Pg 6 Flashcards

1
Q

If there is a violation of knock and announce, does that require exclusion of the evidence under the exclusionary rule?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an illegal confirmatory search?

A

When police already have probable cause for a search, but before getting a warrant, they illegally enter the premises to confirm that contraband is present, then they get a warrant based on the original probable cause.

Although in this case the independent source exception applies because the police illegally searched and violated the fourth amendment, but nothing in the affidavit to the magistrate came from that search, so when the warrant was issued, there was no connection between the search and the warrant, so it was based on independent information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is attenuation?

A

When the causal connection is remote or a constitutional guarantee that has been violated won’t be served by the suppression of evidence. This considers time, distance, and intervening acts by the defendant to decide if evidence has become attenuated from the initial illegality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is evidence immediately following illegal conduct considered to be attenuated?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When might attenuation apply?

A

If you can show a break in the causal chain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the reasoning behind attenuation?

A

There comes a point when the consequences of the illegal police action become so attenuated that the deterrent effect of the exclusionary rule no longer justifies its cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is the “but for“ test the proper one to use to figure out the exclusionary rule?

A

No, because evidence isn’t necessarily fruit of the poisonous tree just because it would not have come to light “but for“ the illegal action of police.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does a Miranda waiver attenuate the initial taint?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If someone commits a new crime as a reaction to an illegal police action, such as an assault or being in a dangerous way, is that enough to break the causal chain and justify a later arrest or search under attenuation?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are things that can break the chain in order for attenuation to apply?

A

– committing a new crime as a reaction to illegal police action
– consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can consent break the chain for attenuation?

A

Consent can break and purge the taint depending on these factors:
– if the police made it clear that the initial illegal detention was over before asking for consent to search. They would’ve had to tell the suspect that he is free to go or return his belongings to him
– if the police told a suspect he could refuse consent
– temporal proximity between the illegal detention and the request for consent to search
– if discovery of the area that the police are requesting to search happened because of an illegal detention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the factors to determine attenuation?

A
  • the amount of time between the initial unlawful act and getting the challenged evidence. If more than a year has passed, that is enough
    – intervening acts of free will: someone agrees to provide testimony that breaks the causal chain
    – flagrancy of the violation: the more serious violation, the longer it takes for the taint to dissipate
    – nature of derivative evidence: verbal evidence is more likely to be free of taint
  • proximity to arrest or confession
    – purpose or flagrancy of the official misconduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is involved in the independent source rule with regard to the exclusionary rule?

A

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply when the government learned of the evidence from an independent source because the evidence is not the fruit of a prior violation. This allows the admission of evidence that is discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you challenge the independent source rule?

A

By showing that the initial illegality is directly linked to the information used to get the warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If there are two groups of police that don’t know about each other and one group has probable cause and already has a warrant and the other does an illegal search, is that evidence admissible?

A

Yes, because of the independent source rule since it could have come into the government’s hands lawfully by the independent source. This only counts if the warrant was already gotten

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What can you use illegally gotten evidence for?

A

Impeachment

17
Q

How can you use illegally gotten evidence for impeachment?

A

If D makes a sweeping claim putting his character in issue, the government can introduce illegally gotten evidence in order to impeach him. There’s no privilege to commit perjury

18
Q

What is the rationale behind allowing illegally gotten evidence to be used for impeachment?

A

It furthers truth seeking and deters perjury

19
Q

Can you use illegally gotten evidence to impeach a witness and not the defendant?

A

No, this only applies to impeachment of a defendant

20
Q

If the government illegally seizes heroin from a defendant and it got suppressed because of the exclusionary rule, but the defendant testified that he had never possessed the drugs, can the government use that evidence just to impeach him?

A

Yes because illegally gotten evidence can be used for impeachment

21
Q

What is the fourth amendment?

A

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrants shall issue except with probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the people or things to be seized.

22
Q

Does the fourth amendment requires a warrant for a valid search?

A

No, it just prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures

23
Q

What things are protected by the fourth amendment?

A
  • privacy
    – interest in possession of property
    – liberty of the person
24
Q

What is the presumption if a search happens without a warrant?

A

It is presumptively unreasonable

25
Q

What is the remedy for a fourth amendment violation?

A

Exclusion under the exclusionary rule.

26
Q

What is the rationale for the fourth amendment?

A

To deter police misconduct

27
Q

What is the test that is applied to the fourth amendment?

A

Reasonableness

28
Q

What is required for the fourth amendment to apply?

A

State action and a search or seizure by either a government actor or police encouragement

29
Q

Do you need a warrant to arrest a defendant in public?

A

No

30
Q

Do you need a warrant to arrest someone in their home without exigent circumstances?

A

Yes

31
Q

What do police need in order to arrest someone to bring them to the station for questioning and fingerprinting?

A

Probable cause

32
Q

What should you watch for on an essay with regard to the fourth amendment?

A

Sometimes there are two seizures or two searches or one of each, but there’s only one warrant

33
Q

Does the fourth amendment right extent to people residing in foreign countries at the time of the search or seizure?

A

Yes, if they are part of the national community of the United States. This means they are citizens or have substantial ties to the US

34
Q

If a US citizen is arrested at night in a house without a warrant in Mexico and cocaine is found, is that evidence allowed under the fourth amendment?

A

No