Perfect Competition, Imperfectly Competitive Markets Flashcards
Order the type of market structures from most competitive to least competitive.
Perfect competition -> monopolistic perfect competition -> oligopoly -> duopoly -> monopoly
What is the definition of market structures?
Market structure refers to the characteristics of a market that determine how firms interact, compete, and set prices.
It is defined by factors such as the number of firms, barriers to entry, product differentiation, and market power.
What assumption does the models that comprise the traditional theory of the firm are based upon?
In traditional economic theory, firms are assumed to aim for profit maximisation where MR=MC, meaning they seek to produce at the level of output that generates the highest possible profit.
What other objectives of firms?
Revenue Maximization
• Some firms prioritize total revenue (TR) over profit.
• Occurs when managers are incentivized based on sales rather than profit.
• Happens when firms seek to increase brand recognition or market dominance.
• Example: Tech companies like Amazon initially focused on revenue growth rather than short-term profit.
Sales Maximization
• Firms may try to sell as much as possible while still covering costs (AC = AR).
• This strategy helps firms gain market share and drive out competitors.
• Common in highly competitive markets where customer loyalty is important.
Market Share Maximization
• Firms may sacrifice short-term profit to capture a larger share of the market.
• This can create customer loyalty and long-term pricing power.
• Example: Ride-sharing firms like Uber and Lyft offered heavy discounts to dominate markets.
Satisficing (Satisfactory Profits Instead of Maximum Profits)
• Coined by Herbert Simon, satisficing means achieving a satisfactory profit level rather than the highest possible profit.
• Happens when there is a divorce of ownership and control (e.g., managers run the firm, but shareholders own it).
• Firms balance multiple goals such as profit, employee satisfaction, and reputation.
Survival
• New firms and firms in crisis may prioritize survival over profit.
• This involves cutting costs, securing funding, and maintaining cash flow.
• Example: Many startups operate at a loss for years before becoming profitable.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
• Some firms balance profit with ethical, environmental, and social concerns.
• This can improve brand reputation, attract ethical consumers, and ensure long-term sustainability.
• Example: Tesla prioritizes sustainable energy solutions, even at high R&D costs.
What is the reasons for and consequences of a divorce of ownership from control?
In small firms, the owner usually makes all key decisions. However, in large corporations, ownership and control are often separated:
Owners (Shareholders): Provide capital and expect returns in the form of dividends and share price growth.
Managers (Executives): Make day-to-day decisions and may have different priorities (e.g., personal salaries, job security, or power).
Consequences:
Managerial inefficiency—managers may waste resources on unnecessary projects.
Need for incentives—companies use bonuses or stock options to align managers’ interests with profit goals.
Corporate governance measures—board oversight or shareholder activism can control managerial behavior.
What is the satisficing principle?
Coined by Herbert Simon, satisficing means firms aim for an acceptable level of profit rather than maximizing it.
Occurs when managers and workers prioritize multiple goals (e.g., work-life balance, job security).
Happens when owners lack complete oversight (due to the divorce of ownership and control).
Leads to “good enough” decision-making rather than optimal profit-maximizing choices.
Example:
A manager may prioritize stable growth and employee satisfaction rather than aggressively cutting costs to maximize profits.
How the divorce of ownership from control may affect the objectives of firms?
When ownership and control are separate, firms may pursue objectives other than profit maximization (MC = MR), such as:
Revenue Maximization (Baumol’s Theory) → Managers may focus on increasing total revenue rather than profit, as their salaries and bonuses may depend on sales figures.
Sales Maximization → Firms may prioritize selling more units rather than maximizing profits to gain market share or increase brand visibility.
Growth Maximization (Marris’ Theory) → Managers may aim to expand the firm (e.g., through mergers and acquisitions) rather than maximizing short-term profits.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) → Managers may focus on ethical and environmental goals to improve the company’s public image.
Satisficing Behavior (Herbert Simon’s Theory) → Managers may seek satisfactory rather than optimal profits, balancing multiple interests (e.g., employees, customers, and shareholders).
How the divorce of ownership from control may affect the conduct of firms?
The divorce of ownership from control can influence managerial decision-making and business strategies:
Inefficiency and Bureaucracy → Managers may waste resources on unnecessary projects, luxury offices, or excessive hiring.
Short-Termism vs. Long-Term Growth → Shareholders often favor short-term profits, while managers may focus on long-term expansion or personal benefits.
Risk Aversion → Managers might avoid risky but profitable investments to protect their job security, leading to lower innovation.
Mergers and Takeovers → Managers may push for expansion strategies to increase their power and prestige, even if they don’t maximize shareholder value.
Use of Incentives → Firms may introduce performance-based pay, stock options, and bonuses to align managers’ goals with profit maximization.
How the divorce of ownership from control may affect the performance of firms?
Potential Benefits:
Professional Management → Experienced executives may improve efficiency and innovation.
Long-Term Stability → Managers may focus on sustainable growth rather than short-term profit maximization.
Potential Drawbacks:
Principal-Agent Problem → Misalignment of interests can reduce efficiency and profitability.
Higher Costs → Increased spending on managerial perks, unnecessary expansion, or CSR initiatives.
Lack of Accountability → Without strong oversight, managers may make poor investment decisions.
Example:
Tesla (Founder-Led vs. Shareholder-Controlled Firms): Elon Musk, as a major shareholder, has significant control over Tesla’s strategy, while firms with dispersed ownership (e.g., large banks) may suffer from managerial inefficiencies.
What is perfect competition market?
Perfect competition is a theoretical market structure characterized by large numbers of producers, identical products, free entry and exit, and perfect knowledge.
What implications of the characteristics in perfect competition market?
Large Number of Producers
No single firm has market power; all are price takers.
Identical (Homogeneous) Products
No product differentiation, so firms must compete purely on price.
Freedom of Entry and Exit
If firms earn supernormal profit, new firms enter; if firms make losses, some exit, driving profits to normal in the long run.
Perfect Knowledge
Consumers and firms have full information, meaning firms cannot charge higher prices, and inefficiencies are eliminated.
Why firms are price takers in the perfect competition market?
Because individual firms are too small to influence the market price, they must accept the market-determined price.
Each firm’s demand curve is perfectly elastic (horizontal) at the market price.
If a firm tries to charge a higher price, consumers will switch to competitors.
Firms maximize profit where MC = MR, but in the long run, only normal profit is earned due to free entry and exit.
Economic efficiency in perfect competition market
Perfect competition leads to an efficient allocation of resources, assuming no externalities:
1. Allocative Efficiency (P = MC)
Firms produce the quantity where price equals marginal cost.
No resources are wasted, and consumer preferences are fully met.
- Productive Efficiency (Producing at Minimum AC)
Firms operate at the lowest point on the AC curve, ensuring no waste.
Inefficient firms are forced out of the market in the long run. - Dynamic Efficiency
Since firms earn only normal profit, they may lack incentive for innovation.
However, competition ensures constant cost-cutting and efficiency improvements.
What limitations of perfect competition market?
Does not exist in reality—real markets have differentiated products, barriers to entry, and imperfect information.
Lack of innovation—firms have little incentive to invest in R&D as they can only earn normal profit.
Market failures—externalities (pollution, public goods, etc.) distort the efficient allocation of resources.
What benefits and cots of perfect competition market?
Arguments in Favor:
Ensures lowest possible prices for consumers.
Leads to maximum consumer choice and surplus.
Drives firms to operate at minimum cost.
Criticisms and Limitations:
Lack of innovation → Firms have no incentive to invest in R&D if they can only earn normal profit.
No economies of scale → Small firms prevent cost reductions that monopolies or oligopolies may achieve.
Market failures persist → Externalities (pollution, climate change) are not accounted for in perfect competition.
Labour exploitation → Wages are driven to the minimum, potentially harming workers.
Conclusion of perfect competition market
While perfect competition serves as a benchmark, it rarely exists in practice. Instead, real-world policies aim to reduce inefficiencies caused by market failures, monopolies, and externalities. Governments may regulate industries, tax externalities, or promote competition to bring markets closer to the perfect competition ideal without sacrificing innovation and economies of scale.
What characteristics of monopolistically competitive markets?
Large Number of Firms
Many small firms operate in the market, each having a small market share.
Product Differentiation
Firms sell slightly different products (branding, quality, design), giving them some pricing power.
Low Barriers to Entry and Exit
Firms can easily enter or leave the market in the long run.
Some Price-Making Power
Due to differentiation, firms face a downward-sloping demand curve and can set prices to some extent.
Normal Profit in the Long Run
Due to free entry, supernormal profits attract new firms, increasing competition until only normal profit is earned.
Since firms sell differentiated products, they rely on non-price competition to attract customers.
What are non price competition in monopolistic competition?
- Branding and Advertising
Firms invest in advertising to create brand loyalty.
Well-known brands can charge higher prices and attract repeat customers. - Product Quality and Innovation
Firms improve design, materials, and features to stand out.
Example: Restaurants offering unique menus or better ingredients. - Customer Service and Convenience
Good customer service can increase customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Example: Extended warranties, free delivery, loyalty programs. - Packaging and Presentation
Attractive packaging can influence consumer choices, even if the product is similar to competitors.
What characteristics of oligopoly market?
Few Large Firms
A small number of firms control a significant share of the market (e.g., airline, smartphone industries).
High Barriers to Entry = monopoly power = differentiation
High startup costs or sunk costs, economies of scale, and strong branding make it difficult for new firms to enter.
Non-Price Competition
Branding, advertising, and innovation are used more than price cuts to avoid destructive competition.
Potential for Collusion
Firms may secretly agree on prices or production levels to act like a monopoly and maximize joint profits.
What is differences between oligopolistic markets?
Number of firms → Some markets have a few dominant firms, while others are highly concentrated.
Degree of product differentiation → Some oligopolies (e.g., smartphones) offer distinct products, while others (e.g., oil) sell homogeneous goods.
Ease of entry → Some industries (e.g., banking) have strict regulations, while others (e.g., clothing) are easier to enter.
Market Structure (Definition by Characteristics) → Oligopoly is defined by few dominant firms with high concentration.
Market Conduct (Definition by Behavior) → Oligopoly is defined by firms’ strategic interactions, such as collusion or competition.
What is concentration ratios and how to calculate them?
A concentration ratio measures how much market share is controlled by the top firms, helping determine market competitiveness.
N- firms Concentration ratios = the sum of the market share of the top n firms.
A high concentration ratio (e.g., CR4 > 60%) suggests a strong oligopoly, while a lower ratio indicates a more competitive market.
Oligopolistic firms have strategic interdependence, meaning their decisions depend on rivals’ actions. This leads to collusive and non-collusive behaviors, influencing price stability, competition, and firm strategies.
What is the difference between collusive and non collusive oligopoly?
Collusive Oligopoly
Firms agree (explicitly or tacitly) to set prices or output to reduce competition.
- Higher prices & restricted output
- Acts like a monopoly
- Illegal in many countries
- Example: OPEC
Non-Collusive Oligopoly
Firms compete without formal agreements, often leading to price wars or stable prices.
- Firms react to rivals’ price changes
- May engage in non-price competition
- More unpredictable outcomes
- Example: Airline industry
What is the difference between cooperation and collusion?
Cooperation
Firms work together legally to improve efficiency, share technology, or lobby for industry benefits.
Joint research projects, setting common industry standards.
Collusion
Firms secretly or openly agree to fix prices, limit output, or restrict competition (often illegal).
Cartels (e.g., OPEC), bid-rigging, price-fixing.
What is the kinked demand curve model?
The kinked demand curve explains price rigidity in oligopolistic markets.
If a firm raises prices, competitors do not follow, so demand falls sharply → elastic demand above the current price.
If a firm lowers prices, competitors match the cut, leading to little increase in sales → inelastic demand below the current price.
This creates a “kink” in the demand curve, leading to a discontinuous marginal revenue curve, discouraging price changes.
Prices remain stable, and firms compete using non-price methods like advertising and product differentiation.