Pg 22 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Does the constitution guarantee an unrestricted privilege to engage in business?

A

No, some types of business are not allowed and the right to do business is conditional.

I.e.: Usery laws fix lending, industry is subject to control for the public good, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are women’s body rights protected under the privileges immunities clause?

A

The Constitution protects women’s rights to have an abortion before viability without undue interference from the state
- but once viability hits, unless there’s an emergency that endangers the female or the baby, the state has a legitimate interest in protecting the health of the woman and the life of the fetus.

This deprives women of their liberty interest at that point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is retroactive legislation permitted?

A

No, it is prohibited by the due process clause and it voids legislation with a retrospective impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are four categories where retroactive legislation could be an issue?

A

– Emergency retroactive legislation
– curative statutes
– retroactive taxing legislation
– retroactive general legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is emergency retroactive legislation permitted?

A

This is usually sustained because of deference to emergency measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are curative statutes often permitted?

A

These are usually sustained when they ratify prior official conduct in order to make a remedial adjustment in an administrative scheme.

I.e.: correcting a statutory flaw, removing unintended flaws that existing legislation had and trying to give full effect to the legislative intent, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is retroactive taxing legislation usually upheld?

A

This is usually held to violate due process if it doesn’t have a rational relationship to a legitimate government interest.

Amendments to income tax laws are usually upheld because the court says that individuals should be on notice that all income may be subject to federal or state tax at some future time.

Increasing or modifying income tax to meet revenue goals of the government is rationally related to the legitimate government interest of raising revenue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is retroactive general legislation usually upheld?

A

The court looks at the constitutional validity of the legislation by considering reasonable notice and expectations. Usually if it is just a modification to a remedy, it is upheld

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the takings clause or eminent domain?

A

Private property will not be taken by the government without just compensation [market value of the property at the time of the taking] or for no reason [must be public use for property]. If property is taken for public use, the owner cannot stop it, but he can compel the government to pay value.

This is applicable to the states through the 14th

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two different kinds of takings that can happen under the takings clause?

A
  • Physical occupation

- regulatory taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a taking?

A

A physical intrusion on land, either permanently or temporarily that counts no matter how small. It is necessary that there is an interference with the owner’s present use or a prevention from him realizing a reasonable rate of return on his investment.

Ie: government parking trucks on the plaintiff’s land while doing construction beside it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What must the government do if they commit a taking?

A

They must pay just compensation for any physical occupation, even if temporary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is it considered to be a taking if the government is not occupying the land, but they are just regulating it in a way that the owner cannot use it anymore or in the way the owner wants to use it?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is it considered to be a taking if the government puts up a prison beside your house and that reduces your property value?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the elements of a taking?

A

– Public use
– public purpose
– just compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two things that have to happen for a taking to be OK?

A

It must be for a public purpose or use and just compensation must be given

17
Q

What does public use mean under the takings clause?

A

For the public good or benefit, a public purpose, public necessity, or public utility, and it must be part of a plan that is legitimate and rational

18
Q

Under the takings clause can a city take land to confer a private benefit on a private party?

A

No

19
Q

Under the takings clause, is it necessary that the property be literally put to public use?

A

No, if it has a public purpose that is enough.

Ie: the state can transfer private property from one person to another private person if future use by the public is the purpose of the taking, such as a railroad

20
Q

If it isn’t a per se taking under the takings clause, but is instead a regulatory taking, then how is it decided?

A

Ad hoc after a balance of equities considering:
– the nature of the harm caused
– the social interests advanced by the regulation

21
Q

If there is a regulatory taking, what do the owners have to show in order to be compensated?

A

That the regulation unjustly shifts social costs to them by greatly diminishing the value of their property without promoting a legitimate social interest

22
Q

If land is transferred to a private person does that mean that it is not being “taken“ for a public purpose?

A

No, it can be for a public purpose if the taking is rationally related to a conceivable public purpose. The state can transfer property from one private party to another if a future use by the public is the point of the taking.

23
Q

If a taking is intended to favour a private party and also has an incidental or pretextual public benefit, is that OK?

A

No, that will be struck down

24
Q

What is the test to use to determine how much compensation a landowner should get under the takings clause?

A

Market value tests: what the owner has lost is what he will get, not what the taker has gained. This is based on the fair market value of the property in light of the property’s present and potential uses if they can be anticipated with reasonable certainty and is determined on the date of taking.

25
Q

Can a plaintiff get interest if there’s been a taking?

A

Yes, he can get interest if there has been a delay between the date of the taking and the date that the government gives payment. He can also get a new valuation if the value of the property materially changed during the delay

26
Q

What is inverse condemnation?

A

When the property has been taken by the government through a regulatory action or impairment of value. This asks for a court determination that a taking occurred and for the government to be forced to pay just compensation, cease their actions, or rescind the regulations.

27
Q

If a license has been revoked, is that a taking?

A

No, because there is no property right in a license, so there’s no taking if it is revoked

28
Q

What is the essay approach for a takings issue?

A

– ask if there has been a per se taking of private property for public use
– ask if it has deprived the plaintiff of all economic value

29
Q

If a taking occurs by regulation, what must have happened?

A

It must’ve denied the owner of all economically productive use of his land

30
Q

What are the different ways that a taking can happen?

A

– Physical seizure/appropriation
– regulation that denies the owner of all economically productive use of his land
– physical invasion

31
Q

What is a per se taking under the takings clause?

A

An absolute deprivation of the economic value of property through either:
- a regulation that denies the owner all economically productive use of the land
– a physical invasion of the land
– a seizure of property

32
Q

What is required when there has been a per se taking?

A

Just compensation must be paid. This is a categorical duty to compensate the owner regardless of whether the interest taken was the entire parcel or just a part of it. It’s necessary that the government pay for that share, no matter how small

33
Q

What is the difference between how you deal with a per se taking and any other kind of taking under the takings clause?

A

When it has been a per se taken, there’s no need for further inquiry, this type requires just compensation. If it is any other type of taking it requires a balancing test