Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology > Perception > Flashcards

Perception Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

Definition of sensation

A

Physical stimulus of 5 senses processed by sense receptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of perception

A

Interpretation and organisation of sensory information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Difference between sensation and perception

A

S-detection of stimulus

P-interpretation of stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Visual Cue

A

Information about distance, movement etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Visual Constancies

A

Seeing the object the same from different angles and distances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Binocular depth cues are with

A

Two eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Retinal disparity definition and what type of cue

A

Binocular depth cue

View from right and left eye are different. The larger the difference the closer the object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Convergence definition and what type of depth cue

A

Binocular depth cue
The eyes point together when an object is closer causing strain on the eye muscles. The more the strain, the closer the object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Monocular depth cue definition

A

One eye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Height in Plane is what type of depth cue and definition

A

Monocular depth cue

Objects higher up in a visual field are perceived as being further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Relative size definition and what type of depth cue

A

Monocular depth cue

Smaller objects in a visual field are perceived as being further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Occlusion definition and what type of depth cue

A

Monocular depth cue

If an object is obscured then the obscured object is perceived as being further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Linear Perspective definition and what type of depth cue

A

Monocular depth cue

Parallel lines in the distance appear to get closer together and eventually join

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Size Constancy explains visual illlusion because

A

Objects are perceived as a constant size although the size on the retina changes with distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Misinterpreted depth cues explains visual illlusion because

A

Objects in the distance are scaled up by the brain to look normal size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does the Alonzo illusion and Mueller - Lyer Illusion support misinterpreted depth cues

A

Ponzo illusion - converging lines give illusion of distance. We mentally enlarged the top line.
Mueller - Lyer illusion - ingoing fins shape the outside building so it appears closer and scaled down .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ambiguous Figure explains visual illlusion because

A

It means that there are two possible interpretations and the brain can not decide which is correct so alternates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does the Necker Cube and Rubin’s Vase supports Rubin’s vase

A

Necker cube -cube can be seen as pointing to the right or downward to the left
Rubin’s Vase - faces and vase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Fiction explains visual illlusion because

A

Seeing something that’s not there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How does the Kanizsa triangle support fiction

A

Illusion creates and impression of a second triangle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Gibson’s direct theory of perception

A

Sensation is perception
Our eyes are highly developed so we do not need to use past experiences to infer from
Motion parallax is another monocular depth cue helping us judge distance in everyday life
Nature not nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

One strength of Gibson’s theory is that it was developed using research with pilots in the real worl

A

This means his explanation of movement and depth were very detailed.
Has real world relevance so successfully explains how we perceive the world daily

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

One weakness of Gibson’s direct theory is that doesn’t explain perceptual errors clearly

A

According to Gibson all we need to perceive the world is the rich information received at our retina however visual illusions are good examples of perceptual errors which draws our brain to the wrong conclusions. Not as helpful as Gregory’s theory

24
Q

Another strength is that research with young infants supports Gibson’s direct theory

A

A visual cliff experiment in which infant were asked to crawl across a fake cliff found that even when their mothers encouraged them they had an innate ability to perceive depth. Some parts of perception are probably innate

25
Q

Gregory’s constructivist theory

A

Perception is a construction
We infer most of the world as most of it is ambiguous and incomplete
Visual cues from the brain help is perceive depth and distance
Past experiences influence the sophistication of our perceptive skills
Nurture not nature

26
Q

On strength from Gregory’s constructivist theory is that studies show cultural differences in perception

A

Hudson’s study shows that different experiences have affected the participants perception and that nurture plays a key role in helping us understand the world around us
Cultural differences are better explained by Gregory than Gibson

27
Q

One weakness of Gregory’s constructivist theory is that, even though it is supported by our understanding of visual illusions it is an unusual example of perception

A

Gregory’s idea is that illusions rely on misinterpreted depth cues and size constancy. However these artificial 2D images are deliberately designed to fool us and may not tell us much about perception in the real world
Gibson’s theory is better in this aspect

28
Q

Another weakness of Gregory’s theory is that it can not explain how perception gets started in the first palace

A

Many studies show evidence of at least some perceptual ability in babies so not all perception is a result of nurture
Also the variety of differences in perception due to culture are not very large so Gregory’s theory struggles to explain examples of innate perception.

