Emotion Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between mood, emotion, and affect?

A

Moods refer to generalized affective states that are temporary and fluctuating and do not have a clear target.

Emotions have a specific target, and moods do not; are relatively short lived, usually have a physiological reaction, and are more intense. Have come to be called “discrete” because they are focused on a specific target.

Affect is a general/umbrella term that typically includes both feeling states (moods and emotions) and feeling traits (dispositional affect).
(Zhou and Shalley, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In what way are emotions functional?

A

Emotions serve as a signaling mechanism for organisms to adapt behavior to meet environmental conditions. Positive emotions signal well being; negative emotions signal that a challenging situation exists that needs to be resolved. Emotions and cognition emerge to serve basic survival (Ashkanasy and Dorris, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the 5-level model of emotion

A

Ashkanasy 2003
o Level 1: within-person – state affect, emotions, mood, behaviors
o Level 2: between-person – trait affectivity, affective commitment, job satisfaction, burnout, emotional intelligence
o Level 3: interpersonal interactions: emotional labor, emotional exchange, displayed vs felt emotion
o Level 4: Groups: affective composition, emotionally intelligent groups, emotional contagion, leader-member exchange
o Level 5: Org-Wide: policies, requirement for emotional labor, stress and well-being, emotional climate and culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was the first scholar to define emotional labor?

A

Hochschild (1983) was a sociologist, who defined it as employees having to display emotions at odds with what they truly feel - the “right emotions”, and as a result they experience burnout and loss of productivity (e.g., flight attendants, debt collectors). Over the last 20 years it’s been a focus in OB literature, primarily focused on emotional regulation strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two key emotion regulation strategies?

A

Two key emotional regulation strategies:
-Surface acting: engaging in superficial display of emotions without genuinely feeling that emotion
-Deep acting: actors seeking to modify their felt emotions so as to align with expected displays of emotion. Antecedent focused in that it focuses on affecting the perception and processing of emotional cues at the onset of an emotion before they elicit behavioral or physiological response
(Grandey, 2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is affective events theory?

A

Weiss and Cropanzano (1996)
AET provided a framework for studying emotions in the workplace as being dynamic. They argue that behavior and performance of employees are largely a function of how they feel in reaction to their environment at any given moment. Events, situations or others may be perceived as threats or opportunities in relation to attaining goals and emotions are responses to that. They impact attitudes. Research indicates that emotions tend to be tied to specific events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which came first, the cognitive revolution or affective revolution?

A

Cognitive revolution occurred in the 1990s, and the affective revolution is seen to have kicked off a decade later, in the aughts! 2000s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are features of the within-person level (Level 1) of the 5-level model of emotions?

A

Level 1: Within Person

  • best understood in terms of affective events theory; positive and negative mood effects
  • positive affect catalyst of creativity and cog flexibility; negative affect can also help creativity but depends on situation and personality
  • affective reactions are outside conscious control
  • empirical procedures need to take account of real-time variations in affect and behavior (daily diary data or several times a day (ESM))
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are features of the between-person level (Level 2) of the 5-level model of emotions?

A

Refers specifically to personal individual differences - emotional intelligence being dominant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define emotional intelligence and the factors of its model.

A

Emotional intelligence is the ability to recognize and use emotional information to guide one’s thinking and actions (Mayer et al, 1997)

Mayer et al (1997) 4-factor model of ABILITIES:
a) Perceiving Emotions: recognition of emotions, both in self and others
b) Using Emotions: knowing which emotions facilitate cognition effectively and using them to do so
c) Understanding Emotions: understanding the effects of emotions and how they change (i.e. embarrassment can turn into anger rather than apology)
d) Managing Emotions: the knowledge of how to regulate
one’s own and others’ emotions to reach goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are outcomes associated with emotional intelligence?

A

Performance (+), especially in emotional skill recognition, but some task
Job satisfaction (+)
Trust (+)
OCBs (+)

Barsade and Gibson, 2007,
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are features of the interpersonal level (Level 3) of the 5-level model of emotions?

A

Level is focused on how emotions are perceived and communicated in dyadic interactions between org members.

Emotional labor is an example, but genuine emotions can also be displayed.

Emotional regulation also a level-2 phenomenon because it’s about interactions.
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are negative outcomes associated with emotional labor?

A
  • Detrimental health effects, especially when felt and expressed emotions are dissonant
  • Surface acting effects are more harmful than deep acting effects
  • WTF conflict
  • Depleted self-reg resources, leading to lack of control

-Surface-acting: negative mood, emotional exhaustion, decreased job satisfaction
-Deep acting: not related to job satisfaction
(Judge et al)

Harmful effects can be mitigated by having a climate of authenticity where org members are more accepting of displays of different emotions. (Grandey, 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are display rules and how effective are they when enacted?

