Pg 12 Flashcards
What is the source of state power?
General police power to enact regulations for the benefit of residents
What is the state’s power to regulate commerce?
States have broad police powers to legislate for the health, morals, and well-being of their citizens.
What are constitutional powers that are exclusively national, and so state regulation is not allowed on these topics?
War power and foreign affairs
What is the dormant commerce clause?
This comes from the commerce clause. The constitution grants Congress plenary power to regulate commerce among the states, and has a negative aspect that denies states the power to unjustifiably discriminate against or burden interstate flow of commerce.
This is a negative power that allows state legislation to be struck down because it infringes on Congress’ power. Any state action that poses an excessive burden on interstate commerce relative to the state’s legitimate interests or discriminates against interstate commerce will be struck down, especially if it is motivated by economic protectionism
What is the purpose of the dormant commerce clause?
It prevents a state from jeopardizing the welfare of the nation as a whole by placing burdens on the flow of commerce across its borders that commerce wholly within its borders would not bear.
States can regulate interstate commerce, but if the motive is to do what, the regulation is per se unconstitutional?
To grant an economic advantage to local interests at the expense of interstate interests [AKA: economic protectionism].
What is the gist of the dormant commerce clause?
If a state law doesn’t discriminate on its face or as applied, it is usually upheld unless it interferes with commerce in a way that is clear and the local interest is not substantial.
If discrimination is present, there cannot be any other reasonable method of safeguarding a legitimate local interest.
If the law has no other purpose than favoring local industry, the balancing test shouldn’t be used, so the point of the regulation is illegitimate
Under the dormant commerce clause, if Congress enacts valid legislation in an area that the states have also regulated, and Congress intends to occupy the field, what happens?
Supremacy clause applies. The discriminatory state law only survives if it advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reasonable non-discriminatory alternatives
What is the vacuum theory under the dormant commerce clause?
There are no areas that NEITHER Congress nor the states can regulate. An activity either substantially relates to interstate commerce [so Congress can regulate it] or doesn’t [then states can regulate it]
What are the elements of the dormant commerce clause?
– discrimination against interstate commerce
– undue burden
– balancing approach
Under the dormant commerce clause if a state restriction discriminates against interstate commerce by giving differing treatment to in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefit the in-state and burden the out-of-state, what usually happens?
It is per se invalid in all but the narrowest circumstances. It will survive only if it advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reasonable non-discriminatory alternatives
What is involved in the element of “discrimination against interstate commerce” that is an element of the dormant commerce clause?
Regulations explicitly treat in-state and out-of-state interests differently. If the state regulates evenhandedly to figure out the legitimate local public interest, and the effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it is upheld unless the burden on commerce is clearly excessive in relation to local benefits
What is involved in the undue burden element of the dormant commerce clause?
Law imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce. This applies the undue burden test that states that if the burden on interstate commerce outweighs the local benefit by regulation, then it is an undue burden. But when the government interest’s benefit outweighs the burden, the regulation is upheld
What is the question to ask under the undue burden element of the dormant commerce clause?
Whether the law discriminates or imposes an excessive burden on interstate commerce.
Generally under the dormant commerce clause tariffs and protectionist acts are treated in what way?
They are nearly always struck down