29
Q

What is a perceptual set

A

The force that makes our brain to notice certain aspects of the sensory environment

30
Q

Hudson’s study aim

A

Do people in different cultures interpret information differently through depth cues

31
Q

Hudson’s study method

A

Showed 2D drawings to native black South Africans who were schooled and unschooled and to white Europeans who were schooled and unschooled . They were asked to what do they see? What is the man doing? And which is nearer tha man, elephant or antelope

32
Q

Hudson’s study results

A

Both black and white schooled participants were more likely to perceive depth than unschooled participants,
White schooled participants were more likely to perceive depth than black schooled participants,

33
Q

Hudson’s study conclusion

A

People from different cultures (schooling and race) perceive depth cues differently - shows that some aspects of perception are learned and this supports Gregory’s constructivist theory

34
Q

One weakness with Hudson’s study is that cross cultural research is that the task and instruction may not make sense to them

A

Language barriers means translators may be used and that can skew a question differently. Affects the validity

35
Q

Another weakness with Hudson’s study is that some participants may have been confused by seeing 2D drawings

A

Many African participants hadn’t seen paper before so this affects the validity of the results

36
Q

Another weakness with Hudson’s study is that it is very old so may be poorly designed

A

Less sophisticated and well recorded so may affect the quality of the results

37
Q

McGinnies study aim

A

Whether things that cause anxiety are less likely to be noticed than things are emotionally neutral. In particular does it take us longer to recognise words that may cause us embarrassment

38
Q

McGinnies method

A

Eight male and eight female participants and were shown a series of words that flashed on a screen. As soon as they saw the word they had to recognise it and and say it. At the same time their GSR which records their emotional response

39
Q

McGinnies Results

A

McGinnies noticed that participants took longer to recognise the offensive words and that the taboo words caused s higher elevation in GSR.

40
Q

McGinnies Conclusion

A

Suggests that emotion is a factor in perceptual set. Higher anxiety levels associated with taboo words s,odd down recognition which McGinnies refers to perceptual defence. Which blocks the information that causes anxiety or embarrassment for even just a moment

41
Q

One strength of McGinnies study is that it used an objective measurement

A

Many studies of perceptual studies are limited because they are based on self report methods however McGinnies uses a GSR so it is not biased

42
Q

One weakness of McGinnies is that delayed recognition may be more to with embarrassment than defence

A

Th Elon get time taken to identify taboo words is that it could be hesitation from participants due to embarrassment than defence.
Awkwardness is an extraneous variable which affects the validity of the results

43
Q

Another weakness of McGinnies kx that studies are emotion and perceptual set is that the restarts are contradictory

A

Sometimes they suggest we are more likely to notice emotional material and sometimes we are less likely to notice it
It doesn’t tell us why we sometimes us perceptual defence and other times don’t
Makes it difficult for psychologist to predict behaviour

44
Q

Bruner and Minturns study aim

A

Whether expectation is an important factor is perceptual set

45
Q

Bruner and Minturns method

A

An independent design where participants were presented with a sequence of letters and numbers. The ambiguous figure B could be seen as 13 or B.

46
Q

Bruner and Minturns study results

A

Those who saw the sequence of letters, they were likely to figure as being of the letter B
If they saw the sequence of numbers they said it was 13

47
Q

Bruners and Minturns conclusion

A

Shows that expectation off why the figure was represented was affected by the context that figure was presented in.

48
Q

One weakness of Bruner and Minturns study was that an artificial task was used

A

An ambiguous figure is designed to trick our perceptional abilities hence lacks validity .

49
Q

Another weakness of Bruner and Minturns study is that it used an independent design

A

Mean participant differences could have acted as an extraneous variable that skewed the results and their validity

50
Q

One strength of Bruner and Minturns study is that it can be applied to real life

A

It can explain errors such as mistaking an commercial aircraft as an enemy aircraft because of expectations. Hence this explains why serious mistakes may be made in the real world

51
Q

Gilchrist and Newburgh aim

A

If food deprivation affects the perception of food pictures

52
Q

Gilchrist and Nesburgh method

A

Two groups of student one deprived for 20hrs of food the other a control group. They were shown four slides of meal. They were then showed the pictures again but dimmer and the participants had to adjust the brightness

53
Q

Gilchrist and nesberg results

A

Participants perceived the food as brighter if they were deprived of food

54
Q

Gilchrist and nesberg cmonclusion

A

Being deprived of food increases perceptual sensitivity

Shows hunger is a motivating factor affecting the perception of food

55
Q

One strength of gilchrist and nesberg is that similar studies support this

A

Sanford deprived participants and showed them ambiguous pics. The longer they were deprived of food the more likely they perceive the ambiguous pictures as food
Increases validity

56
Q

One weakness of gilchrist and nesberg is that many feel this type of studies are unethical

A

Because depriving participants of food and water causes distress and is partially a violation of human rights.

57
Q

Another weakness with gilchrist and nesberg is that it doesn’t apply to everyday life

A

Participants were asked to judge pictures of food rather than actual food which makes it harder to apply the results to other situations.

Psychology (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions