Personality Flashcards

1
Q

Big 5 (Anderson, 2013)

A

Personality traits are characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. They summarize how people tend to behave across diverse situations.

All a continuum, All have facets, Genetics account for 50% of variance

More recently, personality researchers are looking at core self-evaluations, self-monitoring, and need for cognition.

Pers–>Leadership

Predicts emergence, and style (i.e., extraversion to transf. leadership)

Team Pers–>Outcomes

Agree & Consc. post. team perf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Judge et al. (2007)

A

Self-efficacy & Performance

Meta-analysis pitting GMA, Big 5, and Self-Efficacy on Performance (task and job performance)

Self-efficacy predicts task performance well- but not better predictor of job performance than conscientiousness or GMA

From HR Schmidt & Hunter (GMA is the best predictor of performance)

Suggest future research looking at other proximal predictors (i.e., mood states) or self-efficacy as a moderator between personality and performance (as opposed to a mediator)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the Big 5?

A

Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability (or neuroticism), and openness to experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Best predictor of performance? Beyond GMA

A

Conscientiousness has incremental validity above GMA, and emotional stability less so, but seem to operate through motivational aspects (i.e., goal setting)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Best predictor of OCBs

A

Emotional Stability, Openness, & Extraversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Barrick (2005)

A

Personality Matters…Moving on

“getting along” - Emotional stability, conscientiousness, and agreeableness

“Getting ahead” - extraversion (ambition), emot. stab., Conscientiousness

Effects are cumulative over time, sig. predictors over 50 years

  • Strong situations can suppress pers. impacts
  • Personality can change situations (one bad apple)
  • Personality manifests as motivation (goals, expectations, self-efficacy)

Future research (PersXSit), Motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Raja et al. (2004)

A

Personality & Psych Contracts - Personality affects contracts you seek and how you respond to breaches

Psych contracts are self-constructed and idiosyncratic

Personality affects through:
Choice (contract one seeks), Construal (cog./affect perceptions of type, breach, violation), Enactment (behavior & attitudes)

Equity Sensitivities & neurotics –> transactional contract
Consc., Self-esteem, and extroverts –>relational contract

Relational–> int. quit (-), job sat, commit
Transct–>int quit, job sat (-), commit (-)

Violation mediates breach, personality moderates violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Kamdar & Van Dyne (2007)

A

Integrated Social Exchange via LMX & TLMX with personality (conscientiousness & agreeableness) using Trait Activation Theory

Suggested that the presence of strong social exchange relationships suppresses personality’s effects on Helping and Task Performance because it triggers the norm of reciprocity, which is a STRONG reward/contigency

230 engineers, their supervisor, and their coworkers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lam et al. (2002)

A

Performance Appraisal Feedback & Personality

Studied the impact of personality (Negative Affectivity) on work attitudes six months after receiving pos/neg appraisal feedback of bank tellers using AET

Positive Perf Appraisals don’t always lead to good outcomes

After 3 months, those with high negative affect returned to baseline levels of work attitudes (OJ, Commit, Sat, Turnover) even if they received a positive appraisal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Li et al. (2010)

A

Proactive Personality & Outcomes

Chinese sample
Mediator - LMX
Moderator - PJ Climate

Proactivity: A narrowly defined personality trait, proactive personality describes a behavioral tendency to identify opportunities to change things at work and to act on those impulses (Crant, 2000)

PPers individ build higher quality LMX with sups, leading to job sat and OCBs…rel is stronger with PJ Climate is high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chang et al. (2012)

A

Core Self-Evaluations

An individuals’ fundamental beliefs about their capabilities/self-worth

Includes: self-esteem, self-efficacy, locus of control, and neuroticism

CSE predicts job and life satisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Discuss some main outcomes of personality traits

A
  • Conscientiousness (job Perf)
  • Extraversion (Perf in sales)
  • Emotional stability (perf)
  • Agg; Open (Perf in cust support)
  • Agr (OCB)
  • Each related to reduced turnover
  • Cons; Agree (neg to deviant)
  • Extra; emot; cons; open (each predict leader emergence + Effectiv)
  • Extra (Transform Lead)
  • Team Agg; Cons (team process and perf).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Friedman & Kern (2014) annual review of psych

A

Individuals who are conscientious—that is,
prudent, dependable, well organized, and persistent—stay healthier, thrive, and live longer. The
size of this effect is equal to or greater than that of many known biomedical risk factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pierce & Aguinis 2013

A

TGMT - Conscientiousness has a pos. relationship with job performance but this relationship begins to turn negative for high complexity jobs where too much consciousness is bad for performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Overall Conclusions of Personality, GMA, and Performance

A

Schmitt (2014)

  • Validity of GMA is generalizable across situation, usually .20 between GMA and job performance
  • Conscientousness is the most generalizable personality trait predictor (usually in the .20s with job performance)
  • Relations between personality and GMA are LOW
  • Correlations between the Big 5 constructs are moderate (less than .40)

Both Personality and GMA are unique predictors of performance and combinations of the two will produce superior predictions (personality interactions are likely to produce superior predictions as well)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Major questions on GMA and Personality

A

Schmitt (2014)

  • Is the Big 5 the best measure/taxonomy of personality?
  • Need a better understanding of the dimensionality of intelligence
  • Can personality and GMA predict beyond task performance to other facets of performance?
  • Are tests perceived to be fair? Are they valid?