate in and out of the page around the ring.
How does a tBu group affect cyclohexane rings?
It acts as a locking group, where the conformation of the tBu group is in the axial position is heavily disfavoured.
How does the position of a leaving group on a cyclohexane ring affect the rate of substitution with a nucleophile?
The rate of nucleophilic attack is approximately 31x faster when the leaving group is in the axial position for two reasons
- The 1,3-diaxial interactions from the axial groups block the incoming nucleophile from the LUMO
- The nucleophile must substitute into the axial position which is disfavourable
Where will a nucleophile substitute onto when reacting with an epoxide on a cyclohexane ring?
Both epoxide bonds must be in the same direction without axial or equtiorial symmetry. Either way the nucleophile will substitute onto the epoxide in the opposite direction that the epoxide pointed in.
When reforming an epoxide group on a cyclohexane with both carbons in the ring after the epoxide has be Nu attacked, what are the stereochemical requirements of the LG and the O-?
After the substitution the groups will point different directions meaning the favoured conformation will be both groups equitorial. However for the ring closing to occur, there must be good overlap of orbitals which is only the case in the both axial conformation.
If the LG and O- are cis (one axial, one equitorial), the elimination cannot occur as the LG LUMO is too far away from the O-.
What is the structure of a sp2 hybridised group on a cyclohexane ring? Where does the sp2 group move to when attacked by a nucleophile?
It points in the plane the sp2 carbon makes with the 2 carbons it is attached to. This is between the axial and equitorial position but the group points up if it is attached to an up carbon.
The nucleophile can attack from either the equtiorial or axial position, wherever the attack is, the O- will then go to the opposite position. Large nuceophiles will react at the equitorial position (no 1,3-diaxial blocking), small nucleophiles will react at the axial position.
When reducing a tBu locked cyclohexyl carbonyl, which position will the hydride take for LiAlH4 and Li(s-Bu)3BH?
LiAlH4 is a small so can react in either position, hence reacts preferentially at the axial postion. This places the OH into the equitorial position.
Li(s-Bu)3BH is a large source of hydride so preferentially reacts at the equitorial position. This places the OH into the axial position.
What is the conformation of cyclohexene? Give a sketch and name it. How will it react with Br2 and bromonating agents?
It forms a half-chair.
The bromonium ion forms with both bonds pointing in the same direction, leaving the nucleophile to attack from the other side, forming the trans product.