Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Personal jurisdiction

A
  1. Court’s power to bind the person of D
  2. Traditional bases (domicile, personal service, consent) vs.
  3. Modern bases (Long-arm and Int’l Shoe due process)
  4. Long-arm statute
  5. International Shoe (minimum contacts and traditional notions)
  6. Minimum contacts (purposeful availment and forseeability)
  7. Purposeful availment
  8. Foreseeability of lawsuit
  9. Traditional notions

TM-LIM-PFT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Traditional bases

A
  1. Domicile
  2. Personal service in-state;
  3. Consent, express through forum selection or appearance, or implied through failure to raise 12b or driving in state.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Modern bases

A
  1. PJ over D who is not a resident of the forum state;
  2. Long-arm statute that meets International Shoe due process;
  3. D must be served with summons and complaint with 120 days of filing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Long-arm statute

A
  1. Allows forum state to assert PJ over nonresident;
  2. Specific or non-specific.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

International Shoe due process

A
  1. Forum must show that D has such minimum contacts with forum that;
  2. PJ will not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Minimum contacts

A
  1. D’s purposeful availment of forum; and
  2. D’s foreseeability of lawsuit.

PAF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Purposeful availment (fairness factors)

A
  1. Nature and quality of D’s actions;
  2. Voluntary acts directed at forum;
  3. D intentional placement of goods in stream of commerce; and
  4. Where injury took place.

NAGI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Forseeability of lawsuit

A
  1. Reasonably foresee being haled into court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice

A
  1. Court must balance minimum contacts with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice;
  2. Relatedness between claim and D’s contacts;
  3. P’s interest in obtaining relief;
  4. D’s burden vs. benefit; and
  5. State’s interest.

RIBS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PJ Alternative Approach

A
  1. Traditional bases - presence, domicile, consent;
  2. Minimum contacts - purposeful availment and foreseeability;
  3. Relatedness (systematic and continuous or specific jdx) - specific or general PJ; and
  4. Fairness (only for specific jurisdiction)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly