PERSONALITY Flashcards
BEHAVIOURAL GENETICS
CENTRAL GOALS
= determine % of individual differences in a trait attributable to genes vs. Environment
= determine how genes & environment interact to produce individual differences
= determine where in “environment” environmental effects exist
Genetics account for 90% of variation
GENETICS OF PERSONALITY
GENES —> DNA —> BASE PAIRS
Human DNA = 30,000 genes composed of about 3 million base pairs
Roughly 99% of these base pairs are identical for all people -> cannot be the source of ID in personality
= remaining 3 million take different form - genetic mutations or polymorphisms
GENETIC INFLUENCES AND HERITABILITY
If genetic differences underlie all variation in the characteristic then heritability = 1.0
Height = 0.9
Weight = 0.7
Maths Ability = 0.4
Virtually every trait studied has substantial heritability [between 0.3 to 0.5] - one third-one half of personality due to genetic influences [PLOMIN, McCLEARN & RUTTER, 1997]
Confirmed by a recent meta-analysis, all traits reported, heritability 49% [POLDERMAN ET AL, 2015]
BEHAVIOURAL GENETIC MODELS
FAMILY STUDIES:
= correlate the degree of genetic overlap among family members with the degree of similarity in person trait
= If trait is highly heritable then GREATER RELATEDNESS = GREATER SIMILARITY
= MZ twins - 100% shared genes
= DZ twin, parent, sibling - 50% shared genes
= Grandparent, half-sibling, aunt/uncle - 25% shared genes
= Great grandparent, great aunt/uncle, first cousins - 12.5%
Problem = members of family who share genes usually share environment - confounds genetic/environmental influences and family studies can never be definitive
Familial Risk for Alcohol Dependence [Grucza et al. 2006]
= Multiple measures taken via large family study
= 429 families consisting of 1,111 siblings of pro bands, their mothers and fathers
= Semi-structured assessment for the genetics of alcoholism, family history assessments & novelty seeking
= High NS is magnified in high-risk families, low NS acts as a protective factor against familial alcoholism in these high-risk families
TWIN STUDIES:
Monozygotic = identical
Dizygotic = non-identical
If MZ twins more similar than DZ twins, provides evidence of heritability
Heritability = 2x difference between MZ correlation and DZ correlation
ADOPTION STUDIES:
How adoptive child resembles biological and adoptive parents - nature vs. nurture/genetic vs. environment
Minnesota Twin Study [Bouchard, 1979]
Nancy Segal [1999; 2012]
Separated at birth - reunited twins
SELECTIVE BREEDING -artificial selection [animals and plants], eugenics [humans]
SUMMARY OF METHODS
SELECTIVE BREEDING:
+ Can infer heritability if works
- Ethical issues
FAMILY STUDIES:
+ Provides estimates of heritability
- Violate equal environmental assumptions
TWIN STUDIES:
+ Provide both estimates of heritability and environment
- Sometimes violate equal environmental assumptions assumed, may violate assumptions of representativeness
ADOPTION STUDIES:
+ Provide both estimates of heritability and environment, get around the issue of equal environments assumed
- Adopted children might not be representative of population, problem of selective placement
EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE
Evolutionary processes have a major influence on human behaviour
All humans today come from an unbroken line of ancestors who accomplished 2 tasks - survival and reproduction
We carry adaptive mechanisms that led to our ancestors success
Human nature and human personality made up of a collection of evolved mechanisms
FIVE FACTOR MODEL
FFM summarises the most important facets of social landscape [Michalski & Shackelford, 2010]
= Conscientiousness may be evaluated to assess who to trust to complete important tasks
= Agreeableness may be evaluated as an index of an individuals willingness to cooperate and to conform to group norms suspending their own concerns
SOCIAL BEINGS AND GROUPS
GROUPS
= rewards and problems
= Social situation can be seen as a basis to explain how humans have developed certain personality traits to attain certain goals
Five Factor Evidence
= costs and benefits of the major domains
PERSONALITY AND BRAIN FUNCTIONING
Biological processes which underlie personality
Genes do not directly affect behavioural dispositions - do so indirectly by influencing brain development, brain structure and brain chemistry
Focus on major personality dimensions outlined by trait theories
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES
ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY
CARDIOVASCULAR ACTIVITY
BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
OTHER MEASURES:
- Biochemical analysis
- Hormones
DATA TO ASSESS BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES
Differences in the reactivity and regulation of Autonomic Nervous System [ANS]:
= Sympathetic system - fight or flight
= Parasympathetic system - relaxation, digestion, down-regulation
Localisation of Function in Brain Hemispheres and structures:
= Do inhibited children show greater activation in the amygdala when faced with unfamiliar situation
Neurotransmitters:
= secreted by neurons directly into the synapses
= immediate action
Hormones:
= Secreted by neurons and endocrine cells into the bloodstream
= Fight-or-flight hormones [cortisol]
= Social affiliation hormones [oxytocin]
TRAIT THEORIES - HANS EYSENCK
Psychometric measures of personality - EPQ
Biological Basis of Personality [1963]
Supertraits [PEN Theory, 1967]
= Psychoticism
= Neuroticism
= Extraversion
ASCENDING RETICULAR ACTIVATING SYSTEM [ARAS]
Brain area [within the brain stem] responsible for regulating arousal [and sleep-wake transitions]
Through 2 circuits:
= Reticulo-cortical circuit controls the cortical arousal generated by incoming stimuli
= Reticulo-limbic circuit controls arousal to emotional stimuli
Strength of Eysenck’s Theory
= Using the concept of ‘arousal’ as a central variable that allows personality to be linked to a number of responses
Extraverts’ arousal:
= typically low
= prefer more stimulating environments to increase arousal
Introverts’ arousal:
= typically high
= prefer less stimulating environments to reduce arousal
LEMON JUICE EXPERIMENT [Eysenck and Eysenck, 1960s]
= Test the cortical arousal theory of extraversion-introversion
= Who produces more saliva and why
REINFORCEMENT SENSITIVITY THEORY [Gray, 1993]
= Approach and avoidance sensitivity
= Two basic brain systems that control behaviour and emotions - Behavioural Activation System [BAS] and Behavioural Inhibition System [BIS]
= Individual differences in personality traits reflect the variation in sensitivity of BIS & BAS
MEASURING BIS AND BAS
= Gray didn’t come up with one, others have since
= McAndrew and Steele [1991] - measure of BIS sensitivity
= Carver and White [1994] - most reliable and valid, revised Gray’s theory, the ‘Big Two’
SENSATION SEEKING
A trait with a specific biological basis
The sensation seeking trait (SS):
= the seeking of varied, novel, complex and intense sensations and experiences
SS Scale
= Thrill and adventure seeking - I sometimes do things that are a little frightening
= Experience seeking - I like to have new and exciting experiences
= Disinhibition - almost everything enjoyable is illegal or immoral
= Boredom susceptibility - I get bored seeing the same old faces
ZUCKERMAN - Biosocial Basis of Sensation Seeking
= Genetic contributions of SS have been assessed via twin studies - 58% of the variance in SS was found to be heritable [Zuckerman, 1991]
= Low Monoamine Oxidase [MAO] associated with high SS