A

Organizationally prescribed ways of displaying emotions, such as in service jobs.

Deep acting is better than surface acting in terms of effectiveness. But research shows that being genuine can be more effective than acting
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is emotional regulation?

A

The process by which individuals influence which emotions they have, when they have them and how they experience and express these emotions. (Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

Involves a conscious effort and controlled regulation of emotion as well as unconscious, effortless and automatic regulation.

Some parts deal with antecedents and others aimed at the emotions themselves (keeping or getting rid of it), depending on one’s goals
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are some examples of emotional regulation strategies?

A
cognitive reappraisal
authentic expression
expressive suppression
emotional labor - surface and deep acting
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are features of the team and leadership level (Level 4) of the 5-level model of emotions?

A

Mood management critical for team leadership: they engender enthusiasm, and leaders who deal with emotional issues well foster more team cohesion.

Emotional contagion is a team-level phenomenon.

Meso level of org functioning - represents the crossover from individual to org climate and effectiveness.
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is emotional contagion?

A

Emotional contagion is where members of a group come to be “infected” by others’ emotional states. (Hatfield, 1992; Barsade, 2002).

Because leaders act as models, contagion should be a major mechanism for leaders to transfer emotional states to team members.. Leader to member contagion has found lots of support. Contagion can also move from follower to leader.
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are features of the org level (Level 5) of the 5-level model of emotions?

A

Refers to affective context.
Organizational emotional climate: an objective group phenomenon that can be palpably sensed as one walks in the room. It’s a particular form of org climate.

Healthy emotional climate - characterized by positive emotions, created and then sustained across the whole organization
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is org climate?

A

Org climate deals specifically with collective mood of members. and their attitudes toward peers, leaders and the org. Although related to org culture, is different in that it is a function of org policies and procedures rather than org members’ beliefs, values and assumptions (which would be culture). (Schein 2004)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are recommendations for measuring emotions?

A

-ESM/daily diary
-if self report, limit the # of emotions measured bc of common method variance
-avoid single item measures tho bc of measurement error
-non-self report: fMRI
(Ashkanasy et al, 2017)

22
Q

Grandey, 2000

A

Grandey (2000) was a theory paper in which she reviews and past perspectives on emotional labor and presents a mechanism to help explain it (using the theory of emotional regulation as a guiding theory), then also puts forth some proposed antecedents and consequences of emotional labor.

23
Q

Define emotional labor. What are the mechanisms? What are its outcomes?

A

Emotional labor is the process of regulating both feelings and expressions for organizational goals (Grandey, 2000).

Mechanisms are surface acting (managing expressions) and deep acting (managing feelings).

Outcomes: gain customer loyalty (goal), negative attitudes, poor health

24
Q

How does Grandey use emotion theory to explain emotional labor?

A

Emotions usually refer to physiological arousal and cognitive appraisal of the situation. By regulating these, individuals can control their emotional expressions to fit the display rules of the situation (Goffman, 1959).

25
Q

What is emotion regulation theory, how does the emotion regulation process work and how is it related/useful to emotional labor?

A

Emotion regulation is the processes by which individuals influence which emotions they have, when they have them, and how they experience and express them (Gross, 1998).

It has an input-output model whereby people can regulate emotions at two time points - before the situation/appraisal (changing one’s perceptions of the situation or modifying feelings; deep acting) or the response side (faking or enhancing signs of emotions to manage one’s expression of feelings that arise). These correspond to surface and deep acting in EL.

It is used as a guiding framework for emotional labor because it includes guidance on physiological arousal and its suppression and that’s important for understanding the mechanisms through which emotional labor may lead to burnout and stress. (Grandey, 2000)

26
Q

Describe Lazarus’ theory of stress.

A

Lazarus (1999) is a general stress theory that holds that the experience of both emotions and stress are known to be accompanied by a physiological state of arousal involving the endocrine system (release of hormones) and the autonomic nervous system (increased heart rate, breathing, blood pressure, etc). In this aroused state, the body is converting resources to energy to respond to the crisis, which means it’s not available for other tasks such as the immune system.

The management of emotions have been found to be associated with health problems such as cancer and heart disease (Gross et al).

27
Q

What are action tendencies and coping/regulatory processes that accompany them? What are the costs of the regulation?

A

The arousal state from emotions leads the body to a “fight or flight” action tendency, but in today’s society where that would be in appropriate in most settings, they are overridden by coping/regulation strategies (Lazarus, 1991).

