Personality Flashcards

1
Q

What are criticisms of broad Big 5 personality structures?

A

That they’re:
1) method bound (results rely on factor analysis, not person centered)
2) not comprehensive - missing important constructs
3) do not reflect relationships between factors very accurately (many facets load on multiple factors)
4) do not reflect or inspire enough research attention to personality facets that underlie broad factors
5) limit understanding of clusters of facets (personality trait compounds) that may be relevant for certain jobs
6) limit development of synth validity applications…
(Hough et al 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What’s the difference between the Big 5 and Five Factor Model?

A

The terms Five-Factor Model and Big Five are often used interchangeably, although in the narrow sense, the former refers to a stricter version of the model with 30 definite lower level facets (Costa and McCrae, 1992), whereas the latter encompasses a broader array of models with different lower level components.

Big 5 was first. The factors were Tupes et al. They were surgency, agreeableness, dependability, emotional stability, and culture. Project A tested validities.

The FFM has five traits and 6 facets under each.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are facets?

A

Latent variables that are more narrowly defined than, for example, Big Five broad factors. They often have higher criterion-related validities than their parent factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the factors of the FFM

A
emotional stability/neuroticism
extraversion
agreeableness
conscientiousness
openness to experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the factors of the HEXACO?

A

Very similar to 5 factor but has 6th - Honesty/Humility; and emotionality is slightly diff from emotional stability.

However it adds more within subfacets, like self monitoring, narcissism, psychopathy, altruism, modesty, fairness.

Honesty/humility
Emotionality
Xtraversion
Agreeableness
conscientiousness
openness to experience

Hough et al., 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would HEXACO predict?

A

Hough et al 2015 say they think Honesty component would predict CWBs/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s the strength of the circumplex model of personality and what does it solve for?

A

An issue in personality research is that personality variables (items) correlate with each other, so facets within Big 5 and HEXACO tend to correlate with more than one factor to which it is supposed to belong. A circumplex model gets around that because it’s a circle where constructs are grouped in terms of how strong correlations are.
Hough et al 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is synthetic validity?

A

A more flexible version of meta-analysis that can enable a greater understanding of the conditions under which personality traits provide predictive value. Collect data, test against criterion, tailor new models and predictor equations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What impact does personality have on organizational commitment?

A

Agreeableness is most strongly related to affective (wanting to stay) and normative (should stay) commitment. In terms of continuance (needing to stay/lack of other options), the higher people are in extraversion, emotional stability and openness to experience, the lower they are on continuance commitment (Choi et al., 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does personality impact one’s tendency to enact surface vs deep acting in emotional labor?

A

Yagil et al (2017) found that the need to belong was positively related to use of surface acting, and that surface acting mediated the relationship between fear of isolation and emotional exhaustion. This suggests that service employees with a strong need to belong have a heightened sense of burnout bc of their inclination to engage in emotional labor/surface acting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does personality impact one’s ability to deal with job insecurity?

A

Shoss et al (2018) found that psychological resilience (trait) weakened the relationships between job insecurity and emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and psychological contract breach. And CWBs. Thus resilience can buffer effects during times of job insecurity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does personality impact one’s ability to deal with job insecurity?

A

Shoss et al (2018) found that psychological resilience (trait) weakened the relationships between job insecurity and emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and psychological contract breach. And CWBs. Thus resilience can buffer effects during times of job insecurity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Frieder et al 2018

A

This was an empirical study that found that certain personality traits (conscientiousness and openness to experience) impacted job performance, which was mediated by perceived meaningfulness at work.
Transformational leadership moderated that effect such that the lower the TL, the more positive the effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Becker and Cropanzano, 2010

A

This is a review paper on neuroscience and it’s applications to organizational studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are three ways neuroscience can contribute to organizational studies?

A

1) combating procrastination,
2) climate and sub-climates,
3) the lack of correspondence between attitudinal and behavioral change.
(Becker and Cropanzano, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What may increase procrastination and reduce change?

A

Becker and Cropanzano (2011) note that the habitual decision system in the brain biases employees to continue past behaviors and forego novel actions, reducing change and increasing procrastination. Attempts to subvert this system should create undesirable outcomes to past behavior. This is one area where neuroscience can supplement org science.

17
Q

What is a neuroscience approach to viewing why culture change fails?

A

Becker and Cropanzano (2011) note that the mirror neuron system can help explain why top-down attempts to change culture fail: sub-climates tend to emerge as a result of face-to-face interactions, especially those with strong group members

18
Q

What is a neuroscience view of why attitude change often doesn’t lead to behavior change?

A

Becker and Cropanzano (2011) note that attempts to change attitudes often do not result in behavioral change because, while explicit attitudes may change, implicit attitudes that more strongly influence behavior require long-term exposure to contradictory stimuli to change.