The regulation may tax the system. It has been found to increase autonomic nervous system activity. Long-term effects of bottling up the emotion taxes the body over time by overworking cardiovascular and nervous system and weakening the immune system.. Inability to express emotion is one of the biggest predictors of cancer.

Therefore emotional labor may be positive for the organization but negative for employee health.

28
Q

What are situational antecedents of emotional labor in Grandey’s (2000) model of EL?

A
Emotional events (positive and negative)
Interaction expectations (frequency, duration, display rules) 
So, emotional events happen, and combine with display rules etc to lead to emotional regulation processes (Deep acting and surface acting).
29
Q

What are other factors Grandey 2000 says should be considered in emotional labor research?

A

Org factors such as autonomy, supervisor support and coworker support

Individual factors such as gender, emotional expressivity, emotional intelligence, and affectivity (PA, NA)

30
Q

What are outcomes of emotional labor in Grandey’s (2000) model?

A

Individual well-being:
Burnout
Job Satisfaction

Org well-being:
Customer Service Performance (smiles, friendliness)
Withdrawal behavior (turnover, absenteeism)

31
Q

What are the signs of burnout and what is the emotional component/process involved?

A

Emotional exhaustion
Depersonalization
Reduced personal accomplishment
-Maslach, 1982

When a situation induces repeated emotional responses that the employee must regulate, the employee may experience emotional exhaustion. To cope with that feeling, they may detach from others (customers, coworkers) by objectifying or depersonalizing them. This may lead to feeling negatively about themselves and their work, to where they experience a lower sense of accomplishment.

32
Q

What is the relationship between job satisfaction and emotional labor?

A

Expression of emotions may be positively related to JS, but REGULATION to achieve that expression maybe negatively related to JS. (Grandey, 2000). So generally, those who report high levels of emotional regulation may be less satisfied.

33
Q

What is self monitoring and how do high self monitors differ from low self monitors? What is its relationship to emotional labor?

A

Self-monitoring refers to the extent that people monitor their self-presentations and control their expressive behavior. High self monitors are more aware of the emotional cues of others are more willing to change their own emotional expression to fit the situation than low self monitors. Low self monitors tend to remain “true” to their internal feelings. (Snyder, 1974)

It may influence emotional labor as a personal characteristic. Low self monitors may have more difficulty following display rules in a job where emotional labor is required. May lead to higher levels of emotional labor and stress than high self monitors.

34
Q

What is emotion-rule dissonance?

A

The discrepancy between required and felt emotions; a form of person-role conflict stemming from the incongruence between emotions that are actually felt and emotions that are required by display rules and resulting in an unpleasant state of tension.

Hulsheger and Schewe, 2011 found that it has negative relationship with well-being, job attitudes, and performance, via surface acting.

35
Q

Hulsheger and Schewe, 2011

A

A meta-analysis of the costs of emotional labor.

Found that emotional labor is not necessarily harmful to employees:

Found that emotion-rule dissonance and surface acting are detrimental to well-being and performance.

Found that deep acting is largely unrelated to well being and is even positively related to performance.

36
Q

In what situation is emotional labor not detrimental to well being and performance?

A

Hulsheger and Schewe 2011 found that emotional labor is not necessarily harmful to employees - depends on which strategy is used, surface vs deep.

  • Emotion-rule dissonance and surface acting are detrimental to well-being and performance.
  • Found that deep acting is largely unrelated to well being and is even positively related to performance.
37
Q

What were updates to emotional labor model by Grandey and Melloy (2017)?

A

Additions of the new model
● Refers to antecedent- and response-focused strategies to represent ER more broadly than deep and surface acting.
● Expands focus of ER beyond simply customers to team members, leaders, followers.
● Represents EL as a within-person process.
● Includes both momentary and chronic well-being outcomes.
● Conceptualizes display rules at group, organizational, and national level.
● Includes both event-level and long-term performance outcomes.
● rethought individual differences like gender

38
Q

What’s the difference between emotions and moods and what do they have in common?

A

They are both feeling states, as opposed to traits. Emotions have a specific target, and moods do not; are relatively short lived, usually have a physiological reaction, and are more intense.

Moods are more diffuse, take the form of a general positive or negative feeling, and tend to not be focused on a specific cause

Barsade and Gibson, 2007

39
Q

What is dispositional affect?

A

Dispositional affect is a personality trait referring to a person’s relatively stable, underlying tendency to experience positive and negative moods and emotions (Watson & Clark, 1984)

40
Q

What is collective affect?

A

Bottom up or town down.

Bottom up:
The affective composition of the various affective attributes of team members. The degree to which individual level affect characteristics combine to form group level emotion or mood, though emotional contagion.

Top down:
The degree to which groups are characterized by emotion norms for feeling and expression
(Barsade and Gibson, 2007)

41
Q

What are the three emerging trends in studying affect in the workplace in Barsade and Gibson 2007?

A

1) Emotional intelligence - surge in interest
2) Emotion regulation and emotional labor
3) Emotional contagion and collective affect (team and org level)

42
Q

What’s been the controversy over the emotional intelligence construct?

A

Goleman popularized it after Mayer wrote about it, which led to exaggerated claims and criticisms a a result, but then scholars pointed out that it is indeed a valid individual difference similar to physical prowess or cognitive intelligence. It’s legit!

The current consensus is that emotional intelligence is an important and valid personality characteristic that is positively associated with performance.

Measurement:
There’s the EI approach of abilities where there’s a performance test. The other is self-report measure of emotional intelligence.

Measures are a bit more complicated. They correlate highly with personality. Some scholars have found they add incremental value over and above cog ability and personality.

Ashkanasy et al, 2017

43
Q

What is affect’s relationship with performance and how does that compare to the relationship between attitudes and performance?

A

Both trait and state positive affect/emotions are associated with higher performance. Emotional contagion to customers, supervisors, and coworkers helps explain many of the effects. It is not clear whether dispositional affect or mood has a stronger influence on performance, but affective events theory integrates the two (Barsade and Gibson, 2007).

More detail:

Effects of State:
A meta-analysis found that a person’s tendency to experience positive emotions and moods is associated with higher performance in several measures: supervisory ratings, income, negotiating ability, OCBs (Lyubomirsky et al 2005)

Effects of Trait:
Consistent strong relationship between TRAIT positive affect and various measures of work performance (Barsade and Gibson, 2007)

Emotional contagion helps explain performance outcomes (positive mood impacts coworkers, leaders, and customers).

Not clear whether trait or state affect has stronger influence on performance, but some theories integrate the two.

Compared to attitudes
Job satisfaction (attitude) and performance = a modest positive relationship
44
Q

What is affect’s relationship with decision making?

A

Mixed results - Research shows both PA and NA can help. Neg moods may signal something is wrong, so they spend more cognitive processing to solve it. PA may lead to more thorough and efficient decision making (Barsade and Gibson, 2007)

45
Q

What is affect’s relationship with creativity?

A

Very similar to decision making results. PA has positive impacts bc more material is considered in the brain (more flexible thinking too).

46
Q

What is affect’s relationship with absence and turnover?

A

In general, studies demonstrate PA (both state and trait) is associated with reduced absence and turnover and that NA is associated with increased absence and turnover.

However, those who are higher in trait PA are more likely to leave their jobs if they’re dissatisfied than those with low PA. - more willing to change situation and more optimistic

47
Q

What are some outcomes of high positive affect?

A

Barsade and Gibson (2007) note that affect has important implications for a number of critical organizational variables, including performance, decision-making and creativity, withdrawal, prosocial behavior, negotiation and conflict resolution, team effectiveness, and leadership.

Positive affect leads to:

  • Lower turnover and absence
  • More OCBs
  • higher performance
  • higher creativity
  • better decision making

Barsade and Gibson, 2007

48
Q

Barsade and Gibson, 2007

A

This is a review chapter on workplace affect.

Barsade and Gibson (2007) note that affect has important implications for a number of critical organizational variables, including performance, decision-making and creativity, withdrawal, prosocial behavior, negotiation and conflict resolution, team effectiveness, and leadership.

49
Q

What is group affect?

A

Group affect is the affective state arising from a combination of the group’s top-down components (i.e., the affective context) and its bottom-up components (i.e., the affective composition of the group) as transferred and created through explicit and explicit transfer process (Barsade and Knight, 2015)

50
Q

What are some outcomes of group positive affect?

A
  • individual positive attitudes
  • creativity
  • general group effectiveness

(Barsade and Knight, 2015)

51
Q

Describe the broaden and build theory of positive emotions.

A

This theory describes how experiencing positive emotions can help an individual expand their personal resources (e.g., social, psychological) and build reserves for future coping needs.

Positive emotions BROADEN an individual’s momentary thought-action category (joy sparks an urge to play; interest sparks the urge to explore; contentment sparks the urge to savour and integrate; love sparks a recurring cycle of all of them within a close relationship.

These broadened mindsets lead to discovery of new creative actions and ideas, and social bonds, when in turn BUILD more RESOURCES – physical, intellectual, social, etc.

These resources function as RESERVES that can be drawn on later to improve the odds of successful coping and survival.

Empirically supported (Friedrickson, 2004).